The Unenforceability of abortion bans

'Banning' abortion was never about ‘saving babies’ – it was and is about the neo-fascist authoritarian right compelling conformity and punishing dissent in violation of the fundamental right to privacy.
Nobody takes your dumbassery as fact, Dipshit.

Nobody.
 
Until they do and are overturned, you are a liar.
Says you and we all know what that's worth.

Tell me when abortion was rules on the first time you were whining that it was unconstitutional weren't you? Isn't that why you want it overturned?

So you were lying all that time right?

 
Nobody takes your dumbassery as fact, Dipshit.

Nobody.
After Roe is overturned, and women continue to have abortions – in both free states and ban states – no longer restrained by privacy rights jurisprudence, the neo-fascist authoritarian right will turn to even more extreme, radical, and draconian measures to compel conformity and punish dissent.
 
After Roe is overturned, and women continue to have abortions – in both free states and ban states – no longer restrained by privacy rights jurisprudence, the neo-fascist authoritarian right will turn to even more extreme, radical, and draconian measures to compel conformity and punish dissent.
Nobody takes your dumbassery as fact, Dipshit.

Nobody.
 
The Times reports, "The leak of a draft opinion has done irreparable damage to the Supreme Court, Justice Clarence Thomas said at a conference in Dallas on Friday night, adding that it had destroyed trust among its members."
Clarence is upset because impoverished black women will suffer the most due his position. Because of his decision to support overturning Roe vs. Wade, poor black women not only will suffer more, but many will die. Reversing Roe will not end abortions, but reversing Roe will end legal abortions by trained caregivers in Republican controlled states.

Clarence is turning on his own, and he knows it. Forcing his religious beliefs on others will prove deadly.

"But the Supreme Court will not be bullied," Justice Clarence Thomas.

The same might be said for Amy.

Anyone watching the news knows women are clamoring for women's right to chose. Taking into account the many circumstances of a pregnancy, cause, age of woman, financial factors, health of the fetus, health of the mother, women across the country, in consultation with their doctor, should have the inalienable right to make their own health decisions.

But Amy disagrees. She supports overturning Roe. Amy supports taking the decision away from the woman and putting it in the hands of government.

There is another issue.

If this extremely obvious right is being pulled from Americans and placed in the hands of government, what freedoms will be next?

Republicans remain silent on the issue. They don't want to talk about it although they have been fighting for decades to get Roe overturned.
 

Forum List

Back
Top