It's alright...as long as a Democrat does it...just ask Bill Clinton. Liberal women are only selectively outraged by this type of behavior...a (D) makes all the difference.
In 20 years, after Franken's politically useful has come to an end, liberals will safely make a stand for all women everywhere and condemn this behavior in no uncertain terms...good for you feminists-of-convenience...
Did he molest children like Roy Moore?
And I'm going to keep saying this. No matter how much you want to liken him to your child molester Roy Moore or your predator Donald trump, this isn't the same thing.
Now notice it's all men in a tizzy over Al. What does that tell you? It's says that you're being disingenuous and it's you with the double standard.
Have you demanded Donald resign? Roy Moore?
Now say they didn't admit it. Go ahead.
So if someone lies and doesn't take responsibility, it's all good as long as there's an R after their name?
If the same picture evidence came out on Donald Trump, you wouldn't rest until he was expelled from office.
And he would be out of office.
Franken should get the exact same treatment, that (D) after his name should be inconsequential...
...but it's not.
When it's a powerful Democrat, the same people who would crucify anyone else give them a pass.
How do you think Weinstein got away with it so long?
He took his cue from you, and women like you, who not only gave Bill Clinton a pass, but defended him ferociously and re-elected him wholeheartedly, while making Paula Jones, Monica Lewinsky and Linda Tripp the villains.
Being a powerful, important liberal indemnified these men and their sexual harassment, sexual dominance by intimidation, and sex abuse possible.
And here you are again...politics over justice..."it was just bad judgement"..."no harm, no foul"...protect Democrats at all costs...damn the consequences.
Last edited: