This is no witch hunt and there are no spies

[dudmuck]

Gotta love those Trump haters. First they denied there were spies in the Trump campaign, then Clapper slipped and admitted there were spies, then tried to cover his ass by claiming "but they were only spying on the Russians". LOL What happened to "There were no spies in the Trump campaign"? There's enough video evidence of these crooked bastards to seal their fate when their trials come up so they're pinning all their hopes on slander and smear campaigns, hoping they can win back the Congress and stop the prosecutions that are almost certain to come, beginning in 2019. This coup has failed and soon the commiecrats on the left will be brought to justice and charged with treason. You've got it coming, libs.

Your post consists only of delusion; bereft of facts.

Zero indictments because the Obama Justice Dept. was not about to indict one of their own. Democrats have never been known for putting the integrity of the country above the interests of their party.
And how many of the 23 indictments (by Mueller, not DOJ) had anything to do with Donald Trump or Russia collusion? NONE.

Those investigations were controlled by republicans. If they found anything, then DOJ would be forced to act. But the DOJ had proof that the anti-muslim video had nothing to do with benghazi attack.

Mueller also was appointed by republicans.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Donald's Witch Hunt is failing.

 

[JakeStarkey]

That's fine. They infiltrated the campaign illegally, started a phony dossier paid for by a opposition political party to a foreign spy to make up stuff about Trump to get a FISA warrant to spy on Trump.

No, there is nothing crooked going on here. Everything is totally above board. We should be proud of our nation.

Let's ignore ALL OF THAT for a moment.

Over a year later we still have no proof, despite the illegal means by which the search was done. Why isn't the investigation over?

We can IGNORE all that because it is not true.

 

[WTP]

Gotta love those Trump haters. First they denied there were spies in the Trump campaign, then Clapper slipped and admitted there were spies, then tried to cover his ass by claiming "but they were only spying on the Russians". LOL What happened to "There were no spies in the Trump campaign"? There's enough video evidence of these crooked bastards to seal their fate when their trials come up so they're pinning all their hopes on slander and smear campaigns, hoping they can win back the Congress and stop the prosecutions that are almost certain to come, beginning in 2019. This coup has failed and soon the commiecrats on the left will be brought to justice and charged with treason. You've got it coming, libs.

Your post consists only of delusion; bereft of facts.

Zero indictments because the Obama Justice Dept. was not about to indict one of their own. Democrats have never been known for putting the integrity of the country above the interests of their party.
And how many of the 23 indictments (by Mueller, not DOJ) had anything to do with Donald Trump or Russia collusion? NONE.

Look people, another Trump wacko with his or her hair on fire going off topic after it was revealed that this was not the "biggest scandal in history". But not before it was revealed that the fake Republican memo about the FISA warrants was "bigger than Watergate". But not before it was revealed that Devin Nunes concocted a false story about eavesdropping on the president that turned up false. I'm telling you folks, you just can't make this shit up.

 

[WTP]

There is again, zero evidence anyone spied on the campaign, and you have zero proof of that.

You're a fucking idiot.

You can't lie this into the cornfield, Comrade.

{
Furthermore, when the House Intelligence Committee’s investigators managed to uncover the spy — later revealed to be University of Cambridge professor Stefan Halper — the DOJ initially refused to comply with a congressional subpoena for more information. In fact, Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) — finally fed up with being “stalled” and “stonewalled” by the FBI and DOJ — had to threaten Attorney General Jeff Sessions with charges of contempt of Congress before the DOJ caved and briefed the committee on Halper.

Going back a little further, the FBI and DOJ — while protecting Hillary Clinton from being charged for her illegal use of a private e-mail server to send and receive thousands of classified documents — abused the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) process to illegally obtain a surveillance warrant on Trump campaign associate Carter Page. That warrant’s application was based on the now-discredited Trump “dossier” written by ex-MI6 agent Christopher Steele and illegally financed by the DNC and Clinton Campaign (and based on information provided by Russian government sources).

No wonder President Trump tweeted a quote by Fox Business Network anchor David Asman on May 18, saying, “Apparently the DOJ put a Spy in the Trump Campaign. This has never been done before and by any means necessary, they are out to frame Donald Trump for crimes he didn't commit.” And on May 23 — as more information came to light — he tweeted, “Look how things have turned around on the Criminal Deep State. They go after Phony Collusion with Russia, a made up Scam, and end up getting caught in a major SPY scandal the likes of which this country may never have seen before! What goes around, comes around!”

Whatever one’s opinion of President Trump, he is right about this. Spygate could be one of the biggest political scandals in history. It is certainly bigger than Watergate. While Watergate will likely continue to be the scandal by which all other scandals are measured (old habits die hard), the reality is that taken all together, Spygate makes Watergate look mild by comparison.}

Spygate Is a Bigger Scandal Than Watergate

You don't care about facts, you are a Communist and live to serve and obey the party. Irrespective of that, I will continue to post facts in the face of your absurd lies.

What is amusing is that you are too stupid to grasp that your filthy and evil party have given up denying that Halper spied on Trump and are instead trying to spin as if Halper were an informant, a criminal in a gang who turned on his fellow criminals, rather than a spy planted by the FBI on the orders of Obama to rig the election.

Turn on your brain Comrade, that is to say MS13NBC - Madcow will be wildly spinning that Halper is "an informant" rather than lying as you are that he didn't exist.

Lol! And you're a retard; Trey Gowdy: FBI’s Use of Informant for Trump Campaign Was Appropriate

 

[hunarcy]

There is again, zero evidence anyone spied on the campaign, and you have zero proof of that.

You're a fucking idiot.

You can't lie this into the cornfield, Comrade.

{
Furthermore, when the House Intelligence Committee’s investigators managed to uncover the spy — later revealed to be University of Cambridge professor Stefan Halper — the DOJ initially refused to comply with a congressional subpoena for more information. In fact, Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) — finally fed up with being “stalled” and “stonewalled” by the FBI and DOJ — had to threaten Attorney General Jeff Sessions with charges of contempt of Congress before the DOJ caved and briefed the committee on Halper.

Going back a little further, the FBI and DOJ — while protecting Hillary Clinton from being charged for her illegal use of a private e-mail server to send and receive thousands of classified documents — abused the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) process to illegally obtain a surveillance warrant on Trump campaign associate Carter Page. That warrant’s application was based on the now-discredited Trump “dossier” written by ex-MI6 agent Christopher Steele and illegally financed by the DNC and Clinton Campaign (and based on information provided by Russian government sources).

No wonder President Trump tweeted a quote by Fox Business Network anchor David Asman on May 18, saying, “Apparently the DOJ put a Spy in the Trump Campaign. This has never been done before and by any means necessary, they are out to frame Donald Trump for crimes he didn't commit.” And on May 23 — as more information came to light — he tweeted, “Look how things have turned around on the Criminal Deep State. They go after Phony Collusion with Russia, a made up Scam, and end up getting caught in a major SPY scandal the likes of which this country may never have seen before! What goes around, comes around!”

Whatever one’s opinion of President Trump, he is right about this. Spygate could be one of the biggest political scandals in history. It is certainly bigger than Watergate. While Watergate will likely continue to be the scandal by which all other scandals are measured (old habits die hard), the reality is that taken all together, Spygate makes Watergate look mild by comparison.}

Spygate Is a Bigger Scandal Than Watergate

You don't care about facts, you are a Communist and live to serve and obey the party. Irrespective of that, I will continue to post facts in the face of your absurd lies.

What is amusing is that you are too stupid to grasp that your filthy and evil party have given up denying that Halper spied on Trump and are instead trying to spin as if Halper were an informant, a criminal in a gang who turned on his fellow criminals, rather than a spy planted by the FBI on the orders of Obama to rig the election.

Turn on your brain Comrade, that is to say MS13NBC - Madcow will be wildly spinning that Halper is "an informant" rather than lying as you are that he didn't exist.

Lol! And you're a retard; Trey Gowdy: FBI’s Use of Informant for Trump Campaign Was Appropriate

From your link...the last paragraph: "Separately, Gowdy said Trump’s detractors including Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, are “doing a disservice to our fellow citizens” when they do not “make it clear” that the president is not a “target” of the investigation." ??????????

If Trump is not the target of the investigation, what's the point?

 

[WTP]

There is again, zero evidence anyone spied on the campaign, and you have zero proof of that.

You're a fucking idiot.

You can't lie this into the cornfield, Comrade.

{
Furthermore, when the House Intelligence Committee’s investigators managed to uncover the spy — later revealed to be University of Cambridge professor Stefan Halper — the DOJ initially refused to comply with a congressional subpoena for more information. In fact, Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) — finally fed up with being “stalled” and “stonewalled” by the FBI and DOJ — had to threaten Attorney General Jeff Sessions with charges of contempt of Congress before the DOJ caved and briefed the committee on Halper.

Going back a little further, the FBI and DOJ — while protecting Hillary Clinton from being charged for her illegal use of a private e-mail server to send and receive thousands of classified documents — abused the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) process to illegally obtain a surveillance warrant on Trump campaign associate Carter Page. That warrant’s application was based on the now-discredited Trump “dossier” written by ex-MI6 agent Christopher Steele and illegally financed by the DNC and Clinton Campaign (and based on information provided by Russian government sources).

No wonder President Trump tweeted a quote by Fox Business Network anchor David Asman on May 18, saying, “Apparently the DOJ put a Spy in the Trump Campaign. This has never been done before and by any means necessary, they are out to frame Donald Trump for crimes he didn't commit.” And on May 23 — as more information came to light — he tweeted, “Look how things have turned around on the Criminal Deep State. They go after Phony Collusion with Russia, a made up Scam, and end up getting caught in a major SPY scandal the likes of which this country may never have seen before! What goes around, comes around!”

Whatever one’s opinion of President Trump, he is right about this. Spygate could be one of the biggest political scandals in history. It is certainly bigger than Watergate. While Watergate will likely continue to be the scandal by which all other scandals are measured (old habits die hard), the reality is that taken all together, Spygate makes Watergate look mild by comparison.}

Spygate Is a Bigger Scandal Than Watergate

You don't care about facts, you are a Communist and live to serve and obey the party. Irrespective of that, I will continue to post facts in the face of your absurd lies.

What is amusing is that you are too stupid to grasp that your filthy and evil party have given up denying that Halper spied on Trump and are instead trying to spin as if Halper were an informant, a criminal in a gang who turned on his fellow criminals, rather than a spy planted by the FBI on the orders of Obama to rig the election.

Turn on your brain Comrade, that is to say MS13NBC - Madcow will be wildly spinning that Halper is "an informant" rather than lying as you are that he didn't exist.

Lol! And you're a retard; Trey Gowdy: FBI’s Use of Informant for Trump Campaign Was Appropriate

From your link...the last paragraph: "Separately, Gowdy said Trump’s detractors including Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, are “doing a disservice to our fellow citizens” when they do not “make it clear” that the president is not a “target” of the investigation." ??????????

If Trump is not the target of the investigation, what's the point?

Here we go with the diversions again. What does that have to do with the lie that was "Spygate"? Nothing!

This losing strategy of distractions, dodges, and diversions isn't going to fix the lies by Trump and his Sheep herd. Try as you might, it's the ultimate fail.

 

[WTP]

Gotta love those Trump haters. First they denied there were spies in the Trump campaign, then Clapper slipped and admitted there were spies, then tried to cover his ass by claiming "but they were only spying on the Russians". LOL What happened to "There were no spies in the Trump campaign"? There's enough video evidence of these crooked bastards to seal their fate when their trials come up so they're pinning all their hopes on slander and smear campaigns, hoping they can win back the Congress and stop the prosecutions that are almost certain to come, beginning in 2019. This coup has failed and soon the commiecrats on the left will be brought to justice and charged with treason. You've got it coming, libs.

This whole post is a lie.

Sure, that's why you effectively rebutted everything I said. No, wait, you didn't rebut anything. You just continued with your mantra..."Liar liar liar. That's all you have, isn't it, bitch?

Ha "bitch" eat this for lunch today; Trey Gowdy: FBI’s Use of Informant for Trump Campaign Was Appropriate

 

[hunarcy]

There is again, zero evidence anyone spied on the campaign, and you have zero proof of that.

You're a fucking idiot.

You can't lie this into the cornfield, Comrade.

{
Furthermore, when the House Intelligence Committee’s investigators managed to uncover the spy — later revealed to be University of Cambridge professor Stefan Halper — the DOJ initially refused to comply with a congressional subpoena for more information. In fact, Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) — finally fed up with being “stalled” and “stonewalled” by the FBI and DOJ — had to threaten Attorney General Jeff Sessions with charges of contempt of Congress before the DOJ caved and briefed the committee on Halper.

Going back a little further, the FBI and DOJ — while protecting Hillary Clinton from being charged for her illegal use of a private e-mail server to send and receive thousands of classified documents — abused the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) process to illegally obtain a surveillance warrant on Trump campaign associate Carter Page. That warrant’s application was based on the now-discredited Trump “dossier” written by ex-MI6 agent Christopher Steele and illegally financed by the DNC and Clinton Campaign (and based on information provided by Russian government sources).

No wonder President Trump tweeted a quote by Fox Business Network anchor David Asman on May 18, saying, “Apparently the DOJ put a Spy in the Trump Campaign. This has never been done before and by any means necessary, they are out to frame Donald Trump for crimes he didn't commit.” And on May 23 — as more information came to light — he tweeted, “Look how things have turned around on the Criminal Deep State. They go after Phony Collusion with Russia, a made up Scam, and end up getting caught in a major SPY scandal the likes of which this country may never have seen before! What goes around, comes around!”

Whatever one’s opinion of President Trump, he is right about this. Spygate could be one of the biggest political scandals in history. It is certainly bigger than Watergate. While Watergate will likely continue to be the scandal by which all other scandals are measured (old habits die hard), the reality is that taken all together, Spygate makes Watergate look mild by comparison.}

Spygate Is a Bigger Scandal Than Watergate

You don't care about facts, you are a Communist and live to serve and obey the party. Irrespective of that, I will continue to post facts in the face of your absurd lies.

What is amusing is that you are too stupid to grasp that your filthy and evil party have given up denying that Halper spied on Trump and are instead trying to spin as if Halper were an informant, a criminal in a gang who turned on his fellow criminals, rather than a spy planted by the FBI on the orders of Obama to rig the election.

Turn on your brain Comrade, that is to say MS13NBC - Madcow will be wildly spinning that Halper is "an informant" rather than lying as you are that he didn't exist.

Lol! And you're a retard; Trey Gowdy: FBI’s Use of Informant for Trump Campaign Was Appropriate

From your link...the last paragraph: "Separately, Gowdy said Trump’s detractors including Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, are “doing a disservice to our fellow citizens” when they do not “make it clear” that the president is not a “target” of the investigation." ??????????

If Trump is not the target of the investigation, what's the point?

Here we go with the diversions again. What does that have to do with the lie that was "Spygate"? Nothing!

This losing strategy of distractions, dodges, and diversions isn't going to fix the lies by Trump and his Sheep herd. Try as you might, it's the ultimate fail.

It was a paragraph from the article YOU referenced and is legitimate question. If you can't answer it, just say so.

 

[WTP]

There is again, zero evidence anyone spied on the campaign, and you have zero proof of that.

You're a fucking idiot.

You can't lie this into the cornfield, Comrade.

{
Furthermore, when the House Intelligence Committee’s investigators managed to uncover the spy — later revealed to be University of Cambridge professor Stefan Halper — the DOJ initially refused to comply with a congressional subpoena for more information. In fact, Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) — finally fed up with being “stalled” and “stonewalled” by the FBI and DOJ — had to threaten Attorney General Jeff Sessions with charges of contempt of Congress before the DOJ caved and briefed the committee on Halper.

Going back a little further, the FBI and DOJ — while protecting Hillary Clinton from being charged for her illegal use of a private e-mail server to send and receive thousands of classified documents — abused the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) process to illegally obtain a surveillance warrant on Trump campaign associate Carter Page. That warrant’s application was based on the now-discredited Trump “dossier” written by ex-MI6 agent Christopher Steele and illegally financed by the DNC and Clinton Campaign (and based on information provided by Russian government sources).

No wonder President Trump tweeted a quote by Fox Business Network anchor David Asman on May 18, saying, “Apparently the DOJ put a Spy in the Trump Campaign. This has never been done before and by any means necessary, they are out to frame Donald Trump for crimes he didn't commit.” And on May 23 — as more information came to light — he tweeted, “Look how things have turned around on the Criminal Deep State. They go after Phony Collusion with Russia, a made up Scam, and end up getting caught in a major SPY scandal the likes of which this country may never have seen before! What goes around, comes around!”

Whatever one’s opinion of President Trump, he is right about this. Spygate could be one of the biggest political scandals in history. It is certainly bigger than Watergate. While Watergate will likely continue to be the scandal by which all other scandals are measured (old habits die hard), the reality is that taken all together, Spygate makes Watergate look mild by comparison.}

Spygate Is a Bigger Scandal Than Watergate

You don't care about facts, you are a Communist and live to serve and obey the party. Irrespective of that, I will continue to post facts in the face of your absurd lies.

What is amusing is that you are too stupid to grasp that your filthy and evil party have given up denying that Halper spied on Trump and are instead trying to spin as if Halper were an informant, a criminal in a gang who turned on his fellow criminals, rather than a spy planted by the FBI on the orders of Obama to rig the election.

Turn on your brain Comrade, that is to say MS13NBC - Madcow will be wildly spinning that Halper is "an informant" rather than lying as you are that he didn't exist.

Lol! And you're a retard; Trey Gowdy: FBI’s Use of Informant for Trump Campaign Was Appropriate

From your link...the last paragraph: "Separately, Gowdy said Trump’s detractors including Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, are “doing a disservice to our fellow citizens” when they do not “make it clear” that the president is not a “target” of the investigation." ??????????

If Trump is not the target of the investigation, what's the point?

Here we go with the diversions again. What does that have to do with the lie that was "Spygate"? Nothing!

This losing strategy of distractions, dodges, and diversions isn't going to fix the lies by Trump and his Sheep herd. Try as you might, it's the ultimate fail.

It was a paragraph from the article YOU referenced and is legitimate question. If you can't answer it, just say so.

Make a thread about. This is a thread about "spies" not "targets"

 

[hunarcy]

You're a fucking idiot.

You can't lie this into the cornfield, Comrade.

{
Furthermore, when the House Intelligence Committee’s investigators managed to uncover the spy — later revealed to be University of Cambridge professor Stefan Halper — the DOJ initially refused to comply with a congressional subpoena for more information. In fact, Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) — finally fed up with being “stalled” and “stonewalled” by the FBI and DOJ — had to threaten Attorney General Jeff Sessions with charges of contempt of Congress before the DOJ caved and briefed the committee on Halper.

Going back a little further, the FBI and DOJ — while protecting Hillary Clinton from being charged for her illegal use of a private e-mail server to send and receive thousands of classified documents — abused the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) process to illegally obtain a surveillance warrant on Trump campaign associate Carter Page. That warrant’s application was based on the now-discredited Trump “dossier” written by ex-MI6 agent Christopher Steele and illegally financed by the DNC and Clinton Campaign (and based on information provided by Russian government sources).

No wonder President Trump tweeted a quote by Fox Business Network anchor David Asman on May 18, saying, “Apparently the DOJ put a Spy in the Trump Campaign. This has never been done before and by any means necessary, they are out to frame Donald Trump for crimes he didn't commit.” And on May 23 — as more information came to light — he tweeted, “Look how things have turned around on the Criminal Deep State. They go after Phony Collusion with Russia, a made up Scam, and end up getting caught in a major SPY scandal the likes of which this country may never have seen before! What goes around, comes around!”

Whatever one’s opinion of President Trump, he is right about this. Spygate could be one of the biggest political scandals in history. It is certainly bigger than Watergate. While Watergate will likely continue to be the scandal by which all other scandals are measured (old habits die hard), the reality is that taken all together, Spygate makes Watergate look mild by comparison.}

Spygate Is a Bigger Scandal Than Watergate

You don't care about facts, you are a Communist and live to serve and obey the party. Irrespective of that, I will continue to post facts in the face of your absurd lies.

What is amusing is that you are too stupid to grasp that your filthy and evil party have given up denying that Halper spied on Trump and are instead trying to spin as if Halper were an informant, a criminal in a gang who turned on his fellow criminals, rather than a spy planted by the FBI on the orders of Obama to rig the election.

Turn on your brain Comrade, that is to say MS13NBC - Madcow will be wildly spinning that Halper is "an informant" rather than lying as you are that he didn't exist.

Lol! And you're a retard; Trey Gowdy: FBI’s Use of Informant for Trump Campaign Was Appropriate

From your link...the last paragraph: "Separately, Gowdy said Trump’s detractors including Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, are “doing a disservice to our fellow citizens” when they do not “make it clear” that the president is not a “target” of the investigation." ??????????

If Trump is not the target of the investigation, what's the point?

Here we go with the diversions again. What does that have to do with the lie that was "Spygate"? Nothing!

This losing strategy of distractions, dodges, and diversions isn't going to fix the lies by Trump and his Sheep herd. Try as you might, it's the ultimate fail.

It was a paragraph from the article YOU referenced and is legitimate question. If you can't answer it, just say so.

Make a thread about. This is a thread about "spies" not "targets"

Well, I know that's how Hillarybots try to control the conversation, but if a legitimate question comes up in a thread, it should be addressed. YOUR link raised the question. If you didn't want to address it, you shouldn't have posted the link.

OH, and just because Gowdy said it was appropriate to use a spy doesn't mean the campaign wasn't being spied on...just that it was ok.

 

[WTP]

Lol! And you're a retard; Trey Gowdy: FBI’s Use of Informant for Trump Campaign Was Appropriate

From your link...the last paragraph: "Separately, Gowdy said Trump’s detractors including Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, are “doing a disservice to our fellow citizens” when they do not “make it clear” that the president is not a “target” of the investigation." ??????????

If Trump is not the target of the investigation, what's the point?

Here we go with the diversions again. What does that have to do with the lie that was "Spygate"? Nothing!

This losing strategy of distractions, dodges, and diversions isn't going to fix the lies by Trump and his Sheep herd. Try as you might, it's the ultimate fail.

It was a paragraph from the article YOU referenced and is legitimate question. If you can't answer it, just say so.

Make a thread about. This is a thread about "spies" not "targets"

Well, I know that's how Hillarybots try to control the conversation, but if a legitimate question comes up in a thread, it should be addressed. YOUR link raised the question. If you didn't want to address it, you shouldn't have posted the link.

OH, and just because Gowdy said it was appropriate to use a spy doesn't mean the campaign wasn't being spied on...just that it was ok.

It's irrelevant to the thread. Pay attention to the thread title. "No spies"!

"OH, and just because Gowdy said it was appropriate to use a spy doesn't mean the campaign wasn't being spied on...just that it was ok." You folks have been caught up in so many lies, no one can keep up. And you all are, doing it again. Prove the campaign was spied on with a "spy". I seem to recall that the individual was an informant appropriately used by the FBI to spy on Russia. Remember?

You all get caught with one lie, just so you can drop back into another one.

 

[S.J.]

Gotta love those Trump haters. First they denied there were spies in the Trump campaign, then Clapper slipped and admitted there were spies, then tried to cover his ass by claiming "but they were only spying on the Russians". LOL What happened to "There were no spies in the Trump campaign"? There's enough video evidence of these crooked bastards to seal their fate when their trials come up so they're pinning all their hopes on slander and smear campaigns, hoping they can win back the Congress and stop the prosecutions that are almost certain to come, beginning in 2019. This coup has failed and soon the commiecrats on the left will be brought to justice and charged with treason. You've got it coming, libs.

Your post consists only of delusion; bereft of facts.

Zero indictments because the Obama Justice Dept. was not about to indict one of their own. Democrats have never been known for putting the integrity of the country above the interests of their party.
And how many of the 23 indictments (by Mueller, not DOJ) had anything to do with Donald Trump or Russia collusion? NONE.

Those investigations were controlled by republicans. If they found anything, then DOJ would be forced to act. But the DOJ had proof that the anti-muslim video had nothing to do with benghazi attack.

Mueller also was appointed by republicans.

They found plenty, and the DOJ refused to act, just like they refused to act on the voter intimidation case in Philadelphia and the NBPs in an open and shut case. You don't know what the hell you're talking about. And yeah, no shit, the DOJ had proof the video had nothing to do with the Benghazi attack, yet Obama, Rice, and Hillary all insisted it was the cause of the attack. You must be drunk.

 

[dudmuck]

Gotta love those Trump haters. First they denied there were spies in the Trump campaign, then Clapper slipped and admitted there were spies, then tried to cover his ass by claiming "but they were only spying on the Russians". LOL What happened to "There were no spies in the Trump campaign"? There's enough video evidence of these crooked bastards to seal their fate when their trials come up so they're pinning all their hopes on slander and smear campaigns, hoping they can win back the Congress and stop the prosecutions that are almost certain to come, beginning in 2019. This coup has failed and soon the commiecrats on the left will be brought to justice and charged with treason. You've got it coming, libs.

Your post consists only of delusion; bereft of facts.

Zero indictments because the Obama Justice Dept. was not about to indict one of their own. Democrats have never been known for putting the integrity of the country above the interests of their party.
And how many of the 23 indictments (by Mueller, not DOJ) had anything to do with Donald Trump or Russia collusion? NONE.

Those investigations were controlled by republicans. If they found anything, then DOJ would be forced to act. But the DOJ had proof that the anti-muslim video had nothing to do with benghazi attack.

Mueller also was appointed by republicans.

They found plenty, and the DOJ refused to act, just like they refused to act on the voter intimidation case in Philadelphia and the NBPs in an open and shut case. You don't know what the hell you're talking about. And yeah, no shit, the DOJ had proof the video had nothing to do with the Benghazi attack, yet Obama, Rice, and Hillary all insisted it was the cause of the attack. You must be drunk.

The final republican report on benghazi was issued. Republicans have controlled everything but nothing has happened on benghazi since that final report. Instead, they've been wasting time on uranium one hoax.

The DOJ did act on that voter intimidation.
Even Napolitano says spygate is BS.

 

[beagle9]

That's fine. They infiltrated the campaign illegally, started a phony dossier paid for by a opposition political party to a foreign spy to make up stuff about Trump to get a FISA warrant to spy on Trump.

No, there is nothing crooked going on here. Everything is totally above board. We should be proud of our nation.

Let's ignore ALL OF THAT for a moment.

Over a year later we still have no proof, despite the illegal means by which the search was done. Why isn't the investigation over?

Gawdy probably agreed with Clapper about the spy, because now that's just one more witness inside the campaign to prove no collusion.

 

[hunarcy]

From your link...the last paragraph: "Separately, Gowdy said Trump’s detractors including Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, are “doing a disservice to our fellow citizens” when they do not “make it clear” that the president is not a “target” of the investigation." ??????????

If Trump is not the target of the investigation, what's the point?

Here we go with the diversions again. What does that have to do with the lie that was "Spygate"? Nothing!

This losing strategy of distractions, dodges, and diversions isn't going to fix the lies by Trump and his Sheep herd. Try as you might, it's the ultimate fail.

It was a paragraph from the article YOU referenced and is legitimate question. If you can't answer it, just say so.

Make a thread about. This is a thread about "spies" not "targets"

Well, I know that's how Hillarybots try to control the conversation, but if a legitimate question comes up in a thread, it should be addressed. YOUR link raised the question. If you didn't want to address it, you shouldn't have posted the link.

OH, and just because Gowdy said it was appropriate to use a spy doesn't mean the campaign wasn't being spied on...just that it was ok.

It's irrelevant to the thread. Pay attention to the thread title. "No spies"!

"OH, and just because Gowdy said it was appropriate to use a spy doesn't mean the campaign wasn't being spied on...just that it was ok." You folks have been caught up in so many lies, no one can keep up. And you all are, doing it again. Prove the campaign was spied on with a "spy". I seem to recall that the individual was an informant appropriately used by the FBI to spy on Russia. Remember?

You all get caught with one lie, just so you can drop back into another one.

"You people"? Yesterday you were quoting my post that you felt supported your point of view. You tell one lie after another offering NO proof and the one time you provide a link, it claims that Trump was not the target of an investigation, so why were they investigating? The whole exercise should have been to target Trump!

 

[WTP]

Here we go with the diversions again. What does that have to do with the lie that was "Spygate"? Nothing!

This losing strategy of distractions, dodges, and diversions isn't going to fix the lies by Trump and his Sheep herd. Try as you might, it's the ultimate fail.

It was a paragraph from the article YOU referenced and is legitimate question. If you can't answer it, just say so.

Make a thread about. This is a thread about "spies" not "targets"

Well, I know that's how Hillarybots try to control the conversation, but if a legitimate question comes up in a thread, it should be addressed. YOUR link raised the question. If you didn't want to address it, you shouldn't have posted the link.

OH, and just because Gowdy said it was appropriate to use a spy doesn't mean the campaign wasn't being spied on...just that it was ok.

It's irrelevant to the thread. Pay attention to the thread title. "No spies"!

"OH, and just because Gowdy said it was appropriate to use a spy doesn't mean the campaign wasn't being spied on...just that it was ok." You folks have been caught up in so many lies, no one can keep up. And you all are, doing it again. Prove the campaign was spied on with a "spy". I seem to recall that the individual was an informant appropriately used by the FBI to spy on Russia. Remember?

You all get caught with one lie, just so you can drop back into another one.

"You people"? Yesterday you were quoting my post that you felt supported your point of view. You tell one lie after another offering NO proof and the one time you provide a link, it claims that Trump was not the target of an investigation, so why were they investigating? The whole exercise should have been to target Trump!

Okay, thanks! You just backed up my claim that you are lying. You claim the individual is a "spy" when he is not, and when asked to prove your claim you ignore the request. You are a liar. See you later.

 

[hunarcy]

It was a paragraph from the article YOU referenced and is legitimate question. If you can't answer it, just say so.

Make a thread about. This is a thread about "spies" not "targets"

Well, I know that's how Hillarybots try to control the conversation, but if a legitimate question comes up in a thread, it should be addressed. YOUR link raised the question. If you didn't want to address it, you shouldn't have posted the link.

OH, and just because Gowdy said it was appropriate to use a spy doesn't mean the campaign wasn't being spied on...just that it was ok.

It's irrelevant to the thread. Pay attention to the thread title. "No spies"!

"OH, and just because Gowdy said it was appropriate to use a spy doesn't mean the campaign wasn't being spied on...just that it was ok." You folks have been caught up in so many lies, no one can keep up. And you all are, doing it again. Prove the campaign was spied on with a "spy". I seem to recall that the individual was an informant appropriately used by the FBI to spy on Russia. Remember?

You all get caught with one lie, just so you can drop back into another one.

"You people"? Yesterday you were quoting my post that you felt supported your point of view. You tell one lie after another offering NO proof and the one time you provide a link, it claims that Trump was not the target of an investigation, so why were they investigating? The whole exercise should have been to target Trump!

Okay, thanks! You just backed up my claim that you are lying. You claim the individual is a "spy" when he is not, and when asked to prove your claim you ignore the request. You are a liar. See you later.

*Sigh* You're so stupid. A spy is someone who gathers information from the outside. An Informant is someone who has information and informs on the organization to law enforcement. No matter which word is used the effect is the same.

Frankly, all you've proven is that you are a troll who is pedantic and desperate. I hope you never "see" me again. You're just a time suck troll.

 

[beagle9]

It was a paragraph from the article YOU referenced and is legitimate question. If you can't answer it, just say so.

Make a thread about. This is a thread about "spies" not "targets"

Well, I know that's how Hillarybots try to control the conversation, but if a legitimate question comes up in a thread, it should be addressed. YOUR link raised the question. If you didn't want to address it, you shouldn't have posted the link.

OH, and just because Gowdy said it was appropriate to use a spy doesn't mean the campaign wasn't being spied on...just that it was ok.

It's irrelevant to the thread. Pay attention to the thread title. "No spies"!

"OH, and just because Gowdy said it was appropriate to use a spy doesn't mean the campaign wasn't being spied on...just that it was ok." You folks have been caught up in so many lies, no one can keep up. And you all are, doing it again. Prove the campaign was spied on with a "spy". I seem to recall that the individual was an informant appropriately used by the FBI to spy on Russia. Remember?

You all get caught with one lie, just so you can drop back into another one.

"You people"? Yesterday you were quoting my post that you felt supported your point of view. You tell one lie after another offering NO proof and the one time you provide a link, it claims that Trump was not the target of an investigation, so why were they investigating? The whole exercise should have been to target Trump!

Okay, thanks! You just backed up my claim that you are lying. You claim the individual is a "spy" when he is not, and when asked to prove your claim you ignore the request. You are a liar. See you later.

Wait till this so called informant/spy is brought before Congress to confess his role in the situation while under oath, and who put him there, and what did he learn other than the fact that there was no collusion.

Trey Gowdy undoubtedly is looking at it from that point of view, otherwise now we have a target to question, and the ability to put this puzzle together just a little bit more maybe.

 

[g5000]

Like James Clapper said, if it wasn't for Russia, Trump wouldn't have been elected, telling us that he is not a legitimate president.

James Clapper admitted they were spying on the Trump campaign, stupid.

Watch your own clip, retard. Clapper unequivocally says the FBI was NOT spying on Trump campaign.