The Second American Revolution coming......

Because Arizona does not have the constitutional mandate to protect federal borders, bigrebnc1775.

There will be no revolution from your kind, ever. You are all talk, and should any of you violate the law, you will simply disappear into the law enforcement system, where you have spent time before, I take it.

Good riddance.

But they do have a State Constitutional mandate to protect the Arizona citizens. And who the fuck atre you to say there will be no revolution? Since you say there will not be one tells me you have no concepot as to what is going on around you. Wake you and smell the dictatorship that is coming.

What sort of government are you going to replace the current one with? You're rebelling against the concept of the majority ruling, so I assume you want a government where the minority rules.

Will you still call that a democratic government?
 
If things don't dramatically change in November, I think there's a very good chance of a some kind of revolution. Either peaceful or violent. The level of ire with the government in this country is probably higher now than it was before the first Civil War. The country is prime for something to happen, other than voting, which most view as inadequate. Elections are as crooked here as they are in any little third world shit hole. It's evident they can't be trusted, especially to bring about the kind of change that's going to be needed to save this country from the impending doom brought on by the Kenyan and his radical band of socialist shit bags.

Denial is the greatest weapon to complacency. Denying the truth will never change the truth. The civil war was started over less intrusion of the federal government than we have now.

You are correct...the federal government resisting your having slaves was not much of an intrusion
 
Liesmatter said:
"You assholes" refers to your republican cohorts.

Its not my fault you are a child.


I did not lie you buttwipe the tax rate under Reagan was higher than Obamas.

Yes, you did lie because Reagan lowered the top bracket to 28% as shown in your own chart.

When have you ever told the truth?

Taz, compare the Reagan rates by year with the tax rate of 2009, and I think you will be startled.
 
The federal mandate over rides any state mandate, which is, ipso facto, unconstitutional.

Has the tenth amendment been repealed?

In essence, yes. The politically corrupt Supreme Court in 1941, the United States v. Darby Lumber Co., said that the 10th Amendment was a "mere truism" and therefore not enforceable as a matter of law. Since that time, no cases have been decided using the 10th Amendment to demonstrate the Constitutional powers of the states vis-a-vis the federal government.

That is why it is so important to overturn or override this decision as soon as possible.
 
skookerasbil,

Who goes up against the wall come your revolution?

Surely you must have a whatever it takes list of people who must die.

Care to share it with us?

Don't be shy.

Please tell us who needs to die to make America the nation you'd like to live in.

This country has been dragged down a road for the last 80 years that is contrary to the Constitution of the United States. The leadership of those responsible for that dragging are the ones that need to be up against the wall.

I have all the confidence in the world that you'll be able to figure out what I mean Edi.
 
If things don't dramatically change in November, I think there's a very good chance of a some kind of revolution. Either peaceful or violent. The level of ire with the government in this country is probably higher now than it was before the first Civil War. The country is prime for something to happen, other than voting, which most view as inadequate. Elections are as crooked here as they are in any little third world shit hole. It's evident they can't be trusted, especially to bring about the kind of change that's going to be needed to save this country from the impending doom brought on by the Kenyan and his radical band of socialist shit bags.

What a bunch of pussies!

Most Americans don't agree with you politically, so now you want a revolution

Thankfully for the rest of us, you being a bunch of pussies could never get a revolution off the ground. The sole reason being you are too fat, dumb and happy with our current system to get off your fat asses and do anything more significant than post nonsense on the internet

Pussy... blah, blah, blah, pussies, blah, blah, blah... for Christ sake rw, can you pop your head out of your brown eye long enough to say at least one intelligent thing?

Yes, most Americans DO agree with me. The approval rating for congress right now is 11%. You call that happy? Get a fucking clue man.

Revolution, yup, one could erupt here like a volcano. Things WILL get worse. More people are going to be without a job before less. People will be MORE broke before they have more money. This country WILL see civil unrest and a possible bankruptcy. The social fabric of this country WILL be tested in the years to come, and when we hit bottom, all it's going to take for all out civil war to erupt is one tiny, little spark.

And speaking of pussies, it will be the hand holding, lets all sing kumbaya, gun hating, military hating, flower children, group hug, hyper sensitive LIBERAL ***** that will get their ASS KICKED, by the gun loving, military supporting, red neck, back woods, hard ass conservatives. It'll be a fucking cake walk.
 
Because Arizona does not have the constitutional mandate to protect federal borders, bigrebnc1775.

There will be no revolution from your kind, ever. You are all talk, and should any of you violate the law, you will simply disappear into the law enforcement system, where you have spent time before, I take it.

Good riddance.

But they do have a State Constitutional mandate to protect the Arizona citizens. And who the fuck atre you to say there will be no revolution? Since you say there will not be one tells me you have no concepot as to what is going on around you. Wake you and smell the dictatorship that is coming.

What sort of government are you going to replace the current one with? You're rebelling against the concept of the majority ruling, so I assume you want a government where the minority rules.

Will you still call that a democratic government?

Nope, just like this country always used to be. Majority rule with Minority rights.

Simple majority rule is an excuse trampling the rights of others.

I don't think anyone is asking for anything but a return to the common understanding the U.S. Constitution that used to be the basis for governing this country. That is before the political contortions of the left started perverting the plain meaning of the Constitution.
 
The federal mandate over rides any state mandate, which is, ipso facto, unconstitutional.

Has the tenth amendment been repealed?

In essence, yes. The politically corrupt Supreme Court in 1941, the United States v. Darby Lumber Co., said that the 10th Amendment was a "mere truism" and therefore not enforceable as a matter of law. Since that time, no cases have been decided using the 10th Amendment to demonstrate the Constitutional powers of the states vis-a-vis the federal government.

That is why it is so important to overturn or override this decision as soon as possible.

We have a two step rule
step 1. Propose An Amendment
Either Congress or the States can propose an amendment ot the Constitution.
•Both Houses of Congress must propose the amendment with a two-thirds vote. This is how all current amendments have been offered.
•Two-thirds of the State legislatures must call on Congress to hold a Constitutional Convention.

2. Ratify An Admendment
Regardless of how the amendment is proposed, it must be ratified by the States.
•Three-fourths of the State legislatures must approve of the amendment proposed by Congress, or
•Three-fourths of the states must approve the amendment via ratifying conventions. This method has only been used once, to repeal Prohibition (21st Amendment).

The supreme court does not legislate they can only give opinions if a law is Constitutional or not.
So tell me has either one of these steps happened yet?
 
If things don't dramatically change in November, I think there's a very good chance of a some kind of revolution. Either peaceful or violent. The level of ire with the government in this country is probably higher now than it was before the first Civil War. The country is prime for something to happen, other than voting, which most view as inadequate. Elections are as crooked here as they are in any little third world shit hole. It's evident they can't be trusted, especially to bring about the kind of change that's going to be needed to save this country from the impending doom brought on by the Kenyan and his radical band of socialist shit bags.

What a bunch of pussies!

Most Americans don't agree with you politically, so now you want a revolution

Thankfully for the rest of us, you being a bunch of pussies could never get a revolution off the ground. The sole reason being you are too fat, dumb and happy with our current system to get off your fat asses and do anything more significant than post nonsense on the internet

It's one thing to "want" a revolution, as you say.

It's another thing to look at the situation that exists and all of the various inputs into that situation, analyze it and say that it is not unlikely that a revolution could come about.

There of course is frustration with the anti-Constitutional forces of "change" that are occurring more rapidly than in the last 80 years. There is little of the buy-in that people had in the 1930s when almost everyone was a political and economic illiterate. So, people are pissed when they see the Constitution torn asunder for no legitimate reason but political avarice. Love of Power for Power's sake and there are very few solutions for that.

Revolution is one.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: 007
Because Arizona does not have the constitutional mandate to protect federal borders, bigrebnc1775.

There will be no revolution from your kind, ever. You are all talk, and should any of you violate the law, you will simply disappear into the law enforcement system, where you have spent time before, I take it.

Good riddance.

But they do have a State Constitutional mandate to protect the Arizona citizens. And who the fuck atre you to say there will be no revolution? Since you say there will not be one tells me you have no concepot as to what is going on around you. Wake you and smell the dictatorship that is coming.

What sort of government are you going to replace the current one with? You're rebelling against the concept of the majority ruling, so I assume you want a government where the minority rules.

Will you still call that a democratic government?

We are a Republic. The majority rules with minority rights are protected. I want a goivernment that is not seen I want a government that does not spend itslef to death. I want a government that is back under the control of the people.
 
Has the tenth amendment been repealed?

In essence, yes. The politically corrupt Supreme Court in 1941, the United States v. Darby Lumber Co., said that the 10th Amendment was a "mere truism" and therefore not enforceable as a matter of law. Since that time, no cases have been decided using the 10th Amendment to demonstrate the Constitutional powers of the states vis-a-vis the federal government.

That is why it is so important to overturn or override this decision as soon as possible.

We have a two step rule
step 1. Propose An Amendment
Either Congress or the States can propose an amendment ot the Constitution.
•Both Houses of Congress must propose the amendment with a two-thirds vote. This is how all current amendments have been offered.
•Two-thirds of the State legislatures must call on Congress to hold a Constitutional Convention.

2. Ratify An Admendment
Regardless of how the amendment is proposed, it must be ratified by the States.
•Three-fourths of the State legislatures must approve of the amendment proposed by Congress, or
•Three-fourths of the states must approve the amendment via ratifying conventions. This method has only been used once, to repeal Prohibition (21st Amendment).

The supreme court does not legislate they can only give opinions if a law is Constitutional or not.
So tell me has either one of these steps happened yet?

Since Chief Justice Marshall in Marbury v. Madison, said that the Supreme Court has the power to "say what the law is," the power of judicial review has rested with the US Supreme Court to determine the constitutionality or lawfulness of any law or regulation promulgated by the legislative branch.

While you may disagree with this because it is not written in the Constitution, short of an amendment depriving the Supreme Court of this role, you will not see any change to that. There will certainly not be a retroactive loss of that prerogative. I think it's better to deal with the actual facts of the situation than rehash why it shouldn't be the case.

"Shouldn't" is a normative state of being and has little to do with reality.
 
In essence, yes. The politically corrupt Supreme Court in 1941, the United States v. Darby Lumber Co., said that the 10th Amendment was a "mere truism" and therefore not enforceable as a matter of law. Since that time, no cases have been decided using the 10th Amendment to demonstrate the Constitutional powers of the states vis-a-vis the federal government.

That is why it is so important to overturn or override this decision as soon as possible.

We have a two step rule
step 1. Propose An Amendment
Either Congress or the States can propose an amendment ot the Constitution.
•Both Houses of Congress must propose the amendment with a two-thirds vote. This is how all current amendments have been offered.
•Two-thirds of the State legislatures must call on Congress to hold a Constitutional Convention.

2. Ratify An Admendment
Regardless of how the amendment is proposed, it must be ratified by the States.
•Three-fourths of the State legislatures must approve of the amendment proposed by Congress, or
•Three-fourths of the states must approve the amendment via ratifying conventions. This method has only been used once, to repeal Prohibition (21st Amendment).

The supreme court does not legislate they can only give opinions if a law is Constitutional or not.
So tell me has either one of these steps happened yet?

Since Chief Justice Marshall in Marbury v. Madison, said that the Supreme Court has the power to "say what the law is," the power of judicial review has rested with the US Supreme Court to determine the constitutionality or lawfulness of any law or regulation promulgated by the legislative branch.

While you may disagree with this because it is not written in the Constitution, short of an amendment depriving the Supreme Court of this role, you will not see any change to that. There will certainly not be a retroactive loss of that prerogative. I think it's better to deal with the actual facts of the situation than rehash why it shouldn't be the case.

"Shouldn't" is a normative state of being and has little to do with reality.

You're talking all around me, but missing the point has the tenth amendment been repealed?
 
Last edited:
The federal mandate over rides any state mandate, which is, ipso facto, unconstitutional.

Has the tenth amendment been repealed?

You are not the determiner of constitutional law. SCOTUS has already decided this for you. Abide by the law.

This question doesn't require much thought process even for you jake, it may be a streach for you BUT

Has the tenth amendment been repealed?

And who are the others? Name them?
 
Last edited:
As I thought Jake you can't answer it. Which means you would lay down and bend over for any law handed down by the government.

Has the tenth amendment been repealed?

YES or NO?
 
Your question, bigreb, is meaningless; that has already been decided for you, and there is NOTHING you can do about it. :lol:
 
Your question, bigreb, is meaningless; that has already been decided for you, and there is NOTHING you can do about it. :lol:

Bend over and take what ever the government wishes to give you. Be their punk. Is what you claim to have happened constitutinal? No it isn't Has the tenth Amendment been repealed NO IT HASN'T. You lose.
 
If things don't dramatically change in November, I think there's a very good chance of a some kind of revolution. Either peaceful or violent. The level of ire with the government in this country is probably higher now than it was before the first Civil War. The country is prime for something to happen, other than voting, which most view as inadequate. Elections are as crooked here as they are in any little third world shit hole. It's evident they can't be trusted, especially to bring about the kind of change that's going to be needed to save this country from the impending doom brought on by the Kenyan and his radical band of socialist shit bags.

In other words...if Republicans don't win, we'll revolt.....what a whiney baby people can be if they don't win.
 
If things don't dramatically change in November, I think there's a very good chance of a some kind of revolution. Either peaceful or violent. The level of ire with the government in this country is probably higher now than it was before the first Civil War. The country is prime for something to happen, other than voting, which most view as inadequate. Elections are as crooked here as they are in any little third world shit hole. It's evident they can't be trusted, especially to bring about the kind of change that's going to be needed to save this country from the impending doom brought on by the Kenyan and his radical band of socialist shit bags.

In other words...if Republicans don't win, we'll revolt.....what a whiney baby people can be if they don't win.

If things don't change as in stop the growth of Government stop the spending on wasteful pork, stop the liberal controlled government, removce the lobbyist, give the people back the controls of the government.. Thats the change needed o stop any revolt.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top