The Storm Is Coming! Declassified Documents In Deep State Coup To Be Released By Wednesday, July 31

Hey there deflective crime stopper, hold on now, that Sloth Coup is just about ready to pounce, any month now.. (, I mean, Sloths)
Any hopes of salvaging Obama's coup died in front of Congress / on TV when Mueller was exposed as a figurehead who was given a huge office in a high-rise overlooking the city, a ream of paper, the 64-count box of Crayolas, and all the chocolate milk and cookies he wanted to keep him busy while Weismann ran the show.

:p
 
no mention of mueller either debate night. it's dead. they should move forward with impeachment and piss off half the country. go!!!!
 
Last edited:
Hey there deflective crime stopper, hold on now, that Sloth Coup is just about ready to pounce, any month now.. (, I mean, Sloths)
Any hopes of salvaging Obama's coup died in front of Congress / on TV when Mueller was exposed as a figurehead who was given a huge office in a high-rise overlooking the city, a ream of paper, the 64-count box of Crayolas, and all the chocolate milk and cookies he wanted to keep him busy while Weismann ran the show.

:p

Nope, the Sloth Coup Plotters have you just where they want you.
 
no mention of mueller either debate night. it's dead. they should move forward with impeachment and piss of half the country. go!!!!
Ding, Ding, Ding.....They are avoiding it like a 'My Pillow' kiosk offering a free American flag with every purchase of a pillow.

:p
 
Hey White_MAGA_Man when are these things going to be released to the public? we are now two days past when you said it would happen

The info was released on 7/31. We all found out that Horowitz has referred Comey for prosecution because he leaked classified info to the press.
And because he also removed 4 documents from the FBI office after he was fired. Hell, the FBI even came to Comey's home to get those
documents.

The AG has just decided not to charge Comey with anything for the time being.

What made it real interesting was the Horowitz report has not been officially released yet. They want Comey to know that he is theirs for the taking
whenever they want him. Horowitz report also includes FISA abuses, which will be really damaging, if they are there.

Comey has always been a stooge in this entire fiasco. Barr is no dummy. He's going after the big fish...Obama. He just needs to follow the
trail of the crooked folks involved in all of this.

If the FISA court had a fraud perpetuated on it, every DOJ official who signed a FISA warrant is up for arrest. Comey would be up for arrest if
he told the DOJ that it was verified. They all will be up for arrest if they did not return to the court and inform the court of any changes, like
Steele not being able to verify it himself.

He delivered on 7/31.

The weeks ahead will be really interesting.

What does any of that have to do with classified documents being released to the public?

You are more desperate than even our racist MAGAMAN

Nope. I just corrected your false claims
 
Hey White_MAGA_Man when are these things going to be released to the public? we are now two days past when you said it would happen

The info was released on 7/31. We all found out that Horowitz has referred Comey for prosecution because he leaked classified info to the press.
And because he also removed 4 documents from the FBI office after he was fired. Hell, the FBI even came to Comey's home to get those
documents.

The AG has just decided not to charge Comey with anything for the time being.

What made it real interesting was the Horowitz report has not been officially released yet. They want Comey to know that he is theirs for the taking
whenever they want him. Horowitz report also includes FISA abuses, which will be really damaging, if they are there.

Comey has always been a stooge in this entire fiasco. Barr is no dummy. He's going after the big fish...Obama. He just needs to follow the
trail of the crooked folks involved in all of this.

If the FISA court had a fraud perpetuated on it, every DOJ official who signed a FISA warrant is up for arrest. Comey would be up for arrest if
he told the DOJ that it was verified. They all will be up for arrest if they did not return to the court and inform the court of any changes, like
Steele not being able to verify it himself.

He delivered on 7/31.

The weeks ahead will be really interesting.
All you have is speculation and wishful thinking.

Huh...I have an on-going report in play. I have seen Comey be accused of leaking info.
I don't even know what Durham has uncovered..

Speculation is well founded. Wishful thinking is turning into reality.
 
Your God Mueller says otherwise. Grow the fuck up commie.

.
all you know is GOP propaganda. He said he could be arrested if he weren't president or you going to. You get no real news about it. you people haven't heard that the Trump campaign met with the Russians over a hundred times wrote nothing down and lied about it.


More fucking commies lies, he said THEY DID NOT DETERMINE IF THE PRESIDENT COMMITTED A CRIME. He said it in the report and he said it in his testimony.

You commie dupes are Putins best tools. LMAO

.

Stupid people on both sides are useful to the "Very Strong" Putin

Mueller concluded that he could not make a determination of a crime because our So-called President could not defend himself against such a charge.
Which is rather interesting to state considering Muller accused him 10 times and then claimed he could not accuse him because he could not defend himself.

Muller could not have done worse than he did.

The facts he reports on seemed to be accusations to me.
That is the problem.

He essentially said that he cannot indict so that released him from meeting any kind of legal burden whatsoever and then proceeded to throw a bunch of shit at the wall. It is disgusting.
 
Hey White_MAGA_Man when are these things going to be released to the public? we are now two days past when you said it would happen

The info was released on 7/31. We all found out that Horowitz has referred Comey for prosecution because he leaked classified info to the press.
And because he also removed 4 documents from the FBI office after he was fired. Hell, the FBI even came to Comey's home to get those
documents.

The AG has just decided not to charge Comey with anything for the time being.

What made it real interesting was the Horowitz report has not been officially released yet. They want Comey to know that he is theirs for the taking
whenever they want him. Horowitz report also includes FISA abuses, which will be really damaging, if they are there.

Comey has always been a stooge in this entire fiasco. Barr is no dummy. He's going after the big fish...Obama. He just needs to follow the
trail of the crooked folks involved in all of this.

If the FISA court had a fraud perpetuated on it, every DOJ official who signed a FISA warrant is up for arrest. Comey would be up for arrest if
he told the DOJ that it was verified. They all will be up for arrest if they did not return to the court and inform the court of any changes, like
Steele not being able to verify it himself.

He delivered on 7/31.

The weeks ahead will be really interesting.

What does any of that have to do with classified documents being released to the public?

You are more desperate than even our racist MAGAMAN

Nope. I just corrected your false claims

lair. There was no cache of classified documents released to the public, not on the 31st, not on the 1st and not today.
 
Hey White_MAGA_Man when are these things going to be released to the public? we are now two days past when you said it would happen

The info was released on 7/31. We all found out that Horowitz has referred Comey for prosecution because he leaked classified info to the press.
And because he also removed 4 documents from the FBI office after he was fired. Hell, the FBI even came to Comey's home to get those
documents.

The AG has just decided not to charge Comey with anything for the time being.

What made it real interesting was the Horowitz report has not been officially released yet. They want Comey to know that he is theirs for the taking
whenever they want him. Horowitz report also includes FISA abuses, which will be really damaging, if they are there.

Comey has always been a stooge in this entire fiasco. Barr is no dummy. He's going after the big fish...Obama. He just needs to follow the
trail of the crooked folks involved in all of this.

If the FISA court had a fraud perpetuated on it, every DOJ official who signed a FISA warrant is up for arrest. Comey would be up for arrest if
he told the DOJ that it was verified. They all will be up for arrest if they did not return to the court and inform the court of any changes, like
Steele not being able to verify it himself.

He delivered on 7/31.

The weeks ahead will be really interesting.
All you have is speculation and wishful thinking.

Huh...I have an on-going report in play. I have seen Comey be accused of leaking info.
I don't even know what Durham has uncovered..

Speculation is well founded. Wishful thinking is turning into reality.
Durham is a prosecutor, not an investigator.

Prosecutors found the IG’s findings compelling but decided not to bring charges because they did not believe they had enough evidence of Comey’s intent to violate the law, according to multiple sources.

The IG is finished, the prosecutor is finished.

John Solomon is one of the biggest tools out there. He's a lying sack of shit that hates facts almost as much as he hates America. But he still has to report reality, sometimes.
 
all you know is GOP propaganda. He said he could be arrested if he weren't president or you going to. You get no real news about it. you people haven't heard that the Trump campaign met with the Russians over a hundred times wrote nothing down and lied about it.


More fucking commies lies, he said THEY DID NOT DETERMINE IF THE PRESIDENT COMMITTED A CRIME. He said it in the report and he said it in his testimony.

You commie dupes are Putins best tools. LMAO

.

Stupid people on both sides are useful to the "Very Strong" Putin

Mueller concluded that he could not make a determination of a crime because our So-called President could not defend himself against such a charge.
Which is rather interesting to state considering Muller accused him 10 times and then claimed he could not accuse him because he could not defend himself.

Muller could not have done worse than he did.

The facts he reports on seemed to be accusations to me.
That is the problem.

He essentially said that he cannot indict so that released him from meeting any kind of legal burden whatsoever and then proceeded to throw a bunch of shit at the wall. It is disgusting.

I don't see facts as the problem. Several hundred prosecutors said there are cases there, however how many of them would bring a case if they knew the Jury was bias for the defendant and there was nothing they could do to change the make up of the Jury. So the problem is, imo, the facts don't matter, they're just smeared on the wall like so much shit.
 
More fucking commies lies, he said THEY DID NOT DETERMINE IF THE PRESIDENT COMMITTED A CRIME. He said it in the report and he said it in his testimony.

You commie dupes are Putins best tools. LMAO

.

Stupid people on both sides are useful to the "Very Strong" Putin

Mueller concluded that he could not make a determination of a crime because our So-called President could not defend himself against such a charge.
Which is rather interesting to state considering Muller accused him 10 times and then claimed he could not accuse him because he could not defend himself.

Muller could not have done worse than he did.

The facts he reports on seemed to be accusations to me.
That is the problem.

He essentially said that he cannot indict so that released him from meeting any kind of legal burden whatsoever and then proceeded to throw a bunch of shit at the wall. It is disgusting.

I don't see facts as the problem. Several hundred prosecutors said there are cases there, however how many of them would bring a case if they knew the Jury was bias for the defendant and there was nothing they could do to change the make up of the Jury. So the problem is, imo, the facts don't matter, they're just smeared on the wall like so much shit.
Several hundred prosecutors signing a random letter is pretty much meaningless. You can always find a bunch of people willing to back one political side or the other when they don't actually have to answer for those statements.

I would doubt that you hold any of the anti-climate change letters signed by 'experts' in any esteem whatsoever. The same bs applies here.
 
Stupid people on both sides are useful to the "Very Strong" Putin

Mueller concluded that he could not make a determination of a crime because our So-called President could not defend himself against such a charge.
Which is rather interesting to state considering Muller accused him 10 times and then claimed he could not accuse him because he could not defend himself.

Muller could not have done worse than he did.

The facts he reports on seemed to be accusations to me.
That is the problem.

He essentially said that he cannot indict so that released him from meeting any kind of legal burden whatsoever and then proceeded to throw a bunch of shit at the wall. It is disgusting.

I don't see facts as the problem. Several hundred prosecutors said there are cases there, however how many of them would bring a case if they knew the Jury was bias for the defendant and there was nothing they could do to change the make up of the Jury. So the problem is, imo, the facts don't matter, they're just smeared on the wall like so much shit.
Several hundred prosecutors signing a random letter is pretty much meaningless. You can always find a bunch of people willing to back one political side or the other when they don't actually have to answer for those statements.

I would doubt that you hold any of the anti-climate change letters signed by 'experts' in any esteem whatsoever. The same bs applies here.

What's meaningless is impeachment. Those facts will not be meaningless in 2021 if Trump loses.

A scientist predicting the future is much like an odds maker on sporting bets. It has nothing to do with the law. Lawyers and prosecutors do not deal in extrapolating the future.
 
Which is rather interesting to state considering Muller accused him 10 times and then claimed he could not accuse him because he could not defend himself.

Muller could not have done worse than he did.

The facts he reports on seemed to be accusations to me.
That is the problem.

He essentially said that he cannot indict so that released him from meeting any kind of legal burden whatsoever and then proceeded to throw a bunch of shit at the wall. It is disgusting.

I don't see facts as the problem. Several hundred prosecutors said there are cases there, however how many of them would bring a case if they knew the Jury was bias for the defendant and there was nothing they could do to change the make up of the Jury. So the problem is, imo, the facts don't matter, they're just smeared on the wall like so much shit.
Several hundred prosecutors signing a random letter is pretty much meaningless. You can always find a bunch of people willing to back one political side or the other when they don't actually have to answer for those statements.

I would doubt that you hold any of the anti-climate change letters signed by 'experts' in any esteem whatsoever. The same bs applies here.

What's meaningless is impeachment. Those facts will not be meaningless in 2021 if Trump loses.

A scientist predicting the future is much like an odds maker on sporting bets. It has nothing to do with the law. Lawyers and prosecutors do not deal in extrapolating the future.

Trump is a 7:1 prohibitive favorite to win re-election.
If you disagree place your bet and win some $$$$$$$$$ 2020 is all but over.
Donald Trump -110
Kamala Harris +700
Joe Biden +700
Elizabeth Warren +700
 
The facts he reports on seemed to be accusations to me.
That is the problem.

He essentially said that he cannot indict so that released him from meeting any kind of legal burden whatsoever and then proceeded to throw a bunch of shit at the wall. It is disgusting.

I don't see facts as the problem. Several hundred prosecutors said there are cases there, however how many of them would bring a case if they knew the Jury was bias for the defendant and there was nothing they could do to change the make up of the Jury. So the problem is, imo, the facts don't matter, they're just smeared on the wall like so much shit.
Several hundred prosecutors signing a random letter is pretty much meaningless. You can always find a bunch of people willing to back one political side or the other when they don't actually have to answer for those statements.

I would doubt that you hold any of the anti-climate change letters signed by 'experts' in any esteem whatsoever. The same bs applies here.

What's meaningless is impeachment. Those facts will not be meaningless in 2021 if Trump loses.

A scientist predicting the future is much like an odds maker on sporting bets. It has nothing to do with the law. Lawyers and prosecutors do not deal in extrapolating the future.

Trump is a 7:1 prohibitive favorite to win re-election.
If you disagree place your bet and win some $$$$$$$$$ 2020 is all but over.
Donald Trump -110
Kamala Harris +700
Joe Biden +700
Elizabeth Warren +700

Nov. 1 2016

"With just one week to go, at offshore sportsbooks and at shops in the betting-mad United Kingdom, Clinton remains a substantial favorite, with odds hovering around -300 – meaning one must bet $300 to win $100. Meanwhile, Trump is in the range of a +275 underdog – meaning a $100 bet could bring in $275."

Smoke um if ya got um.

What are the odds of Trump, Clinton winning the 2016 presidential election?
 
Which is rather interesting to state considering Muller accused him 10 times and then claimed he could not accuse him because he could not defend himself.

Muller could not have done worse than he did.

The facts he reports on seemed to be accusations to me.
That is the problem.

He essentially said that he cannot indict so that released him from meeting any kind of legal burden whatsoever and then proceeded to throw a bunch of shit at the wall. It is disgusting.

I don't see facts as the problem. Several hundred prosecutors said there are cases there, however how many of them would bring a case if they knew the Jury was bias for the defendant and there was nothing they could do to change the make up of the Jury. So the problem is, imo, the facts don't matter, they're just smeared on the wall like so much shit.
Several hundred prosecutors signing a random letter is pretty much meaningless. You can always find a bunch of people willing to back one political side or the other when they don't actually have to answer for those statements.

I would doubt that you hold any of the anti-climate change letters signed by 'experts' in any esteem whatsoever. The same bs applies here.

What's meaningless is impeachment. Those facts will not be meaningless in 2021 if Trump loses.

A scientist predicting the future is much like an odds maker on sporting bets. It has nothing to do with the law. Lawyers and prosecutors do not deal in extrapolating the future.
What are you even responding to?
 
The facts he reports on seemed to be accusations to me.
That is the problem.

He essentially said that he cannot indict so that released him from meeting any kind of legal burden whatsoever and then proceeded to throw a bunch of shit at the wall. It is disgusting.

I don't see facts as the problem. Several hundred prosecutors said there are cases there, however how many of them would bring a case if they knew the Jury was bias for the defendant and there was nothing they could do to change the make up of the Jury. So the problem is, imo, the facts don't matter, they're just smeared on the wall like so much shit.
Several hundred prosecutors signing a random letter is pretty much meaningless. You can always find a bunch of people willing to back one political side or the other when they don't actually have to answer for those statements.

I would doubt that you hold any of the anti-climate change letters signed by 'experts' in any esteem whatsoever. The same bs applies here.

What's meaningless is impeachment. Those facts will not be meaningless in 2021 if Trump loses.

A scientist predicting the future is much like an odds maker on sporting bets. It has nothing to do with the law. Lawyers and prosecutors do not deal in extrapolating the future.
What are you even responding to?

You.
 
That is the problem.

He essentially said that he cannot indict so that released him from meeting any kind of legal burden whatsoever and then proceeded to throw a bunch of shit at the wall. It is disgusting.

I don't see facts as the problem. Several hundred prosecutors said there are cases there, however how many of them would bring a case if they knew the Jury was bias for the defendant and there was nothing they could do to change the make up of the Jury. So the problem is, imo, the facts don't matter, they're just smeared on the wall like so much shit.
Several hundred prosecutors signing a random letter is pretty much meaningless. You can always find a bunch of people willing to back one political side or the other when they don't actually have to answer for those statements.

I would doubt that you hold any of the anti-climate change letters signed by 'experts' in any esteem whatsoever. The same bs applies here.

What's meaningless is impeachment. Those facts will not be meaningless in 2021 if Trump loses.

A scientist predicting the future is much like an odds maker on sporting bets. It has nothing to do with the law. Lawyers and prosecutors do not deal in extrapolating the future.
What are you even responding to?

You.
Then respond to something I posted. I said nothing about scientists predicting the future. I said something about supposed experts signing a meaningless letter and equated that with the letter you brought up. You were deflecting there. I said nothing about facts regarding prosecuting Trump. I did say something about prosecutors signing a letter that has no accountability or impact of any sort. You actually directly stated that facts are irrelevant - whatever that was supposed to mean. I was directly responding to the fact that you brought up the letter that 'hundreds of prosecutors' signed a letter as though it has some meaning. It does not. None of them have any relation to any case and I doubt the vast majority of them even bothered to take a serious look at the case anyway.

The reality is that letter is nothing but a general political statement by those prosecutors. A political statement that we should all take with a grain of salt. The evidence and the summaries are there for everyone to view directly.
 

Forum List

Back
Top