Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
and i wish fairness would stop offending people on the right.
do you think that the 'sacrifice' should be shared or should it all be dumped on the people who can afford it least?
How is it "shared sacrifice" when half the country doesn't pay the federal tax? Never could understand that.
do you think deployed military personnel should pay taxes?
do you think people on social security should pay taxes?
that number is silly....
How is it "shared sacrifice" when half the country doesn't pay the federal tax? Never could understand that.
do you think deployed military personnel should pay taxes?
do you think people on social security should pay taxes?
that number is silly....
Deployed military personnel are no more qualified for not paying taxes on their income than anyone else. They would be the first to agree with that, because by their nature and honesty and dignity they are not freeloaders like you.
Getting Social Security IS income. Recipients should pay tax on that income just like everybody else.
and i wish fairness would stop offending people on the right.
do you think that the 'sacrifice' should be shared or should it all be dumped on the people who can afford it least?
How is it "shared sacrifice" when half the country doesn't pay the federal tax? Never could understand that.
do you think deployed military personnel should pay taxes?
do you think people on social security should pay taxes?
that number is silly....
How is it "shared sacrifice" when half the country doesn't pay the federal tax? Never could understand that.
do you think deployed military personnel should pay taxes?
do you think people on social security should pay taxes?
that number is silly....
I think everyone should pay tax on every dollar earned, I don't care where the income comes from.
Because you actually proved MY point with the chart.
lying about it doesnt make it so
The chart does NOT show the correlation you claim
Get some new glasses, dude.
We already tried right wing "give everything to the rich" fiscal plans for decades, they never worked.
Everyone pays their fair share democratic plans have been proven to work.
I really wish he would stop using the word fair, it's grating.
and i wish fairness would stop offending people on the right.
do you think that the 'sacrifice' should be shared or should it all be dumped on the people who can afford it least?
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUhENCtiYes]Obama's Fairshare - YouTube[/ame]
Nice, lame, lefty talking point, with NO basis in reality. When upper income folks, many of them small and large business owners, are taxed less, the invest, hire and consume much more. This creates economic activity, jobs, and larger tax base, and increase revenue.
When tax rates go up THAT is when rich folks begin moving more money and jobs offshore.
I'm a self-employed contractor, and when those folks keep more of their money, my business picks up so I earn more, then I spend more which helps others.
Supply-side DOES work, every time.
It's a fact.
It's a 100% fact.
Under Reagan "trickle down", all we got was massive debt
Under Bush "trickle down", all we got was massive debt
Under Clinton "everyone pays their fair share" we got the most booming economy and largest surplus in US history.
Under W "trickle down on steroids" all we got was insane debt.
It's been proven time and time again that right wing fiscal plans have never, and will never work.
Clinton benefited from the tech/internet boom and hosing bubble building. When the economy is booming, you can raise tax rates, and no one complains.
But BO has created more national debt in 4 years than Bush did in 8, with 911, the tech bust, and energy meltdown! The Bush tax cuts kept is from going into a depression.
http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/art/lfHendersonCEE2_figure_004.jpg
check out this chart.
it is NOT as the right claims it is
Thanks for proving Gibson was right!
When the CG tax rate is lowered, revenue increases!
do you think deployed military personnel should pay taxes?
do you think people on social security should pay taxes?
that number is silly....
I think everyone should pay tax on every dollar earned, I don't care where the income comes from.
okie dokey smokey....
and i think making people who are already existing at subsistence levels is absurd, counter productive and absolutely is bad for our economy.
you are very shortsighted, imo.
and i wish fairness would stop offending people on the right.
do you think that the 'sacrifice' should be shared or should it all be dumped on the people who can afford it least?
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sUhENCtiYes]Obama's Fairshare - YouTube[/ame]
i'm sorry.. .i don't watch wingnut stuff...
http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/art/lfHendersonCEE2_figure_004.jpg
check out this chart.
it is NOT as the right claims it is
Thanks for proving Gibson was right!
When the CG tax rate is lowered, revenue increases!
this chart does NOT show what you clam in the OP
A flat tax would solve the whole "fairness" issue. One tax rate for all.
But Democrats reject that solution. Why? Because "fairness" is not the real goal, that is just a code word- "punishment" is the true goal. Our current policies reward failure and punish success.
Utopia for Democrats is an ever expanding cadre of people that are dependent upon government for food, shelter, transportation, medical care, education, for everything a person needs..... They'll always vote for more free shit.
A flat tax would solve the whole "fairness" issue. One tax rate for all.
But Democrats reject that solution. Why? Because "fairness" is not the real goal, that is just a code word- "punishment" is the true goal. Our current policies reward failure and punish success.
Utopia for Democrats is an ever expanding cadre of people that are dependent upon government for food, shelter, transportation, medical care, education, for everything a person needs..... They'll always vote for more free shit.
Actually utopia to them would be to tax everyone at 100% and then dole out what they felt everyone "deserved".
what would be the rate of this flat tax to provide the revenue we need?
http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/art/lfHendersonCEE2_figure_004.jpg
check out this chart.
it is NOT as the right claims it is
Thanks for proving Gibson was right!
When the CG tax rate is lowered, revenue increases!
this chart does NOT show what you clam in the OP
