They can kiss my ass

[dilloduck]

man we are in so much trouble,we are at war but its not with alqueda




Feds Train Clergy To "Quell Dissent" During Martial Law
Shocking KSLA 12 news report confirms story we broke last year, Pastors to cite Romans 13 as reason for public to obey government orders, relinquish guns and be taken to camps during state of emergency
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Thursday, August 16, 2007


A shocking KSLA news report has confirmed the story we first broke last year, that Clergy Response Teams are being trained by the federal government to "quell dissent" and pacify citizens to obey the government in the event of a declaration of martial law.

In May 2006, we exposed the existence of a nationwide FEMA program which is training Pastors and other religious representatives to become secret police enforcers who teach their congregations to "obey the government" in preparation for the implementation of martial law, property and firearm seizures, mass vaccination programs and forced relocation.

A whistleblower who was secretly enrolled into the program told us that the feds were clandestinely recruiting religious leaders to help implement Homeland Security directives in anticipation of a potential bio-terrorist attack, any natural disaster or a nationally declared emergency.

The first directive was for Pastors to preach to their congregations Romans 13, the often taken out of context bible passage that was used by Hitler to hoodwink Christians into supporting him, in order to teach them to "obey the government" when martial law is declared.

It was related to the Pastors that quarantines, martial law and forced relocation were a problem for state authorities when enforcing federal mandates due to the "cowboy mentality" of citizens standing up for their property and second amendment rights as well as farmers defending their crops and livestock from seizure.

It was stressed that the Pastors needed to preach subservience to the authorities ahead of time in preparation for the round-ups and to make it clear to the congregation that "this is for their own good."

Pastors were told that they would be backed up by law enforcement in controlling uncooperative individuals and that they would even lead SWAT teams in attempting to quell resistance.

Though some doubted the accuracy of this report at the time due to its fundamentally disturbing implications, the story has now been confirmed by a KSLA 12 news report, in which participating clergy and officials admit to the existence of the program.



The report entertains the scenario of martial law as depicted in the movie The Siege and states that "quelling dissent would be critical."

Dr. Durell Tuberville serves as chaplain for the Shreveport Fire Department and the Caddo Sheriff's Office. Tuberville said of the clergy team's mission, "the primary thing that we say to anybody is, 'let's cooperate and get this thing over with and then we'll settle the differences once the crisis is over.'"

Such clergy response teams would walk a tight-rope during martial law between the demands of the government on the one side, versus the wishes of the public on the other. "In a lot of cases, these clergy would already be known in the neighborhoods in which they're helping to diffuse that situation," assured Sandy Davis. He serves as the director of the Caddo-Bossier Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness.

For the clergy team, one of the biggest tools that they will have in helping calm the public down or to obey the law is the bible itself, specifically Romans 13. Dr. Tuberville elaborated, "because the government's established by the Lord, you know. And, that's what we believe in the Christian faith. That's what's stated in the scripture."



So there you have it - Homeland Security are working with local police departments and religious leaders to prepare for the declaration of martial law and in particular developing techniques they will employ during the crisis to "quell dissent."

Phony Christian leaders are brainwashing their congregations to accept the premise that the totalitarian police state is "of the Lord" and that they should get on their knees and lick jackboots while the round-ups take place as citizens are processed into quarantine zones and detention camps by the National Guard and U.S. troops returning from Iraq.



The precedent for mass gun confiscation and martial law in times of a real or manufactured emergency was set during Hurricane Katrina, when police and National Guard patrols forced home owners - even in areas unaffected by the hurricane - to hand over their legally owned firearms at gunpoint.

This is a clear precursor for the imminent declaration of a state of emergency, a scenario that President Bush codified in his recent Presidential Decision Directive of May 9th, which states in the event of a "catastrophic event" the President can take total control over the government and the country, bypassing all other levels of government at the state, federal, local, territorial and tribal levels, and thus ensuring total unprecedented dictatorial power.

The scope of the program is so secretive that even Homeland Security Committee member and Congressman Peter DeFazio was denied access to view the classified portion of the documents.

How stupid. Planning for something that can't happen. Why don't they plan for something like anarchy and mass chaotic insane revolution ?

 

[mattskramer]

If a structured prayer time is set apart to allow for free expression of religion for all, why would you want to gag teachers? Or any government employee? Or representative? The people who represent the people are people with rights too. To deny a teacher her rights would be setting a very bad example in a political sense.

I think that you answered your own question with your second paragraph here. See below. Teachers are not students. They are in a higher position of power, authority, and influence. By the way, I also support the voucher system.

However, I agree with your valid point that any teacher is in a position of power over children and thus may be seen as leading innocent children in a certain direction. Children are not fully mature human beings. That is why I support school vouchers so parents can have a free CHOICE as to which school they wish their children to attend. Then they can choose schools with teachers who would be able to lead their children in Christian prayer (or whatever) in peace without the ACLU breathing down their necks and attempting to yank God out of their schools. I believe that it is without saying that children are taught ethics and morals while in school but that the parents have the right to CHOOSE which ethics and morals are being taught to their children.

 

[ScreamingEagle]

I think that you answered your own question with your second paragraph here. See below. Teachers are not students. They are in a higher position of power, authority, and influence. By the way, I also support the voucher system.

The voucher system is the only way I can see to fight today what has already gone down in the schools. Gagging teachers moral authority by banning God and religious morality/expression does not address the very important question of what will be taught.

Since you agree that teachers are in a higher position of power, you will also agree with me that sexual education or other values-oriented propaganda should not be taught, especially beginning at the youngest grade levels which is now what is being done. And homosexuality or other deviant behaviors should not be taught, especially presented in a favorable light. And condoms should not be gratuitously passed out to teens. Nor should schools skip the notification of parents of girls who are pregnant and want abortions. Schools should not punish children without parental consent. Nor should teachers teach liberal propaganda topics such as global warming or any other sensitive political or social issues. Teachers should stick to the very basics of reading, writing, literature, math, science, history, civics, geography, art, music, and PE class without any of the "fluffy" extras that would include any type of values-oriented instruction.

After all, most parents do not wish teachers to have this kind of power over on their children either. As you said, teachers are in a higher position of power, authority, and influence. If they could possibly damage their children by mentioning God or leading a prayer or two, think of how much they could damage their children by exposing them to other ideas and values! You do believe in parental rights when it comes to values? Or do you believe that the government bureaucracy has the right to choose which values it wishes to disseminate? If so, how is that determined? What about minorities (or majorities) that believe differently?

 

[mattskramer]

The voucher system is the only way I can see to fight today what has already gone down in the schools. Gagging teachers moral authority by banning God and religious morality/expression does not address the very important question of what will be taught.

Since you agree that teachers are in a higher position of power, you will also agree with me that sexual education or other values-oriented propaganda should not be taught, especially beginning at the youngest grade levels which is now what is being done. And homosexuality or other deviant behaviors should not be taught, especially presented in a favorable light. And condoms should not be gratuitously passed out to teens. Nor should schools skip the notification of parents of girls who are pregnant and want abortions. Schools should not punish children without parental consent. Nor should teachers teach liberal propaganda topics such as global warming or any other sensitive political or social issues. Teachers should stick to the very basics of reading, writing, literature, math, science, history, civics, geography, art, music, and PE class without any of the "fluffy" extras that would include any type of values-oriented instruction.

After all, most parents do not wish teachers to have this kind of power over on their children either. As you said, teachers are in a higher position of power, authority, and influence. If they could possibly damage their children by mentioning God or leading a prayer or two, think of how much they could damage their children by exposing them to other ideas and values! You do believe in parental rights when it comes to values? Or do you believe that the government bureaucracy has the right to choose which values it wishes to disseminate? If so, how is that determined? What about minorities (or majorities) that believe differently?

Wow! I think that we are in complete agreement. If you want to send your child the a “Bible believing school” where children are taught to pray through Jesus you should receive a voucher to help you send your child to that school. If I want to send my child to a school where comprehensive sexual education and the “10 Commandments” are not displayed, I should receive a voucher to help me send my child to that school. Parents should be free to decide how best to educate their children with respect to sensitive personal issues like sexual education, religion, etc.