Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Because from the moment Obama took office he was spying on people. He must have threatened hundreds, maybe thousands of public officials, media personalities, and Hollywood actors.That would be the logical conclusion. That's why I can't figure how anyone could defend it. It's completely unethical.The DNC's servers should have.I think this is a cover up also.
Her private server should have been handed over to the FBI. I'm not sure how anyone could argue differently.
They filed a complaint and the refused to cooperate in a investigation.
Must be because they had plenty to hide.
Kind of difficult with Rod Rosenstein acting like he's the Attorney General.Well, this may be your best shot. If you have a case, someone should bring it.The GOP doesn't control everything.So when is Hillary going to the pokey? The GOP controls everything right now, this would be a good time to get that stuff fired up.Thank you.Yep, it's just my opinion.Your opinion doesn't really matter much when it comes to the truth.
The FBI is good at their jobs.
If Trump has committed crimes, they already know it.
He had to be investigated when he won.
That's why this investigation is nothing but a coverup.
My understanding is Bill Clinton never held a clearance, but a temp clearance because of his past.
Obama was probably the same.
Being tied in with terrorists and communists makes getting a clearance impossible.
However, being president means people make exceptions for you.
And trust me, if they had anything on Trump it would be leaked to the press and be front page news.
.
I had to go through an investigation when I got my clearance.
If I had any of the things Hillary, Bill, and Obama had in their backgrounds, not only would my clearance had been rejected but I would have had to get a different MOS or job classification. My job in the Army required the highest clearance in government.
.
You of all people should know that.
.
the 200 hundred dead Russians in Syria may not see it your way !Good Grief...Face it, Trump is a spineless weasel and stop with these inane, insipid and desperate Hillary deflection threads. Sad and pathetic!
Imagine what the MSM and D Party would do to Trump, if he destroyed over 30k government emails.As long as the Democrats hold impeachment over Trump's head this investigation will continue. But anyone with half a brain knows it is bogus and the people involved are working at the highest levels of the Department of Justice. They should all be fired and then let the Democrats scream bloody murder. They will anyway no matter what situation occurs. To think that these fuckers are screaming bloody murder because Trump wasn't stupid enough to embarrass Putin in public.
It's a God Damned disgrace.
Why wasn't' Al Capone convicted of anything other than tax evasion?And your opinion of the 70 y/o man isn't lousy?Ridiculous post. Yeah...the 70 y/o woman is a master criminal...
Jesus....you are a serious hypocrite.
Don't you ever get tired of these ridiculous conspiracy theories that are crazy just on the surface and batshit crazy when someone looks at the details. You didn't believe Osama Bin Laden was killed simply because Obama was the one who reported it. You said 2013 would be the worst year on record....because Mitt Romney (someone you now despise) wasn't elected in the 2012 election. Cut out the crazy.
Don't you ever tire of limiting your thinking within the meta-narrative spoonfed?
Care to explain why she hasn't been convicted of one thing during this supposed 30 year crime spree?
And your opinion of the 70 y/o man isn't lousy?Ridiculous post. Yeah...the 70 y/o woman is a master criminal...
Jesus....you are a serious hypocrite.
Don't you ever get tired of these ridiculous conspiracy theories that are crazy just on the surface and batshit crazy when someone looks at the details. You didn't believe Osama Bin Laden was killed simply because Obama was the one who reported it. You said 2013 would be the worst year on record....because Mitt Romney (someone you now despise) wasn't elected in the 2012 election. Cut out the crazy.
Don't you ever tire of limiting your thinking within the meta-narrative spoonfed?
Care to explain why she hasn't been convicted of one thing during this supposed 30 year crime spree?
Do you understand the concept of programmed response? A criminal isn't one until proven guilty, even if the evidentiary trail is chartreuse and leads to Her front door. Time will tell the true story. However, simply repeating the MSM mouthpiece is not patriotic service to our nation. Rather, it is--particularly in this case--at least anti-patriotic, when in doing so, you campaign for without a shred of proof or conviction, the downfall of our elected commander in chief. You so desire he be labelled Caesar at the Rubicon. Perhaps he ought to be, and then cross it.
Other than alot of coercion, blackmail, bribery, and being lucky when it comes to witnesses committing suicide of being shot sitting at traffic lights, I can't think of a single reason why?There's the rub.And your opinion of the 70 y/o man isn't lousy?Ridiculous post. Yeah...the 70 y/o woman is a master criminal...
Jesus....you are a serious hypocrite.
Don't you ever get tired of these ridiculous conspiracy theories that are crazy just on the surface and batshit crazy when someone looks at the details. You didn't believe Osama Bin Laden was killed simply because Obama was the one who reported it. You said 2013 would be the worst year on record....because Mitt Romney (someone you now despise) wasn't elected in the 2012 election. Cut out the crazy.
You folks think dog crap on a car roof is proof of abuses.....as is two scoops of friggen ice cream.
But when Hillary has been admittedly caught doing things that have been spelled out in great detail as espionage in my annual security training classes, and she still gets off scot-free, I tend to question our Department of Justice, and anyone with half a brain would do the same.
Care to comment on how she has not been convicted (much less charged) with a single crime in 30+ years of public life? Wait; let me guess...deep state....or are we going to go with the swamp today? I get confused between you guys and your made-up boogey men.
The GOP doesn't control everything.So when is Hillary going to the pokey? The GOP controls everything right now, this would be a good time to get that stuff fired up.Thank you.Yep, it's just my opinion.Your opinion doesn't really matter much when it comes to the truth.Compared to whom?
The guy in there now?
.
The FBI is good at their jobs.
If Trump has committed crimes, they already know it.
He had to be investigated when he won.
That's why this investigation is nothing but a coverup.
My understanding is Bill Clinton never held a clearance, but a temp clearance because of his past.
Obama was probably the same.
Being tied in with terrorists and communists makes getting a clearance impossible.
However, being president means people make exceptions for you.
And trust me, if they had anything on Trump it would be leaked to the press and be front page news.
.
I had to go through an investigation when I got my clearance.
If I had any of the things Hillary, Bill, and Obama had in their backgrounds, not only would my clearance had been rejected but I would have had to get a different MOS or job classification. My job in the Army required the highest clearance in government.
.
You of all people should know that.
Good Grief...Face it, Trump is a spineless weasel and stop with these inane, insipid and desperate Hillary deflection threads. Sad and pathetic!
Because from the moment Obama took office he was spying on people. He must have threatened hundreds, maybe thousands of public officials, media personalities, and Hollywood actors.That would be the logical conclusion. That's why I can't figure how anyone could defend it. It's completely unethical.The DNC's servers should have.I think this is a cover up also.
Her private server should have been handed over to the FBI. I'm not sure how anyone could argue differently.
They filed a complaint and the refused to cooperate in a investigation.
Must be because they had plenty to hide.
There never seems to be a shortage of assholes willing to cuss out Trump. And if they can't get them to agree willingly, they present them with an offer they can't refuse. Here.. Read this prepared statement and we'll forget about your online account to "Chicks With Dicks".
As long as the Democrats hold impeachment over Trump's head this investigation will continue. But anyone with half a brain knows it is bogus and the people involved are working at the highest levels of the Department of Justice. They should all be fired and then let the Democrats scream bloody murder. They will anyway no matter what situation occurs. To think that these fuckers are screaming bloody murder because Trump wasn't stupid enough to embarrass Putin in public.
It's a God Damned disgrace.
Kind of difficult with Rod Rosenstein acting like he's the Attorney General.Well, this may be your best shot. If you have a case, someone should bring it.The GOP doesn't control everything.So when is Hillary going to the pokey? The GOP controls everything right now, this would be a good time to get that stuff fired up.Thank you.Yep, it's just my opinion.
.
I had to go through an investigation when I got my clearance.
If I had any of the things Hillary, Bill, and Obama had in their backgrounds, not only would my clearance had been rejected but I would have had to get a different MOS or job classification. My job in the Army required the highest clearance in government.
.
You of all people should know that.
.
BTW, where the fuck is Jeff Sessions???
Yep.....Saddam won his last election at 100%....so what's your point???Why wasn't' Al Capone convicted of anything other than tax evasion?And your opinion of the 70 y/o man isn't lousy?
Jesus....you are a serious hypocrite.
Don't you ever get tired of these ridiculous conspiracy theories that are crazy just on the surface and batshit crazy when someone looks at the details. You didn't believe Osama Bin Laden was killed simply because Obama was the one who reported it. You said 2013 would be the worst year on record....because Mitt Romney (someone you now despise) wasn't elected in the 2012 election. Cut out the crazy.
Don't you ever tire of limiting your thinking within the meta-narrative spoonfed?
Care to explain why she hasn't been convicted of one thing during this supposed 30 year crime spree?
So now in your seriously deteriorated mind, you’re comparing Ms. Clinton to a Chicago Crime Boss. Yet amazingly, the GOP congress you were once so proud off approved this crime boss 98 to 0 as Secretary of State.
And your opinion of the 70 y/o man isn't lousy?
Jesus....you are a serious hypocrite.
Don't you ever get tired of these ridiculous conspiracy theories that are crazy just on the surface and batshit crazy when someone looks at the details. You didn't believe Osama Bin Laden was killed simply because Obama was the one who reported it. You said 2013 would be the worst year on record....because Mitt Romney (someone you now despise) wasn't elected in the 2012 election. Cut out the crazy.
Don't you ever tire of limiting your thinking within the meta-narrative spoonfed?
Care to explain why she hasn't been convicted of one thing during this supposed 30 year crime spree?
Do you understand the concept of programmed response? A criminal isn't one until proven guilty, even if the evidentiary trail is chartreuse and leads to Her front door. Time will tell the true story. However, simply repeating the MSM mouthpiece is not patriotic service to our nation. Rather, it is--particularly in this case--at least anti-patriotic, when in doing so, you campaign for without a shred of proof or conviction, the downfall of our elected commander in chief. You so desire he be labelled Caesar at the Rubicon. Perhaps he ought to be, and then cross it.
If you do not think there is a “shred” of proof, you’re simply retarded. Do you really believe all of these meetings with Russians during the campaign were just a coincidence? If so, why did they lie about them?
Don't you ever get tired of these ridiculous conspiracy theories that are crazy just on the surface and batshit crazy when someone looks at the details. You didn't believe Osama Bin Laden was killed simply because Obama was the one who reported it. You said 2013 would be the worst year on record....because Mitt Romney (someone you now despise) wasn't elected in the 2012 election. Cut out the crazy.
Don't you ever tire of limiting your thinking within the meta-narrative spoonfed?
Care to explain why she hasn't been convicted of one thing during this supposed 30 year crime spree?
Do you understand the concept of programmed response? A criminal isn't one until proven guilty, even if the evidentiary trail is chartreuse and leads to Her front door. Time will tell the true story. However, simply repeating the MSM mouthpiece is not patriotic service to our nation. Rather, it is--particularly in this case--at least anti-patriotic, when in doing so, you campaign for without a shred of proof or conviction, the downfall of our elected commander in chief. You so desire he be labelled Caesar at the Rubicon. Perhaps he ought to be, and then cross it.
If you do not think there is a “shred” of proof, you’re simply retarded. Do you really believe all of these meetings with Russians during the campaign were just a coincidence? If so, why did they lie about them?
Analysis:
Word games^^
Yes I do believe our President is loyal to the American people, is defending the Constitution, and will be vindicated of any accusation.
It's unimaginable what the Clintons have cost this country since they first moved into the Whitehouse in the 90s. It seems that all that we have time for is media driven disasters with direct ties to Bill & Hill. It appears that this is a massive attempt to not only de-legitimize the Trump Administration but to also remove him from office. However, the fact is this is just an attempt to coverup for the crimes that Bill and Hillary have committed in the last several years.
Thanks to our spying capability nobody can hide the skeletons in their closets anymore. At least not hide them from a president or a Secretary of State who broke the law with zero thought for the consequences.
The media asks if Putin has something on Trump. Hogwash.
The real question is what does Hillary have on our leaders in Washington?
Hillary said if she hangs everyone else will hang with her.
What crimes are they trying to cover up?
July 18, 2018
If Not Russia, Who Is Hillary's 'Foreign Entity'?
By Joe Herring
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/07/if_not_russia_who_is_hillarys_foreign_entity.html
I've long said Hillary Clinton is insufficiently stupid to have believed she could operate an unsecured home server without compromising the security of any data transmitted through it or stored on it.
For just as long, it has been my contention that the server was the faucet through which she pumped information she was selling (yes, selling) to foreign entities, both public and private.
I.T. security protocols would've easily flagged attempts at intrusion if targeted toward the State Department's secure servers, through which then-secretary of state Clinton ought to have conducted business. Likewise, the transfer or copying of said information from a secure server is a detectable act with access being tightly controlled and records kept of who looked at what and when.
"Convenience," the excuse proffered by Clinton for not following even the most basic of security procedures, is, in a way, a rare instance of Clinton telling the truth, just not in the way she would have us believe.
She claims that it was more convenient to utilize a home server, using linked devices to conduct business. More truthfully, it was more convenient to offload state secrets absent the prying eyes of government I.T. security staff.
In his now infamous "exoneration presser," fired FBI director James Comey admitted that Clinton's server was "likely compromised" by foreign actors, but he also claimed there was "no evidence" of such an intrusion. During disgraced FBI agent Peter Strzok's recent testimony, we discovered that this assertion was just another in a long line of brazen falsehoods tumbling out of Comey's mouth.
To drink a shot of liquor every time Comey says something that might be true might prove an entertaining parlor game for teetotalers. Beyond stating his name, there's precious little else he might say that is not suspect.
Rep. Louie Gohmert, (R-Texas) gave Strzok a moral shellacking over Strzok's extramarital affair with his co-worker and co-conspirator, Lisa Page, wondering aloud whether Strzok bore the same smirk he exhibited in that day's hearings when he looked his wife in the eye and lied to her about his fidelity.
A legitimate point, as the character of the smirking doyen was at issue, given that Strzok had spent the better part of that day swearing that his personal biases did not bear on his public duties, an assertion belied by both the evidence and common sense.
The resulting furor from Democrat members of the committee overshadowed the point Gohmert was making – that from Strzok's own mouth came yet more confirmation that Hillary Clinton's home server was compromised by a "foreign entity"; that there was indeed evidence of the intrusion and the theft of data; and that Comey had lied yet again, as he most certainly knew of this prior to his tortured-logic exoneration spectacle.
Representative Gohmert emphasized that the "foreign entity" responsible for placing the digital back door into Clinton's server was not Russia. "And this is a foreign entity, not related to Russia in the least!"
Who is this unnamed foreign entity? Gohmert knows but isn't saying, as that information is likely still classified. This revelation causes numerous questions to spring to mind, not the least of which, the timing of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein's splashy unsealing of indictments against Russian targets over "election meddling," coming within hours of Strzok's damning admission.
The difficulty in unraveling the perfidy of the Clintons, the previous administration, and their overseas entanglements has always been the sheer scope of the corruption. When investigating one crime, ten more are discovered, leading to ten more for each of those. The high levels at which these crimes have been committed – President Obama's Cabinet and the president himself – compound the problem as their ideological allies within the permanent bureaucracy continue to obstruct, misdirect, and cover up in the name of "resistance."
It strains credulity to believe that the vast investigative resources of the federal government have been brought to bear against the Trump administration simply to enable a twice failed presidential candidate to avoid accountability for carelessly handling classified information.
While the Clintons have made their careers by enmeshing in criminality nearly everyone with whom they come in contact, their lives, politically and physically, are nearing the end. Even the risk of Clinton "bringing everyone down with me" is likely insufficient motivation for such herculean efforts to conceal and deceive both the public and the Trump administration.
It is my assertion that the Democratic Party, under the shadow leadership of President Obama, is mounting such a vigorous defense to hide its own involvement in the criminality that characterizes all things Clinton – most notably, the money-laundering operation known as the Clinton Foundation.
President Obama knew of Hillary's illicit server. He communicated with her on it. Both surely knew that any electronic device with even a tangential connection to either of them would be targeted by every hacker on the globe with nefarious purpose. Logic then would dictate that any information passed through, or placed on that server, was placed there to be picked up – a digital dead drop, if you will.
Politicians have made an art form out of evading accountability for bribery and financial malfeasance in office. It simply isn't conceivable that the unprecedented contortions of the Deep State displayed since the arrival of Trump would be triggered by a desire to conceal garden variety influence-peddling. However, as a reason sufficiently important to warrant committing hundreds of additional crimes to prevent its discovery, treason stands alone.
The same mindset that has no difficulty in short-circuiting the Constitution by enacting through judicial and executive fiat those policy aims they could never accomplish legislatively also has little problem with bypassing national security restrictions, if they believe that their purpose is sufficiently noble. We saw this in Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, selling nuclear secrets to the Soviets to maintain a "balance of power." Indeed, nearly every instance of domestic espionage in modern times has been rooted in this misshapen sense of moral imperative so fondly inculcated on the left.
Don't you ever tire of limiting your thinking within the meta-narrative spoonfed?
Care to explain why she hasn't been convicted of one thing during this supposed 30 year crime spree?
Do you understand the concept of programmed response? A criminal isn't one until proven guilty, even if the evidentiary trail is chartreuse and leads to Her front door. Time will tell the true story. However, simply repeating the MSM mouthpiece is not patriotic service to our nation. Rather, it is--particularly in this case--at least anti-patriotic, when in doing so, you campaign for without a shred of proof or conviction, the downfall of our elected commander in chief. You so desire he be labelled Caesar at the Rubicon. Perhaps he ought to be, and then cross it.
If you do not think there is a “shred” of proof, you’re simply retarded. Do you really believe all of these meetings with Russians during the campaign were just a coincidence? If so, why did they lie about them?
Analysis:
Word games^^
Yes I do believe our President is loyal to the American people, is defending the Constitution, and will be vindicated of any accusation.
Fact; his team met repeatedly with Russians during the 2016 campaign
Fact; the Russians tried to influence our 2016 election through various means
Fact; several members of his team have lied about the meetings
If there is a game being played….Trump is losing.
