Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No I didn't. YOU say I did and you are wrong.But you allude to it being a parasite, like many abortion rights supporters to justify you desire to kill it.
Giving a fetus protection still cannot violate the rights of the woman.
No I didn't. YOU say I did and you are wrong.
ANd I have no desire to kill anything.
But it is not my right to tell any woman she cannot do what she wants to with her own body and like it or not a fetus is still part of her body as it is attached to her and dependent on her bodily function
That's already the case...except it is not a vote, it is fiat by unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats.No it doesn't.
Tell me you'd you be OK with any state putting to the popular your ability to get a medical procedure?
Why do you want to give the fucking government that kind of power over your life?
The right to any medical procedure she chooses to have performed.What right? Roe made up a right to an abortion, it never existed as something constitutionally protected. You can think it's a right, that doesn't make it a right, especially and constitutional right.
I have never been told any medical procedure I wanted was illegal and punishable by jail time have you?That's already the case...except it is not a vote, it is fiat by unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats.
Wrong.All well and good, but the Constitution is mute on the whole thing, and Roe was a terrible court case. Sending it back to the states is the right thing to do.
The right to any medical procedure she chooses to have performed.
The state cannot put to a vote your personal medical decisions.
Wrong.
The state has no right to meddle in personal medical decisions PERIOD.
No, but people have.I have never been told any medical procedure I wanted was illegal and punishable by jail time have you?
Wanna bet? They are doing that now.
Again, abortion is different because it involves another human life. You can try mind games to ignore that, but it doesn't change the fact of the matter.
Irrelevant. That life does not have any rights that supersede the rights of the mother
They do it all the time. Do you think you can have your armed chopped off voluntarily without being evaluated mentally?
The "States" have no bar on their legislating abortion in the federal constitution. Roe created a made up "right" out of thin air, and is rightly being put to pasture.
Actually even under Roe it does. You can't get a third trimester abortion in most States just because you feel like it. The old standard used to be risk to life of the Mother.
In some places the standard is being relaxed to risk to health.
Yes I can. Elective amputation is not illegal and all one needs is a Doctor willing to do the surgery. There is ZERO government intervention.
And you are ignoring the fact that an abortion is just a single medical procedure unless your position is that no one has the right to have ANY medical procedure performed without fist putting it to a vote then you are being a hypocrite.
No it doesn't.
If that fetus is endangering the life of the mother the mother's rights take precedence.
With your logic, why have pedo & child abuse laws since they happen anyway?
Did what to his license?There would be if the doctor did it to his license, sure as all hell.
I've told you why abortion is different, you refuse to acknowledge the difference.
The old "lump of cells" argument.
only after viability.That still means the fetus is part of the equation in deciding to allow the abortion. If her life isn't in danger she just can't get rid of it even if she wants to.
