To Kill a Mockingbird becomes an Obama Re election commercial

[candycorn]

The fool who began with making it personal gets mad because he can dish it but not take it.

JRK's problem.

He's doing a great job ignoring you and responding to every post.

 

[JRK]

Bears repeating.

Candy Corn there is a huge difference in correcting information that is not true and yea but.
You keep putting out information that is not true and every single time I catch it, I am going to correct it
Now if your not man enough to face that, I cannot help that
Your lack of rebuttle does your reputation no good. That would bother most

Why would you support anything in life you have to spin the truth, 1/2 truth or flat out lies to make them look good?

I do not blame you, but the biased media is flat out of control and you should be smart enough to do your own DD on these issues

In 2008 there was no-one there to correct all the lies that was told about GWB, now BHO has a record that will be corrected every-time all the time

Bears repeating

Correcting, not yea but

Yeah, nobody corrected Bush's lies that lead us into war in Iraq. Somehow when the white guy was running things, you're truth-filter was not so acute. Now--wow; 24/7/365.

There were no WMD's, Colin Powell refused to parrot the cooked intel to the UN.
Those are the facts.

Spin away little one! GO!

Munitions Found in Iraq Meet WMD Criteria, Official Says
Update 27 January 2003

You might want to read these 2 links and get back with me
you rpoblem is with information, your debating me and all I have done is provide links to inforamtion that you do not like
worse with Jake
allot wose

What does race have to do with any of this?

 

[JakeStarkey]

JRK ain't real secure in himself!

 

[JRK]

Candy Corn I am real disappointed in you to play the race card. My god son those days are long gone for most of us and those who it is not
fuck em and let them eat shit
That includes blacks, whites, Hispanics, any-one who thinks there race makes them better or worse

BHO is part white? what does that have to do with a 1.4 trillion dollar defict?

 

[candycorn]

Candy Corn there is a huge difference in correcting information that is not true and yea but.
You keep putting out information that is not true and every single time I catch it, I am going to correct it
Now if your not man enough to face that, I cannot help that
Your lack of rebuttle does your reputation no good. That would bother most

Why would you support anything in life you have to spin the truth, 1/2 truth or flat out lies to make them look good?

I do not blame you, but the biased media is flat out of control and you should be smart enough to do your own DD on these issues

In 2008 there was no-one there to correct all the lies that was told about GWB, now BHO has a record that will be corrected every-time all the time

Bears repeating

Correcting, not yea but

Yeah, nobody corrected Bush's lies that lead us into war in Iraq. Somehow when the white guy was running things, you're truth-filter was not so acute. Now--wow; 24/7/365.

There were no WMD's, Colin Powell refused to parrot the cooked intel to the UN.
Those are the facts.

Spin away little one! GO!

Munitions Found in Iraq Meet WMD Criteria, Official Says
Update 27 January 2003

You might want to read these 2 links and get back with me
you rpoblem is with information, your debating me and all I have done is provide links to inforamtion that you do not like
worse with Jake
allot wose

What does race have to do with any of this?

WMD's not found.
Bush Lied.
You're "truth-o-meter" is not calibrated to Presidents of all races....thats what it has to do.

 

[JRK]

Yeah, nobody corrected Bush's lies that lead us into war in Iraq. Somehow when the white guy was running things, you're truth-filter was not so acute. Now--wow; 24/7/365.

There were no WMD's, Colin Powell refused to parrot the cooked intel to the UN.
Those are the facts.

Spin away little one! GO!

Munitions Found in Iraq Meet WMD Criteria, Official Says
Update 27 January 2003

You might want to read these 2 links and get back with me
you rpoblem is with information, your debating me and all I have done is provide links to inforamtion that you do not like
worse with Jake
allot wose

What does race have to do with any of this?

WMD's not found.
Bush Lied.
You're "truth-o-meter" is not calibrated to Presidents of all races....thats what it has to do.

I see you did not read the link
the Dems began this WMD thing with the UN as sson as the first war In Iraq was over
The UN (Blix) made claims there was still 6000 munitions as well as nerve gas and anthrax on Jan 27, 2003
this is what the link is for CC
The only one who really lied was Saddam, and he paid for it

as a reminder
none of these are GWB

One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

 

[candycorn]

Munitions Found in Iraq Meet WMD Criteria, Official Says
Update 27 January 2003

You might want to read these 2 links and get back with me
you rpoblem is with information, your debating me and all I have done is provide links to inforamtion that you do not like
worse with Jake
allot wose

What does race have to do with any of this?

WMD's not found.
Bush Lied.
You're "truth-o-meter" is not calibrated to Presidents of all races....thats what it has to do.

I see you did not read the link
the Dems began this WMD thing with the UN as sson as the first war In Iraq was over
The UN (Blix) made claims there was still 6000 munitions as well as nerve gas and anthrax on Jan 27, 2003
this is what the link is for CC
The only one who really lied was Saddam, and he paid for it

as a reminder
none of these are GWB

One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

No I didn't read the link. WMDs were not found. You're the only person making the claim.

A great many of your quotes above is derived from the CIA intelligence cooking operations that took place in the ramp-up to Bush's great mis-adventure in Iraq. Who knows how long they were cooking before that.

Had George said that "We don't know but I don't get a second chance so I'm going in" that would have been one thing. He had Condi Rice out there saying, "We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud" indicating not only WMDs but Nukes too.

I'm sure after Romney loses by 4-5 million votes, you'll be here with some article citing how he actually won.

You're almost 9/11 denier in your avoidance of the truth.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Munitions Found in Iraq Meet WMD Criteria, Official Says
Update 27 January 2003
You might want to read these 2 links and get back with me you rpoblem is with information, your debating me and all I have done is provide links to inforamtion that you do not like worse with Jake allot wose What does race have to do with any of this?

WMD's not found. Bush Lied. You're "truth-o-meter" is not calibrated to Presidents of all races....thats what it has to do.

SNIP SNIP

Irrelevant, JRK. No WMDs. Bush said he would not have invaded if he knew that. The neo-cons, like you broke the country. You will never be allowed to have power again.

 

[candycorn]

WMD's not found. Bush Lied. You're "truth-o-meter" is not calibrated to Presidents of all races....thats what it has to do.

SNIP SNIP

Irrelevant, JRK. No WMDs. Bush said he would not have invaded if he knew that. The neo-cons, like you broke the country. You will never be allowed to have power again.

Whoa....they will be back in power in 2016. The American people tire of the same party in control for too long. Which is how Gore lost. That and he was a shitty campaigner.

 

[JRK]

WMD's not found.
Bush Lied.
You're "truth-o-meter" is not calibrated to Presidents of all races....thats what it has to do.

I see you did not read the link
the Dems began this WMD thing with the UN as sson as the first war In Iraq was over
The UN (Blix) made claims there was still 6000 munitions as well as nerve gas and anthrax on Jan 27, 2003
this is what the link is for CC
The only one who really lied was Saddam, and he paid for it

as a reminder
none of these are GWB

One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
--Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
--Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
-- Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by:
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), and others, Dec 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and th! e means of delivering them."
-- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
-- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
-- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do"
-- Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

No I didn't read the link. WMDs were not found. You're the only person making the claim.

A great many of your quotes above is derived from the CIA intelligence cooking operations that took place in the ramp-up to Bush's great mis-adventure in Iraq. Who knows how long they were cooking before that.

Had George said that "We don't know but I don't get a second chance so I'm going in" that would have been one thing. He had Condi Rice out there saying, "We don't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud" indicating not only WMDs but Nukes too.

I'm sure after Romney loses by 4-5 million votes, you'll be here with some article citing how he actually won.

You're almost 9/11 denier in your avoidance of the truth.

Denail is not a river in Egypt
those kids who died fighting that war should get more from you than that
The events that led to that invasion are here, yet your in denial or scared to read the true events that took place before we invaded
The UN were the ones screaming WMDs, and based on the information Saddam provided as well as the intel gathered from the first war, 1000s of the missiles that existed were never found CC
The dumb SOB buried jet fighters CC

The left cried bush lied and people died to get power while those troops won that war and did every thing we set out to do CC, thet deserve your time to do real DD on those events

9-11 had nothing to do with the Iraq invasion, and i am not sure wny-one stated it did
Case Closed | The Weekly Standard
This was the link that was stated and DID exist

 

[JRK]

SNIP SNIP

Irrelevant, JRK. No WMDs. Bush said he would not have invaded if he knew that. The neo-cons, like you broke the country. You will never be allowed to have power again.

Whoa....they will be back in power in 2016. The American people tire of the same party in control for too long. Which is how Gore lost. That and he was a shitty campaigner.

CC you keep blaming GWB, what aput those comments I shared with you?
you got issues with "lies" about WMDs the dems and the UN lied long before GWB was even running for president
Gore lost because he lost his home state of Tenn, think about that

 

[JakeStarkey]

The issue is Bush's and no one else. That is why no listens to JRK and the failed neo-cons.

 

[JRK]

Jake your still on ignore
Debating the issuings along with trying to inform the in informaed is my only purpose
Not to get into a name calling event

 

[JakeStarkey]

Jake your still on ignore. . .

Then, gently but firmly, I suggest you ignore me.

ps: you are losing this thread.

 

[JRK]

The fool who began with making it personal gets mad because he can dish it but not take it.

JRK's problem.

He's doing a great job ignoring you and responding to every post.

CC not sure wht your defendng Jake
information
thats all I do in response
Provide Information

 

[JakeStarkey]

JRK's information, however, has been solidly rejected and rebuked yet he recycles the same nonsense.

 

[JRK]

Obama Plays the Race Card | The Blog on Obama: White House Dossier

 

[JakeStarkey]

Obama Plays the Race Card | The Blog on Obama: White House Dossier

JRK plays the race card once again.

Please we Republicans don't need you neo-cons, JRK, losing us another election.

 

[JRK]

Trayvon Martin Remarks From Obama: Conservatives Say He Is Race-Baiting
Jake your on lgnore

 

[JakeStarkey]

Nope, TM's remarks according to real people are a teenager's remarks.

JRK, if I am on ignore, you are still responding to me.