Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
dude, they admitted they manipulate the data. No good explanationShe sounds like you stupid usmb republicans Fox News host: Climate scientists 'fabricated' temperature data
and this was ruled PANTS ON FIRE!
oh, so what is the solution that came out of the meetings then? So no path forward. except to handle some cash. hmmmmmmm. I can make that type of agreement. And only us tax payers too. funny shit on something that isn't real.Are you a fucking caveman or what? Do you feel dumb being the last person to know?it isn't an issue. how many times must a libturd hear that? Why would any candidate say anything on climate, leaders from 196 couldn't even come to an agreement on it. So it died on the vine in Paris!!!! get it died on the vine???????Go to France and tell them GW is a hoax. They'll laugh at you.and you can back that up?
It's a HufPo piece reprinted on Mother Jones. Short on evidence, high on rhetoric. Preaching to the choir I suppose.
Lets see if the GOP nominee will get up on stage and deny global warming. Bet they won't. And if they do, they'll lose the general election.
6 takeaways from the Paris climate agreement
The private sector was more engaged in this process than ever before, with thousands of businesses, investors and trade coalitions involved over the past year. We have climate pledges from 5,000 diverse global companies representing virtually every industrial sector and over 90 countries. They include signatories to the American Business Act on Climate Pledge, the CDP/We Mean Business Coalition, the World Economic Form CEOs group, the B Team and many others. All together, companies pledging climate action represent combined annual revenue over $38 trillion — about half of global GDP — and the majority of the world’s market capitalization. Already, the global market for low-carbon goods and services is estimated at $5.5 trillion per year. The agreement should increase investor confidence and help the low-carbon share of the global economy grow.
At the U.N. climate talks, Unilever and other big businesses announced plans to stabilize forest cover by 2030 and restore forest cover to 1990 levels by 2050. Hundreds of major companies are committed to eliminating deforestation from their supply chains, including those conducting about 90 percent of the global palm oil trade. Their support helped cement a prominent place for forest conservation in the Paris Agreement.
Oh its an issue. Its one of the issues you guys don't win the White House.it isn't an issue. how many times must a libturd hear that? Why would any candidate say anything on climate, leaders from 196 couldn't even come to an agreement on it. So it died on the vine in Paris!!!! get it died on the vine???????Go to France and tell them GW is a hoax. They'll laugh at you.and you can back that up?
It's a HufPo piece reprinted on Mother Jones. Short on evidence, high on rhetoric. Preaching to the choir I suppose.
Lets see if the GOP nominee will get up on stage and deny global warming. Bet they won't. And if they do, they'll lose the general election.
New Wisconsin utility regulator says volcanos worse than cars for greenhouse gas
Look how many times you guys are wrong about climate change.
Oh its an issue. Its one of the issues you guys don't win the White House.it isn't an issue. how many times must a libturd hear that? Why would any candidate say anything on climate, leaders from 196 couldn't even come to an agreement on it. So it died on the vine in Paris!!!! get it died on the vine???????Go to France and tell them GW is a hoax. They'll laugh at you.and you can back that up?
It's a HufPo piece reprinted on Mother Jones. Short on evidence, high on rhetoric. Preaching to the choir I suppose.
Lets see if the GOP nominee will get up on stage and deny global warming. Bet they won't. And if they do, they'll lose the general election.
New Wisconsin utility regulator says volcanos worse than cars for greenhouse gas
Look how many times you guys are wrong about climate change.
Go to France and tell them GW is a hoax. They'll laugh at you.and you can back that up?1 to 2 degrees hotter is not good. We know that.No doubt human population growth is a major contributor to global warming, given that humans use fossil fuels to power their increasingly mechanized lifestyles. More people means more demand for oil, gas, coal and other fuels mined or drilled from below the Earth’s surface that, when burned, spew enough carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere to trap warm air inside like a greenhouse.
Does Population Growth Impact Climate Change?
Population growth is a major factor in Climate Change and quite a few other problems. It's not politically correct to work on the problems from that angle though.
CO2 is a necessary constituent of the Greenhouse Effect that keeps our world inhabitable. I'm not sure whether we know what the best levels are, or what the perfect temperature is.
2 degrees will change the world
Now you know.
It's a HufPo piece reprinted on Mother Jones. Short on evidence, high on rhetoric. Preaching to the choir I suppose.
Lets see if the GOP nominee will get up on stage and deny global warming. Bet they won't. And if they do, they'll lose the general election.
funny line eh?Oh its an issue. Its one of the issues you guys don't win the White House.it isn't an issue. how many times must a libturd hear that? Why would any candidate say anything on climate, leaders from 196 couldn't even come to an agreement on it. So it died on the vine in Paris!!!! get it died on the vine???????Go to France and tell them GW is a hoax. They'll laugh at you.and you can back that up?
It's a HufPo piece reprinted on Mother Jones. Short on evidence, high on rhetoric. Preaching to the choir I suppose.
Lets see if the GOP nominee will get up on stage and deny global warming. Bet they won't. And if they do, they'll lose the general election.
New Wisconsin utility regulator says volcanos worse than cars for greenhouse gas
Look how many times you guys are wrong about climate change.
Actually it is your hero's who have been wrong. There's still ice at the North pole two years after it was claimed it would be gone. There's still snow almost a decade after it was claimed there would be no more. Every thing you are posting has been proven false on many occasions. Nice to see you are still incapable of arguing from an intellectually honest position.
She sounds like you stupid usmb republicans Fox News host: Climate scientists 'fabricated' temperature data
and this was ruled PANTS ON FIRE!
Go to France and tell them GW is a hoax. They'll laugh at you.and you can back that up?1 to 2 degrees hotter is not good. We know that.No doubt human population growth is a major contributor to global warming, given that humans use fossil fuels to power their increasingly mechanized lifestyles. More people means more demand for oil, gas, coal and other fuels mined or drilled from below the Earth’s surface that, when burned, spew enough carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere to trap warm air inside like a greenhouse.
Does Population Growth Impact Climate Change?
Population growth is a major factor in Climate Change and quite a few other problems. It's not politically correct to work on the problems from that angle though.
CO2 is a necessary constituent of the Greenhouse Effect that keeps our world inhabitable. I'm not sure whether we know what the best levels are, or what the perfect temperature is.
2 degrees will change the world
Now you know.
It's a HufPo piece reprinted on Mother Jones. Short on evidence, high on rhetoric. Preaching to the choir I suppose.
....
There's still ice at the North pole two years after it was claimed it would be gone.
There's still snow almost a decade after it was claimed there would be no more.
Every thing you are posting has been proven false on many occasions.
Nice to see you are still incapable of arguing from an intellectually honest position.
Define fabricated. More than a quarter of US data is estimated. The estimated data has a larger warming trend than actual measured data, although it has also usually be adjusted. Up.
Define fabricated. More than a quarter of US data is estimated. The estimated data has a larger warming trend than actual measured data, although it has also usually be adjusted. Up.
The adjustments make the warming look smaller. The fundamentally denier conspiracy theory is pathologically dishonest, along with most of their other crap.
And scientists know that. Hence, they ignore deniers. And you can't do anything about it.
Denialism is now just an emotional support group, people on the internet trying to convince each other that they haven't been acting crazy.
There's still ice at the North pole two years after it was claimed it would be gone.
You're lying about that being a prediction of AGW theory.
There's still snow almost a decade after it was claimed there would be no more.
You're lying about that being a prediction of AGW theory.
Every thing you are posting has been proven false on many occasions.
Everything that you are posting has been proven false on many occasions.
Nice to see you are still incapable of arguing from an intellectually honest position.
You can't discuss science, hence you have to create the dishonest strawmen.
Again, what does the phrase "widely accepted theory" mean Mr Westwall? How does one discern what the dominant theory on any question is Mr Westwall? Why do you think mainstream science believes you and the rest of the deniers here are fringe whackjobs Mr Westwall?
CON-FUCKING-SENSUS
From Wikipedia's article on "Scientific Theory"
The scientific method involves the proposal and testing of hypotheses, by deriving predictions from the hypotheses about the results of future experiments, then performing those experiments to see whether the predictions are valid. This provides evidence either for or against the hypothesis. When enough experimental results have been gathered in a particular area of inquiry, scientists may propose an explanatory framework that accounts for as many of these as possible. This explanation is also tested, and if it fulfills the necessary criteria (see above), then the explanation becomes a theory. This can take many years, as it can be difficult or complicated to gather sufficient evidence.
Once all of the criteria have been met, it will be widely accepted by scientists (see scientific consensus) as the best available explanation of at least some phenomena. It will have made predictions of phenomena that previous theories could not explain or could not predict accurately, and it will have resisted attempts at falsification. The strength of the evidence is evaluated by the scientific community, and the most important experiments will have been replicated by multiple independent groups.
Consensus is a Cult word.
Speaking of experiment, you've never once show a single experiment linking trace amount of CO2 with increases in temperature. Why is that?
Why are there NO experiments that control for trace amounts of CO2?
Just as well quote from the Weekly Globe as Jo Nova. I think the Globe may be more accurate.Link ?Everyone in the world except American Republicans know man made climate change/global warming is real.The only argument you folks have any more is the grand conspiracy. Let me offer some enlightenment: the grand conspiracy isn't a viable argument. It's not even sane. Open your eyes and look where you're going.
It'll be interesting to see if the Republican nominee denies it while debating hillary.
Edit: 54% of Australians don't
54% of Australians skeptics of man-made global warming, 80% don’t donate to environment or vote for it « JoNova
Again a site that makes up lies continuallyCheck this out
JAPANESE SPACE AGENCY AGREES WITH SKEPTICS ON CLIMATE CHANGE - Principia Scientific Intl
Japanese climate satellite data supports climate realist Professor Murry Salby in rejecting global warming theory; humans are not responsible for measured increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) affirm evidence in Report from Japanese Aerospace exploration agency (JAXA).The Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) has revealed that its climate satellite IBUKI data shows that the growth in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is coming from third world under developed forested equatorial regions of Africa and South America.
What the hell would know of science, you old fraud. You have lied continually here, and all who post know it.The world is meeting in Paris talking about going green.Link ?Everyone in the world except American Republicans know man made climate change/global warming is real.The only argument you folks have any more is the grand conspiracy. Let me offer some enlightenment: the grand conspiracy isn't a viable argument. It's not even sane. Open your eyes and look where you're going.
It'll be interesting to see if the Republican nominee denies it while debating hillary.
Edit: 54% of Australians don't
54% of Australians skeptics of man-made global warming, 80% don’t donate to environment or vote for it « JoNova
We didn't send any Republicans and fox and rush aren't talking about it. It's why you need to ask for a link.
Do you need a link if I say evolution or the big bang are real?
Scientific consensus.
Why don't you Google it
Because consensus is the language of politics, not science, and those who are pushing the fraud directly benefit from it. What you are advocating is the same as a drug maker churning out "studies" that support their product, all the while knowing it is crap, like all those male supplements we get barraged with, but they churn them out because they make money on them.
Color me unsurprised you're not educated enough to understand that.
Data like you predicting a cooling for the past 5 years, and we have had years that at least matched 1998 in 2010 and 2014. And 2015 will blow all these years right out of the water.Prior to 1960 the "consensus" was that the Earth was contracting and that's how mountains were built. Then plate tectonics came along and blew that shit right out of the water. The scientific method has been around for centuries so you are just as ignorant of the history of science as you are its methodology and ethics.
So better evidence arrived, and the consensus changed.
The lesson we learn is that if you can show the better evidence, the consensus will change fairly quickly. That's how it was with global warming theory, or plate tectonics, or the bacterial cause of ulcers.
So, just show the better data.
We show data. You show computer derived fiction. See the difference? Nope. Didn't think you would.
I can't even discuss it anymore.What the hell would know of science, you old fraud. You have lied continually here, and all who post know it.The world is meeting in Paris talking about going green.Link ?Everyone in the world except American Republicans know man made climate change/global warming is real.The only argument you folks have any more is the grand conspiracy. Let me offer some enlightenment: the grand conspiracy isn't a viable argument. It's not even sane. Open your eyes and look where you're going.
It'll be interesting to see if the Republican nominee denies it while debating hillary.
Edit: 54% of Australians don't
54% of Australians skeptics of man-made global warming, 80% don’t donate to environment or vote for it « JoNova
We didn't send any Republicans and fox and rush aren't talking about it. It's why you need to ask for a link.
Do you need a link if I say evolution or the big bang are real?
Scientific consensus.
Why don't you Google it
Because consensus is the language of politics, not science, and those who are pushing the fraud directly benefit from it. What you are advocating is the same as a drug maker churning out "studies" that support their product, all the while knowing it is crap, like all those male supplements we get barraged with, but they churn them out because they make money on them.
Color me unsurprised you're not educated enough to understand that.
The whole world is now in agreement that we have to address this problem, and assholes like you are no more than a footnote. Old, and in the way, for you, that is accurate.
I bet you are sick, you senile old fool. The funds for our part in implementing the Treaty were passed in Congress, and the Treaty was effectively the whole world agreeing to address a problem affecting us all. You and yours are now just a footnote in history.Okay, you're officially on record as rejecting the modern scientific method. Good of you to stop pretending.
"Modern" Scientific Method? What the hell is that? The old scientific method went something like this: The principles and empirical processes of discovery and demonstration considered characteristic of or necessary for scientific investigation, generallyy involving the observation of phenomena, the formulation of a hypothesis concerning the phenomena ,experimentation to demonstrate the truth or falseness of the hypothesis, and a conclusion that validates or modifies the hypothesis. Climate science certainly isn't following the old scientific method...describe this "modern" scientific method.
Wow, I didn't even catch that one. Gives you an idea of how sick I am! What a crock of shit....
Like hell, you stupid ass. You asses were claiming right up to 2000 that there was no warming. Then you changed you claim that it was all natural cycles. And when it was shown that you could not show the cycles, you changed it to 'the warming is good for you'. Except many thousands of people in this nation have lost their homes to fires or floods created by the predicted weather extremes this year. Why don't you just give up on your lies.Oh its an issue. Its one of the issues you guys don't win the White House.it isn't an issue. how many times must a libturd hear that? Why would any candidate say anything on climate, leaders from 196 couldn't even come to an agreement on it. So it died on the vine in Paris!!!! get it died on the vine???????Go to France and tell them GW is a hoax. They'll laugh at you.and you can back that up?
It's a HufPo piece reprinted on Mother Jones. Short on evidence, high on rhetoric. Preaching to the choir I suppose.
Lets see if the GOP nominee will get up on stage and deny global warming. Bet they won't. And if they do, they'll lose the general election.
New Wisconsin utility regulator says volcanos worse than cars for greenhouse gas
Look how many times you guys are wrong about climate change.
How many times we were wrong, lmao were not the ones that have been making the predictions over the past 40 years ya frickin moron.
