Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
What matters is the right of all women to make their family decisions based on their life and their personal values, not the ideology of any wing of any party. _
And yet,
...stop having so many babies!!!!!!!!!
Especially if you are 13 yrs old.
Malkin channeling Sanger is just plain stupid and very typical of Professional Sicko Malkin but -
if the R's get their way, 13 year olds and everyone else will be forced to have babies. There will be no contraception and no abortion.
And, R's will make sure there is no help for all those unwanted babies they forced women to bear.
Get the damn rw's out of our bedrooms, out of our private lives.
lots of links in article at site.
SNIP:
By Michelle Malkin February 10, 2012 09:06 AM
To Stop the Multiplication of the Unfit
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2012
If you arent creeped out by the No Birth Control Left Behind rhetoric of the White House and Planned Parenthood, you arent listening closely enough. The anesthetic of progressive benevolence always dulls the senses. Wake up.
When a bunch of wealthy white women and elite Washington bureaucrats defend the trampling of religious liberties in the name of increased access to reproductive services for poor women, the ghost of Margaret Sanger is cackling.
As she wrote in her autobiography, Sanger founded Planned Parenthood in 1916 to stop the multiplication of the unfit. This, she boasted, would be the most important and greatest step towards race betterment. While she oversaw the mass murder of black babies, Sanger cynically recruited minority activists to front her death racket. She conspired with eugenics financier and businessman Clarence Gamble to hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities to sell their genocidal policies as community health and welfare services.
Outright murder wouldnt sell. But wrapping it under the egalitarian cloak of womens health and adorning it with the moral authority of black churches would. Sanger and Gamble called their deadly campaign The Negro Project.
In other writings, historian Mike Perry found, Sanger attacked programs that provided medical and nursing facilities to slum mothers because they facilitate the function of maternity when the absolute necessity is to discourage it. In an essay included in her writing collection held by the Library of Congress, Sanger urged her abortion clinic colleagues to breed a race of thoroughbreds. Nationwide birth control bureaus would propagate the proper science of breeding to stop impoverished, non-white women from breeding like weeds.
Speaking with CBS veteran journalist Mike Wallace in 1957, long after her racist views had supposedly mellowed, Sanger again revealed her true colors: I think the greatest sin in the world is bringing children into the world that have disease from their parents, that have no chance in the world to be a human being practically. Delinquents, prisoners, all sorts of things just marked when theyre born. That to me is the greatest sin that people can can commit.
read it all at.
Michelle Malkin
Malkin is a joke
why? because she just might make you have to think about the twisted sickness of Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood?
We don't discourage it. We promote it! We pay welfare whores for every child they can produce. (That's the liberal way....liberals see future votes being born!)Big talk coming from a woman who posts home addresses of children she disagrees with on the internet.
Malkin would better serve this country acting as a whore for our servicemen than as one for the failed policies of the Republican party.
Sounds like you're speaking from experience about whores.
Do you think it's wrong to discourage poor women from having babies? Especially, many babies?
lots of links in article at site.
SNIP:
By Michelle Malkin • February 10, 2012 09:06 AM
‘To Stop the Multiplication of the Unfit’
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2012
If you aren’t creeped out by the No Birth Control Left Behind rhetoric of the White House and Planned Parenthood, you aren’t listening closely enough. The anesthetic of progressive benevolence always dulls the senses. Wake up.
When a bunch of wealthy white women and elite Washington bureaucrats defend the trampling of religious liberties in the name of “increased access” to “reproductive services” for “poor” women, the ghost of Margaret Sanger is cackling.
As she wrote in her autobiography, Sanger founded Planned Parenthood in 1916 “to stop the multiplication of the unfit.” This, she boasted, would be “the most important and greatest step towards race betterment.” While she oversaw the mass murder of black babies, Sanger cynically recruited minority activists to front her death racket. She conspired with eugenics financier and businessman Clarence Gamble to “hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities” to sell their genocidal policies as community health and welfare services.
Outright murder wouldn’t sell. But wrapping it under the egalitarian cloak of “women’s health” — and adorning it with the moral authority of black churches — would. Sanger and Gamble called their deadly campaign “The Negro Project.”
In other writings, historian Mike Perry found, Sanger attacked programs that provided “medical and nursing facilities to slum mothers” because they “facilitate the function of maternity” when “the absolute necessity is to discourage it.” In an essay included in her writing collection held by the Library of Congress, Sanger urged her abortion clinic colleagues to “breed a race of thoroughbreds.” Nationwide “birth control bureaus” would propagate the proper “science of breeding” to stop impoverished, non-white women from “breeding like weeds.”
Speaking with CBS veteran journalist Mike Wallace in 1957, long after her racist views had supposedly mellowed, Sanger again revealed her true colors: “I think the greatest sin in the world is bringing children into the world — that have disease from their parents, that have no chance in the world to be a human being practically. Delinquents, prisoners, all sorts of things just marked when they’re born. That to me is the greatest sin — that people can — can commit.”
read it all at.
Michelle Malkin
Malkin is a joke
and yet santorum thinks women should bare the children of rapist? abortion is a non issue both parties have proven that......
all this talk of abortion is simply an issue of distraction
You do understand the difference between belief and public policy, don't you? President Santorum would not force rape victims to bear the children of their rapists.
Especially if you are 13 yrs old.
Malkin channeling Sanger is just plain stupid and very typical of Professional Sicko Malkin but -
if the R's get their way, 13 year olds and everyone else will be forced to have babies. There will be no contraception and no abortion.
And, R's will make sure there is no help for all those unwanted babies they forced women to bear.
Get the damn rw's out of our bedrooms, out of our private lives.
Conservatives want America to look like Africa, where poor children have no social safety net, and where poor women have no access to birth control.
In short, conservatives are socially depraved.
wow, that is just so inhumane.
What is sick is what we hear from you on the left. If you happen to have sex and by golly you get that unwanted pregnancy out of it...just abort abort abort...it's simple and painless, forget the mental guilt afterwards of realizing you just killed YOUR OWN CHILD.
Now, any comment on the article?
Let me repeat my question to you:
Do you think it's wrong to discourage poor women from having babies? Especially, many babies?
What exactly do you mean by "discourage"?
Malkin is a joke
why? because she just might make you have to think about the twisted sickness of Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood?
She's much more dangerous than a joke because weak minded rw's actually believe her shit.
Margaret Sanger (like Robert Byrd) has been dead a long time. She's not part of this discussion and to say she is is just DUMB.
Nothing twisted about health care for poor women AND MEN. Nothing twisted about pre-natal care, cancer screening and birth control. What is twisted is that R's believe the poor should not have access to the services provided by PP - including the 3% abortions they do.
GET OUT OF PEOPLE'S BEDROOMS, OUT OF THEIR LIVES.
MIND YOUR OWN BUSINESS AND STOP TRYING TO CONTROL OTHER PEOPLE'S BUSINESS.
if the R's get their way, 13 year olds and everyone else will be forced to have babies.
Let me repeat my question to you:
Do you think it's wrong to discourage poor women from having babies? Especially, many babies?
What exactly do you mean by "discourage"?
Hey, if you don't have the guts to answer the question, just don't reply. Don't waste my time with some lame dodge.
The fact is that 99% of the rightwingers on this board and everywhere else believe that poor people should limit their rate of reproduction, i.e., should refrain from having babies they can't afford to raise.
What is sick is what we hear from you on the left. If you happen to have sex and by golly you get that unwanted pregnancy out of it...just abort abort abort...it's simple and painless, forget the mental guilt afterwards of realizing you just killed YOUR OWN CHILD.
Now, any comment on the article?
We don't discourage it. We promote it! We pay welfare whores for every child they can produce. (That's the liberal way....liberals see future votes being born!)Sounds like you're speaking from experience about whores.
Do you think it's wrong to discourage poor women from having babies? Especially, many babies?
Now, any comment on the article?
What is sick is what we hear from you on the left. If you happen to have sex and by golly you get that unwanted pregnancy out of it...just abort abort abort...it's simple and painless, forget the mental guilt afterwards of realizing you just killed YOUR OWN CHILD.
Now, any comment on the article?
No, no comments on the article. Seeing as you're clearly incapable of being honest, with your little "abort, abort, abort" tirade, I see no reason for anyone to acknowledge your article.
Eugenics was a very popular 'science' of the early 20th century, and many of its most zealous proponents were conservatives.
Uh, its not the Dems who want to force every girl and woman to bear children she doesn't want or cannot care for. .
Big talk coming from a woman who posts home addresses of children she disagrees with on the internet.
Malkin would better serve this country acting as a whore for our servicemen than as one for the failed policies of the Republican party.
Now, any comment on the article?
Sure.
I find it hypocritical you and the Right attacking a woman who offered birth control because she was 100% against abortions in all cases.
