Top 1% file class action suit for being forced to pay 40% of income taxes.

[bripat9643]

So um, Hitler was a capitalist not a socialist despite a well used name and campaign.

Hitler was a socialist. No one in here is obligated to swallow your commie propaganda.

Anyways, you misunderstand the question. I did not ask if Stalin was a monster.

I asked if you knew the reasons behind the revolutions.

The reason is that a lot of ignorant people fell for horseshit and propaganda.

You have to know why folks go and have a socialist revolution, right? No deflections to "socialists are monsters". I readily admit Stalin and Mao are monsters.

Again, the commie theory is bullshit.

 

[bripat9643]

One thing that happens with the Hitler is a Socialist debate is the "left / right" lines are not complicated enough. Else-wise you end up with Stalin near Ghandi and they just were not alike.

Political Compass - Analysis

They actually weren't all that different in the economic policies they endorsed.

 

[bripat9643]

Well as a hater of socialism you should beware of the day conditions are too hard on the masses. They'll have a revolution and probably a socialist one.

Good, bad or indifferent. Just remember that.

too stupid but so perfectly liberal!!! Who defines hard, a brainwashed liberal genocidal communist or an intelligent person. If you want to see hard go to the Congo and see millions of the masses that your heart bleeds for killed thanks to liberal government.

Hard you goof lunatic is not America where the poor get free housing, education state of the art health care and suffer far more from too much to eat than too little.

Oh yeah Edward. They'll riot in the streets of our cities way before it gets as bad as Mexico much less the Congo.

Then why aren't they rioting in Mexico and the Congo?

You're theory obviously needs some work.

 

[bripat9643]

"The streets of our country are in turmoil. The universities are filled with students rebelling and rioting. Communists are seeking to destroy our country. Russia is threatening us with her might, and the Republic is in danger. Yes - danger from within and without. We need law and order! Without it our nation cannot survive."–Adolf Hitler

How does that prove Hitler was not a socialist?

 

[bripat9643]

Every person is treated the same

Every dollar is not treated the same

And the difference between dollar #10 that you earn and dollar #123003 that I earn is what?? Does it buy more or less milk? Does it not spend the same? Is it unable to pay for the same toll? Does it not work in a Coke machine??

Life is not fair

Our society functions as a whole and the people vote to decide how revenue from that society will be generated

Guess what? Those who have little money are not asked to make the same contribution as those who have immense wealth

The basic concept is that those with very little money have to use that money for basic necessities of life (food, shelter, healthcare....) Those with immense wealth still have immense wealth after they have paid for lifes necessities and are asked to contribute more

We've heard your fucking bullshit concept a million times. It doesn't get any smarter with the re-telling.

 

[KissMy]

Top 1% file class action suit for being forced to pay 40% of income taxes.

This seems a clear violation of the equal protection clause. Does anyone doubt it?

What class action lawsuit dip-shit. The middle class are subsidizing the rich through higher taxes. Not only would the rich lose your fantasy lawsuit, the middle class counter-suit for damages from tax code abuse would strip them of a shit load of their ill-gotten gain from income tax subsidy to the rich. They would never be stupid enough to bring that suit.

 

[bripat9643]

Relying on private charity has not worked since before the Great Depression and it did not work then

I've heard libturds make this claim a million times. Yet, I've never seen a shred of evidence to support it.

Private charity is inherently inefficient since it must expend a large percent of its contributions to generate more contributions. It is also incapable of handling massive loss like we saw in Hurricane Sandy

ROFL! You're trying to tell us that government "charity" (cough) is efficient? Do you know that only something like 15% of welfare dollars end up in the hands of the intended beneficiaries?

YES...we do need government charity

You have just been nominated for the Oxymoron of the Month award for your entry "government charity."

Congratulations!

 

[bripat9643]

The government is highly efficient.

BAWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

You kill me!

 

[bripat9643]

The government is highly efficient?

At what?

It's efficient at shaking you down for cash.

 

[bripat9643]

When the top 1% own 90% of the wealth of our nation I suspect they're getting a very good deal.

Do you have any actual evidence that the top 1% own 90% of the wealth? . . . . .

I didn't think so.

Equal protection, hmm, so any gold, oil, natural gas, coal, etc. taken from the earth within the borders of the United States should be apportioned equally to every living American Citizen, correct?

No, it should be "apportioned" to the people who own the property where it was found, nimrod.

 

[bripat9643]

If charity solved the problem, then it would have already.

What's stopping charitable organizations and churches from obliterating hunger and homelessness?

When did the federal government solve the poverty problem?

 

[bripat9643]

Government agencies typically have 4-6% administrative costs.

Private companies typically have 25-30% administrative costs.

The difference? Executive pay.

Only 15% of every welfare dollar actually makes it to a welfare recipient, dipshit.

 

[bripat9643]

So, in your opinion the 10th Amendment and the Constitution have been violated by every Supreme Court Decision since and including Marbury v. Madison, is that correct? That Nullification and Secession are legal actions by any state when the state or an individual person decides acts of Congress are not of their liking? Is that correct?

I would agree with that.

 

[JakeStarkey]

bripat the fluffer had Hitler's dick in his mouth in this thread.

Good heavens, bripat is more of a socialist than ever was Hitler.

bripat, don't look now, but the FEMA is pulling up in front of your house right now.

 

[usmcstinger]

Top 1% file class action suit for being forced to pay 40% of income taxes.

This seems a clear violation of the equal protection clause. Does anyone doubt it?

What class action lawsuit dip-shit. The middle class are subsidizing the rich through higher taxes. Not only would the rich lose your fantasy lawsuit, the middle class counter-suit for damages from tax code abuse would strip them of a shit load of their ill-gotten gain from income tax subsidy to the rich. They would never be stupid enough to bring that suit.

Do you have a viable source to prove that the "middle class are subsidizing the rich through higher taxes?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

The middle class are subsidizing the rich through higher taxes.

actually the top 1% pay 40% of all federal income taxes!! How unusual that a liberal got it backwards again.

 

[JakeStarkey]

EB and usmcstinger have their fingers in each other's ass.

You two jerk! Think of Buffet and his secretaries' tax rates.

You morons.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Top 1% file class action suit for being forced to pay 40% of income taxes.

This seems a clear violation of the equal protection clause. Does anyone doubt it?

What class action lawsuit dip-shit. The middle class are subsidizing the rich through higher taxes. Not only would the rich lose your fantasy lawsuit, the middle class counter-suit for damages from tax code abuse would strip them of a shit load of their ill-gotten gain from income tax subsidy to the rich. They would never be stupid enough to bring that suit.

Do you have a viable source to prove that the "middle class are subsidizing the rich through higher taxes?

gee I guess not; what a surprise!!

 

[JakeStarkey]

The tax rates maybe, EB: toostupid.

 

[Toronado3800]

The tax rates maybe, EB: toostupid.

Jake, are you talking.about the lower effective rate.for Romney who can take advantage of loopholes.