Tim Scott: Moore Election a Test of Character

Polling Data
Poll Date Sample MoE Jones (D) Moore (R) Spread
RCP Average 11/9 - 11/20 -- -- 46.8 46.0 Jones +0.8
WBRC-TV/Strategy Research 11/20 - 11/20 3000 LV 2.0 45 47 Moore +2
Gravis 11/14 - 11/15 628 LV 3.5 47 42 Jones +5
FOX News 11/13 - 11/15 649 LV 3.5 50 42 Jones +8
Emerson 11/9 - 11/11 600 LV 3.9 45 55 Moore +10
JMC Analytics* 11/9 - 11/11 575 LV 4.1 48 44 Jones +4
Opinion Savvy 11/9 - 11/9 515 LV 4.3 46 46 Tie
All Alabama Senate Special Election - Moore vs. Jones Polling Data
RealClearPolitics - Election 2017 - Alabama Senate Special Election - Moore vs. Jones

Still a horse race.
Liberals always got polls! Polls from the same sites And companies. Just how reliable are they Ms Clinton?
Quite reliable. Clinton won the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes. The treasonous fat senile old orange clown won the EC with the help of the Russians. Now we need to find out what was the quid pro for that.
Without crazy Cali she would not have won the popular vote, if you took both Hildabeast’s and trumps Cali votes away Trump would’ve won the rest of the country in the popular vote.

Without the crazy ex-Confederacy Trump would have lost the election every whichway.
This map is very telling
election-2016-county-map.png
 
Polling Data
Poll Date Sample MoE Jones (D) Moore (R) Spread
RCP Average 11/9 - 11/20 -- -- 46.8 46.0 Jones +0.8
WBRC-TV/Strategy Research 11/20 - 11/20 3000 LV 2.0 45 47 Moore +2
Gravis 11/14 - 11/15 628 LV 3.5 47 42 Jones +5
FOX News 11/13 - 11/15 649 LV 3.5 50 42 Jones +8
Emerson 11/9 - 11/11 600 LV 3.9 45 55 Moore +10
JMC Analytics* 11/9 - 11/11 575 LV 4.1 48 44 Jones +4
Opinion Savvy 11/9 - 11/9 515 LV 4.3 46 46 Tie
All Alabama Senate Special Election - Moore vs. Jones Polling Data
RealClearPolitics - Election 2017 - Alabama Senate Special Election - Moore vs. Jones

Still a horse race.
Liberals always got polls! Polls from the same sites And companies. Just how reliable are they Ms Clinton?

Actually the pollsters got the popular vote correct. They had Clinton winning the popular vote which is what she did. Also the one who gets the most votes wins. There is no electoral college. Take your ignorant ass and shut up.
election-2016-county-map.png

A pure popular vote is nothing more than mob rule… Shit for brains
 
“It is pretty clear to me that the best thing that Roy Moore can do for the country is to move on,” Scott told “This Week” co-anchor Martha Raddatz in an exclusive interview Sunday.

“It is time for us to turn the page because it is not about partisan politics,” Scott said. “It is not about electing Republicans versus Democrats. This is about the character of our country. I want to be on the side of right when history writes the story.”

I could not have said it better. Tim Scott is a hero for speaking out. This is a test of character. Roy Moore is a selfish man for putting the people of Alabama through this. Anyone else would have a 20 point lead right now. Mitt Romney was hardly a southern conservative and he got 61% in Alabama. Are Republicans so desperate for power that they will support a pervert? It is time to do the right thing. If Moore is the winner then the Republicans should expel him immediately.

GOP Senator Tim Scott Has Some HARSH Words for Roy Moore

Indeed, do we want to live in a country where people are convicted without evidence like in the 3rd world, or a country that values evidence over baseless accusations by political opponents.

To me the answer is clear, but of course, if you like rats for dinner you may have different opinions.
Without evidence? That's some bad beam you've got in your eye there.
 
You wanted to live in a countey where Hillary Clinton was convicted w/o evidence, calling her a crook and demanding she be locked up. But when it is a Repubican who is accused, you start demanding evidence. You show yourself to have a very low character. You bleat one standard for Republicans and scream another for Democrats.

There was no shortage of evidence demonstrating Hillary's guilt.
There was no shortage of rumor, rightwing speculation, gossip, hearsay, scandal mongering, and out right lies. If there had been any credible evidence, she would have been indicted. She never was because it ws all BS.
You can’t get any more corrupt than the Clintons… fact

Trump paid a 25 million dollar settlement for the corruption involved with Trump University. When have the Clintons done anything greater than that?
The Clintons sold nuclear secrets, and are into sex trafficking for starters…

Oh really? Where are those convictions recorded?

Nice to see you give Trump a pass on being effectively a convicted con artist, but you need unproven allegations to rant against the Clintons.

Partisan hackery at its worst.
 
Polling Data
Poll Date Sample MoE Jones (D) Moore (R) Spread
RCP Average 11/9 - 11/20 -- -- 46.8 46.0 Jones +0.8
WBRC-TV/Strategy Research 11/20 - 11/20 3000 LV 2.0 45 47 Moore +2
Gravis 11/14 - 11/15 628 LV 3.5 47 42 Jones +5
FOX News 11/13 - 11/15 649 LV 3.5 50 42 Jones +8
Emerson 11/9 - 11/11 600 LV 3.9 45 55 Moore +10
JMC Analytics* 11/9 - 11/11 575 LV 4.1 48 44 Jones +4
Opinion Savvy 11/9 - 11/9 515 LV 4.3 46 46 Tie
All Alabama Senate Special Election - Moore vs. Jones Polling Data
RealClearPolitics - Election 2017 - Alabama Senate Special Election - Moore vs. Jones

Still a horse race.
Liberals always got polls! Polls from the same sites And companies. Just how reliable are they Ms Clinton?
Quite reliable. Clinton won the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes. The treasonous fat senile old orange clown won the EC with the help of the Russians. Now we need to find out what was the quid pro for that.
Without crazy Cali she would not have won the popular vote, if you took both Hildabeast’s and trumps Cali votes away Trump would’ve won the rest of the country in the popular vote.

Without the crazy ex-Confederacy Trump would have lost the election every whichway.
This map is very telling
election-2016-county-map.png
Tells me the art of gerrymandering really works!
 
There was no shortage of evidence demonstrating Hillary's guilt.
There was no shortage of rumor, rightwing speculation, gossip, hearsay, scandal mongering, and out right lies. If there had been any credible evidence, she would have been indicted. She never was because it ws all BS.
You can’t get any more corrupt than the Clintons… fact

Trump paid a 25 million dollar settlement for the corruption involved with Trump University. When have the Clintons done anything greater than that?
The Clintons sold nuclear secrets, and are into sex trafficking for starters…

Oh really? Where are those convictions recorded?

Nice to see you give Trump a pass on being effectively a convicted con artist, but you need unproven allegations to rant against the Clintons.

Partisan hackery at its worst.
The Clintons are above the law… No two ways about it
 
Polling Data
Poll Date Sample MoE Jones (D) Moore (R) Spread
RCP Average 11/9 - 11/20 -- -- 46.8 46.0 Jones +0.8
WBRC-TV/Strategy Research 11/20 - 11/20 3000 LV 2.0 45 47 Moore +2
Gravis 11/14 - 11/15 628 LV 3.5 47 42 Jones +5
FOX News 11/13 - 11/15 649 LV 3.5 50 42 Jones +8
Emerson 11/9 - 11/11 600 LV 3.9 45 55 Moore +10
JMC Analytics* 11/9 - 11/11 575 LV 4.1 48 44 Jones +4
Opinion Savvy 11/9 - 11/9 515 LV 4.3 46 46 Tie
All Alabama Senate Special Election - Moore vs. Jones Polling Data
RealClearPolitics - Election 2017 - Alabama Senate Special Election - Moore vs. Jones

Still a horse race.
Liberals always got polls! Polls from the same sites And companies. Just how reliable are they Ms Clinton?

Actually the pollsters got the popular vote correct. They had Clinton winning the popular vote which is what she did. Also the one who gets the most votes wins. There is no electoral college. Take your ignorant ass and shut up.
election-2016-county-map.png

A pure popular vote is nothing more than mob rule… Shit for brains

1. that map doesn't represent the popular vote

2. You're saying that every other election in the US besides the presidential election is MOB RULE?


Goddam that's funny.
 
Liberals always got polls! Polls from the same sites And companies. Just how reliable are they Ms Clinton?
Quite reliable. Clinton won the popular vote by nearly 3 million votes. The treasonous fat senile old orange clown won the EC with the help of the Russians. Now we need to find out what was the quid pro for that.
Without crazy Cali she would not have won the popular vote, if you took both Hildabeast’s and trumps Cali votes away Trump would’ve won the rest of the country in the popular vote.

Without the crazy ex-Confederacy Trump would have lost the election every whichway.
This map is very telling
election-2016-county-map.png
Tells me the art of gerrymandering really works!
Elections have consequences, I think A half black president said that once… LOL
 
There was no shortage of rumor, rightwing speculation, gossip, hearsay, scandal mongering, and out right lies. If there had been any credible evidence, she would have been indicted. She never was because it ws all BS.
You can’t get any more corrupt than the Clintons… fact

Trump paid a 25 million dollar settlement for the corruption involved with Trump University. When have the Clintons done anything greater than that?
The Clintons sold nuclear secrets, and are into sex trafficking for starters…

Oh really? Where are those convictions recorded?

Nice to see you give Trump a pass on being effectively a convicted con artist, but you need unproven allegations to rant against the Clintons.

Partisan hackery at its worst.
The Clintons are above the law… No two ways about it

Waaaa....you know, it's Cyber Monday, not Crybaby Monday. lol
 
“It is pretty clear to me that the best thing that Roy Moore can do for the country is to move on,” Scott told “This Week” co-anchor Martha Raddatz in an exclusive interview Sunday.

“It is time for us to turn the page because it is not about partisan politics,” Scott said. “It is not about electing Republicans versus Democrats. This is about the character of our country. I want to be on the side of right when history writes the story.”

I could not have said it better. Tim Scott is a hero for speaking out. This is a test of character. Roy Moore is a selfish man for putting the people of Alabama through this. Anyone else would have a 20 point lead right now. Mitt Romney was hardly a southern conservative and he got 61% in Alabama. Are Republicans so desperate for power that they will support a pervert? It is time to do the right thing. If Moore is the winner then the Republicans should expel him immediately.

GOP Senator Tim Scott Has Some HARSH Words for Roy Moore

Indeed, do we want to live in a country where people are convicted without evidence like in the 3rd world, or a country that values evidence over baseless accusations by political opponents.

To me the answer is clear, but of course, if you like rats for dinner you may have different opinions.

This is a Senate race not a court of law. Character is important. Just because you have no character. You are a corrupt bastard.
Says a clinton supporter.... lol
Oh, okay. So you believe they have made a settlement like that. Where is your evidence? Supply a reliable, valid source of information. Your liking to believe something is true doesn't make it true. Only if you're five or under.
 
Polling Data
Poll Date Sample MoE Jones (D) Moore (R) Spread
RCP Average 11/9 - 11/20 -- -- 46.8 46.0 Jones +0.8
WBRC-TV/Strategy Research 11/20 - 11/20 3000 LV 2.0 45 47 Moore +2
Gravis 11/14 - 11/15 628 LV 3.5 47 42 Jones +5
FOX News 11/13 - 11/15 649 LV 3.5 50 42 Jones +8
Emerson 11/9 - 11/11 600 LV 3.9 45 55 Moore +10
JMC Analytics* 11/9 - 11/11 575 LV 4.1 48 44 Jones +4
Opinion Savvy 11/9 - 11/9 515 LV 4.3 46 46 Tie
All Alabama Senate Special Election - Moore vs. Jones Polling Data
RealClearPolitics - Election 2017 - Alabama Senate Special Election - Moore vs. Jones

Still a horse race.
Liberals always got polls! Polls from the same sites And companies. Just how reliable are they Ms Clinton?

Actually the pollsters got the popular vote correct. They had Clinton winning the popular vote which is what she did. Also the one who gets the most votes wins. There is no electoral college. Take your ignorant ass and shut up.
election-2016-county-map.png

A pure popular vote is nothing more than mob rule… Shit for brains

1. that map doesn't represent the popular vote

2. You're saying that every other election in the US besides the presidential election is MOB RULE?


Goddam that's funny.
92ajib6aw0001.jpg

La county has more population than these states, that is the reason for the electoral college to keep us in check
We can’t have crazy Cali dictating the countrys direction...
That’s fucking insane. Lol
 
So when are the Democrats starting the witch trails again?

Wait, when Trump called Hillary a criminal, you people loved it. Witch hunts, you just don't like them when they attack your side.
She had already admitted to stealing the White House silver when she and bj left it, she was also compelled to return items that were gifts (jewels) presented to her that belonged to the people she was supposed to be representing in her government position and various other things concerning Benghazi. Those things with all of her other statements through the years are well documented. She proved herself through her own actions and words to be nonviable candidate with a criminal mind and not worthy to serve the public in the majority of the minds of voters throughout the country (a few large metro areas in the east and west are not the whole so don't go that route of 'she won the popular vote' as it does not fly in a Republic). Roy Moore on the other hand denies thirty+ year old claims that a few media outlets are seeming to push even with bogus things like that fake signature in a year book. Slander (old gossip) without substance to back it up just makes Democrats look like the assholes that many know they have already been through the years.
 
“It is pretty clear to me that the best thing that Roy Moore can do for the country is to move on,” Scott told “This Week” co-anchor Martha Raddatz in an exclusive interview Sunday.

“It is time for us to turn the page because it is not about partisan politics,” Scott said. “It is not about electing Republicans versus Democrats. This is about the character of our country. I want to be on the side of right when history writes the story.”

I could not have said it better. Tim Scott is a hero for speaking out. This is a test of character. Roy Moore is a selfish man for putting the people of Alabama through this. Anyone else would have a 20 point lead right now. Mitt Romney was hardly a southern conservative and he got 61% in Alabama. Are Republicans so desperate for power that they will support a pervert? It is time to do the right thing. If Moore is the winner then the Republicans should expel him immediately.

GOP Senator Tim Scott Has Some HARSH Words for Roy Moore

Indeed, do we want to live in a country where people are convicted without evidence like in the 3rd world, or a country that values evidence over baseless accusations by political opponents.

To me the answer is clear, but of course, if you like rats for dinner you may have different opinions.

This is a Senate race not a court of law. Character is important. Just because you have no character. You are a corrupt bastard.
Says a clinton supporter.... lol
Oh, okay. So you believe they have made a settlement like that. Where is your evidence? Supply a reliable, valid source of information. Your liking to believe something is true doesn't make it true. Only if you're five or under.
Never trust a clinton they are the most repugnant of people and corrupt… Fact
 
So when are the Democrats starting the witch trails again?

Wait, when Trump called Hillary a criminal, you people loved it. Witch hunts, you just don't like them when they attack your side.
She had already admitted to stealing the White House silver when she and bj left it, she was also compelled to return items that were gifts (jewels) presented to her that belonged to the people she was supposed to be representing in her government position and various other things concerning Benghazi. Those things with all of her other statements through the years are well documented. She proved herself through her own actions and words to be nonviable candidate with a criminal mind and not worthy to serve the public in the majority of the minds of voters throughout the country (a few large metro areas in the east and west are not the whole so don't go that route of 'she won the popular vote' as it does not fly in a Republic). Roy Moore on the other hand denies thirty+ year old claims that a few media outlets are seeming to push even with bogus things like that fake signature in a year book. Slander (old gossip) without substance to back it up just makes Democrats look like the assholes that many know they have already been through the years.

So.... what's a criminal then? Someone who has ever broken a law? That'd be most people. Or someone convicted of a crime?
 
So when are the Democrats starting the witch trails again?

Wait, when Trump called Hillary a criminal, you people loved it. Witch hunts, you just don't like them when they attack your side.
She had already admitted to stealing the White House silver when she and bj left it, she was also compelled to return items that were gifts (jewels) presented to her that belonged to the people she was supposed to be representing in her government position and various other things concerning Benghazi. Those things with all of her other statements through the years are well documented. She proved herself through her own actions and words to be nonviable candidate with a criminal mind and not worthy to serve the public in the majority of the minds of voters throughout the country (a few large metro areas in the east and west are not the whole so don't go that route of 'she won the popular vote' as it does not fly in a Republic). Roy Moore on the other hand denies thirty+ year old claims that a few media outlets are seeming to push even with bogus things like that fake signature in a year book. Slander (old gossip) without substance to back it up just makes Democrats look like the assholes that many know they have already been through the years.

So.... what's a criminal then? Someone who has ever broken a law? That'd be most people. Or someone convicted of a crime?
A criminal is someone breaking the law. A felon is someone convicted of it.
 
So when are the Democrats starting the witch trails again?

Wait, when Trump called Hillary a criminal, you people loved it. Witch hunts, you just don't like them when they attack your side.
She had already admitted to stealing the White House silver when she and bj left it, she was also compelled to return items that were gifts (jewels) presented to her that belonged to the people she was supposed to be representing in her government position and various other things concerning Benghazi. Those things with all of her other statements through the years are well documented. She proved herself through her own actions and words to be nonviable candidate with a criminal mind and not worthy to serve the public in the majority of the minds of voters throughout the country (a few large metro areas in the east and west are not the whole so don't go that route of 'she won the popular vote' as it does not fly in a Republic). Roy Moore on the other hand denies thirty+ year old claims that a few media outlets are seeming to push even with bogus things like that fake signature in a year book. Slander (old gossip) without substance to back it up just makes Democrats look like the assholes that many know they have already been through the years.

So.... what's a criminal then? Someone who has ever broken a law? That'd be most people. Or someone convicted of a crime?
Grandpa gave you the answer so no need for me to do it.
 
So when are the Democrats starting the witch trails again?

Wait, when Trump called Hillary a criminal, you people loved it. Witch hunts, you just don't like them when they attack your side.
She had already admitted to stealing the White House silver when she and bj left it, she was also compelled to return items that were gifts (jewels) presented to her that belonged to the people she was supposed to be representing in her government position and various other things concerning Benghazi. Those things with all of her other statements through the years are well documented. She proved herself through her own actions and words to be nonviable candidate with a criminal mind and not worthy to serve the public in the majority of the minds of voters throughout the country (a few large metro areas in the east and west are not the whole so don't go that route of 'she won the popular vote' as it does not fly in a Republic). Roy Moore on the other hand denies thirty+ year old claims that a few media outlets are seeming to push even with bogus things like that fake signature in a year book. Slander (old gossip) without substance to back it up just makes Democrats look like the assholes that many know they have already been through the years.

So.... what's a criminal then? Someone who has ever broken a law? That'd be most people. Or someone convicted of a crime?

Moore hasn't been convicted, Conyers lost a sexual harassment arbitration case. Thanks for clearing up the differences.
 

Forum List

Back
Top