The Soviet Union & Iran: Then and Now

[NYcarbineer]

[ No single nation should pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons.”s.

Do you even know what that means?

 

[NYcarbineer]

" join the collective."

The warcry of every Liberal, socialist, communist, Nazi, fascist."

Geeeezzzz....you make this easy.

It's really a shame you 'muricans don't do irony


But just for humor, if nazis and commies are just the same why did the nazis attack their communist brothers?

Hitler came to power allying himself with anti-communist parties in Germany. Not to mention allying himself with the Catholic party.

 

[Jantje_Smit]

At least the wars that Roosevelt facilitated didn't involve nuclear weapons.

Jeebus.....nobody can be this stupid.....on the other hand, the political thing also advocates home schooling...

 

[PoliticalChic]

" join the collective."

The warcry of every Liberal, socialist, communist, Nazi, fascist."

Geeeezzzz....you make this easy.

It's really a shame you 'muricans don't do irony


But just for humor, if nazis and commies are just the same why did the nazis attack their communist brothers?

And one more of the characteristics that bind all totalitarians: a lack of understanding of human nature.

 

[PoliticalChic]

" join the collective."

The warcry of every Liberal, socialist, communist, Nazi, fascist."

Geeeezzzz....you make this easy.

It's really a shame you 'muricans don't do irony


But just for humor, if nazis and commies are just the same why did the nazis attack their communist brothers?

Hitler came to power allying himself with anti-communist parties in Germany. Not to mention allying himself with the Catholic party.

Adolph Hitler was the spawn of Karl Marx....just as Joseph Stalin was.

 

[PoliticalChic]

At least the wars that Roosevelt facilitated didn't involve nuclear weapons.

Jeebus.....nobody can be this stupid.....on the other hand, the political thing also advocates home schooling...

Remember what I predicted about you being unable to deal with the facts and truth of my posts....and your responses were never more than "is not,is nottttttt!"?

See what I mean.

 

[Jantje_Smit]

At least the wars that Roosevelt facilitated didn't involve nuclear weapons.

Remember what I predicted about you being unable to deal with the facts and truth of my posts....and your responses were never more than "is not,is nottttttt!"?

See what I mean.

See what I mean

 

[PoliticalChic]

At least the wars that Roosevelt facilitated didn't involve nuclear weapons.

Remember what I predicted about you being unable to deal with the facts and truth of my posts....and your responses were never more than "is not,is nottttttt!"?

See what I mean.

See what I mean

[ No single nation should pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons.”s.

Do you even know what that means?

I speak several languages fluently.

English is one.

 

[Camp]

At least the wars that Roosevelt facilitated didn't involve nuclear weapons.

Remember what I predicted about you being unable to deal with the facts and truth of my posts....and your responses were never more than "is not,is nottttttt!"?

See what I mean.

See what I mean

www.hydro.com/en/About-Hydro/Our-history/1929---1945/1943-The-Heroes-of-Telemark/

The OP is notorious for her lack of knowledge about this period of world history.

 

[PoliticalChic]

6. Roosevelt's unbelievably naive attitude about the homicidal manic, Stalin, can be proven in his own words:

In a letter to FDR, dated January 29, 1943, Ambassador to Moscow, William Bullitt warned Roosevelt about what would happen if he continued pursuing the policies of appeasement toward Stalin that formed the foundation of the American war strategy. He pleaded with FDR not to 'permit our war to prevent Nazi domination of Europe to be turned into a war to establish Soviet domination of Europe.' He predicted the Soviet annexation of half of Europe; George Kennan identified that letter as the earliest warning of what would be the result of FDR's policies.
"For the President Personal & Secret: Correspondence Between Franklin D. Roosevelt and William C. Bullitt," Orville H. Bullitt, p. 575-590



Now read what Franklin Roosevelt wrote back about Stalin:

"Bill, I don't dispute your facts, they are accurate, I don't dispute the logic of your reasoning. I have just had a hunch that Stalin is not that kind of a man. Harry [Hopkins, Stalin's spy living in the White House] says he's not and that he [Stalln] doesn't want anything in the world but security for his country, and I think that if I give him everything I possibly can and ask nothing from him in return, noblesse oblige, he won't try to annex anything and will work with me for a world of democracy and peace."
William C. Bullitt, "How We Won The War and Lost The Peace," Life Magazine, August 30, 1948, p. 94


Insane???
Remember....FDR knew all about the genocides, purges, and lies of the Bolsheviks.



OK....now see Obama in exactly the same mode.....next.

 

[Camp]

At least the wars that Roosevelt facilitated didn't involve nuclear weapons.

Remember what I predicted about you being unable to deal with the facts and truth of my posts....and your responses were never more than "is not,is nottttttt!"?

See what I mean.

See what I mean

[ No single nation should pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons.”s.

Do you even know what that means?

I speak several languages fluently.

English is one.

Which single country is attempting to pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons?

 

[CremeBrulee]

What does any of this have to do with President Obama and Iran?

So glad you asked.

The first part of the thread was to remind all of the debilitation caused by Roosevelt....


5. Although Obama has lied about his foreign policy constantly, he gave away his desire to make Iran a nuclear power early on. Just as Franklin Roosevelt gave the communist state recognition in his first year as President- something every other President and Secretaries of State declined to do- in his first year, Barack Obama went abroad and said this:

"On June 4, 2009 in Cairo, Obama said about Iran: “In the middle of the Cold War, the United States played a role in the overthrow of a democratically elected Iranian government. I understand those who protest that some countries have weapons that others do not. No single nation should pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons.”
Obama: American in name only




"It appeared to be a go-ahead for Iran—far more than any other country—to militarize and nuclearize. And it also appeared to be consent for the rest of the Middle East to do the same.

The Middle East is the most unstable region in the world, and it is getting worse [due to Obama's policies], even as you read this. It is on a path toward chaos that will spread far beyond that region.

The reality is, this downward spiral is being accelerated by America’s foreign policy—specifically, America’s extraordinary reversal of its foreign policy toward its long-time enemy, Iran."
Made in America: A Nuclear Middle East



At least the wars that Roosevelt facilitated didn't involve nuclear weapons.

I'm sorry, but I need more than just the words of a birther that alludes to rebellion and violence to remove President Obama from office or a publication that describes itself as "...in-depth news analysis on top stories, world news, weather, economics and society in the light of Bible prophecy." Those sources are not convincing

 

[PoliticalChic]

At least the wars that Roosevelt facilitated didn't involve nuclear weapons.

Remember what I predicted about you being unable to deal with the facts and truth of my posts....and your responses were never more than "is not,is nottttttt!"?

See what I mean.

See what I mean

[ No single nation should pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons.”s.

Do you even know what that means?

I speak several languages fluently.

English is one.

Which single country is attempting to pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons?

Guess.

 

[PoliticalChic]

What does any of this have to do with President Obama and Iran?

So glad you asked.

The first part of the thread was to remind all of the debilitation caused by Roosevelt....


5. Although Obama has lied about his foreign policy constantly, he gave away his desire to make Iran a nuclear power early on. Just as Franklin Roosevelt gave the communist state recognition in his first year as President- something every other President and Secretaries of State declined to do- in his first year, Barack Obama went abroad and said this:

"On June 4, 2009 in Cairo, Obama said about Iran: “In the middle of the Cold War, the United States played a role in the overthrow of a democratically elected Iranian government. I understand those who protest that some countries have weapons that others do not. No single nation should pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons.”
Obama: American in name only




"It appeared to be a go-ahead for Iran—far more than any other country—to militarize and nuclearize. And it also appeared to be consent for the rest of the Middle East to do the same.

The Middle East is the most unstable region in the world, and it is getting worse [due to Obama's policies], even as you read this. It is on a path toward chaos that will spread far beyond that region.

The reality is, this downward spiral is being accelerated by America’s foreign policy—specifically, America’s extraordinary reversal of its foreign policy toward its long-time enemy, Iran."
Made in America: A Nuclear Middle East



At least the wars that Roosevelt facilitated didn't involve nuclear weapons.

I'm sorry, but I need more than just the words of a birther that alludes to rebellion and violence to remove President Obama from office or a publication that describes itself as "...in-depth news analysis on top stories, world news, weather, economics and society in the light of Bible prophecy." Those sources are not convincing

So...do some research.

You will find the post to be truthful and accurate.



Of course....that may be exactly what you fear.


Could you point out any part of that post that you doubt.
Any?

 

[Camp]

At least the wars that Roosevelt facilitated didn't involve nuclear weapons.

Remember what I predicted about you being unable to deal with the facts and truth of my posts....and your responses were never more than "is not,is nottttttt!"?

See what I mean.

See what I mean

[ No single nation should pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons.”s.

Do you even know what that means?

I speak several languages fluently.

English is one.

Which single country is attempting to pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons?

Guess.

You are evading a simple question. How many nations are involved in the negotiated proposed treaty with Iran which is the topic of your claims in this thread.

 

[CremeBrulee]

You posted those two articles as a link between FDR/Stalin/WWII and President Obama/Iran. The Trumpet piece ends with:

"This clash of civilizations is soon to occur, and America’s foolish foreign-policy decisions to allow the Middle East to nuclearize are leading to this event. The shaking of the nations has begun.

If we are prepared to listen to God, we will see how all these prophesied events will soon lead to the glorious return of Jesus Christ. This is the real new beginning the Middle East needs!

The author of the other article is a birther that has written several editorials in which he alludes to the violent overthrow of the government.

Like I said, I just can't accept either of those as legitimate links to those two subjects.

 

[Camp]

What does any of this have to do with President Obama and Iran?

So glad you asked.

The first part of the thread was to remind all of the debilitation caused by Roosevelt....


5. Although Obama has lied about his foreign policy constantly, he gave away his desire to make Iran a nuclear power early on. Just as Franklin Roosevelt gave the communist state recognition in his first year as President- something every other President and Secretaries of State declined to do- in his first year, Barack Obama went abroad and said this:

"On June 4, 2009 in Cairo, Obama said about Iran: “In the middle of the Cold War, the United States played a role in the overthrow of a democratically elected Iranian government. I understand those who protest that some countries have weapons that others do not. No single nation should pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons.”
Obama: American in name only




"It appeared to be a go-ahead for Iran—far more than any other country—to militarize and nuclearize. And it also appeared to be consent for the rest of the Middle East to do the same.

The Middle East is the most unstable region in the world, and it is getting worse [due to Obama's policies], even as you read this. It is on a path toward chaos that will spread far beyond that region.

The reality is, this downward spiral is being accelerated by America’s foreign policy—specifically, America’s extraordinary reversal of its foreign policy toward its long-time enemy, Iran."
Made in America: A Nuclear Middle East



At least the wars that Roosevelt facilitated didn't involve nuclear weapons.

I'm sorry, but I need more than just the words of a birther that alludes to rebellion and violence to remove President Obama from office or a publication that describes itself as "...in-depth news analysis on top stories, world news, weather, economics and society in the light of Bible prophecy." Those sources are not convincing

So...do some research.

You will find the post to be truthful and accurate.



Of course....that may be exactly what you fear.


Could you point out any part of that post that you doubt.
Any?

You are insisting that a judgmental opinion commentary is fact and everyone must accept it and agree with it because it fits your agenda. How ridiculous are you going to be today?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Remember what I predicted about you being unable to deal with the facts and truth of my posts....and your responses were never more than "is not,is nottttttt!"?

See what I mean.

See what I mean

[ No single nation should pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons.”s.

Do you even know what that means?

I speak several languages fluently.

English is one.

Which single country is attempting to pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons?

Guess.

You are evading a simple question. How many nations are involved in the negotiated proposed treaty with Iran which is the topic of your claims in this thread.

That's not what you asked.

"Which single country is attempting to pick and choose which nation holds nuclear weapons?"

Until the current fake entered office....only one nation was actively demanding an end to Iran's nuclear power grab.


Don't pretend to be even more stupid than you are.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You posted those two articles as a link between FDR/Stalin/WWII and President Obama/Iran. The Trumpet piece ends with:

"This clash of civilizations is soon to occur, and America’s foolish foreign-policy decisions to allow the Middle East to nuclearize are leading to this event. The shaking of the nations has begun.

If we are prepared to listen to God, we will see how all these prophesied events will soon lead to the glorious return of Jesus Christ. This is the real new beginning the Middle East needs!

The author of the other article is a birther that has written several editorials in which he alludes to the violent overthrow of the government.

Like I said, I just can't accept either of those as legitimate links to those two subjects.

Let's stick to post #56...the one at issue.
Don't run and hide:
Could you point out any part of that post that you doubt.
Any?

 

[NYcarbineer]

The US populace wanted nothing to do with another war, they wanted war to end..Even if it meant letting Stalin have what his armies fought for..

As is the case with just about every post you send....this is not the case.

The truth is that FDR had every intention of ceding half of Europe to the tender mercies of Joseph Stalin.

Oh, so now you admit you believe that FDR should have taken the US to war with the Soviets in 1945.

Could you supply any such "admission," NYLiar?

Right after you deny it. On the record.

Afterall, how can you rag on FDR for letting the Soviets occupy much of Eastern Europe if you didn't support the only alternative which would have been to oppose them by force?

So you made a post that you can't back up.

No surprise....after all, you are the NYLiar.

No, I just backed it up by tricking you into refusing to deny it.

Case closed.