‘To Stop the Multiplication of the Unfit’

[Stephanie]

lots of links in article at site.

SNIP:

By Michelle Malkin • February 10, 2012 09:06 AM

‘To Stop the Multiplication of the Unfit’
by Michelle Malkin
Creators Syndicate
Copyright 2012

If you aren’t creeped out by the No Birth Control Left Behind rhetoric of the White House and Planned Parenthood, you aren’t listening closely enough. The anesthetic of progressive benevolence always dulls the senses. Wake up.

When a bunch of wealthy white women and elite Washington bureaucrats defend the trampling of religious liberties in the name of “increased access” to “reproductive services” for “poor” women, the ghost of Margaret Sanger is cackling.

As she wrote in her autobiography, Sanger founded Planned Parenthood in 1916 “to stop the multiplication of the unfit.” This, she boasted, would be “the most important and greatest step towards race betterment.” While she oversaw the mass murder of black babies, Sanger cynically recruited minority activists to front her death racket. She conspired with eugenics financier and businessman Clarence Gamble to “hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities” to sell their genocidal policies as community health and welfare services.

Outright murder wouldn’t sell. But wrapping it under the egalitarian cloak of “women’s health” — and adorning it with the moral authority of black churches — would. Sanger and Gamble called their deadly campaign “The Negro Project.”

In other writings, historian Mike Perry found, Sanger attacked programs that provided “medical and nursing facilities to slum mothers” because they “facilitate the function of maternity” when “the absolute necessity is to discourage it.” In an essay included in her writing collection held by the Library of Congress, Sanger urged her abortion clinic colleagues to “breed a race of thoroughbreds.” Nationwide “birth control bureaus” would propagate the proper “science of breeding” to stop impoverished, non-white women from “breeding like weeds.”

Speaking with CBS veteran journalist Mike Wallace in 1957, long after her racist views had supposedly mellowed, Sanger again revealed her true colors: “I think the greatest sin in the world is bringing children into the world — that have disease from their parents, that have no chance in the world to be a human being practically. Delinquents, prisoners, all sorts of things just marked when they’re born. That to me is the greatest sin — that people can — can commit.”

read it all at.
Michelle Malkin

 

[strollingbones]

and yet santorum thinks women should bare the children of rapist? abortion is a non issue both parties have proven that......

all this talk of abortion is simply an issue of distraction

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

and yet santorum thinks women should bare the children of rapist? abortion is a non issue both parties have proven that......

all this talk of abortion is simply an issue of distraction

A non-issue.. yet you talk about it 24/7.

 

[Stephanie]

and yet santorum thinks women should bare the children of rapist? abortion is a non issue both parties have proven that......

all this talk of abortion is simply an issue of distraction

well that didn't take long.

 

[Decepticon]

Big talk coming from a woman who posts home addresses of children she disagrees with on the internet.

Malkin would better serve this country acting as a whore for our servicemen than as one for the failed policies of the Republican party.

 

[Stephanie]

Big talk coming from a woman who posts home addresses of children she disagrees with on the internet.

Malkin would better serve this country acting as a whore for our servicemen than as one for the failed policies of the Republican party.

Sounds like you're speaking from experience about whores.

 

[NYcarbineer]

And yet,

in just about every discussion around here about the poor, about social spending, welfare etc.,

the first admonition to those poor you hear from the Right is...

...stop having so many babies!!!!!!!!!

 

[NYcarbineer]

Big talk coming from a woman who posts home addresses of children she disagrees with on the internet.

Malkin would better serve this country acting as a whore for our servicemen than as one for the failed policies of the Republican party.

Sounds like you're speaking from experience about whores.

Do you think it's wrong to discourage poor women from having babies? Especially, many babies?

 

[NLT]

And yet,

...stop having so many babies!!!!!!!!!

Especially if you are 13 yrs old.

 

[uscitizen]

‘To Stop the Multiplication of the Unfit’

So mandatory birth control for right wingers?

 

[Stephanie]

And yet,

in just about every discussion around here about the poor, about social spending, welfare etc.,

the first admonition to those poor you hear from the Right is...

...stop having so many babies!!!!!!!!!

wow, that is just so inhumane.

What is sick is what we hear from you on the left. If you happen to have sex and by golly you get that unwanted pregnancy out of it...just abort abort abort...it's simple and painless, forget the mental guilt afterwards of realizing you just killed YOUR OWN CHILD.

Now, any comment on the article?

 

[GuyPinestra]

Big talk coming from a woman who posts home addresses of children she disagrees with on the internet.

Malkin would better serve this country acting as a whore for our servicemen than as one for the failed policies of the Republican party.

Sounds like you're speaking from experience about whores.

Do you think it's wrong to discourage poor women from having babies? Especially, many babies?

I think it's wrong for poor women to have babies for the sole purpose of upping their welfare and food stamp benefits.

No woman/family should have more babies than they can afford to raise without the taxpayer picking up the tab.

 

[edthecynic]

Sounds like you're speaking from experience about whores.

Do you think it's wrong to discourage poor women from having babies? Especially, many babies?

I think it's wrong for poor women to have babies for the sole purpose of upping their welfare and food stamp benefits.

No woman/family should have more babies than they can afford to raise without the taxpayer picking up the tab.

And there it is, only the wealthy can have a family.

 

[midcan5]

I have no idea what Sanger was about nor what her values were, they are irrelevant today. What matters is the right of all women to make their family decisions based on their life and their personal values, not the ideology of any wing of any party. That planned parenhood does good is noted by many women who use their services, the right has no right to enter into the personal freedom of another and impose on them their desires. If you want lots of children go for it, but leave others alone. If you want less abortion, support education. If you want living healthy children, support programs that help those in need. If you want to be labeled a hypocrite continue to criticize those who sometimes help women make tough life decisions and don't simply preach. Words are too easy for the soapbox orator and really useless.


The Consequences of Evil - Republican Legislation Since 2010

"Having ensured that children will be born through their anti-abortion legislation, House Republicans have now ensured those children will be deprived of proper nutrition once they come into the world, ensuring that 300,000 millionaires will have more money in their pockets at the expense of nearly 500,000 women and children. Republicans on the House Appropriations Committee approved the appropriations bill which reduces WIC funding from $6.73 billion this year to $5.90 billion in 2012. The bill will also cut $38 million from the Commodity Supplemental Food Program (CSIP), as well as $63 million from the Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAB). If the Republicans had been truly interested in slashing the federal budget they could have saved more money by ending tax cuts for the rich or slashing subsidies to the oil companies. Instead they starve the infants and elderly. Why do I say that? WIC could be fully funded at the cost of just one week of Bush’s tax cuts for millionaires. According to the Center for American Progress, “one day’s worth of millionaire tax cuts would feed needy families for a year.”"
_

 

[PoliticalChic]

and yet santorum thinks women should bare the children of rapist? abortion is a non issue both parties have proven that......

all this talk of abortion is simply an issue of distraction

"...women should bare the children..."

I'm shoulder to shoulder to you on any punishment you can think of for the rapist...
...but what, exactly, is the crime of the 'child' you reference such that it should be put to death?

 

[Truthmatters]

A fetus is not a child

 

[Katzndogz]

Do you think it's wrong to discourage poor women from having babies? Especially, many babies?

I think it's wrong for poor women to have babies for the sole purpose of upping their welfare and food stamp benefits.

No woman/family should have more babies than they can afford to raise without the taxpayer picking up the tab.

And there it is, only the wealthy can have a family.

Meaning that anyone that can raise a family on what resources they have is wealthy.

 

[Sallow]

And yet,

in just about every discussion around here about the poor, about social spending, welfare etc.,

the first admonition to those poor you hear from the Right is...

...stop having so many babies!!!!!!!!!

This can't be stressed more and more.

And none of them have any problems with killing innocent people in foreign countries or making a mistake in a death penalty case.

 

[Stephanie]

I have no idea what Sanger was about nor what her values were, they are irrelevant today. What matters is the right of all women to make their family decisions based on their life and their personal values, not the ideology of any wing of any party. That planned parenhood does good is noted by many women who use their services, the right has no right to enter into the personal freedom of another and impose on them their desires. If you want lots of children go for it, but leave others alone. If you want less abortion, support education. If you want living healthy children, support programs that help those in need. If you want to be labeled a hypocrite continue to criticize those who sometimes help women make tough life decisions and don't simply preach. Words are too easy for the soapbox orator and really useless.


The Consequences of Evil - Republican Legislation Since 2010

"Having ensured that children will be born through their anti-abortion legislation, House Republicans have now ensured those children will be deprived of proper nutrition once they come into the world, ensuring that 300,000 millionaires will have more money in their pockets at the expense of nearly 500,000 women and children. Republicans on the House Appropriations Committee approved the appropriations bill which reduces WIC funding from $6.73 billion this year to $5.90 billion in 2012. The bill will also cut $38 million from the Commodity Supplemental Food Program (CSIP), as well as $63 million from the Emergency Food Assistance Program (TEFAB). If the Republicans had been truly interested in slashing the federal budget they could have saved more money by ending tax cuts for the rich or slashing subsidies to the oil companies. Instead they starve the infants and elderly. Why do I say that? WIC could be fully funded at the cost of just one week of Bush’s tax cuts for millionaires. According to the Center for American Progress, “one day’s worth of millionaire tax cuts would feed needy families for a year.”"
_

We don't care if you all want to abort your kids...WE the people just DON'T WANT TO HELP pay for them..
As for the rest of the babble from some commie-socialist website that has nothing to do with Margaret Sanger or the evils within Planned Parenthood

 

[PoliticalChic]

A fetus is not a child

If that makes you feel better.....