The Republican party is willing to go down with Trump

[Hutch Starskey]

View attachment 205219

well the only one that actually did anything was the one fbi agent. I mean let's call a fking spade a spade damn it.

Thanks for the timely example, traitor.

 

[jc456]

Strzok: I could have exposed Russia investigation to hurt Trump, but didn’t

As Malcolm Nance has said, this Republican party, with their desperation, as evidenced by the Strzok hearing and the recent indictments of twelve Russians who we know by name, those Republicans are willing to impeach Rod Rosenstein, and attack an FBI agent who did his job, are all doing anything and everything to protect Trump.

Now, let's unpack that reality. What does that say for those Republicans who are in Congress? It says, that they took an oath, that they currently have abandoned, in favor of a president who actively used Russians to change the election in favor of him. And that is what these Republicans support. They also support the criminal aspect of this election theft, by a known criminal, while the Republicans in Congress comply with his crimes. They are so criminal themselves, that they are willing to obstruct justice by getting rid of the top investigators issuing the indictments.

It's as if the Republican party is the Corleone family lawyers trying to protect Don Corleone. The Republicans in Congress are nothing more than a mafia lead organization.

And here's the other bad news. The Republican deplorable voters are also complicit in the crimes. And this is what it has all come down to. Defending the country against a huge mafia organization lead by Donald Trump.

No, strzok is a disgrace and should be in prison.

For what?

hmmm sort of easy, treason? obstruction of justice? to name two.

Easy? You just said nothing.

Show us when and where that occured.

just watched him on the telly.

 

[jc456]

View attachment 205219

well the only one that actually did anything was the one fbi agent. I mean let's call a fking spade a spade damn it.

Thanks for the timely example, traitor.

he was, yuge traitor.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Strzok: I could have exposed Russia investigation to hurt Trump, but didn’t

As Malcolm Nance has said, this Republican party, with their desperation, as evidenced by the Strzok hearing and the recent indictments of twelve Russians who we know by name, those Republicans are willing to impeach Rod Rosenstein, and attack an FBI agent who did his job, are all doing anything and everything to protect Trump.

Now, let's unpack that reality. What does that say for those Republicans who are in Congress? It says, that they took an oath, that they currently have abandoned, in favor of a president who actively used Russians to change the election in favor of him. And that is what these Republicans support. They also support the criminal aspect of this election theft, by a known criminal, while the Republicans in Congress comply with his crimes. They are so criminal themselves, that they are willing to obstruct justice by getting rid of the top investigators issuing the indictments.

It's as if the Republican party is the Corleone family lawyers trying to protect Don Corleone. The Republicans in Congress are nothing more than a mafia lead organization.

And here's the other bad news. The Republican deplorable voters are also complicit in the crimes. And this is what it has all come down to. Defending the country against a huge mafia organization lead by Donald Trump.

No, strzok is a disgrace and should be in prison.

For what?

hmmm sort of easy, treason? obstruction of justice? to name two.

Easy? You just said nothing.

Show us when and where that occured.

just watched him on the telly.

You said nothing again, loser.

 

[bodecea]

 

[jc456]

No, strzok is a disgrace and should be in prison.

For what?

hmmm sort of easy, treason? obstruction of justice? to name two.

Easy? You just said nothing.

Show us when and where that occured.

just watched him on the telly.

You said nothing again, loser.

I've said it all.

 

[OKTexas]

There are 80 sections in the indictment, which one are you referring to?


.

Obviously the part that covers what you asked the retarded question about, dope.

So you don't know, figures. But none of it covers what I asked for. Your smoking gun is nothing but a firecracker.

.

You didn't read it, liar.

The bitches server was in FBI hands Aug 2015, a full year before Trump made that joke. What did they try to hack?

NEXT????

Just keep asking dumbass questions then, loser.

More smoke and noise from your firecracker. Nothing in the indictment dealt with the 30,000 emails missing form the bitches illegal server, which is exactly what Trump was talking about. You're free to fantasize otherwise, doesn't make it true.


.

I never said it did, retard. I said you asked a dumbass question and the answer was in the indictment.

No it wasn't, there was nothing in the indictment related to Trumps joke. Why do you think otherwise?


.

 

[edward37]

Just witnessed the worst performance of an American president of all time Cowardly week ,believes the murderer rather than our intelligence agencies Brings up his great victory and Hills e mails? WTF does he think, we're all stupid republicans ?

thank god that eight years of obammy finally concluded eh?

Glad you're proud of the way your president showed how weak he is Takes putins word over his own intelligence agencies?? The man today showed his cowardice.. and his trump first BS

 

[jc456]

Just witnessed the worst performance of an American president of all time Cowardly week ,believes the murderer rather than our intelligence agencies Brings up his great victory and Hills e mails? WTF does he think, we're all stupid republicans ?

thank god that eight years of obammy finally concluded eh?

Glad you're proud of the way your president showed how weak he is Takes putins word over his own intelligence agencies?? The man today showed his cowardice.. and his trump first BS

weak is a president who turns over 150 million to Iran. obammy baby, ain't you proud?

 

[Papageorgio]

Your link doesn’t go to the story, can you please fix it.

If you want a link, just watch the Strzok hearing. This hearing was an example of pure desperation by the Republicans to try and get rid of an ongoing investigation where we are into the thirties with indictments. Republicans have become full fledged obstructionists. This investigation is becoming more and more about the Republicans in Congress and their base, than Trump. We know he is guilty of multiple crimes. Now the investigation is spilling over into the party itself.

What happened to the rule of law and the Constitution? You folks would just as well flush those values down the toilet.

Who is “You folks”? I from day one asked for an investigation and if Trump is proven guilty then he needs to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. So far, we have not verdict, no trial, no hearings, no indictments, we have nothing. I am waiting for Mueller to finish his investigation and then move on from there. So, I am following the rule of law and the Constitution.

Good! Most of the Trump cultists are not. They express their sentiments about that every day. They don't care if he is guilty of this attack on our election system. They don't care if he used campaign money to pay off porn stars. They don't care if he lies every day, or puts kidnapped children in camps. His base cares about one thing. To make sure he continues being president, despite the fact that he is a thief and a criminal.


As to the investigation, we don't have a verdict, but we certainly have the evidence.

I am not a Trump cultist, I am an independent voter that was disgusted and offended by the nominee of both parties. I didn’t vote for Trump and am not inclined to vote for him next time around, however unless the Democrats get a clue, I’ll find another party that will earn my vote. As far as the “evidence”, it isn’t enough otherwise Mueller would be done.

And if Trump isn’t convicted the left nuts won’t let go of it just like the right nuts won’t let go on the otherside.

"Isn't enough evidence"? Seriously? Trump hires Kris Kobach who purges over a million voters through "Cross check" that automatically caused this election to be illegal. He had a Trump tower meeting with our adversary Russia to get dirt on Clinton, which is illegal, and while Trump was in the same building. Trump called on Russia to find the emails in a press conference, and Russia responded that day. Trump paid Cambridge Analytica, headed up by Bob Mercer and Steve Bannon to use stolen data from Russia and Wikileaks to help Trump get elected, which is also illegal. He also used campaign finance money in an election to pay hush money to porn stars. And I could still go on. And you say there isn't enough evidence? Boss, you have got to be high

I am waiting for the evidence to be presented by Mueller, I usually wait for investigations to finish before making a judgement call, they have a better more in depth than I do.

 

[edward37]

Just witnessed the worst performance of an American president of all time Cowardly week ,believes the murderer rather than our intelligence agencies Brings up his great victory and Hills e mails? WTF does he think, we're all stupid republicans ?

thank god that eight years of obammy finally concluded eh?

Glad you're proud of the way your president showed how weak he is Takes putins word over his own intelligence agencies?? The man today showed his cowardice.. and his trump first BS

weak is a president who turns over 150 million to Iran. obammy baby, ain't you proud?

You have something that makes sense of what this dumb f-er in our WH is doing besides tearing America down?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Strzok: I could have exposed Russia investigation to hurt Trump, but didn’t

As Malcolm Nance has said, this Republican party, with their desperation, as evidenced by the Strzok hearing and the recent indictments of twelve Russians who we know by name, those Republicans are willing to impeach Rod Rosenstein, and attack an FBI agent who did his job, are all doing anything and everything to protect Trump.

Now, let's unpack that reality. What does that say for those Republicans who are in Congress? It says, that they took an oath, that they currently have abandoned, in favor of a president who actively used Russians to change the election in favor of him. And that is what these Republicans support. They also support the criminal aspect of this election theft, by a known criminal, while the Republicans in Congress comply with his crimes. They are so criminal themselves, that they are willing to obstruct justice by getting rid of the top investigators issuing the indictments.

It's as if the Republican party is the Corleone family lawyers trying to protect Don Corleone. The Republicans in Congress are nothing more than a mafia lead organization.

And here's the other bad news. The Republican deplorable voters are also complicit in the crimes. And this is what it has all come down to. Defending the country against a huge mafia organization lead by Donald Trump.

No, strzok is a disgrace and should be in prison.

For what?

Covering the crimes committed by the O admin

 

[jc456]

Just witnessed the worst performance of an American president of all time Cowardly week ,believes the murderer rather than our intelligence agencies Brings up his great victory and Hills e mails? WTF does he think, we're all stupid republicans ?

thank god that eight years of obammy finally concluded eh?

Glad you're proud of the way your president showed how weak he is Takes putins word over his own intelligence agencies?? The man today showed his cowardice.. and his trump first BS

weak is a president who turns over 150 million to Iran. obammy baby, ain't you proud?

You have something that makes sense of what this dumb f-er in our WH is doing besides tearing America down?

obammy left, no reason to discuss him anymore.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Obviously the part that covers what you asked the retarded question about, dope.

So you don't know, figures. But none of it covers what I asked for. Your smoking gun is nothing but a firecracker.

.

You didn't read it, liar.

The bitches server was in FBI hands Aug 2015, a full year before Trump made that joke. What did they try to hack?

NEXT????

Just keep asking dumbass questions then, loser.

More smoke and noise from your firecracker. Nothing in the indictment dealt with the 30,000 emails missing form the bitches illegal server, which is exactly what Trump was talking about. You're free to fantasize otherwise, doesn't make it true.


.

I never said it did, retard. I said you asked a dumbass question and the answer was in the indictment.

No it wasn't, there was nothing in the indictment related to Trumps joke. Why do you think otherwise?


.

Your question, " what did they try to hack", was answered clearly in the indictment, dope.

Try reading it instead of being an idiot.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Strzok: I could have exposed Russia investigation to hurt Trump, but didn’t

As Malcolm Nance has said, this Republican party, with their desperation, as evidenced by the Strzok hearing and the recent indictments of twelve Russians who we know by name, those Republicans are willing to impeach Rod Rosenstein, and attack an FBI agent who did his job, are all doing anything and everything to protect Trump.

Now, let's unpack that reality. What does that say for those Republicans who are in Congress? It says, that they took an oath, that they currently have abandoned, in favor of a president who actively used Russians to change the election in favor of him. And that is what these Republicans support. They also support the criminal aspect of this election theft, by a known criminal, while the Republicans in Congress comply with his crimes. They are so criminal themselves, that they are willing to obstruct justice by getting rid of the top investigators issuing the indictments.

It's as if the Republican party is the Corleone family lawyers trying to protect Don Corleone. The Republicans in Congress are nothing more than a mafia lead organization.

And here's the other bad news. The Republican deplorable voters are also complicit in the crimes. And this is what it has all come down to. Defending the country against a huge mafia organization lead by Donald Trump.

No, strzok is a disgrace and should be in prison.

For what?

Covering the crimes committed by the O admin

How and when did he do that?

 

[Papageorgio]

So you don't know, figures. But none of it covers what I asked for. Your smoking gun is nothing but a firecracker.

.

You didn't read it, liar.

The bitches server was in FBI hands Aug 2015, a full year before Trump made that joke. What did they try to hack?

NEXT????

Just keep asking dumbass questions then, loser.

More smoke and noise from your firecracker. Nothing in the indictment dealt with the 30,000 emails missing form the bitches illegal server, which is exactly what Trump was talking about. You're free to fantasize otherwise, doesn't make it true.


.

I never said it did, retard. I said you asked a dumbass question and the answer was in the indictment.

No it wasn't, there was nothing in the indictment related to Trumps joke. Why do you think otherwise?


.

Your question, " what did they try to hack", was answered clearly in the indictment, dope.

Try teading it instead of being an idiot.

"teading"? While accusing a person of being an idiot? Thanks for the chuckle.

 

[jc456]

So you don't know, figures. But none of it covers what I asked for. Your smoking gun is nothing but a firecracker.

.

You didn't read it, liar.

The bitches server was in FBI hands Aug 2015, a full year before Trump made that joke. What did they try to hack?

NEXT????

Just keep asking dumbass questions then, loser.

More smoke and noise from your firecracker. Nothing in the indictment dealt with the 30,000 emails missing form the bitches illegal server, which is exactly what Trump was talking about. You're free to fantasize otherwise, doesn't make it true.


.

I never said it did, retard. I said you asked a dumbass question and the answer was in the indictment.

No it wasn't, there was nothing in the indictment related to Trumps joke. Why do you think otherwise?


.

Your question, " what did they try to hack", was answered clearly in the indictment, dope.

Try teading it instead of being an idiot.

no one looked at the DNC server. so how did they do that?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

You didn't read it, liar.

Just keep asking dumbass questions then, loser.

More smoke and noise from your firecracker. Nothing in the indictment dealt with the 30,000 emails missing form the bitches illegal server, which is exactly what Trump was talking about. You're free to fantasize otherwise, doesn't make it true.


.

I never said it did, retard. I said you asked a dumbass question and the answer was in the indictment.

No it wasn't, there was nothing in the indictment related to Trumps joke. Why do you think otherwise?


.

Your question, " what did they try to hack", was answered clearly in the indictment, dope.

Try teading it instead of being an idiot.

"teading"? While accusing a person of being an idiot? Thanks for the chuckle.

A typo does not make an idiot. Got anything of substance to add, loser?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

You didn't read it, liar.

Just keep asking dumbass questions then, loser.

More smoke and noise from your firecracker. Nothing in the indictment dealt with the 30,000 emails missing form the bitches illegal server, which is exactly what Trump was talking about. You're free to fantasize otherwise, doesn't make it true.


.

I never said it did, retard. I said you asked a dumbass question and the answer was in the indictment.

No it wasn't, there was nothing in the indictment related to Trumps joke. Why do you think otherwise?


.

Your question, " what did they try to hack", was answered clearly in the indictment, dope.

Try teading it instead of being an idiot.

no one looked at the DNC server. so how did they do that?

Probably because they didn't need to, dope.

 

[jc456]

More smoke and noise from your firecracker. Nothing in the indictment dealt with the 30,000 emails missing form the bitches illegal server, which is exactly what Trump was talking about. You're free to fantasize otherwise, doesn't make it true.


.

I never said it did, retard. I said you asked a dumbass question and the answer was in the indictment.

No it wasn't, there was nothing in the indictment related to Trumps joke. Why do you think otherwise?


.

Your question, " what did they try to hack", was answered clearly in the indictment, dope.

Try teading it instead of being an idiot.

"teading"? While accusing a person of being an idiot? Thanks for the chuckle.

A typo does not make an idiot. Got anything of substance to add, loser?

sure it does, it means you didn't take the time to proof read what you wrote, that makes you an idiot.