The Soviet Union & Iran: Then and Now

[NYcarbineer]

" join the collective."

The warcry of every Liberal, socialist, communist, Nazi, fascist."

Geeeezzzz....you make this easy.

It's really a shame you 'muricans don't do irony


But just for humor, if nazis and commies are just the same why did the nazis attack their communist brothers?

Hitler came to power allying himself with anti-communist parties in Germany. Not to mention allying himself with the Catholic party.

Adolph Hitler was the spawn of Karl Marx....just as Joseph Stalin was.

That couldn't be further from the truth. Your dementia is getting boring.

 

[Camp]

See what I mean

Do you even know what that means?

I speak several languages fluently.

English is one.

Which single country is attempting to pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons?

Guess.

You are evading a simple question. How many nations are involved in the negotiated proposed treaty with Iran which is the topic of your claims in this thread.

That's not what you asked.

"Which single country is attempting to pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons?"

Until the current fake entered office....only one nation was actively demanding an end to Iran's nuclear power grab.


Don't pretend to be even more stupid than you are.

You can not be this poorly informed. You are suggesting that prior to Obama, Israel and the Arab nations were not demanding an end to Iran's nuclear program.

 

[NYcarbineer]

See what I mean

Do you even know what that means?

I speak several languages fluently.

English is one.

Which single country is attempting to pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons?

Guess.

You are evading a simple question. How many nations are involved in the negotiated proposed treaty with Iran which is the topic of your claims in this thread.

That's not what you asked.

"Which single country is attempting to pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons?"

Until the current fake entered office....only one nation was actively demanding an end to Iran's nuclear power grab.


Don't pretend to be even more stupid than you are.

You disagree with the statement which means you must believe that one nation should be able to pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons.

 

[Buzz Jenkins]

PolyChick, your disjointed posts suggest to me that you suffer from some sort of attention deficit disorder. If I recall correctly, the actual medical diagnosis is called "You Are A Stupid Fuck-Up."

From what the regulars say you merely copy and paste stuff. Pretty lame.

Finally, why do you express yourself through aphorism (look it up, dumbass!)? Do you lack the education to write above a 5th grade level, shit head?

Notice that this very post is disjointed and aphoristic in an effort to actually communicate with you in an effect manner. In other words, I am dumbing down in an attempt to reach you, rather than you simply knee-jerking into another nonsensical rant upon reading something critical of yourself.

I am sure that you possess some very appealing qualities. You are just doing a good job of keeping those qualities hidden.

Moreover, you are making those right of center look bad. Knock it off!

 

[PoliticalChic]

As is the case with just about every post you send....this is not the case.

The truth is that FDR had every intention of ceding half of Europe to the tender mercies of Joseph Stalin.

Oh, so now you admit you believe that FDR should have taken the US to war with the Soviets in 1945.

Could you supply any such "admission," NYLiar?

Right after you deny it. On the record.

Afterall, how can you rag on FDR for letting the Soviets occupy much of Eastern Europe if you didn't support the only alternative which would have been to oppose them by force?

So you made a post that you can't back up.

No surprise....after all, you are the NYLiar.

No, I just backed it up by tricking you into refusing to deny it.

Case closed.

So THAT'S why you're called the NYLiar!

 

[PoliticalChic]

I speak several languages fluently.

English is one.

Which single country is attempting to pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons?

Guess.

You are evading a simple question. How many nations are involved in the negotiated proposed treaty with Iran which is the topic of your claims in this thread.

That's not what you asked.

"Which single country is attempting to pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons?"

Until the current fake entered office....only one nation was actively demanding an end to Iran's nuclear power grab.


Don't pretend to be even more stupid than you are.

You disagree with the statement which means you must believe that one nation should be able to pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons.

".... you must believe that one nation should be able to pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons."

And?

 

[PoliticalChic]

PolyChick, your disjointed posts suggest to me that you suffer from some sort of attention deficit disorder. If I recall correctly, the actual medical diagnosis is called "You Are A Stupid Fuck-Up."

From what the regulars say you merely copy and paste stuff. Pretty lame.

Finally, why do you express yourself through aphorism (look it up, dumbass!)? Do you lack the education to write above a 5th grade level, shit head?

Notice that this very post is disjointed and aphoristic in an effort to actually communicate with you in an effect manner. In other words, I am dumbing down in an attempt to reach you, rather than you simply knee-jerking into another nonsensical rant upon reading something critical of yourself.

I am sure that you possess some very appealing qualities. You are just doing a good job of keeping those qualities hidden.

Moreover, you are making those right of center look bad. Knock it off!

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck....etc.....you're a duck.

You walk like a Liberal, squawk like a Liberal.....clearly you're a lying Liberal.



Bad news: we have several already.

 

[PoliticalChic]

" join the collective."

The warcry of every Liberal, socialist, communist, Nazi, fascist."

Geeeezzzz....you make this easy.

It's really a shame you 'muricans don't do irony


But just for humor, if nazis and commies are just the same why did the nazis attack their communist brothers?

Hitler came to power allying himself with anti-communist parties in Germany. Not to mention allying himself with the Catholic party.

Adolph Hitler was the spawn of Karl Marx....just as Joseph Stalin was.

That couldn't be further from the truth. Your dementia is getting boring.

Watch me shove those words back down your lying throat:


1. The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. The next footage was the Nazi attempt to do exactly the same thing: in German, "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"

a. "In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris

2. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." NYTimes, November 27, 1925.


a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.



Once again I owe you a debt for helping to prove that I am never wrong.

Don't ever change.

 

[PoliticalChic]

7. Obama has embraced the Iranian madmen as tightly as Roosevelt did Stalin, and he has lied to the America public just as prolifically as FDR did.


First he said to the NYTimes that Iran can be convinced to change. " The notion that Iran is undeterrable — “it’s simply not the case,”.... Iran may change." http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/06/o...e-obama-doctrine-and-iran-interview.html?_r=0



This is pretty important....because if they not "undeterrable"....that they are mad, irrational maniacs planning a worldwide holocaust so that the 12th Imam can hop out of a well........then it is insane to have a treaty with them, to allow them to build a nuclear bomb.



The next day, this Iago sociopath, Obama, says.....


"But in a National Public Radio interview the next day, the president said that to demand that Iran recognize Israel’s right to exist as a state before permitting it to have nuclear capacity is “really akin to saying that we won’t sign a deal unless the natureof the Iranian regime completely transforms. And that is, I think, a fundamental misjudgment” (emphasis added throughout). He added, “We want Iran not to have nuclear weapons precisely becausewe can’t bank on the nature of the regime changing.”

How true! We cannot bank on Iran’s nature changing. We cannot bank on Iran changing its natural tendency to lie about its nuclear program; its virulently anti-American and anti-Semitic nature; its age-long, deep-seated support and sponsorship of terrorism; and its desire to dominate the Middle East." Made in America: A Nuclear Middle East


First this: " The notion that Iran is undeterrable — “it’s simply not the case,”..

Then this:

"....we can’t bank on the nature of the regime changing.”

But it makes sense to allow them to have a nuclear bomb????


Who is most insane, the mullahs, Obama, or the nuts who voted for him????

 

[Buzz Jenkins]

" join the collective."

The warcry of every Liberal, socialist, communist, Nazi, fascist."

Geeeezzzz....you make this easy.

It's really a shame you 'muricans don't do irony


But just for humor, if nazis and commies are just the same why did the nazis attack their communist brothers?

Hitler came to power allying himself with anti-communist parties in Germany. Not to mention allying himself with the Catholic party.

Adolph Hitler was the spawn of Karl Marx....just as Joseph Stalin was.

You moron! That is not even worth a serious response. Poly Chick, do you wear your tin foil hat 24/7 or do you remove it when you sleep?

 

[PoliticalChic]

" join the collective."

The warcry of every Liberal, socialist, communist, Nazi, fascist."

Geeeezzzz....you make this easy.

It's really a shame you 'muricans don't do irony


But just for humor, if nazis and commies are just the same why did the nazis attack their communist brothers?

Hitler came to power allying himself with anti-communist parties in Germany. Not to mention allying himself with the Catholic party.

Adolph Hitler was the spawn of Karl Marx....just as Joseph Stalin was.

You moron! That is not even worth a serious response. Poly Chick, do you wear your tin foil hat 24/7 or do you remove it when you sleep?

So....it's Fakey III.


Post #88 destroys you, huh?

 

[Buzz Jenkins]

PolyChick, your disjointed posts suggest to me that you suffer from some sort of attention deficit disorder. If I recall correctly, the actual medical diagnosis is called "You Are A Stupid Fuck-Up."

From what the regulars say you merely copy and paste stuff. Pretty lame.

Finally, why do you express yourself through aphorism (look it up, dumbass!)? Do you lack the education to write above a 5th grade level, shit head?

Notice that this very post is disjointed and aphoristic in an effort to actually communicate with you in an effect manner. In other words, I am dumbing down in an attempt to reach you, rather than you simply knee-jerking into another nonsensical rant upon reading something critical of yourself.

I am sure that you possess some very appealing qualities. You are just doing a good job of keeping those qualities hidden.

Moreover, you are making those right of center look bad. Knock it off!

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck....etc.....you're a duck.

You walk like a Liberal, squawk like a Liberal.....clearly you're a lying Liberal.



Bad news: we have several already.

I am not a liberal, you shithead. I am so far to the right that I have hit the wall. I am telling you, Chick, you are a nut.

 

[NYcarbineer]

" join the collective."

The warcry of every Liberal, socialist, communist, Nazi, fascist."

Geeeezzzz....you make this easy.

It's really a shame you 'muricans don't do irony


But just for humor, if nazis and commies are just the same why did the nazis attack their communist brothers?

Hitler came to power allying himself with anti-communist parties in Germany. Not to mention allying himself with the Catholic party.

Adolph Hitler was the spawn of Karl Marx....just as Joseph Stalin was.

That couldn't be further from the truth. Your dementia is getting boring.

Watch me shove those words back down your lying throat:


1. The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. The next footage was the Nazi attempt to do exactly the same thing: in German, "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"

a. "In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris

2. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." NYTimes, November 27, 1925.


a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.



Once again I owe you a debt for helping to prove that I am never wrong.

Don't ever change.

Quite a few unverified unsubstantiated opinions in that mess you posted.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Which single country is attempting to pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons?

Guess.

You are evading a simple question. How many nations are involved in the negotiated proposed treaty with Iran which is the topic of your claims in this thread.

That's not what you asked.

"Which single country is attempting to pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons?"

Until the current fake entered office....only one nation was actively demanding an end to Iran's nuclear power grab.


Don't pretend to be even more stupid than you are.

You disagree with the statement which means you must believe that one nation should be able to pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons.

".... you must believe that one nation should be able to pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons."

And?

So which one nation should be able to pick and choose whether Iran has nuclear weapons?

 

[NYcarbineer]

The US populace wanted nothing to do with another war, they wanted war to end..Even if it meant letting Stalin have what his armies fought for..

As is the case with just about every post you send....this is not the case.

The truth is that FDR had every intention of ceding half of Europe to the tender mercies of Joseph Stalin.

Oh, so now you admit you believe that FDR should have taken the US to war with the Soviets in 1945.

Could you supply any such "admission," NYLiar?

I already did. Your endorsement of Patton's politics. The Patton that wanted war with the Soviets.

 

[Buzz Jenkins]

" join the collective."

The warcry of every Liberal, socialist, communist, Nazi, fascist."

Geeeezzzz....you make this easy.

It's really a shame you 'muricans don't do irony


But just for humor, if nazis and commies are just the same why did the nazis attack their communist brothers?

Hitler came to power allying himself with anti-communist parties in Germany. Not to mention allying himself with the Catholic party.

Adolph Hitler was the spawn of Karl Marx....just as Joseph Stalin was.

You moron! That is not even worth a serious response. Poly Chick, do you wear your tin foil hat 24/7 or do you remove it when you sleep?

So....it's Fakey III.


Post #88 destroys you, huh?

Bitch, the only thing you are destroying is your own credibility. Hitler was not a Marxist (can you believe that I actually had to say this?).

 

[PoliticalChic]

PolyChick, your disjointed posts suggest to me that you suffer from some sort of attention deficit disorder. If I recall correctly, the actual medical diagnosis is called "You Are A Stupid Fuck-Up."

From what the regulars say you merely copy and paste stuff. Pretty lame.

Finally, why do you express yourself through aphorism (look it up, dumbass!)? Do you lack the education to write above a 5th grade level, shit head?

Notice that this very post is disjointed and aphoristic in an effort to actually communicate with you in an effect manner. In other words, I am dumbing down in an attempt to reach you, rather than you simply knee-jerking into another nonsensical rant upon reading something critical of yourself.

I am sure that you possess some very appealing qualities. You are just doing a good job of keeping those qualities hidden.

Moreover, you are making those right of center look bad. Knock it off!

If it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck....etc.....you're a duck.

You walk like a Liberal, squawk like a Liberal.....clearly you're a lying Liberal.



Bad news: we have several already.

I am not a liberal, you shithead. I am so far to the right that I have hit the wall. I am telling you, Chick, you are a nut.

FakeyIII....anyone can tell from your language and your lies you can be nothing but a Liberal.

But...bad news.....you're third on the depth chart for lying Liberals.

 

[PoliticalChic]

It's really a shame you 'muricans don't do irony


But just for humor, if nazis and commies are just the same why did the nazis attack their communist brothers?

Hitler came to power allying himself with anti-communist parties in Germany. Not to mention allying himself with the Catholic party.

Adolph Hitler was the spawn of Karl Marx....just as Joseph Stalin was.

That couldn't be further from the truth. Your dementia is getting boring.

Watch me shove those words back down your lying throat:


1. The birth of "The New Soviet Man" was the stated aim of Marxism, breeding a new evolutionary form of human being who will think, look, and act differently. The next footage was the Nazi attempt to do exactly the same thing: in German, "We must create a new man! A new life form should appear!"

a. "In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."
Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris

2. A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...." NYTimes, November 27, 1925.


a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.



Once again I owe you a debt for helping to prove that I am never wrong.

Don't ever change.

Quite a few unverified unsubstantiated opinions in that mess you posted.

Jot this down: you can't beat something with nothing.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Guess.

You are evading a simple question. How many nations are involved in the negotiated proposed treaty with Iran which is the topic of your claims in this thread.

That's not what you asked.

"Which single country is attempting to pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons?"

Until the current fake entered office....only one nation was actively demanding an end to Iran's nuclear power grab.


Don't pretend to be even more stupid than you are.

You disagree with the statement which means you must believe that one nation should be able to pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons.

".... you must believe that one nation should be able to pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons."

And?

So which one nation should be able to pick and choose whether Iran has nuclear weapons?

If you can't answer that you don't belong here.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The US populace wanted nothing to do with another war, they wanted war to end..Even if it meant letting Stalin have what his armies fought for..

As is the case with just about every post you send....this is not the case.

The truth is that FDR had every intention of ceding half of Europe to the tender mercies of Joseph Stalin.

Oh, so now you admit you believe that FDR should have taken the US to war with the Soviets in 1945.

Could you supply any such "admission," NYLiar?

I already did. Your endorsement of Patton's politics. The Patton that wanted war with the Soviets.

So your endorsement of Clinton means you favor rape and racism?