Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Soggy and bigreb are laughable in that because those who rejected the bushies and reactionary doctrines somehow did not vote for the Dems.
Ah, boys? The Dems got a majority. Want to guess from where those votes came. It wasn't Argentina or Mexico.
Were you so nonchalant about the Constitution when Bush was in office?
yes
no liberals were running around shouting "death to those constitutional traitorous conservatives!"
no liberals were saying "boy...I am looking forward to killing people with the wrong opinions"
They most certainly were. Lefties wished people dead, talked about using violence, Talked about sucession and moving away from America. Hell a movie was Made wishing Bush Dead.
You people have the most selective Memories ever.
Oh and Bush never talked about Using Executive Fiat to grant amnesty to and register to vote 12 Million people before a contested election. I would not support armed rebellion unless he did something like that. The act of a Dictator not a president. Let's hope it is just crazy talk, and he is not seriously considering bypassing Congress and granting Amnesty and full citizenship to 12 to 20 Million people with the stoke of his pen. That is all I have to say.
Soggy and bigreb are laughable in that because those who rejected the bushies and reactionary doctrines somehow did not vote for the Dems.
Ah, boys? The Dems got a majority. Want to guess from where those votes came. It wasn't Argentina or Mexico.
Whats laughable to say the least is your unfounded claims that you have yet to prove.
Soggy and bigreb are laughable in that because those who rejected the bushies and reactionary doctrines somehow did not vote for the Dems.
Ah, boys? The Dems got a majority. Want to guess from where those votes came. It wasn't Argentina or Mexico.
Whats laughable to say the least is your unfounded claims that you have yet to prove.
You mean "unfounded claims like:
"Obama hates rich people"
"Obama hates America"
Soggy and bigreb are laughable in that because those who rejected the bushies and reactionary doctrines somehow did not vote for the Dems.
Ah, boys? The Dems got a majority. Want to guess from where those votes came. It wasn't Argentina or Mexico.
Whats laughable to say the least is your unfounded claims that you have yet to prove.
You mean "unfounded claims like:
"Obama hates rich people"
"Obama hates America"
Whats laughable to say the least is your unfounded claims that you have yet to prove.
You mean "unfounded claims like:
"Obama hates rich people"
"Obama hates America"
Now don't confuse pseudo-conservatives (who are really reactionaries), Doctor. They follow RushLimbaugh's Rules for Conservatives: they make assertions, then demand others refute them with evidence.
yes
no liberals were running around shouting "death to those constitutional traitorous conservatives!"
no liberals were saying "boy...I am looking forward to killing people with the wrong opinions"
They most certainly were. Lefties wished people dead, talked about using violence, Talked about sucession and moving away from America. Hell a movie was Made wishing Bush Dead.
You people have the most selective Memories ever.
Oh and Bush never talked about Using Executive Fiat to grant amnesty to and register to vote 12 Million people before a contested election. I would not support armed rebellion unless he did something like that. The act of a Dictator not a president. Let's hope it is just crazy talk, and he is not seriously considering bypassing Congress and granting Amnesty and full citizenship to 12 to 20 Million people with the stoke of his pen. That is all I have to say.
Obama has never talked about that either. Only batshit crazy conservative talking heads.
This is yet another false emergency - fearmongering talking heads have yet another thing to make you afraid, just like the "fairness doctrine" and "they're coming to take your guns".
What sort of government are you going to replace the current one with? You're rebelling against the concept of the majority ruling, so I assume you want a government where the minority rules.
we have that now
bigrebnc1775 is deflecting here.
The administration, particularly since it will keep its majorities this November, will enact the memorandum as executive order after January 1, 2011.
There will be nothing you can do about that, bigreb.
bigrebnc1775 is deflecting here.
The administration, particularly since it will keep its majorities this November, will enact the memorandum as executive order after January 1, 2011.
There will be nothing you can do about that, bigreb.
Then obama will be impeached or shot one or the other but he will be gone.
bigrebnc1775 is deflecting here.
The administration, particularly since it will keep its majorities this November, will enact the memorandum as executive order after January 1, 2011.
There will be nothing you can do about that, bigreb.
Then obama will be impeached or shot one or the other but he will be gone.
Once again showing how conservatives react to being out of power
Yea....shoot the President
Great job of problem solving reb
bigrebnc1775 is deflecting here.
The administration, particularly since it will keep its majorities this November, will enact the memorandum as executive order after January 1, 2011.
There will be nothing you can do about that, bigreb.
Then obama will be impeached or shot one or the other but he will be gone.
bigrebnc1775 is deflecting here.
The administration, particularly since it will keep its majorities this November, will enact the memorandum as executive order after January 1, 2011.
There will be nothing you can do about that, bigreb.
Then obama will be impeached or shot one or the other but he will be gone.
You might want to reconsider, for I do believe your last sentence is objectionable subject to federal law.
bigrebnc1775 is deflecting here.
The administration, particularly since it will keep its majorities this November, will enact the memorandum as executive order after January 1, 2011.
There will be nothing you can do about that, bigreb.
Then obama will be impeached or shot one or the other but he will be gone.
You might want to reconsider, for I do believe your last sentence is objectionable subject to federal law.
bigrebnc1775 is deflecting here.
The administration, particularly since it will keep its majorities this November, will enact the memorandum as executive order after January 1, 2011.
There will be nothing you can do about that, bigreb.
Then obama will be impeached or shot one or the other but he will be gone.
Then obama will be impeached or shot one or the other but he will be gone.
You might want to reconsider, for I do believe your last sentence is objectionable subject to federal law.
I do believe the Secret Service is obligated to investigate such threats. Big Reb should have someone knocking on his door
bigrebnc1775 is deflecting here.
The administration, particularly since it will keep its majorities this November, will enact the memorandum as executive order after January 1, 2011.
There will be nothing you can do about that, bigreb.
Then obama will be impeached or shot one or the other but he will be gone.
What Constitutes a "Threat?"
According to this law -- 18 USC Sec. 871 -- which reads, in part:
"...Whoever knowingly and willfully deposits for conveyance in the mail or for a delivery from any post office or by any letter carrier any letter, paper, writing, print, missive, or document containing any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States, the President-elect, the Vice President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President of the United States, or the Vice President-elect, or knowingly and willfully otherwise makes any such threat against the President, President-elect, Vice President or other officer next in the order of succession to the office of President, or Vice President-elect, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both."
That covers a lot of deeds and statements. It gives the Secret Service a lot of latitude when conducting an investigation. There is a very good reason for this. Few jobs are more dangerous than President of the United States.
