The U.s. National Debt Has Grown By More Than A Trillion Dollars In The Last 12 Months

[Faun]

Was it your goal to show how the unemployment rate rose after every Republican president except Reagan; but never after any Democrat president?

It was to show that Reagan Inherited an exploding unemployment rate and high interest rates when he took office. A Recession nearly equivalent to the one in 2008. His actions created a recovery even though it took a couple of years to get it under control. Obama has been in their a while and still can't get it together.

Either way, it was a hit on Carter which was clearly in the posts of this op.

Than I guess it was just an unintended consequence to show how the unemployment rate never went up following a Democrat presidency; whereas Reagan was the only Republican president who could boast that.

Oh, and Reagan inherited a declining unemployment rate. Unemployment peaked under Carter at 7.8% in July, 1980. It then trickled downward to 7.2% in July, 1981, when the country entered the Reagan Recession.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

 

[eagle1462010]

Was it your goal to show how the unemployment rate rose after every Republican president except Reagan; but never after any Democrat president?

It was to show that Reagan Inherited an exploding unemployment rate and high interest rates when he took office. A Recession nearly equivalent to the one in 2008. His actions created a recovery even though it took a couple of years to get it under control. Obama has been in their a while and still can't get it together.

Either way, it was a hit on Carter which was clearly in the posts of this op.

Than I guess it was just an unintended consequence to show how the unemployment rate was never went up following a Democrat presidency; whereas Reagan was the only Republican president who could boast that.

Oh, and Reagan inherited a declining unemployment rate. Unemployment peaked under Carter at 7.8% in July, 1980. It then trickled downward to 7.2% in July, 1981, when the country entered the Reagan Recession.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

We were in a high inflation going into recession when he took office..........We recovered from it...........Reagan turned it around as you attempt to change Carter to a good President from a Peanut Head. We all called him Peanut head back then.

 

[Faun]

Was it your goal to show how the unemployment rate rose after every Republican president except Reagan; but never after any Democrat president?

It was to show that Reagan Inherited an exploding unemployment rate and high interest rates when he took office. A Recession nearly equivalent to the one in 2008. His actions created a recovery even though it took a couple of years to get it under control. Obama has been in their a while and still can't get it together.

Either way, it was a hit on Carter which was clearly in the posts of this op.

Than I guess it was just an unintended consequence to show how the unemployment rate was never went up following a Democrat presidency; whereas Reagan was the only Republican president who could boast that.

Oh, and Reagan inherited a declining unemployment rate. Unemployment peaked under Carter at 7.8% in July, 1980. It then trickled downward to 7.2% in July, 1981, when the country entered the Reagan Recession.

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

We were in a high inflation going into recession when he took office..........We recovered from it...........Reagan turned it around as you attempt to change Carter to a good President from a Peanut Head. We all called him Peanut head back then.

Huh? Real GDP was +7.6% when Reagan took over and unemployment was dropping. I understand inflation and interest rates were very high, but Reagan's recession didn't start until 6 months later. How is that, "going into a recession?" GDP was even higher during Reagan's first quarter in office.

 

[eagle1462010]

Index = Unemployment rate + Inflation rate

President	Time Period	Average	Low	High	Start	End	Change
Harry Truman	1948–1952	7.88	3.45 – Dec 1952	13.63 – Jan 1948	13.63	3.45	-10.18
Dwight D. Eisenhower	1953–1960	9.26	2.97 – Jul 1953	10.98 – Apr 1958	3.28	9.96	+4.68
John F. Kennedy	1961–1962	7.14	6.40 – Jul 1962	8.38 – Jul 1961	8.31	6.82	-1.49
Lyndon B. Johnson	1963–1968	6.77	5.70 – Nov 1965	8.19 – Jul 1968	7.02	8.12	+1.10
Richard Nixon	1969–1974	10.57	7.80 – Jan 1969	17.01 – Jul 1974	7.80	17.01	+9.21
Gerald Ford	1974–1976	16.00	12.66 – Dec 1976	19.90 – Jan 1975	16.36	12.66	-3.70
Jimmy Carter	1977–1980	16.26	12.60 – Apr 1978	21.98 – Jun 1980	12.72	19.72	+7.00
Ronald Reagan	1981–1988	12.19	7.70 – Dec 1986	19.33 – Jan 1981	19.33	9.72	-9.61
George H. W. Bush	1989–1992	10.68	9.64 – Sep 1989	14.47 – Nov 1990	10.07	10.30	+0.23
Bill Clinton	1993–2000	7.80	5.74 – Apr 1998	10.56 – Jan 1993	10.56	7.29	-3.27
George W. Bush	2001–2008	8.11	5.71 – Oct 2006	11.47 – Aug 2008	7.93	7.39	-0.54
Barack Obama	2009–Dec 2013 Incomplete data	10.26	7.30 – July 2009 index offset by negative inflation (-2.10)	12.97 – September 2011	7.83	8.20	+0.37

[THEAD] [/THEAD]
[TBODY] [/TBODY]

[2]

 

[Faun]

Index = Unemployment rate + Inflation rate

President	Time Period	Average	Low	High	Start	End	Change
Harry Truman	1948–1952	7.88	3.45 – Dec 1952	13.63 – Jan 1948	13.63	3.45	-10.18
Dwight D. Eisenhower	1953–1960	9.26	2.97 – Jul 1953	10.98 – Apr 1958	3.28	9.96	+4.68
John F. Kennedy	1961–1962	7.14	6.40 – Jul 1962	8.38 – Jul 1961	8.31	6.82	-1.49
Lyndon B. Johnson	1963–1968	6.77	5.70 – Nov 1965	8.19 – Jul 1968	7.02	8.12	+1.10
Richard Nixon	1969–1974	10.57	7.80 – Jan 1969	17.01 – Jul 1974	7.80	17.01	+9.21
Gerald Ford	1974–1976	16.00	12.66 – Dec 1976	19.90 – Jan 1975	16.36	12.66	-3.70
Jimmy Carter	1977–1980	16.26	12.60 – Apr 1978	21.98 – Jun 1980	12.72	19.72	+7.00
Ronald Reagan	1981–1988	12.19	7.70 – Dec 1986	19.33 – Jan 1981	19.33	9.72	-9.61
George H. W. Bush	1989–1992	10.68	9.64 – Sep 1989	14.47 – Nov 1990	10.07	10.30	+0.23
Bill Clinton	1993–2000	7.80	5.74 – Apr 1998	10.56 – Jan 1993	10.56	7.29	-3.27
George W. Bush	2001–2008	8.11	5.71 – Oct 2006	11.47 – Aug 2008	7.93	7.39	-0.54
Barack Obama	2009–Dec 2013 Incomplete data	10.26	7.30 – July 2009 index offset by negative inflation (-2.10)	12.97 – September 2011	7.83	8.20	+0.37

[THEAD] [/THEAD]
[TBODY] [/TBODY]

[2]

The misery index is misleading. For example, what does a misery index of 6.5 indicate? Good economy or bad economy?

 

[Vigilante]

You actually spent YOUR TIME, over half an hour, looking this shit up to find ONE EXCEPTION?....

Wasn't that the start of the Dot Com bubble?

No, it wasn't. And looking that up took only seconds to bring up the BLS page on the LFPR. Don't think just because you're glued here means everyone is.

1993 was the start with the mosaic web browser.... You probably weren't able to walk then!

You probably are stupid enough to think you can pull off a bait and switch, but as usual, you fail. You didn't ask if 1993 was when the mosaic web browser started, you asked if that was the start of the dot com bubble. The dot com bubble started years later.

Bursting bubbles

The year 2000 marked the end of the “Internet bubble,” a five-year period when the paper value of publicly traded stock in Internet-based companies rose far above the real earning potential of the industry.​

Yes, I hit you with a FACT and you go off on one of your HALF HOUR searches to see if you can find something to refute it!

While the latter part was a boom and bust cycle, the Internet boom is sometimes meant to refer to the steady commercial growth of the Internet with the advent of the World Wide Web, as exemplified by the first release of the Mosaic web browser in 1993, and continuing through the 1990s

Dot-com bubble - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

You must be insane. When I read your post about the LFPR, it took literally took less than 30 seconds to do a Google search and bring up this page...

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

At any rate, you asked about the dotcom bubble. Now I understand you want to change that since I bitch slapped with the dotcom bubble, but that's your problem, not mine.

Oh, by the way ... your link to Wikipedia says the dotcom bubble began in 1997.

You knew exactly what I was talking about and now you want to parse it, well Pawn, I said "While the latter part was a boom and bust cycle, the Internet boom is sometimes meant to refer to the steady commercial growth of the Internet with the advent of the World Wide Web, as exemplified by the first release of the Mosaic web browser in 1993, and continuing through the 1990s"

If you can't understand THAT, you really are the fucking idiot everyone in this thread believes you are!

 

[Faun]

No, it wasn't. And looking that up took only seconds to bring up the BLS page on the LFPR. Don't think just because you're glued here means everyone is.

1993 was the start with the mosaic web browser.... You probably weren't able to walk then!

You probably are stupid enough to think you can pull off a bait and switch, but as usual, you fail. You didn't ask if 1993 was when the mosaic web browser started, you asked if that was the start of the dot com bubble. The dot com bubble started years later.

Bursting bubbles

The year 2000 marked the end of the “Internet bubble,” a five-year period when the paper value of publicly traded stock in Internet-based companies rose far above the real earning potential of the industry.​

Yes, I hit you with a FACT and you go off on one of your HALF HOUR searches to see if you can find something to refute it!

While the latter part was a boom and bust cycle, the Internet boom is sometimes meant to refer to the steady commercial growth of the Internet with the advent of the World Wide Web, as exemplified by the first release of the Mosaic web browser in 1993, and continuing through the 1990s

Dot-com bubble - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

You must be insane. When I read your post about the LFPR, it took literally took less than 30 seconds to do a Google search and bring up this page...

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

At any rate, you asked about the dotcom bubble. Now I understand you want to change that since I bitch slapped with the dotcom bubble, but that's your problem, not mine.

Oh, by the way ... your link to Wikipedia says the dotcom bubble began in 1997.

You knew exactly what I was talking about and now you want to parse it, well Pawn, I said "While the latter part was a boom and bust cycle, the Internet boom is sometimes meant to refer to the steady commercial growth of the Internet with the advent of the World Wide Web, as exemplified by the first release of the Mosaic web browser in 1993, and continuing through the 1990s"

If you can't understand THAT, you really are the fucking idiot everyone in this thread believes you are!

Imbecile, I'm not parsing anything. I'm using your words. You're the one who said "dotcom bubble," not me. Now you're pissed because I proved you wrong. As far as the boom starting in 1993, so what? It was just getting started. By the end of 1994, which was a year and a half after Clinton raised taxes, there were still only about 12 million Internet users in the U.S. that would explode in the years to come by 2000, there were about 125 million users.

 

[Vigilante]

1993 was the start with the mosaic web browser.... You probably weren't able to walk then!

You probably are stupid enough to think you can pull off a bait and switch, but as usual, you fail. You didn't ask if 1993 was when the mosaic web browser started, you asked if that was the start of the dot com bubble. The dot com bubble started years later.

Bursting bubbles

The year 2000 marked the end of the “Internet bubble,” a five-year period when the paper value of publicly traded stock in Internet-based companies rose far above the real earning potential of the industry.​

Yes, I hit you with a FACT and you go off on one of your HALF HOUR searches to see if you can find something to refute it!

While the latter part was a boom and bust cycle, the Internet boom is sometimes meant to refer to the steady commercial growth of the Internet with the advent of the World Wide Web, as exemplified by the first release of the Mosaic web browser in 1993, and continuing through the 1990s

Dot-com bubble - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

You must be insane. When I read your post about the LFPR, it took literally took less than 30 seconds to do a Google search and bring up this page...

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

At any rate, you asked about the dotcom bubble. Now I understand you want to change that since I bitch slapped with the dotcom bubble, but that's your problem, not mine.

Oh, by the way ... your link to Wikipedia says the dotcom bubble began in 1997.

You knew exactly what I was talking about and now you want to parse it, well Pawn, I said "While the latter part was a boom and bust cycle, the Internet boom is sometimes meant to refer to the steady commercial growth of the Internet with the advent of the World Wide Web, as exemplified by the first release of the Mosaic web browser in 1993, and continuing through the 1990s"

If you can't understand THAT, you really are the fucking idiot everyone in this thread believes you are!

Imbecile, I'm not parsing anything. I'm using your words. You're the one who said "dotcom bubble," not me. Now you're pissed because I proved you wrong. As far as the boom starting in 1993, so what? It was just getting started. By the end of 1994, which was a year and a half after Clinton raised taxes, there were still only about 12 million Internet users in the U.S. that would explode in the years to come by 2000, there were about 125 million users.

Well asshole it appears the bubble started in 1993 with the mosaic web browser.... Too bad you're such a pathetic fool!

 

[Faun]

You probably are stupid enough to think you can pull off a bait and switch, but as usual, you fail. You didn't ask if 1993 was when the mosaic web browser started, you asked if that was the start of the dot com bubble. The dot com bubble started years later.

Bursting bubbles

The year 2000 marked the end of the “Internet bubble,” a five-year period when the paper value of publicly traded stock in Internet-based companies rose far above the real earning potential of the industry.​

Yes, I hit you with a FACT and you go off on one of your HALF HOUR searches to see if you can find something to refute it!

While the latter part was a boom and bust cycle, the Internet boom is sometimes meant to refer to the steady commercial growth of the Internet with the advent of the World Wide Web, as exemplified by the first release of the Mosaic web browser in 1993, and continuing through the 1990s

Dot-com bubble - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

You must be insane. When I read your post about the LFPR, it took literally took less than 30 seconds to do a Google search and bring up this page...

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

At any rate, you asked about the dotcom bubble. Now I understand you want to change that since I bitch slapped with the dotcom bubble, but that's your problem, not mine.

Oh, by the way ... your link to Wikipedia says the dotcom bubble began in 1997.

You knew exactly what I was talking about and now you want to parse it, well Pawn, I said "While the latter part was a boom and bust cycle, the Internet boom is sometimes meant to refer to the steady commercial growth of the Internet with the advent of the World Wide Web, as exemplified by the first release of the Mosaic web browser in 1993, and continuing through the 1990s"

If you can't understand THAT, you really are the fucking idiot everyone in this thread believes you are!

Imbecile, I'm not parsing anything. I'm using your words. You're the one who said "dotcom bubble," not me. Now you're pissed because I proved you wrong. As far as the boom starting in 1993, so what? It was just getting started. By the end of 1994, which was a year and a half after Clinton raised taxes, there were still only about 12 million Internet users in the U.S. that would explode in the years to come by 2000, there were about 125 million users.

Well asshole it appears the bubble started in 1993 with the mosaic web browser.... Too bad you're such a pathetic fool!

Asshole? Moi?? Yet you're the one lying. Go figger?

According to YOUR link, the bubble started in 2007 ...

The dot-com bubble (also referred to as the dot-com boom, the Internet bubble and the information technology bubble)[1] was a historic speculative bubble covering roughly 1997–2000​

And that's from YOUR link, vagisil. So what up? Did you not read YOUR own link or did you not understand it?

 

[Youch]

More Obuma economic LIES uncovered!

The idea that the Obama administration has the budget deficit under control is a complete and total lie. According to the U.S. Treasury, the federal government has officially run a deficit of 589 billion dollars for the first 11 months of fiscal year 2014. But this number is just for public consumption and it relies on accounting tricks which massively understate how much debt is actually being accumulated. If you want to know what the real budget deficit is, all you have to do is go to a U.S. Treasury website which calculates the U.S. national debt to the penny....

The U.S. National Debt Has Grown By More Than A Trillion Dollars In The Last 12 Months

Bee Eye En Gee Oh

They are buying votes, that is the only motive of the lib machine. A dependent state, Statism, socialism, is their desire. Which of course has failed every time it has been tried. Public schools are dumbed down, the media fails to probe on the important issues, and the apathy of the cell-phone addicted populace cares not a wit for their own liberty.

We are doomed.

I'm reminded of an old joke....why are the streets of Paris lined with trees? Because the Germans like to march in the shade.

Today, nobody gives a shit.

 

[Darkwind]

You will need more revenue if you are really committed to reducing the deficit.

No.

You will need less spending, significantly less, if you want to cut the deficit.

If you want to pay down the debt, then lessen the burden on Government to fund unnecessary programs.

Like The Military and Medical Industrial Complexes that both rely so heavily on tax dollars to feed their fat?

January 17, 1961 - A Discussion on the Rise of The Military Industrial Complex in America

No similarity at all. Both the Military and the company's that supply them, along with the Medical industry, actually produce something and contribute to something. In the case of the former, the contribute security in a dangerous world and the latter contributes to the overall improvement of human-kind.

 

[AVG-JOE]

The post below was published in July, 2013. Way back then, America was doing 39% of the worlds military spending. Over two and a half times what Russia and China combined spend.

List of Countries by Military Spending

$682 BILLION in borrowed money to feed the military beast in 2013.

Can we really afford to continue our self appointed role as The Worlds Police Force?

​

Obviously from my qualifier on industry, I'm arguing that we are in a detrimental quagmire of complex industry and other special interest groups stuck in a self perpetuating industry of lobbying government for special treatment and, MORE IMPORTANTLY, spending contracts.

Monkeys have yet to figure out a way to spend more government money than waging war.

WYGD? ​

Proof that 'Military' is the industry that leads the way in American pork?

America spends 39% of the total military spending worldwide. China, then Russia are next.
America spends what China spends times 4.
America spends what Russia spends times 6.
America spends what Russia and China spend times 2.66.​

By next January, America will borrow $682 Billion in military debt, just to feed the beast for 2013.

List of Countries by Military Spending




I think Eisenhower was right. An Industrial Complex led by military spending took hold and became the US spending problem.


Our military budget should be cut by $432 billion to $250 billion. This would still be what China spends times 1.5. Combine that with a serious look at the out of control spending in the well lobbied Medical Industrial Complex and... Federal Spending problem solved.

 

[Joe Steel]

You will need more revenue if you are really committed to reducing the deficit.

Indeed. Our deficit and debt are the result of our wealth coddling tax policies. If we want to eliminate the deficit and reduce the debt, we have to raise taxes.

How about we stop spending more then what we take in?

I agree. Let's raise taxes until revenue meets spending.

 

[Vigilante]

Yes, I hit you with a FACT and you go off on one of your HALF HOUR searches to see if you can find something to refute it!

While the latter part was a boom and bust cycle, the Internet boom is sometimes meant to refer to the steady commercial growth of the Internet with the advent of the World Wide Web, as exemplified by the first release of the Mosaic web browser in 1993, and continuing through the 1990s

Dot-com bubble - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

You must be insane. When I read your post about the LFPR, it took literally took less than 30 seconds to do a Google search and bring up this page...

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

At any rate, you asked about the dotcom bubble. Now I understand you want to change that since I bitch slapped with the dotcom bubble, but that's your problem, not mine.

Oh, by the way ... your link to Wikipedia says the dotcom bubble began in 1997.

You knew exactly what I was talking about and now you want to parse it, well Pawn, I said "While the latter part was a boom and bust cycle, the Internet boom is sometimes meant to refer to the steady commercial growth of the Internet with the advent of the World Wide Web, as exemplified by the first release of the Mosaic web browser in 1993, and continuing through the 1990s"

If you can't understand THAT, you really are the fucking idiot everyone in this thread believes you are!

Imbecile, I'm not parsing anything. I'm using your words. You're the one who said "dotcom bubble," not me. Now you're pissed because I proved you wrong. As far as the boom starting in 1993, so what? It was just getting started. By the end of 1994, which was a year and a half after Clinton raised taxes, there were still only about 12 million Internet users in the U.S. that would explode in the years to come by 2000, there were about 125 million users.

Well asshole it appears the bubble started in 1993 with the mosaic web browser.... Too bad you're such a pathetic fool!

Asshole? Moi?? Yet you're the one lying. Go figger?

According to YOUR link, the bubble started in 2007 ...

The dot-com bubble (also referred to as the dot-com boom, the Internet bubble and the information technology bubble)[1] was a historic speculative bubble covering roughly 1997–2000​

And that's from YOUR link, vagisil. So what up? Did you not read YOUR own link or did you not understand it?

You have an exact date the bubble started in 1997?.... I simply quote that the 1993 Mosiac web browser is acknowledged as the START of the bubble. Now OCDPawn, you can continue to rage, AS YOU ALWAYS DO, about inconsequential shit, or you can get me the exact date AND TIME in 1997 that the bubble started, with link to such, and I'll STILL CLAIM it started as stated in 1993.... You're up, OCDBoy!

 

[Faun]

You must be insane. When I read your post about the LFPR, it took literally took less than 30 seconds to do a Google search and bring up this page...

Bureau of Labor Statistics Data

At any rate, you asked about the dotcom bubble. Now I understand you want to change that since I bitch slapped with the dotcom bubble, but that's your problem, not mine.

Oh, by the way ... your link to Wikipedia says the dotcom bubble began in 1997.

You knew exactly what I was talking about and now you want to parse it, well Pawn, I said "While the latter part was a boom and bust cycle, the Internet boom is sometimes meant to refer to the steady commercial growth of the Internet with the advent of the World Wide Web, as exemplified by the first release of the Mosaic web browser in 1993, and continuing through the 1990s"

If you can't understand THAT, you really are the fucking idiot everyone in this thread believes you are!

Imbecile, I'm not parsing anything. I'm using your words. You're the one who said "dotcom bubble," not me. Now you're pissed because I proved you wrong. As far as the boom starting in 1993, so what? It was just getting started. By the end of 1994, which was a year and a half after Clinton raised taxes, there were still only about 12 million Internet users in the U.S. that would explode in the years to come by 2000, there were about 125 million users.

Well asshole it appears the bubble started in 1993 with the mosaic web browser.... Too bad you're such a pathetic fool!

Asshole? Moi?? Yet you're the one lying. Go figger?

According to YOUR link, the bubble started in 2007 ...

The dot-com bubble (also referred to as the dot-com boom, the Internet bubble and the information technology bubble)[1] was a historic speculative bubble covering roughly 1997–2000​

And that's from YOUR link, vagisil. So what up? Did you not read YOUR own link or did you not understand it?

You have an exact date the bubble started in 1997?.... I simply quote that the 1993 Mosiac web browser is acknowledged as the START of the bubble. Now OCDPawn, you can continue to rage, AS YOU ALWAYS DO, about inconsequential shit, or you can get me the exact date AND TIME in 1997 that the bubble started, with link to such, and I'll STILL CLAIM it started as stated in 1993.... You're up, OCDBoy!

Who needs an exact date, vagisil? 1997 is not 1993.

You're arguing with your own link at this point, which calls you an idiot and a liar.

The dot-com bubble (also referred to as the dot-com boom, the Internet bubble and the information technology bubble)[1] was a historic speculative bubble covering roughly 1997–2000​

 

[Vigilante]

You knew exactly what I was talking about and now you want to parse it, well Pawn, I said "While the latter part was a boom and bust cycle, the Internet boom is sometimes meant to refer to the steady commercial growth of the Internet with the advent of the World Wide Web, as exemplified by the first release of the Mosaic web browser in 1993, and continuing through the 1990s"

If you can't understand THAT, you really are the fucking idiot everyone in this thread believes you are!

Imbecile, I'm not parsing anything. I'm using your words. You're the one who said "dotcom bubble," not me. Now you're pissed because I proved you wrong. As far as the boom starting in 1993, so what? It was just getting started. By the end of 1994, which was a year and a half after Clinton raised taxes, there were still only about 12 million Internet users in the U.S. that would explode in the years to come by 2000, there were about 125 million users.

Well asshole it appears the bubble started in 1993 with the mosaic web browser.... Too bad you're such a pathetic fool!

Asshole? Moi?? Yet you're the one lying. Go figger?

According to YOUR link, the bubble started in 2007 ...

The dot-com bubble (also referred to as the dot-com boom, the Internet bubble and the information technology bubble)[1] was a historic speculative bubble covering roughly 1997–2000​

And that's from YOUR link, vagisil. So what up? Did you not read YOUR own link or did you not understand it?

You have an exact date the bubble started in 1997?.... I simply quote that the 1993 Mosiac web browser is acknowledged as the START of the bubble. Now OCDPawn, you can continue to rage, AS YOU ALWAYS DO, about inconsequential shit, or you can get me the exact date AND TIME in 1997 that the bubble started, with link to such, and I'll STILL CLAIM it started as stated in 1993.... You're up, OCDBoy!

Who needs an exact date, vagisil? 1997 is not 1993.

You're arguing with your own link at this point, which calls you an idiot and a liar.

The dot-com bubble (also referred to as the dot-com boom, the Internet bubble and the information technology bubble)[1] was a historic speculative bubble covering roughly 1997–2000​

So OCDPawn, DOESN'T have an exact date for his DOT COM BUBBLE.... Yeah, for the guy who dwells on the small shit, you have NOTHING NOW! Nice play dummy, it still shows the start with the web browser in 1993.... live with it, or choke with it!

 

[Faun]

Imbecile, I'm not parsing anything. I'm using your words. You're the one who said "dotcom bubble," not me. Now you're pissed because I proved you wrong. As far as the boom starting in 1993, so what? It was just getting started. By the end of 1994, which was a year and a half after Clinton raised taxes, there were still only about 12 million Internet users in the U.S. that would explode in the years to come by 2000, there were about 125 million users.

Well asshole it appears the bubble started in 1993 with the mosaic web browser.... Too bad you're such a pathetic fool!

Asshole? Moi?? Yet you're the one lying. Go figger?

According to YOUR link, the bubble started in 2007 ...

The dot-com bubble (also referred to as the dot-com boom, the Internet bubble and the information technology bubble)[1] was a historic speculative bubble covering roughly 1997–2000​

And that's from YOUR link, vagisil. So what up? Did you not read YOUR own link or did you not understand it?

You have an exact date the bubble started in 1997?.... I simply quote that the 1993 Mosiac web browser is acknowledged as the START of the bubble. Now OCDPawn, you can continue to rage, AS YOU ALWAYS DO, about inconsequential shit, or you can get me the exact date AND TIME in 1997 that the bubble started, with link to such, and I'll STILL CLAIM it started as stated in 1993.... You're up, OCDBoy!

Who needs an exact date, vagisil? 1997 is not 1993.

You're arguing with your own link at this point, which calls you an idiot and a liar.

The dot-com bubble (also referred to as the dot-com boom, the Internet bubble and the information technology bubble)[1] was a historic speculative bubble covering roughly 1997–2000​

So OCDPawn, DOESN'T have an exact date for his DOT COM BUBBLE.... Yeah, for the guy who dwells on the small shit, you have NOTHING NOW! Nice play dummy, it still shows the start with the web browser in 1993.... live with it, or choke with it!

Holyfuck. It's like your brain stopped developing at the age of 4. The exact date is irrelevant since you made the idiotic claim that the bubble started in 2003 and your own link said it started in 2007. The exact date doesn't even factor into this since no date in 2007 occurred in 2003. You could have pointed out the bubble didn't start on a day with an eclipse, that would have as relevant.

But hey, if you want to demonstrate for the forum that you're nothing but a feces flinging monkey, I won't stand in your way.

 

[Vigilante]

Well asshole it appears the bubble started in 1993 with the mosaic web browser.... Too bad you're such a pathetic fool!

Asshole? Moi?? Yet you're the one lying. Go figger?

According to YOUR link, the bubble started in 2007 ...

The dot-com bubble (also referred to as the dot-com boom, the Internet bubble and the information technology bubble)[1] was a historic speculative bubble covering roughly 1997–2000​

And that's from YOUR link, vagisil. So what up? Did you not read YOUR own link or did you not understand it?

You have an exact date the bubble started in 1997?.... I simply quote that the 1993 Mosiac web browser is acknowledged as the START of the bubble. Now OCDPawn, you can continue to rage, AS YOU ALWAYS DO, about inconsequential shit, or you can get me the exact date AND TIME in 1997 that the bubble started, with link to such, and I'll STILL CLAIM it started as stated in 1993.... You're up, OCDBoy!

Who needs an exact date, vagisil? 1997 is not 1993.

You're arguing with your own link at this point, which calls you an idiot and a liar.

The dot-com bubble (also referred to as the dot-com boom, the Internet bubble and the information technology bubble)[1] was a historic speculative bubble covering roughly 1997–2000​

So OCDPawn, DOESN'T have an exact date for his DOT COM BUBBLE.... Yeah, for the guy who dwells on the small shit, you have NOTHING NOW! Nice play dummy, it still shows the start with the web browser in 1993.... live with it, or choke with it!

Holyfuck. It's like your brain stopped developing at the age of 4. The exact date is irrelevant since you made the idiotic claim that the bubble started in 2003 and your own link said it started in 2007. The exact date doesn't even factor into this since no date in 2007 occurred in 2003. You could have pointed out the bubble didn't start on a day with an eclipse, that would have as relevant.

But hey, if you want to demonstrate for the forum that you're nothing but a feces flinging monkey, I won't stand in your way.

but it didn't start in 1997 by my post which stated again....covering ROUGHLY 1997–2000.... Do you know what ROUGHLY means?...Apparently not. All things have a STARTING point, as does the DOTCOM BUBBLE and as stated it appears to have started in 1993 with the Mosiac Web Browser. Now, you can OCD over whatever insignificant detail you want to, but since you use MY QUOTE, I simply show that, as stated, the web browser appears to be the starting point.... now you can obsess over trying to prove that wrong, please do, as your entertainment value for your affliction is increasing with each post!

 

[Faun]

Asshole? Moi?? Yet you're the one lying. Go figger?

According to YOUR link, the bubble started in 2007 ...

The dot-com bubble (also referred to as the dot-com boom, the Internet bubble and the information technology bubble)[1] was a historic speculative bubble covering roughly 1997–2000​

And that's from YOUR link, vagisil. So what up? Did you not read YOUR own link or did you not understand it?

You have an exact date the bubble started in 1997?.... I simply quote that the 1993 Mosiac web browser is acknowledged as the START of the bubble. Now OCDPawn, you can continue to rage, AS YOU ALWAYS DO, about inconsequential shit, or you can get me the exact date AND TIME in 1997 that the bubble started, with link to such, and I'll STILL CLAIM it started as stated in 1993.... You're up, OCDBoy!

Who needs an exact date, vagisil? 1997 is not 1993.

You're arguing with your own link at this point, which calls you an idiot and a liar.

The dot-com bubble (also referred to as the dot-com boom, the Internet bubble and the information technology bubble)[1] was a historic speculative bubble covering roughly 1997–2000​

So OCDPawn, DOESN'T have an exact date for his DOT COM BUBBLE.... Yeah, for the guy who dwells on the small shit, you have NOTHING NOW! Nice play dummy, it still shows the start with the web browser in 1993.... live with it, or choke with it!

Holyfuck. It's like your brain stopped developing at the age of 4. The exact date is irrelevant since you made the idiotic claim that the bubble started in 2003 and your own link said it started in 2007. The exact date doesn't even factor into this since no date in 2007 occurred in 2003. You could have pointed out the bubble didn't start on a day with an eclipse, that would have as relevant.

But hey, if you want to demonstrate for the forum that you're nothing but a feces flinging monkey, I won't stand in your way.

but it didn't start in 1997 by my post which stated again....covering ROUGHLY 1997–2000.... Do you know what ROUGHLY means?...Apparently not. All things have a STARTING point, as does the DOTCOM BUBBLE and as stated it appears to have started in 1993 with the Mosiac Web Browser. Now, you can OCD over whatever insignificant detail you want to, but since you use MY QUOTE, I simply show that, as stated, the web browser appears to be the starting point.... now you can obsess over trying to prove that wrong, please do, as your entertainment value for your affliction is increasing with each post!

Holyfuckingshit

Why do you insist on making a dumb ass of yourself, Vagisil??

"Roughly 1997" doesn't translate into 1993.

Holyfuckingshit!

 

[Vigilante]

You have an exact date the bubble started in 1997?.... I simply quote that the 1993 Mosiac web browser is acknowledged as the START of the bubble. Now OCDPawn, you can continue to rage, AS YOU ALWAYS DO, about inconsequential shit, or you can get me the exact date AND TIME in 1997 that the bubble started, with link to such, and I'll STILL CLAIM it started as stated in 1993.... You're up, OCDBoy!

Who needs an exact date, vagisil? 1997 is not 1993.

You're arguing with your own link at this point, which calls you an idiot and a liar.

The dot-com bubble (also referred to as the dot-com boom, the Internet bubble and the information technology bubble)[1] was a historic speculative bubble covering roughly 1997–2000​

So OCDPawn, DOESN'T have an exact date for his DOT COM BUBBLE.... Yeah, for the guy who dwells on the small shit, you have NOTHING NOW! Nice play dummy, it still shows the start with the web browser in 1993.... live with it, or choke with it!

Holyfuck. It's like your brain stopped developing at the age of 4. The exact date is irrelevant since you made the idiotic claim that the bubble started in 2003 and your own link said it started in 2007. The exact date doesn't even factor into this since no date in 2007 occurred in 2003. You could have pointed out the bubble didn't start on a day with an eclipse, that would have as relevant.

But hey, if you want to demonstrate for the forum that you're nothing but a feces flinging monkey, I won't stand in your way.

but it didn't start in 1997 by my post which stated again....covering ROUGHLY 1997–2000.... Do you know what ROUGHLY means?...Apparently not. All things have a STARTING point, as does the DOTCOM BUBBLE and as stated it appears to have started in 1993 with the Mosiac Web Browser. Now, you can OCD over whatever insignificant detail you want to, but since you use MY QUOTE, I simply show that, as stated, the web browser appears to be the starting point.... now you can obsess over trying to prove that wrong, please do, as your entertainment value for your affliction is increasing with each post!

Holyfuckingshit

Why do you insist on making a dumb ass of yourself, Vagisil??

"Roughly 1997" doesn't translate into 1993.

Holyfuckingshit!

Because YOU say it doesn't yet the article we both use states 1993 for the Web Browser... HOLYFUCKINGSHITBATASS, you now still refuse to acknowledge the 1993 date as a starting of the bubble....