Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
- Banned
- #21
then why did it DIVE in 1980 after they lowered the rate?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
We already tried right wing "give everything to the rich" fiscal plans for decades, they never worked.
Everyone pays their fair share democratic plans have been proven to work.
Why do democrats want to keep Bush-era tax cuts that benefited only the disgusting filthy rich?
Does "fair share" include people that don't pay federal income taxes at all?
Bush tax rates are reduced for ALL income levels, and 50% of the nation pays NO income tax, which is the Obama voter base btw...
10% on taxable income from $0 to $8,700, plus
15% on taxable income over $8,700 to $35,350, plus
25% on taxable income over $35,350 to $85,650, plus
28% on taxable income over $85,650 to $178,650, plus
33% on taxable income over $178,650 to $388,350, plus
35% on taxable income over $388,350.
then why did it DIVE in 1980 after they lowered the rate?
We were in the Carter recession in the early 80's. Took a while to pick up.
We already tried right wing "give everything to the rich" fiscal plans for decades, they never worked.
Everyone pays their fair share democratic plans have been proven to work.
Why do democrats want to keep Bush-era tax cuts that benefited only the disgusting filthy rich?
Does "fair share" include people that don't pay federal income taxes at all?
Bush tax rates are reduced for ALL income levels, and 50% of the nation pays NO income tax, which is the Obama voter base btw...
10% on taxable income from $0 to $8,700, plus
15% on taxable income over $8,700 to $35,350, plus
25% on taxable income over $35,350 to $85,650, plus
28% on taxable income over $85,650 to $178,650, plus
33% on taxable income over $178,650 to $388,350, plus
35% on taxable income over $388,350.
From 75 to 1980 the revenues were rising with a 35% rate.
then it tumbled when they lower the rates
Don't mention the fact that we were in a recession, gas lines and mortgage rates at 20%, don't mention that
then why did it DIVE in 1980 after they lowered the rate?
We were in the Carter recession in the early 80's. Took a while to pick up.
We already tried right wing "give everything to the rich" fiscal plans for decades, they never worked.
Everyone pays their fair share democratic plans have been proven to work.
Can't read?
When capital gains tax rates go up, they raise less revenue. Even lefty Charlie Gibson admits that.
In spite of that FACT, King Barry just HAS to raise capital gains rates out of "fairness".
Makes NO sense.
The right wing goons said if we "don't raise taxes on the job creators", they will trickle down and create countless jobs. We already tried that and they don't "trickle down", only throw the funds in their already mountain sized pile of cash stashed away in offshore bank account.
Nice, lame, lefty talking point, with NO basis in reality. When upper income folks, many of them small and large business owners, are taxed less, the invest, hire and consume much more. This creates economic activity, jobs, and larger tax base, and increase revenue.
When tax rates go up THAT is when rich folks begin moving more money and jobs offshore.
I'm a self-employed contractor, and when those folks keep more of their money, my business picks up so I earn more, then I spend more which helps others.
Supply-side DOES work, every time.
It's a fact.
We need to put it at 35% and leave it there if we want revenue
I really wish he would stop using the word fair, it's grating.