Time To Reveal Who Putin Wanted As President

trump has made it obvious where his loyalties lie and it's NOT with the USA intelligence community :eusa_clap:



https://www.nytimes.com/2017/05/10/...-american-reporters-blocked.html?mcubz=2&_r=0

Trump's meeting with Russians closed to U.S. media, but not to TASS photographer





The issue was further inflamed by the presence of Kislyak, who has been at the center of several controversies involving administration officials, including now fired National Security Adviser Michael Flynn and Attorney General Jeff Sessions. The Russian embassy even tweeted a photograph of Trump smiling broadly as he put his arm around the diplomat while shaking his hand in the Oval Office.

Flynn was fired in February for lying to Vice President Mike Pence by denying that he had discussed the issue of U.S. sanctions with Kislyak. Sessions recused himself from any investigations involving the Trump administration and Russia after acknowledging that he had failed to tell senators during his confirmation hearing that he had met previously with he diplomat.

In addition, Kislyak was brought into the Trump Tower in New York in December out of the sight of reporters for a meeting with Flynn and Jared Kushner, Trump's son-in-law and now senior advisor, according to The New York Times.


Trump hurts himself and the nation by trashing the intelligence community

Trump tweets about intelligence and WikiLeaks' Julian Assange

Trump's frustration with press, intelligence community explodes



The intell agencies, i.e., the Deep State, can't be trusted any more than you can be.
The following from the former CIA Moscow Station head...


1. "The U.S. intelligence community is in the midst of a severe crisis. It has been used, or perhaps allowed itself to be used, as a tool of political destruction,...


2. The twin serpents of politicization and political correctness — a Soviet term, by the way — walk hand in hand throughout the intelligence community, as well as every other government agency. The PC mindset that now dominates every college campus is also positioned firmly throughout our government — particularly within the intelligence community,

3. ....all diversity is embraced — except diversity of thought. Federal workers have been partisan for years, but combined with the rigid Obama PC mindset, it has created a Frankenstein of politicization that has never been seen before.





4. ...made up of thousands of similarly credentialed, remarkably “un-diverse” civil servants and political appointees who saw themselves promoted rapidly during the eight years of the Obama administration.

5. The present culture of the intelligence community and the shameless political shenanigans of the Obama administration combined to create this disaster. ....CIA leadership famously stood up to the Nixon administration when asked to domestically spy on Justice during Watergate, for example.

It seems that today we lack the character and the competence to ensure that the intelligence community honors the trust of the American people."
How the intel community was turned into a political weapon against President Trump

Can you say 'Reality Winner'????
 
Putin hates Hillary as much as most here do.
That's why various Russian Citizens in the Russian Government donated over $125 Million to The Clinton Foundation, right?
Because they hate Hillary.



And why the Kremlin put together the fake dossier accusing Trump of unspeakable habits.



"FBI Director James Comey has been caught going around to secret Congressional briefings in “recent weeks” touting the lurid fake “Trump dossier.” He has been claiming that it is a major foundation of the FBI’s investigation of purported Russian collusion with Trump to interfere in the election—months after the FBI had already assessed the “dossier” as non-credible.

This “Trump dossier” is the controversial document supposedly composed by “ex” British MI6 agent Christopher Steele through the group known as Fusion GPS. Paid for by still-unidentified Hillary Clinton supporters, it was “opposition research” against then-candidate, now President, Donald Trump.

Fusion GPS has been revealed to be a pro-Russia lobby by Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA). British citizen Steele admitted he had larger plans than writing the “dossier” itself, but “really thought that what he had would sway the election“—by using the “dossier” to defeat Trump —said an associate to the BBC. That is called foreign interference in a U.S. election.

At this point, here is what we know for sure: the document, which was designed to “prove” that Trump is a Russian agent, originated with a group working on behalf of Russian interests and the Hillary Clinton campaign."
The Final Truth about the “Trump Dossier”



Clearly, the facts are that Putin wanted the candidate with a record of taking bribes.
 
3. The modern Democrat Party stands for the same things that the CPUSA (Communist Party, USA) advanced.



Did I mention that you're an imbecile?
You very smart, tovarishka, Democratic Party founded in Moscow, 1917.


The democratic party became Bolshevik in 1968. That is irrefutable. There are some in this forum who actively fought for a Soviet victory over America, BlindBoo for instance.
 
Another day, another hearing.

And every one of 'em, from Clapper, to Yates, to Comey, and now Sessions.....

....zero evidence of either the Collusion Fable or the Obstruction Myth.



Fact is, the rage of the Left at being kicked out of power by Americans is evident in Kathy Griffin, the fake Shakespeare slaughter of the President, and, today the Liberal stalking and shooting of Republicans in Alexandria.


The Left's savagery looks like the reason they have so much simpatico with the 7th century barbarians that they want to bring into the country.
 
Interesting that the only....ONLY....evidence of Russian involvement in the election is the anti-Trump, pro-Hillary 'dossier.'

The ONLY evidence!
 
15. In this thread we have seen a truly astounding....but often shown.....trait of Liberals and Liberalism, and that is blaming the other side for their very own schemes and iniquities.


No matter what logic and experience indicate, the Left puts to good use its control of the media, and, when necessary, the most corrupt members of he other side as well.


In the current soap opera, rage, hurt, and amazement of having lost a sew-up election...'Trump has no path to an election win'....has been turned into blaming the Russians, Collusion, Comey, Wikileaks, the NYTimes, Misogyny, Obstruction of Justice, Content Farms in Macedonia, the DNC, The Basket of Deplorables, Ukrainian Hackers.

No matter how insane,jejune, and inconsequential....the troglodytes who have given a tacit promise never to think, nod and aver...'duh, yup...yup.....dat's it!'





No matter what the logic of the situation is....Hillary was a terrible candidate, she has been called a congenital liar since it was printed in the NYTime in 1996, she has a long and public record of scandal and criminality for a quarter of a century, is well known to accept bribes to enrich the Clinton crime family to America's detriment, has promised to continue failed policies of Obama: ObamaCare, and millions of unvetted Muslims, ...

...Liberal acolytes ignore all to support the fables.



In summary: the Russians wanted the candidate with a history of being unethical and perfidious, one whose associates have been paid millions by Russia, and that would be Hillary.


To that end, Putin worked up a false dossier to sink Trump, used the American media and the intell community...Comey.... to spread it, and like Jack in the Corner, he sat in the corner and said 'what a good boy am I."



No evidence, no smoking gun from the intell community- none of which has claimed evidence of the story- testimony from Clapper, Yates, Comey, and now Sessions....

....yet the soap opera continues with abject fools...'useful idiots' ....still on board
 
16. It's time to review what has been shown in this thread:


1. There has never been any proof that Russia 'hacked' the election.

2. No intell agency has ever claimed that they had proof of any Russian involvement.

3. The 'slippery' words, such as 'assessed,' or 'concluded,' or 'agreed' have no relationship to proof or evidence.



And, in fact, lead to #4 below:

4. The intell agencies, known as The Deep State, have worked to unseat this President, and hinted at, leaked, made up all sorts of propaganda to harm this administration.

In fact, months after the leaked and faked 'dossier' had been found non-credible, Comey was still pushing it to the media.

The only real crime in the entire farrago is the 'leaking.'



5. The hermeneutical key to the who Putin supported:
The dossier itself is now believed to have been produced by Soviet 'disinformation' agents....and this in itself reveals who the Kremlin wanted as President.



6. Here's the Russians' motive:
Hillary Clinton has a history of accepting bribes, and selling out the United States (the uranium deal) for the benefit of the Clinton Crime Family. Of course Putin would rather see her as President.




7. Two Leftwing journalists authored the book, "Shattered," in which they show that the Hillary war room came up with the 'Trump/Putin Collusion" thesis.

8. Misdirection, i.e., lying, is the hallmark of the Democrats. Accepting lies is the obligation of Democrat voters (see #3 above).




9. Oh....and BTW....subsequently, we have also learned that the DNC is in charge of both the DoJ and the FBI: they refused...refused... requests that the DNC's servers be investigated. Imagine, if you refused the FBI.

10. This summary from the Leftwing Slate:
".... if the evidence that they’ve used to level major accusations at a foreign government comes not from agencies of the U.S. government or direct law enforcement investigations, but rather from private sector firms like CrowdStrike, then the “high confidence” of the government counts for very little. "
The FBI Relied on a Private Firm’s Investigation of the DNC Hack—Which Makes the Agency Harder to Trust  


QED....cutting through all of the lies.....Hillary was the Kremlin's choice for President.
 
17. The dossier is central to the question of which candidate the Russians wished to see as President.


This was the vaunted dossier, designed to take down the Trump candidacy:

"The report gives a fly-on-the-wall account of just about every conceivable event associated with Donald Trump’s Russian connections. It claims to know more than is knowable as it recounts sordid tales of prostitutes, “golden showers,” bribes, squabbles in Putin’s inner circle, and who controls the dossiers of kompromat (compromising information).

As someone who has worked for more than a decade with the microfilm collection of Soviet documents in the Hoover Institution Archives, I can say that the dossier itself was compiled by a Russian, whose command of English is far from perfect and who follows the KGB (now FSB) practice of writing intelligence reports, in particular the practice of capitalizing all names for easy reference. The report includes Putin’s inner circle – Peskov, Ivanov, Sechin, Lavrov. The anonymous author claims to have “trusted compatriots” who knew the roles that each Kremlin insider, including Putin himself, played in the Trump election saga and were prepared to tell him."
The Trump Dossier Is Fake -- And Here Are The Reasons Why




The above analysis was written by an expert:
Paul Roderick Gregory I am a research fellow at the Hoover Institution, at Stanford, and energy fellow and Cullen Professor of Economics at the University of Houston. I am also a research professor at the German Institute for Economic Research Berlin. My specialties are Russia and Comparative Economics, and I am adding China to my portfolio. I have written more than 20 books on economics, Russia and comparative economics. I blog at paulgregorysblog.blogspot.com.


Said dossier, 'written by a Russian,' turned over to a Socialist Christopher Steele, formerly of M.I.6., sent to an organization working for Hillary, ORBIS BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE, LTD.,aimed at destroying Trump.

The clear conclusion is that the candidate Putin wanted for President was none other than the career criminal, and easily bribed, 'Crooked Hillary.'
 
Two weeks ago, I began this thread....one which ran counter to every news source and attacked the Liberal propaganda that the Kremlin wanted Trump to win.


I stated that it was disinformation by both the Russians, and by the losing Democrats.

The central issue, as I see it, is
1. who was the more malleable....bribable...candidate: clearly Hillary
and
2. what is the only actual evidence of Russia involving itself in the campaign
(there is no actual internet evidence)

The dossier that supposedly linked Trump with unspeakable acts is the key.


And...as I said....Russia put the dossier together.


Now....this:


"Sketchy firm behind Trump dossier is stalling investigators
A secretive Washington firm that commissioned the dubious intelligence dossier on Donald Trump is stonewalling congressional investigators trying to learn more about its connections to the Democratic Party.

....Fusion GPS, after it refused to answer questions and provide records to the panel identifying who financed the error-ridden dossier, which was circulated during the election and has sparked much of the Russia scandal.....

....it’s actually an opposition-research group for Democrats, and the founders, who are more political activists than journalists, have a pro-Hillary, anti-Trump agenda."
http://nypost.com/2017/06/24/inside-the-shadowy-intelligence-firm-behind-the-trump-dossier/



 
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.





1200px-Donald_Trump_alt-right_supporter_%2832452974604%29.jpg



1. Who is the 'enemy'?

2. If it is Russia, then Hillary should be in prison:

There is zero evidence that of any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.

There are scads of evidence of collusion between the media and the DNC, and there is this:
The only folks with a close relationship with the Russians are Democrats.
The names Clinton and Podesta come to mind.

"52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe"
52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe - Rasmussen Reports™


Here's why:
You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
The first Republican President


And this:
"Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html


And

"Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin"
Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin » Liberty Alliance

And

"EXCLUSIVE: Dem Super-Lobbyist Podesta Got $170K to End US Sanctions On Russian Bank"
EXCLUSIVE: Dem Super-Lobbyist Podesta Got $170K to End US Sanctions On Russian Bank




Of course Putin wanted his business partner, Hillary, as President.


Put your foot in your mouth again, huh?




And this just came out....


"Claire McCaskill Used Undisclosed Foundation to Pay for Dinner at Russian Ambassador’s House
Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill (Mo.) used a personal foundation to pay for a dinner she attended at Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak's Washington, D.C., residence. The senator had failed to disclose her role in the foundation until earlier this month.

McCaskill came under fire this March after she told the Washington Post she never had a "call or meeting" with Kislyak even though she had publicly announced both a call and meeting with him. This week, CNN reportedthat McCaskill also attended a black-tie reception at Kislyak's D.C. residence in November 2015.

McCaskill's attendance at the dinner was accompanied by an $873 payment to the American-Russian Cultural Cooperation Foundation, where Kislyak serves on its board of directors as honorary chairman."
Claire McCaskill Used Undisclosed Foundation to Pay for Dinner at Russian Ambassador's House
 
The only real evidence of who the Russians wanted for President was the dossier that they created to sink Donald Trump.

And guess who sent agents to the UK to pick it up?


"Revealed: 'Ordinary 'citizen' John McCain dispatched a trusted aide across the Atlantic to get dirty dossier from ex-spy after former British diplomat told him about blackmail tapes

The Kremlin made it up to sink Trump, and catapult Bill's wife into the presidency....funneled it through socialist Christopher Steele, to a company the DNC hired.
 
"According to a new court document in the British lawsuit, counsel for defendants Steele and Orbis repeatedly point to McCain, R-Ariz., a vocal Trump critic, and a former State Department official as two in a handful of people known to have had copies of the full document before it circulated among journalists and was published by BuzzFeed."
John McCain faces questions in Trump-Russia dossier case


The dossier is the only real evidence, and it was designed to end the Trump campaign.
1. Russian sources 'gave' the material to socialist Christopher Steele
2. Orbis and Fusion, hired by Hillary, tried to get it published
3. Comey was pushing it long after it was debunked
4. Trump enemy McCain brought it to the US from the UK
5.Easily bribed, live-long bagwoman, Hillary Clinton, was the candidate for the Kremlin.
 
"Democrats intentionally used disinformation from Russia to attack Trump, campaign aides
While the liberal news media hunts for evidence of Trump-Russia collusion, the public record shows that Democrats have willfully used Moscow disinformation to influence the presidential election against Donald Trump and attack his administration.

The disinformation came in the form of a Russian-fed dossier written by former British intelligenceagent Christopher Steele. It contains a series of unverified criminal charges against Mr. Trump’s campaign aides, such as coordinating Moscow’s hacking of Democratic Party computers.

Some Democrats have widely circulated the discredited information. Mr. Steele was paid by the Democrat-funded opposition research firm Fusion GPS with money from a Hillary Clinton backer. Fusion GPS distributed the dossier among Democrats and journalists. The information fell into the hands of the FBI, which used it in part to investigate Mr. Trump’s campaign aides."


Mr. Steele makes clear that his unproven charges came almost exclusively from sources linked to the Kremlin and Russian President Vladimir Putin."

Democrats spread false Russian information on Trump, campaign aides



Obviously, the Russians wanted the candidate that they have easily bribed in the past: Bill's wife, the career criminal.
 
"Podesta Group retroactively files more DOJ disclosures for pro-Putin work

...the powerful Washington lobbying firm run by Clinton ally Tony Podesta filed a document admitting its work for the pro-Russia European Centre for a Modern Ukraine may have principally benefited a foreign government. New disclosures revealed dozens of previously unreported interactions the firm made with influential government offices, including Hillary Clinton's State Department and the office of former Vice President Joe Biden, while lobbying on behalf of the center. Embattled ex-Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort failed to disclose his extensive lobbying efforts on behalf of the center at the time as well."
How do you say 'whoops' in Russian? Podesta Group retroactively files more DOJ disclosures for pro-Putin work
 
A one party government: the Clinton campaign and the FBI worked together to sink Trump.


"FBI Plan to Pay Ex-Spy for Trump Intel during Campaign Sparks Questions of Obama Admin’s Use of Federal Authorities for Political Gain"

Author of unsubstantiated dossier was also researching Trump for Clinton campaign associates when FBI sought to hire him

WASHINGTON – Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley today is seeking details on the FBI’s reported plans to hire former British spy Christopher Steele to investigate Donald Trump during the presidential campaign, even though the FBI was aware that he was being paid by Democrat political operatives to conduct opposition research on Trump. Steele is the author of the controversial dossier that includes unsubstantiated claims alleging ties between the Trump campaign and the Russian government.


“The idea that the FBI and associates of the Clinton campaign would pay Mr. Steele to investigate the Republican nominee for President in the run-up to the election raises further questions about the FBI’s independence from politics, as well as the Obama administration’s use of law enforcement and intelligence agencies for political ends. It is additionally troubling that the FBI reportedly agreed to such an arrangement given that, in January of 2017, then-Director Clapper issued a statement stating that ‘the IC has not made any judgment that the information in this document is reliable, and we did not rely upon it in any way for our conclusions,’” Grassley said in the letter."
FBI Plan to Pay Ex-Spy for Trump Intel during Campaign Sparks Questions of Obama Admin’s Use of Federal Authorities for Political Gain | Chuck Grassley




Soooo
a. Russia put together an anti-Trump farrago
b. The slipped it to British socialist former spy
c. The Clinton cartel paid part of the costs of the anti-Trump fabrications
and
d. Comey's FBI kicked in part of the payment for the anti-Trump fabrications
 
The logo of the Right is Miss Liberty....

View attachment 132255

....will the logo of the Left is 'Misdirection'
images



To know what the Left is doing, note what they blame the other side for.




1. The history of the Left, the Democrats/Liberals is the history of the Soviet Communists. The modern Democrat Party stands for the same things that the CPUSA (Communist Party, USA) did post war.
Why would anyone be shocked that Putin backed Bill's wife, not Donald Trump???



2. While screeching about some imaginary links between Trump and Putin, who was it who saw to it that the Soviets gained control of huge stocks of uranium and cash flowed to the Clinton Foundation
"Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html





3. Why would Putin want an immensely wealthy businessman, over a money-grubbing life-long criminal with a history of accepting bribes?????
Like this:
Cattlegate...."... computerized records of her trades, which the White House obtained from the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, show for the first time how she was able to turn her initial investment into $6,300 overnight. In about 10 months of trading, she made nearly $100,000, relying heavily on advice from her friend James B. Blair, an experienced futures trader.

The new records also raise the possibility that some of her profits -- as much as $40,000 – came from larger trades ordered by someone else and then shifted to her account,...." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpsrv/politics/special/whitewater/stories/wwtr940527.htm

a. "....guided through the risky trades by James Blair, a friend and top lawyer for one of Arkansas' most powerful companies, Tyson Foods Inc."
Business | Hillary Clinton Invested $1,000, Netted $100,000 Through Trading | Seattle Times Newspaper

b. "....Tyson was everything she'd been taught to despise at Wellesley and Yale, a greedy capitalist who hated labor unions and had no compunction about polluting Mother Earth for financial gain. Yet she allowed Blair, Big Daddy's right-hand man, to manage her financial affairs. Second, assuming the speculation in Marshalls Magazine is correct, she was the conduit for a bribe."
Democrook: Hillary Clinton

c. "....Hillary received $100,000 in bribes in return for putting $1,000 into the cattle futures market. The odds that Hillary did that honestly have been computed at 1 in 31 trillion. That was small potatoes compared to the deals Bill and Hillary appear to have cut with foreign governments. Enormous sums went directly into Bill’s pockets for doing speeches or to the scammy Clinton Foundation and next thing you know, the State Department was doing favors for those shady deep pocketed donors. Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton's State Department





Coming up: the proof that Russia aimed to sink Trump.....not the career-criminal, Hillary.
it's the rosenbergs all over again.

images

Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, a married couple convicted of conspiracy to commit espionage in 1951, are put to death in the electric chair. The execution marked the dramatic finale of the most controversial espionage case of the Cold War.
 
I told ya' so!

The thesis here is that our enemies always wanted Bill's wife as President...not Trump.
After all, they have a history of being able to bribe Hillary and other high Democrats.

Further.....the Kremlin worked to produce the spurious dossier that made up all sorts of allegations designed to sink the Trump candidacy....


Now this:
"The chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee is questioning the FBI about what he says would be an “alarming” development regarding the infamous Trump dossier.

In a letter sent last week, Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley, the Republican chairman of the Judiciary Committee, asked FBI Director Christopher Wray about the possibility that the dossier’s allegations about collusion between Trump associates and the Russian government were “surreptitiously funneled” from foreign intelligence agencies to U.S. intelligence agencies.


.... the foreign reporting was actually based on the work of [Democrat funded] Mr. Steele and [Democrat funded] Fusion GPS.”

The bureau reportedly cited the dossier in an application for a surveillance warrant last September on former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. FBI agents also reportedly offered Steele $50,000 ...."
Senate Committee Raises New Questions About The Trump Dossier


The real collusion:
The Democrats, the Deep State, and the FBI itself.....and the Kremlin.
 

Forum List

Back
Top