1. Of course, we must begin with an understanding of the role of a Supreme Court Justice, and move on to the contumely due the Democrat Party for what it has done to the Court.
For a clear explanation of the role, here is Justice par excellence, Justice Wm.Rehnquist:
"...[Liberal judicial activism] seems instead to be based upon the proposition that federal judges, perhaps judges as a whole, have a role of their own, quite independent of popular will, to play in solving society’s problems. Once we have abandoned the idea that the authority of the courts to declare laws unconstitutional is somehow tied to the language of the Constitution that the people adopted, a judiciary exercising the power of judicial review appears in a quite different light.
Judges then are no longer the keepers of the covenant; instead they are a small group of fortunately situated people with a roving commission to second-guess Congress, state legislatures, and state and federal administrative officers concerning what is best for the country.
Surely there is no justification for a third legislative branch in the federal government, and there is even less justification for a federal legislative branch’s reviewing on a policy basis the laws enacted by the legislatures of the fifty states."
THE NOTION OF A LIVING CONSTITUTION*
WILLIAM H. REHNQUIST
http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol29_No2_Rehnquist.pdf
2. That bears restating: the only role for a Justice is to know the Constitution and apply.....it is written in English.....it to any problem that comes before the court.
Nothing else.
3. Democrats do not nominate judges for the court based either on knowledge, or the role stated above, merely to count on their vote no matter the issue.
And now, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit:
“Judge Jackson’s record of reversals by the left-leaning D.C. Circuit is troubling for anyone concerned about the rule of law,” Judicial Crisis Network president Carrie Severino told Fox News Digital on Tuesday.
Democrats have saddled the court with Kagan, an opponent of free speech and Sotomayor, a dunce who has claimed that different ethnic groups can read the Constitution differently.
4.This week the Court has taken a giant step toward reviving the America that the Founders believed they created, not an administrative state run by bureaucrats, technocrats and unelected judges.
In a major 6-3 ruling, for the case West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, limits the EPA's ability to set regulations on the energy sector a decision that poses massive implications on the Biden administration's goals to fight climate change.
The Court correctly decided that regulations of the sort the EPA claimed to have power over, are only constitutional when elected officials, the Congress, or legislatures offer them.
5. Now back to the befuddled imbecile, Democrat Kagan, who, like the majority of Democrat voters, is clueless as to the role of a Justice:
Kagan wrote:
".....a decision that poses massive implications for the Biden Administrations to fight climate change....."
"....this Court does not have a clue about how to address climate change...."
WHAT???????????
The Court's role is singular: to make certain that the only document the people have agreed to be governed by....the Constitution is adhered to.
This gormless idiot, and that applies to any Justice who voted against the EPA rebuke, is the reason that Democrats have one goal and one goal only......
....to destroy America.
For a clear explanation of the role, here is Justice par excellence, Justice Wm.Rehnquist:
"...[Liberal judicial activism] seems instead to be based upon the proposition that federal judges, perhaps judges as a whole, have a role of their own, quite independent of popular will, to play in solving society’s problems. Once we have abandoned the idea that the authority of the courts to declare laws unconstitutional is somehow tied to the language of the Constitution that the people adopted, a judiciary exercising the power of judicial review appears in a quite different light.
Judges then are no longer the keepers of the covenant; instead they are a small group of fortunately situated people with a roving commission to second-guess Congress, state legislatures, and state and federal administrative officers concerning what is best for the country.
Surely there is no justification for a third legislative branch in the federal government, and there is even less justification for a federal legislative branch’s reviewing on a policy basis the laws enacted by the legislatures of the fifty states."
THE NOTION OF A LIVING CONSTITUTION*
WILLIAM H. REHNQUIST
http://www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/jlpp/Vol29_No2_Rehnquist.pdf
2. That bears restating: the only role for a Justice is to know the Constitution and apply.....it is written in English.....it to any problem that comes before the court.
Nothing else.
3. Democrats do not nominate judges for the court based either on knowledge, or the role stated above, merely to count on their vote no matter the issue.
And now, Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit:
“Judge Jackson’s record of reversals by the left-leaning D.C. Circuit is troubling for anyone concerned about the rule of law,” Judicial Crisis Network president Carrie Severino told Fox News Digital on Tuesday.
Democrats have saddled the court with Kagan, an opponent of free speech and Sotomayor, a dunce who has claimed that different ethnic groups can read the Constitution differently.
4.This week the Court has taken a giant step toward reviving the America that the Founders believed they created, not an administrative state run by bureaucrats, technocrats and unelected judges.
In a major 6-3 ruling, for the case West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, limits the EPA's ability to set regulations on the energy sector a decision that poses massive implications on the Biden administration's goals to fight climate change.
The Court correctly decided that regulations of the sort the EPA claimed to have power over, are only constitutional when elected officials, the Congress, or legislatures offer them.
5. Now back to the befuddled imbecile, Democrat Kagan, who, like the majority of Democrat voters, is clueless as to the role of a Justice:
Kagan wrote:
".....a decision that poses massive implications for the Biden Administrations to fight climate change....."
"....this Court does not have a clue about how to address climate change...."
WHAT???????????
The Court's role is singular: to make certain that the only document the people have agreed to be governed by....the Constitution is adhered to.
This gormless idiot, and that applies to any Justice who voted against the EPA rebuke, is the reason that Democrats have one goal and one goal only......
....to destroy America.
Last edited:
