The Trump-Carroll Case is Blatantly the Greatest Miscarriage of Justice in Modern American History

Federal judge Kaplan violated so many of Trump's rights that it is frightening.

People keep saying no one (Trump) is above the law, but Trump was treated in Kaplan's courtroom as beneath the law. It cannot be allowed to stand, equal justice means just that.
You just don't get it. Trump's fate was sealed on J6. He will be destroyed one way or another.
 
I'm not exactly sure how a cat with an unusual name would be relevant in this trial, but then, I ain't an attorney.
We can also observe that another piece of evidence not entered in this week's trial was -----well, it was what Trump said he could do because he was a celebrity. He could grab women "by the pussy" whenever he wanted.

Which, per testimony in the previous trial is exactly....exactly....what he did to Carroll, except it was more than just 'grab', he forcefully inserted his fingers into her.

------------------------------------------------------------



Well, OK. That's the MAGA we all know and love.

Everybody who is surprised that the above is the real Make America Great zeitgeist....raise your hand.

In my humble opinion, too many MAGA-Q's are anger-filled misanthropes, and ne'er-do-wells who hold this grievance driven angst about how their life has turned out. So they, like Steve Bannon, want to 'burn it all down'.

Other than that, I'm sure some of them are very fine people.


(*) Just so we recognize what the responsible poster "Godboy" aspires to, let's look at New York:

It has just under 20 million citizens. But Godboy wants to wreck their home.
It has an economy of over two trillion dollars (if New York was an independent nation it would be the 11th largest in the world). But Godboy wants to wreck that.

And because some bloke who bragged on video he could grab women by their genitals whenever he desired got caught doing just that, and now has to pay for doing just that.....well, one of the MAGA-Q's of this gossipboard wants to wreck the state that he was held accountable in.
Go figger.
Misanthrope anyone?

ps2....Poster Godboy, get your calculator out and crunch some numbers. I'm gonna bet that if you were able to "wreck that f*cking place"....your temper tantrum would cost the orangejesus far more....far more.....than what his indiscretion with his fingers is gonna cost him in the Carroll case. So ain't you kinda sorta throwing the baby out with the bathwater? Over your personal little hissyfit? Is maturity an issue here?


Just askin'.
But Godboy didn't support physically wrecking NY. He supported burying them under a pile of Democrat style governance. They don't like cops, don't fund their cops. They're a sanctuary city, send another million illegal aliens there. They spend a fortune on City union pensions but don't have money for education or the poor, make them prioritize better and use their own money, don't bail them out. So you see, Godboy was just pointing out how ab surd Democrat policy is. Putting America first is the answer.
 
........Putting America first is the answer.

bf26b801-2540-413c-9bc3-eaa713a04742-kkk.jpg
 
Yep. The story is fraudulent, and take from a TV show.

E . Jean Carroll is a nutter and a liar.


...​
Far from a compelling claim, the 80-year-old writer initially laid out the story that her supposed rape occurred either in 1994, before altering the day to be “in the fall of 1995 or the spring of 1996.” She couldn’t remember the specifics. What she did remember was that she was wearing a “Donna Karan coatdress and high heels but not a coat.” She later refused to produce said coat for DNA testing despite admitting to still owning it, describing it as “unworn and unlaundered since that evening.” It later came to light that the coatdress was not made in 1994 or 1995.​
It didn’t matter to Carroll, who has accused multiple men of sexually assaulting or raping her throughout her life, including a babysitter’s boyfriend, a dentist, a camp counselor, an unnamed college date, an unnamed boss, and CBS chief executive Les Moonves.​
...​
But even if your sympathies still lay with Carroll, consider this. Carroll – a self-declared Law and Order TV show fan – first made her allegations against Trump in a 2019 book, just a few years after an episode of the show saw characters discuss a role-played rape in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room.​
...​
Carroll’s entire character is one of bizarre sexual thoughts, antics, and actions. Another piece of evidence the judge refused to allow was that Carroll named her cat “Vagina” and posted repeatedly about anal sex, celebrity fantasies, and pornography.​
In fact, in 2012, Trump himself was the subject of one of these fantasies Carroll shared on her Facebook page: “Would you have sex with Donald Trump for $17,000?” before going on to suggest that in her fantasy scenario, Trump may not be able to speak. An odd thing to post for someone who alleges that the same man raped her less than two decades prior.​
Again, none of this was allowed to be heard by the jury that awarded Carroll nearly $85 million today, in addition to the $5.5 million another Manhattan jury already awarded her in her first case.
Carroll has admitted that she first considered bringing a suit against Trump during a house party hosted by far-left blogger Molly Jong-Fast.​
Jong-Fast, a writer for the viciously ‘Never Trump’ publications the Atlantic, the Bulwark, the Daily Beast, and Vanity Fair, is the daughter of feminist activist Erica Jong and anti-gun author Jonathan Fast. She is also the granddaughter of communist author Howard Fast.​
...​


Golly.
If only his attorneys had presented this in court.
Then we'd have some jail time for perjury
 
If i was Trump, i would round up every single illegal in the nation and shove them all into NY and then build a wall around the state. I would WRECK that fucking place. I would deny all federal funding to them, even if they have a natural disaster or terrorist attack. I would turn that shithole into something similar to "Escape from New York", except this time we wont be sending in Snake Pliskin to save the day.
Trump ain't president.
Trump ain't gonna be president.
 
Federal judge Kaplan violated so many of Trump's rights that it is frightening.

People keep saying no one (Trump) is above the law, but Trump was treated in Kaplan's courtroom as beneath the law. It cannot be allowed to stand, equal justice means just that.
Yeah it was a joke. That trial was illegal to the point where you have to wonder if the judge was pro Trump.
 
"The entire process was illegal."
Well, on the face of it, it surely doesn't appear that it was illegal.

I mean, there were properly filed complaints in an official court of law, appropriate pre-trial hearings, expensive & competent counsel on both sides, a long experienced judge on the bench for decades overseeing thousands of trials and hearings, and then and most likely the most important aspect....we had 18 individual local citizens and peers of the defendant in two separate jury boxes making two separate judgments; and each did it unanimously in just about 3hrs each (including lunch).

Golly, I ain't a lawyer but it sure has the appearance of legal proceeding. Also appears to be rather decisive (only 3 friggin' hours?)

It was likely more legal than some bloke slamming a woman into a wall, pulling down her tights, and ramming his fingers into her genitals. IMHO
 
The problem is that it is impossible to defend yourself from a decades old allegation of bad or illegal conduct. Especially when the complainant can’t recall even the year that the alleged event happen.
------------------------------------------------

And the problem with AZ's dilemma, is that a decades old allegation of bad or illegal conduct.....should have been really really difficult for the plaintiff to convince juries totaling 18 individual people that her story was more true than the defendant's.

Yet, she did.
Now, did the defendant's admission on video that he could grab women by the genitals whenever he wished without their consent lend credibility to the plaintiff's argument that that is exactly what he did......well, was that persuasive to those 5 women and 13 men on those two juries?

I don't know for sure, but could be persuaded that that was not irrelevant.

IMHO
 
"Such is the case of your copying and pasting from a blog called, “Media Bias / Fact Check”."

Also, copied and pasted:

"Jim Hoft said E.Jean Carroll helped to pass MeToo inspired laws that protected thousands of sexual abuse victims in New York.....and will protect many more in the future
I ain't gonna refute that.
Hell, such laws are good things. You really really should know that. And support that. Sexual abuse victims need everybody's help."


So, let us give credit to Jim Hoft and his controversial blog 'Gateway Pundit'....for giving credit to E.Jean Carroll for at least making a contribution to the legal efforts to protect victims of sexual abuse.

So good on Hoft. And good on Carroll.
 
Also, copied and pasted:

"Jim Hoft said E.Jean Carroll helped to pass MeToo inspired laws that protected thousands of sexual abuse victims in New York.....and will protect many more in the future
I ain't gonna refute that.
Hell, such laws are good things. You really really should know that. And support that. Sexual abuse victims need everybody's help."


So, let us give credit to Jim Hoft and his controversial blog 'Gateway Pundit'....for giving credit to E.Jean Carroll for at least making a contribution to the legal efforts to protect victims of sexual abuse.

So good on Hoft. And good on Carroll.

Yeah. I anticipated you would want to avoid addressing your attempt to conceal the source of your cutting and pasting.

How are Dems / Marxists bolstering the MeToo movement when Dems / Marxists are trying to erase the very nature of females and female biology?
 

Forum List

Back
Top