Time To Reveal Who Putin Wanted As President

The logo of the Right is Miss Liberty....

View attachment 132255

....will the logo of the Left is 'Misdirection'
images



To know what the Left is doing, note what they blame the other side for.




1. The history of the Left, the Democrats/Liberals is the history of the Soviet Communists. The modern Democrat Party stands for the same things that the CPUSA (Communist Party, USA) did post war.
Why would anyone be shocked that Putin backed Bill's wife, not Donald Trump???



2. While screeching about some imaginary links between Trump and Putin, who was it who saw to it that the Soviets gained control of huge stocks of uranium and cash flowed to the Clinton Foundation
"Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html





3. Why would Putin want an immensely wealthy businessman, over a money-grubbing life-long criminal with a history of accepting bribes?????
Like this:
Cattlegate...."... computerized records of her trades, which the White House obtained from the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, show for the first time how she was able to turn her initial investment into $6,300 overnight. In about 10 months of trading, she made nearly $100,000, relying heavily on advice from her friend James B. Blair, an experienced futures trader.

The new records also raise the possibility that some of her profits -- as much as $40,000 – came from larger trades ordered by someone else and then shifted to her account,...." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpsrv/politics/special/whitewater/stories/wwtr940527.htm

a. "....guided through the risky trades by James Blair, a friend and top lawyer for one of Arkansas' most powerful companies, Tyson Foods Inc."
Business | Hillary Clinton Invested $1,000, Netted $100,000 Through Trading | Seattle Times Newspaper

b. "....Tyson was everything she'd been taught to despise at Wellesley and Yale, a greedy capitalist who hated labor unions and had no compunction about polluting Mother Earth for financial gain. Yet she allowed Blair, Big Daddy's right-hand man, to manage her financial affairs. Second, assuming the speculation in Marshalls Magazine is correct, she was the conduit for a bribe."
Democrook: Hillary Clinton

c. "....Hillary received $100,000 in bribes in return for putting $1,000 into the cattle futures market. The odds that Hillary did that honestly have been computed at 1 in 31 trillion. That was small potatoes compared to the deals Bill and Hillary appear to have cut with foreign governments. Enormous sums went directly into Bill’s pockets for doing speeches or to the scammy Clinton Foundation and next thing you know, the State Department was doing favors for those shady deep pocketed donors. Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton's State Department





Coming up: the proof that Russia aimed to sink Trump.....not the career-criminal, Hillary.
Why do you guys keep bringing up a deal Clinton had nothing to do with. It's crazy insisting the State Department would step on the toes of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Oh, cuz you guys are so desperate, you push an obvious lie. Trump is a terrible president. And Republicans are going to pay a political price for standing behind a man with mental problems.



Did you actually post that Cattlegate had nothing to do with Hillary Clinton?????

Cattlegate...."... computerized records of her trades, which the White House obtained from the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, show for the first time how she [Hillary Clinton] was able to turn her initial investment into $6,300 overnight. In about 10 months of trading, she made nearly $100,000, relying heavily on advice from her friend James B. Blair, an experienced futures trader.

The new records also raise the possibility that some of her profits -- as much as $40,000 – came from larger trades ordered by someone else and then shifted to her account,...."http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpsrv/politics/special/whitewater/stories/wwtr940527.htm

a. "....guided through the risky trades by James Blair, a friend and top lawyer for one of Arkansas' most powerful companies, Tyson Foods Inc."
Business | Hillary Clinton Invested $1,000, Netted $100,000 Through Trading | Seattle Times Newspaper

b. "....Tyson was everything she'd been taught to despise at Wellesley and Yale, a greedy capitalist who hated labor unions and had no compunction about polluting Mother Earth for financial gain. Yet she allowed Blair, Big Daddy's right-hand man, to manage her financial affairs. Second, assuming the speculation in Marshalls Magazine is correct, she was the conduit for a bribe."
Democrook: Hillary Clinton

c. "....Hillary received $100,000 in bribes in return for putting $1,000 into the cattle futures market. The odds that Hillary did that honestly have been computed at 1 in 31 trillion. That was small potatoes compared to the deals Bill and Hillary appear to have cut with foreign governments. Enormous sums went directly into Bill’s pockets for doing speeches or to the scammy Clinton Foundation and next thing you know, the State Department was doing favors for those shady deep pocketed donors. Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton's State Department




What kind of imbecile are you?????
 
We do know who Putin wanted...not Hillary.

Yet Hillary and her team are his biggest business partners.

{
Bill and Hillary Clinton received large sums of money directly and indirectly from Russian officials while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State. Bill Clinton was paid a cool $500,000 (well above his normal fee) for a speech in Moscow in 2010. Who footed the bill? An investment firm in Moscow called Renaissance Capital, which boasts deep ties to Russian intelligence. The Clinton Foundation itself took money from Russian officials and Putin-connected oligarchs. They also took donations from:

  • Viktor Vekselberg, a Putin confidant who gave through his company, Renova Group
  • Andrey Vavilov, a former Russian government official who was Chairman of SuperOx, a research company that was part of the “nuclear Cluster” at the Russian government’s Skolkovo research facility
  • Elena Baturina, the wife of the former Mayor of Moscow, who apparently gave them money through JSC Inteco, an entity that she controls
Then there is the glaring fact that the Clinton Foundation also scored $145 million in donations from nine shareholders in a Canadian uranium company called Uranium One that was sold to the Russian government in 2010. The deal required the approval of several federal government agencies, including Hillary Clinton’s State Department. The deal allowed Rosatom, the Russian State Nuclear Agency, to buy assets that amounted to 20 percent of American uranium. Rosatom, by the way controls the Russian nuclear arsenal.

Equally troubling: some of those donations were hidden and not disclosed by the Clintons. President Obama required the Clinton Foundation to disclose all contributions as a condition of Hillary Clinton becoming Secretary of State. But that did not happen. The only reason the hidden donations ever came to light is because we uncovered them by combing through Canadian tax records.}

Peter Schweizer: Trump vs. Clintons' Russia ties (guess who always got a free pass)
 
Maybe the Hillary-boot licker had this in mind:

While screeching about some imaginary links between Trump and Putin, who was it who saw to it that the Soviets gained control of huge stocks of uranium and cash flowed to the Clinton Foundation
"Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html



And that from the NYTimes.
 
Putin hates Hillary as much as most here do.

Why did he give her a $173 million bribe, then?

{
Russian President Vladimir Putin looks on as he delivers a statement on his departure at Tegel airport in Berlin on October 20, 2016.President Vladimir Putin came in for a grilling over Russia's role in Ukraine and Syria at talks in Berlin, on his first visit to the German capital since the Ukrainian conflict erupted. / AFP / Odd ANDERSEN (Photo credit should read ODD ANDERSEN/AFP/Getty Images)

Russia’s two foreign propaganda arms RT (Russia Today) and Sputnik have put the finishing touches on the Kremlin’s interpretation of the US November 8 election. Their narrative rests on five interrelated points:

1) The 2016 election reveals deep flaws in the democracy that the US holds up as an example to the rest of the world. The numerous email leaks reveal that US elections are decided by insiders who are doing the bidding of Soros, Goldman Sachs, and the Saudis of this world. Exhibit No.1 is the “rigging of the election” against the “peoples’” candidate, Bernie Sanders, by the Democratic establishment.

2) The Clinton campaign diverted attention from its insider system by blaming Russia for the leaks that disclosed its crookedness. Caught red handed, the Clinton team was left with nothing but a “blame Putin” strategy. As the Washington Post put it, the Democrats “put Putin on the ballot.” Indeed, RT’s analysis shows that “Russia” easily surpassed every other subject by a wide margin in the debates (more than six times the email scandals) with Islamic State a distant second.

3) A Clinton victory would bring to power a criminal gang that would make Tony Soprano proud. The Clinton “clan’s” lies, brutality, and unlimited power make the Kremlin kleptocracy pale by comparison. The Clinton Foundation uses donations from foreign, corporate, and private entities in its pay-to-play operation to influence foreign policy, distribute political favors, and enrich the Clinton family with goodies, such as one-million-dollar birthday presents or paying for Chelsea’s wedding.}

Hillary Clinton's Corrupt Dealings Have Given Putin A Massive Propaganda Victory
 
cuckoobird op makes up his own version of reality... AGAIN

alternate reality much like alternate facts are FALSE as a result of DELUSIONS

alternativefacts-alternative-kale-15100159.png


the FBI and intelligence agencies concluded that Putin wanted Trump to win

FBI head confirms Russia election probe, says Moscow backed Trump



Can you really be this stupid??

Seems you can be.

No intelligence agency has claimed to have any such evidence.

Not a one.





Time to put you in your place.....again:

Let's review the incontrovertible facts.

a. Contrary to that 'common knowledge,' the desire of the Kremlin was to have Hillary Clinton as President, not Donald Trump.

b. No intell agency has ever claimed to have evidence that Russia either 'hacked' the election, or took control of the Podesta or DNC servers.

c. From the start, the attack was on Trump, via a disgusting 'Dossier,' which is now known not only to be non-credible, but recent evidence suggests that Russia was it's provenance.
Anti-Trump from the Kremlin's Ministry of Disinformation.


d. Two Leftist journalists...which may be a redundancy....authored a book, "Shattered," which revealed that the Clinton war room came up with the plan to claim Trump-Putin Collusion, the scam which, by now, only the very dumbest still accept.




Unless you care to try to disprove any of the above, QED....it is Bill's wife that the Russians wanted in the Oval Office.



And you fell for the fable like this...





Sooooo....you really don't mind being recognized as being this stupid?
 
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.





1200px-Donald_Trump_alt-right_supporter_%2832452974604%29.jpg

 
....will the logo of the Left is 'Misdirection'
images

huh??




the LOGO of the new ALT RIGHT is TREASON to your country! :eusa_clap:




"no other word for it'

FBI have uncovered 'evidence of treason' among alt-right websites, says George W Bush ethics lawyer


1. There is no such thing as the 'Alt Right.'

2. Treason is the only crime described in the Constitution.
You have inadvertently revealed that you don't understand what that is.

3. But.....there are so very many thing you don't understand....what's one more.
 
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.





1200px-Donald_Trump_alt-right_supporter_%2832452974604%29.jpg



1. Who is the 'enemy'?

2. If it is Russia, then Hillary should be in prison:

There is zero evidence that of any collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians.

There are scads of evidence of collusion between the media and the DNC, and there is this:
The only folks with a close relationship with the Russians are Democrats.
The names Clinton and Podesta come to mind.

"52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe"
52% Say Clintons Should Be Part of Russia Probe - Rasmussen Reports™


Here's why:
You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.
The first Republican President


And this:
"Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

...the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

....major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.

Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons,...."
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html


And

"Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin"
Both Hillary Clinton And John Podesta Made Millions From Russia & Putin » Liberty Alliance

And

"EXCLUSIVE: Dem Super-Lobbyist Podesta Got $170K to End US Sanctions On Russian Bank"
EXCLUSIVE: Dem Super-Lobbyist Podesta Got $170K to End US Sanctions On Russian Bank



Of course Putin wanted his business partner, Hillary, as President.


Put your foot in your mouth again, huh?
 
Treason is the only crime described in the Constitution.
You have inadvertently revealed that you don't understand what that is.


oh i understand, it's the new LOGO of the ALT RIGHT :eusa_clap:



There is no 'Alt Right,' nor any Far Right in this nation.


There is a Far Left.....and lots of dunces who follow their orders.
Raise you paw.
 
Putin hated Obama's sanctions; HRC supported Obama's sanctions;
Ergo,

HRC was an experienced public servant who intended to keep the heat on Putin.

What an absurd hack you are.

{


1. Hillary Clinton approved the transfer of 20 percent of U.S. uranium to Russia and nine investors in the deal funneled $145 million to the Clinton Foundation.

While Hillary Clinton’s State Department was one of eight agencies to review and sign off on the transfer of 20 percent of U.S. uranium to Russia — then-Secretary of State Clinton herself was the only agency head whose family foundation received $145 million in donations from multiple people connected to the uranium deal, as reported by the New York Times.

2. Bill Clinton bagged $500,000 for a Moscow speech paid for by a Kremlin-backed bank while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State.

Former President Bill Clinton delivered a speech in Moscow and received a $500,000 speaking fee from a Russian government-connected bank, while his wife’s State Department was getting ready to sign off on the transfer of 20 percent of U.S. uranium to Russia.

“And, in one case, a Russian investment bank connected to the deals paid money to Bill Clinton personally, through a half-million-dollar speaker’s fee,” reported the New Yorker.

3. Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman’s Joule energy company bagged $35 million from Putin’s Rusnano.

Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta sat on the executive board of an energy company, Joule Unlimited, which received millions from a Putin-connected Russian government fund. Podesta also owned “75,000 common shares” in Joule Unlimited, which he had transferred to a holding company called Leonidio LLC.

Podesta also failed to fully disclose his position on Joule Unlimited’s board of directors and include it in his federal financial disclosures, as required by law, before he became President Obama’s senior adviser in January 2014.

4. Clinton Foundation chatter with State Dept. on Uranium Deal with Russia.

Senior staffers inside Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign were warned by Clinton Foundation senior vice president Maura Pally that the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA), was asking the Department of Justice to investigate the State Department approval of the sale of American uranium assets to a Russian company.

The chain of emails proved the regular interaction between members of the Clinton campaign and senior staff at the Clinton Foundation.

5. Hillary Clinton hid $2.35 million in secret donations from Ian Telfer, the head of Russia’s uranium company.

Ian Telfer, the head of the Russian government’s uranium company, Uranium One, made four foreign donations totaling $2.35 million to the Clinton Foundation, as the New York Times reported.

“Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million,” the Times reported. “Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.”}
Five Clinton-Russia Bombshells Progressives Yawned Over
 

Forum List

Back
Top