This will no doubt interest the climate watchers of the forum

[ReinyDays]

That is the temperature of the entire planet. It does NOT see a change like that every morning.

Yes it does ... it's call the diurnal cycle ... it happens everyday all over the world ... are you denying it's coolest at sunrise? ...

HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW ... fucking stupid bitch ...

 

[Crick]

Yes it does ... it's call the diurnal cycle ... it happens everyday all over the world ... are you denying it's coolest at sunrise? ...

HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW ... fucking stupid bitch ...

God are you stupid. When is it sunrise for "the entire planet"?

 

[Rigby5]

This isn't spin folks. This is a realistic examination of FACTS about models and global climate patterns.
Would we all feel better knowing that we can't manage climate and that climate will not end our life on Earth?
Or do you prefer the disaster is on us people?

Suppose you were told you are going to die in an auto wreck? And you know very well you are a very safe driver. But they persisted in getting into your face pronouncing you will die unless you totally stop driving? This analogy is how they are terrifying the public by two things. First they blame humans for global warming at the same time when asked if Man can manage climate, they shout in unison, absolutely not. Well if man can't manage Climate globally, why try to scare them to death?

The video is lying.

Sure there are complex orbit and solar activity cycles that can cause some climate change that is not human caused.
But they are understood, predictable, short lived, and not a problem.
They are not causing the current warming.

The big natural climate cycle is from plants absorbing CO2, reducing global temperature, until the plants die from the cold, rot, and release the CO2 back into the atmosphere so it warms up again.
But that cycle is about 110,000 years long, so is not the cause of the current warming.

Of course man can manage global climate, but only by controlling carbon emissions.

 

[Rigby5]

Climate change is real. It has been going on for billions of years and it has resulted in most of all the species that ever lived on earth to go extinct. If nothing else gets us before then climate change will probably be the end of humans one of these days.

Man made global warming is bullshit.

Wrong.
We have almost doubled the atmospheric CO2, and it is CO2 that interferes with heat radiating away from the planet as infrared photons.

 

[Rigby5]

Yes it does ... it's call the diurnal cycle ... it happens everyday all over the world ... are you denying it's coolest at sunrise? ...

HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW ... fucking stupid bitch ...

Wrong.
The point is that it does not drop to absolute 0 at night.
That is because CO2 in the air traps heat and does not let it quickly escape.
It can only leave the earth as infrared photonic radiation since the earth is surrounded by a nonconducting vacuum.
So the amount of CO2 is the thermostat that decides how much heat the planet retains of not.
We doubled the amount of CO2, so that means the heat retained will greatly increase.
Not all at once, but slowly ever year, more heat will be retained.
Eventually it can and likely will get too hot for any life to survive on the planet any more.

 

[ding]

Wrong.
We have almost doubled the atmospheric CO2, and it is CO2 that interferes with heat radiating away from the planet as infrared photons.

Ummm... no we haven't almost doubled the atmospheric CO2. A doubling of the pre-industrial revolution atmospheric CO2 would be 580 ppm or so. We are only about halfway there.

Yes, there is an instantaneous radiative forcing of CO2 which we call the GHG effect. Simple physics shows the world will warm by a bit more than 1C once CO2 doubles, if feedbacks are not taken into account.

Explainer: How scientists estimate climate sensitivity

The sensitivity of the Earth’s climate to increases in atmospheric CO2 concentration is a question that sits at the heart of climate science. Essentially, it dictates how much global temperatures will rise in response to human-caused CO2 emissions, but it is a question that does not yet have a...

www.carbonbrief.org