The Real War on Women....This will Break your heart

[TheOldSchool]

The murder of an 11 year old child is not any kind of "war on women".

Except if you're Mike Huckster, Duggars, Ted Nugent, Warren Jeffs, Duck Dynasty ...

You're a pathetic little nothing, leftist, scumbag, with not an ounce of compassion.

Compassion is self-destructive. If we cared about everyone as much as our immediate families we'd feel compelled to act and intervene everywhere. Oh look, there's injustice there, we better send troops to put that down. Oh look, now there's injustice over there too, send in the Marines.

At some point you have to either accept your role as world polcieman where you know best and anyone who disagrees is an enemy to be killed, or accept that there's more than one way to do the same thing, and no way is objectively better.

Instead of thinking like an individual, think like a collective. It isn't me and you, but it's us. ALl of us as a whole species. For the whole to survive, some must perish. Can't save everybody, and trying to only ensures the whole dies.

Where's the women's right groups? Where's the U.N.? Leftist have no compassion, they never have had any

They are working on fighting atrocities against women all over the world. That are usually committed by social conservatives btw.

 

[amrchaos]

Actually, child brides is an old issue.

Just a couple of decades ago, India outlawed marrying girls off before a certain age. Also, there are numerous efforts in different countries by different groups such as the Red Cross, Doctors across Borders and so forth that help put pressure on regimes and explain the problems to locals.

This problem is in most Middle Eastern,Africa and some parts of South East Asia and it had existed as far as history can record.

Both secular and religious(not just Christian) group are working to stop it. Did you think it was another problem being ignored? Do some research and learn how deep and messed up the problem is to understand why it still persist.

 

[Jroc]

11 yo is a child.
A woman is an adult.
That's why children are called "children" and adults are called ADULTS.

We have laws to protect children from evil twisted vile adults who want children treated as adults. Like it not, that's as it should be.

Fed up with you assholes wanting the age of consent to be lowered to grade school age. And really fed up with people saying that protecting children from evil, twisted, vile adults is "trivial".

Like i say you're a leftist moron who could give a shit about anybody but yourself "War on women" includes girls. This poor, sweet, intelligent, girl was killed, because she refused to be enslaved by the islamonazis and all you can think about is Ted Nugent? You're a poor excuse for a human being

 

[Jroc]

The murder of an 11 year old child is not any kind of "war on women".

Except if you're Mike Huckster, Duggars, Ted Nugent, Warren Jeffs, Duck Dynasty ...

You're a pathetic little nothing, leftist, scumbag, with not an ounce of compassion.

Compassion is self-destructive. If we cared about everyone as much as our immediate families we'd feel compelled to act and intervene everywhere. Oh look, there's injustice there, we better send troops to put that down. Oh look, now there's injustice over there too, send in the Marines.

At some point you have to either accept your role as world polcieman where you know best and anyone who disagrees is an enemy to be killed, or accept that there's more than one way to do the same thing, and no way is objectively better.

Instead of thinking like an individual, think like a collective. It isn't me and you, but it's us. ALl of us as a whole species. For the whole to survive, some must perish. Can't save everybody, and trying to only ensures the whole dies.

Where's the women's right groups? Where's the U.N.? Leftist have no compassion, they never have had any

They are working on fighting atrocities against women all over the world. That are usually committed by social conservatives btw.

When that happen? maybe you should post evidence of that. Where are these women's groups working to help the women?

 

[Avatar4321]

11 yo is a child.
A woman is an adult.
That's why children are called "children" and adults are called ADULTS.

We have laws to protect children from evil twisted vile adults who want children treated as adults. Like it not, that's as it should be.

Fed up with you assholes wanting the age of consent to be lowered to grade school age. And really fed up with people saying that protecting children from evil, twisted, vile adults is "trivial".

US law defines a child as everyone under the magic age of 18 since something magical and not well understood happens to people on the morning of their 18th birthday.

Let "children" be Hollywood actors cause what could possibly go wrong with that? Let them walk themselves to school before they hit their teens cause that's never been a problem. Let them drive at 16 because the current fad of texting and looking at a smartphone display isn't worrisome. Let children play football because all the protective gear is just for show, not like crashing heads into heads is dangerous or anything.

Our selective concern for children is fucking annoying. If children are "children" and somehow incompetant solely because of their age, then why can children have sex with other children? If they're too young to know whether they should be having sex or not, why are they usually allowed to make that bad decision with another child? Two mentally incompetant people having sex is somehow safe?

USA is among the most infantilizing countries on this planet. If not the most. If having sex at 13 is a 'bad decision' but only by virtue of being 13, and that same decision is an 'acceptable risk' at 16, 17, or 18, when it's also then legal, then it's also an acceptable risk at 13. I'm sure there are pleanty of 13 yos FAR more mature than some 16-18 yos. Is the 16yo who drives and kills someone because they just HAD to respond to a text MORE mature than a 13yo who seeks sex by virtue of being 16?

People desperately need to get over their 'ooh sex is naughty and sinful' infantilism quickly because it's not helping protect anyone.

Sex isn't naughty and sinful. It's quite the opposite. It's sacred.

It's the profaning of the sacred that is naughty and sinful.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

The murder of an 11 year old child is not any kind of "war on women".

Except if you're Mike Huckster, Duggars, Ted Nugent, Warren Jeffs, Duck Dynasty ...

You're a pathetic little nothing, leftist, scumbag, with not an ounce of compassion.

Compassion is self-destructive. If we cared about everyone as much as our immediate families we'd feel compelled to act and intervene everywhere. Oh look, there's injustice there, we better send troops to put that down. Oh look, now there's injustice over there too, send in the Marines.

At some point you have to either accept your role as world polcieman where you know best and anyone who disagrees is an enemy to be killed, or accept that there's more than one way to do the same thing, and no way is objectively better.

Instead of thinking like an individual, think like a collective. It isn't me and you, but it's us. ALl of us as a whole species. For the whole to survive, some must perish. Can't save everybody, and trying to only ensures the whole dies.

Where's the women's right groups? Where's the U.N.? Leftist have no compassion, they never have had any

They are working on fighting atrocities against women all over the world. That are usually committed by social conservatives btw.

RWs always want someone else to do the dirty work. They COULD get off their butts and work for justice for women AND children but they would rather blame others for not doing what the RWs want them to do.


Why are RWs always so against protecting children?

Why don't they know and understand that there are laws for children and laws for adults and those laws are not necessarily the same?

Why do the phony ass christians always want to "forgive" those who harm children? Why do they ALWAYS support and defend RW child predators?

 

[Luddly Neddite]

11 yo is a child.
A woman is an adult.
That's why children are called "children" and adults are called ADULTS.

We have laws to protect children from evil twisted vile adults who want children treated as adults. Like it not, that's as it should be.

Fed up with you assholes wanting the age of consent to be lowered to grade school age. And really fed up with people saying that protecting children from evil, twisted, vile adults is "trivial".

US law defines a child as everyone under the magic age of 18 since something magical and not well understood happens to people on the morning of their 18th birthday.

Let "children" be Hollywood actors cause what could possibly go wrong with that? Let them walk themselves to school before they hit their teens cause that's never been a problem. Let them drive at 16 because the current fad of texting and looking at a smartphone display isn't worrisome. Let children play football because all the protective gear is just for show, not like crashing heads into heads is dangerous or anything.

Our selective concern for children is fucking annoying. If children are "children" and somehow incompetant solely because of their age, then why can children have sex with other children? If they're too young to know whether they should be having sex or not, why are they usually allowed to make that bad decision with another child? Two mentally incompetant people having sex is somehow safe?

USA is among the most infantilizing countries on this planet. If not the most. If having sex at 13 is a 'bad decision' but only by virtue of being 13, and that same decision is an 'acceptable risk' at 16, 17, or 18, when it's also then legal, then it's also an acceptable risk at 13. I'm sure there are pleanty of 13 yos FAR more mature than some 16-18 yos. Is the 16yo who drives and kills someone because they just HAD to respond to a text MORE mature than a 13yo who seeks sex by virtue of being 16?

People desperately need to get over their 'ooh sex is naughty and sinful' infantilism quickly because it's not helping protect anyone.

Sex isn't naughty and sinful. It's quite the opposite. It's sacred.

It's the profaning of the sacred that is naughty and sinful.

Avatar4321

Oh brother. WHAT are you thinking?

Sex with an 11 yo is far worse than "naughty and sinful".

WTF is WRONG with you phoney christians? You Avatar4321 have consistently come down on the side of child molesters and now, in THIS thread about the rape and murder of an 11yo CHILD, you're saying its "sacred"?

This is why I despise these phoney christians.

 

[Book of Jeremiah]

The murder of an 11 year old child is not any kind of "war on women".

Except if you're Mike Huckster, Duggars, Ted Nugent, Warren Jeffs, Duck Dynasty ...

Yeah, you just lost the little credibility you had over on the duggar thread.

I have to disagree with you. Luddly stood up four square for the victims on the Duggar thread.

 

[Jroc]

The murder of an 11 year old child is not any kind of "war on women".

Except if you're Mike Huckster, Duggars, Ted Nugent, Warren Jeffs, Duck Dynasty ...

You're a pathetic little nothing, leftist, scumbag, with not an ounce of compassion.

Compassion is self-destructive. If we cared about everyone as much as our immediate families we'd feel compelled to act and intervene everywhere. Oh look, there's injustice there, we better send troops to put that down. Oh look, now there's injustice over there too, send in the Marines.

At some point you have to either accept your role as world polcieman where you know best and anyone who disagrees is an enemy to be killed, or accept that there's more than one way to do the same thing, and no way is objectively better.

Instead of thinking like an individual, think like a collective. It isn't me and you, but it's us. ALl of us as a whole species. For the whole to survive, some must perish. Can't save everybody, and trying to only ensures the whole dies.

Where's the women's right groups? Where's the U.N.? Leftist have no compassion, they never have had any

They are working on fighting atrocities against women all over the world. That are usually committed by social conservatives btw.

RWs always want someone else to do the dirty work. They COULD get off their butts and work for justice for women AND children but they would rather blame others for not doing what the RWs want them to do.


Why are RWs always so against protecting children?

Why don't they know and understand that there are laws for children and laws for adults and those laws are not necessarily the same?

Why do the phony ass christians always want to "forgive" those who harm children? Why do they ALWAYS support and defend RW child predators?

You're a rambling buffoon. You have no compassion for this girl or anybody. You like most leftist scum are a selfish, unfeeling, pig

 

[TheOldSchool]

You're a pathetic little nothing, leftist, scumbag, with not an ounce of compassion.

Compassion is self-destructive. If we cared about everyone as much as our immediate families we'd feel compelled to act and intervene everywhere. Oh look, there's injustice there, we better send troops to put that down. Oh look, now there's injustice over there too, send in the Marines.

At some point you have to either accept your role as world polcieman where you know best and anyone who disagrees is an enemy to be killed, or accept that there's more than one way to do the same thing, and no way is objectively better.

Instead of thinking like an individual, think like a collective. It isn't me and you, but it's us. ALl of us as a whole species. For the whole to survive, some must perish. Can't save everybody, and trying to only ensures the whole dies.

Where's the women's right groups? Where's the U.N.? Leftist have no compassion, they never have had any

They are working on fighting atrocities against women all over the world. That are usually committed by social conservatives btw.

RWs always want someone else to do the dirty work. They COULD get off their butts and work for justice for women AND children but they would rather blame others for not doing what the RWs want them to do.


Why are RWs always so against protecting children?

Why don't they know and understand that there are laws for children and laws for adults and those laws are not necessarily the same?

Why do the phony ass christians always want to "forgive" those who harm children? Why do they ALWAYS support and defend RW child predators?

You're a rambling buffoon. You have no compassion for this girl or anybody. You like most leftist scum are a selfish, unfeeling, pig

Yo, you're a big ol' phony! Oh!

 

[Jroc]

The murder of an 11 year old child is not any kind of "war on women".

Except if you're Mike Huckster, Duggars, Ted Nugent, Warren Jeffs, Duck Dynasty ...

Yeah, you just lost the little credibility you had over on the duggar thread.

I have to disagree with you. Luddly stood up four square for the victims on the Duggar thread.

He's piece of shit...You shouldn't be swayed by his bull. if those people were leftist, he'd give a shit. Like he could give a shit about this sweet girl who was slaughtered

 

[Avatar4321]

11 yo is a child.
A woman is an adult.
That's why children are called "children" and adults are called ADULTS.

We have laws to protect children from evil twisted vile adults who want children treated as adults. Like it not, that's as it should be.

Fed up with you assholes wanting the age of consent to be lowered to grade school age. And really fed up with people saying that protecting children from evil, twisted, vile adults is "trivial".

US law defines a child as everyone under the magic age of 18 since something magical and not well understood happens to people on the morning of their 18th birthday.

Let "children" be Hollywood actors cause what could possibly go wrong with that? Let them walk themselves to school before they hit their teens cause that's never been a problem. Let them drive at 16 because the current fad of texting and looking at a smartphone display isn't worrisome. Let children play football because all the protective gear is just for show, not like crashing heads into heads is dangerous or anything.

Our selective concern for children is fucking annoying. If children are "children" and somehow incompetant solely because of their age, then why can children have sex with other children? If they're too young to know whether they should be having sex or not, why are they usually allowed to make that bad decision with another child? Two mentally incompetant people having sex is somehow safe?

USA is among the most infantilizing countries on this planet. If not the most. If having sex at 13 is a 'bad decision' but only by virtue of being 13, and that same decision is an 'acceptable risk' at 16, 17, or 18, when it's also then legal, then it's also an acceptable risk at 13. I'm sure there are pleanty of 13 yos FAR more mature than some 16-18 yos. Is the 16yo who drives and kills someone because they just HAD to respond to a text MORE mature than a 13yo who seeks sex by virtue of being 16?

People desperately need to get over their 'ooh sex is naughty and sinful' infantilism quickly because it's not helping protect anyone.

Sex isn't naughty and sinful. It's quite the opposite. It's sacred.

It's the profaning of the sacred that is naughty and sinful.

Avatar4321

Oh brother. WHAT are you thinking?

Sex with an 11 yo is far worse than "naughty and sinful".

WTF is WRONG with you phoney christians? You Avatar4321 have consistently come down on the side of child molesters and now, in THIS thread about the rape and murder of an 11yo CHILD, you're saying its "sacred"?

This is why I despise these phoney christians.

Odd how I talk about sex and your mind jumps to sex with an 11 year old. Doesn't sound like it's me with the problem.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

11 yo is a child.
A woman is an adult.
That's why children are called "children" and adults are called ADULTS.

We have laws to protect children from evil twisted vile adults who want children treated as adults. Like it not, that's as it should be.

Fed up with you assholes wanting the age of consent to be lowered to grade school age. And really fed up with people saying that protecting children from evil, twisted, vile adults is "trivial".

US law defines a child as everyone under the magic age of 18 since something magical and not well understood happens to people on the morning of their 18th birthday.

Let "children" be Hollywood actors cause what could possibly go wrong with that? Let them walk themselves to school before they hit their teens cause that's never been a problem. Let them drive at 16 because the current fad of texting and looking at a smartphone display isn't worrisome. Let children play football because all the protective gear is just for show, not like crashing heads into heads is dangerous or anything.

Our selective concern for children is fucking annoying. If children are "children" and somehow incompetant solely because of their age, then why can children have sex with other children? If they're too young to know whether they should be having sex or not, why are they usually allowed to make that bad decision with another child? Two mentally incompetant people having sex is somehow safe?

USA is among the most infantilizing countries on this planet. If not the most. If having sex at 13 is a 'bad decision' but only by virtue of being 13, and that same decision is an 'acceptable risk' at 16, 17, or 18, when it's also then legal, then it's also an acceptable risk at 13. I'm sure there are pleanty of 13 yos FAR more mature than some 16-18 yos. Is the 16yo who drives and kills someone because they just HAD to respond to a text MORE mature than a 13yo who seeks sex by virtue of being 16?

People desperately need to get over their 'ooh sex is naughty and sinful' infantilism quickly because it's not helping protect anyone.

Sex isn't naughty and sinful. It's quite the opposite. It's sacred.

It's the profaning of the sacred that is naughty and sinful.

Avatar4321

Oh brother. WHAT are you thinking?

Sex with an 11 yo is far worse than "naughty and sinful".

WTF is WRONG with you phoney christians? You Avatar4321 have consistently come down on the side of child molesters and now, in THIS thread about the rape and murder of an 11yo CHILD, you're saying its "sacred"?

This is why I despise these phoney christians.

Odd how I talk about sex and your mind jumps to sex with an 11 year old. Doesn't sound like it's me with the problem.

Probably works for Fox as an editor

 

[Luddly Neddite]

The murder of an 11 year old child is not any kind of "war on women".

Except if you're Mike Huckster, Duggars, Ted Nugent, Warren Jeffs, Duck Dynasty ...

Yeah, you just lost the little credibility you had over on the duggar thread.

I have to disagree with you. Luddly stood up four square for the victims on the Duggar thread.

Thank you Jeremiah

Same with this child. She was a victim and I can't believe how people have twisted my opinion that children should be protected.

There is nothing any of the apologists can say that will make me change my mind that children should be protected against child predators.

The murder of an 11 year old child is not any kind of "war on women".

Except if you're Mike Huckster, Duggars, Ted Nugent, Warren Jeffs, Duck Dynasty ...

Yeah, you just lost the little credibility you had over on the duggar thread.

I have to disagree with you. Luddly stood up four square for the victims on the Duggar thread.

He's piece of shit...You shouldn't be swayed by his bull. if those people were leftist, he'd give a shit. Like he could give a shit about this sweet girl who was slaughtered

Jroc

Protecting children is NOT a partisan issue. I don't care what their politics are - child predators are slime who should be shot on the spot.

Not to mention that YOU don't know what the politics are of the people involved in this CHILD's death. If you say you DO know their politics, you are LYING. AGAIN.

OTOH, we DO know the Duggars are far RW and I stood up for those victims while you RWs made excuses for the pedophile. So, you saying I only care about liberal victims is a pile of bull shit.

Read my posts in any of the Duggar, Duck Dynasty, Ted Nugent threads or any other thread about child welfare. Read the posts from YOU asshole RWs. You'll see that its always the RWs who side with the chile predators and against the victims.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

11 yo is a child.
A woman is an adult.
That's why children are called "children" and adults are called ADULTS.

We have laws to protect children from evil twisted vile adults who want children treated as adults. Like it not, that's as it should be.

Fed up with you assholes wanting the age of consent to be lowered to grade school age. And really fed up with people saying that protecting children from evil, twisted, vile adults is "trivial".

US law defines a child as everyone under the magic age of 18 since something magical and not well understood happens to people on the morning of their 18th birthday.

Let "children" be Hollywood actors cause what could possibly go wrong with that? Let them walk themselves to school before they hit their teens cause that's never been a problem. Let them drive at 16 because the current fad of texting and looking at a smartphone display isn't worrisome. Let children play football because all the protective gear is just for show, not like crashing heads into heads is dangerous or anything.

Our selective concern for children is fucking annoying. If children are "children" and somehow incompetant solely because of their age, then why can children have sex with other children? If they're too young to know whether they should be having sex or not, why are they usually allowed to make that bad decision with another child? Two mentally incompetant people having sex is somehow safe?

USA is among the most infantilizing countries on this planet. If not the most. If having sex at 13 is a 'bad decision' but only by virtue of being 13, and that same decision is an 'acceptable risk' at 16, 17, or 18, when it's also then legal, then it's also an acceptable risk at 13. I'm sure there are pleanty of 13 yos FAR more mature than some 16-18 yos. Is the 16yo who drives and kills someone because they just HAD to respond to a text MORE mature than a 13yo who seeks sex by virtue of being 16?

People desperately need to get over their 'ooh sex is naughty and sinful' infantilism quickly because it's not helping protect anyone.

Sex isn't naughty and sinful. It's quite the opposite. It's sacred.

It's the profaning of the sacred that is naughty and sinful.

Avatar4321

Oh brother. WHAT are you thinking?

Sex with an 11 yo is far worse than "naughty and sinful".

WTF is WRONG with you phoney christians? You Avatar4321 have consistently come down on the side of child molesters and now, in THIS thread about the rape and murder of an 11yo CHILD, you're saying its "sacred"?

This is why I despise these phoney christians.

Odd how I talk about sex and your mind jumps to sex with an 11 year old. Doesn't sound like it's me with the problem.

How dare you accuse me of being a pedophile.

I have never said we should forgive pedos or defended and made excuses for pedos. And its not me who came into a thread about the rape and murder an 11 year old child and said it wasn't "naughty and sinful".

Who'd-a thunk a cockroach could wear magic underwear?

 

[Delta4Embassy]

11 yo is a child.
A woman is an adult.
That's why children are called "children" and adults are called ADULTS.

We have laws to protect children from evil twisted vile adults who want children treated as adults. Like it not, that's as it should be.

Fed up with you assholes wanting the age of consent to be lowered to grade school age. And really fed up with people saying that protecting children from evil, twisted, vile adults is "trivial".

US law defines a child as everyone under the magic age of 18 since something magical and not well understood happens to people on the morning of their 18th birthday.

Let "children" be Hollywood actors cause what could possibly go wrong with that? Let them walk themselves to school before they hit their teens cause that's never been a problem. Let them drive at 16 because the current fad of texting and looking at a smartphone display isn't worrisome. Let children play football because all the protective gear is just for show, not like crashing heads into heads is dangerous or anything.

Our selective concern for children is fucking annoying. If children are "children" and somehow incompetant solely because of their age, then why can children have sex with other children? If they're too young to know whether they should be having sex or not, why are they usually allowed to make that bad decision with another child? Two mentally incompetant people having sex is somehow safe?

USA is among the most infantilizing countries on this planet. If not the most. If having sex at 13 is a 'bad decision' but only by virtue of being 13, and that same decision is an 'acceptable risk' at 16, 17, or 18, when it's also then legal, then it's also an acceptable risk at 13. I'm sure there are pleanty of 13 yos FAR more mature than some 16-18 yos. Is the 16yo who drives and kills someone because they just HAD to respond to a text MORE mature than a 13yo who seeks sex by virtue of being 16?

People desperately need to get over their 'ooh sex is naughty and sinful' infantilism quickly because it's not helping protect anyone.

Sex isn't naughty and sinful. It's quite the opposite. It's sacred.

It's the profaning of the sacred that is naughty and sinful.

Avatar4321

Oh brother. WHAT are you thinking?

Sex with an 11 yo is far worse than "naughty and sinful".

WTF is WRONG with you phoney christians? You Avatar4321 have consistently come down on the side of child molesters and now, in THIS thread about the rape and murder of an 11yo CHILD, you're saying its "sacred"?

This is why I despise these phoney christians.

Odd how I talk about sex and your mind jumps to sex with an 11 year old. Doesn't sound like it's me with the problem.

How dare you accuse me of being a pedophile.

I have never said we should forgive pedos or defended and made excuses for pedos. And its not me who came into a thread about the rape and murder an 11 year old child and said it wasn't "naughty and sinful".

The 'naughty and sinful' thing was in reference to sex as denounced by moralistc theists. Not underaged sex, child murder, or anything else of the sort. Looking at back posts it seemed tog et inserted erroneously over time but shouldn't have.

Av' referenced the term refutting my assertion in part, then you Luddly jumped in and seem to have replied adding the other stuff to his rebuttal of my post.

Happens when replying to a reply to another reply.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

US law defines a child as everyone under the magic age of 18 since something magical and not well understood happens to people on the morning of their 18th birthday.

Let "children" be Hollywood actors cause what could possibly go wrong with that? Let them walk themselves to school before they hit their teens cause that's never been a problem. Let them drive at 16 because the current fad of texting and looking at a smartphone display isn't worrisome. Let children play football because all the protective gear is just for show, not like crashing heads into heads is dangerous or anything.

Our selective concern for children is fucking annoying. If children are "children" and somehow incompetant solely because of their age, then why can children have sex with other children? If they're too young to know whether they should be having sex or not, why are they usually allowed to make that bad decision with another child? Two mentally incompetant people having sex is somehow safe?

USA is among the most infantilizing countries on this planet. If not the most. If having sex at 13 is a 'bad decision' but only by virtue of being 13, and that same decision is an 'acceptable risk' at 16, 17, or 18, when it's also then legal, then it's also an acceptable risk at 13. I'm sure there are pleanty of 13 yos FAR more mature than some 16-18 yos. Is the 16yo who drives and kills someone because they just HAD to respond to a text MORE mature than a 13yo who seeks sex by virtue of being 16?

People desperately need to get over their 'ooh sex is naughty and sinful' infantilism quickly because it's not helping protect anyone.

Sex isn't naughty and sinful. It's quite the opposite. It's sacred.

It's the profaning of the sacred that is naughty and sinful.

Avatar4321

Oh brother. WHAT are you thinking?

Sex with an 11 yo is far worse than "naughty and sinful".

WTF is WRONG with you phoney christians? You Avatar4321 have consistently come down on the side of child molesters and now, in THIS thread about the rape and murder of an 11yo CHILD, you're saying its "sacred"?

This is why I despise these phoney christians.

Odd how I talk about sex and your mind jumps to sex with an 11 year old. Doesn't sound like it's me with the problem.

How dare you accuse me of being a pedophile.

I have never said we should forgive pedos or defended and made excuses for pedos. And its not me who came into a thread about the rape and murder an 11 year old child and said it wasn't "naughty and sinful".

The 'naughty and sinful' thing was in reference to sex as denounced by moralistc theists. Not underaged sex, child murder, or anything else of the sort. Looking at back posts it seemed tog et inserted erroneously over time but shouldn't have.

Av' referenced the term refutting my assertion in part, then you Luddly jumped in and seem to have replied adding the other stuff to his rebuttal of my post.

Happens when replying to a reply to another reply.

Look at the subject of the thread.

Make any excuses you want but it doesn't change the fact that Avatar accused me of being a pedophile. Nor does it change the FACT that its not me who has consistently made excuses child predators, said they should be "forgiven" and blamed the victims.

 

[Delta4Embassy]

Sex isn't naughty and sinful. It's quite the opposite. It's sacred.

It's the profaning of the sacred that is naughty and sinful.

Avatar4321

Oh brother. WHAT are you thinking?

Sex with an 11 yo is far worse than "naughty and sinful".

WTF is WRONG with you phoney christians? You Avatar4321 have consistently come down on the side of child molesters and now, in THIS thread about the rape and murder of an 11yo CHILD, you're saying its "sacred"?

This is why I despise these phoney christians.

Odd how I talk about sex and your mind jumps to sex with an 11 year old. Doesn't sound like it's me with the problem.

How dare you accuse me of being a pedophile.

I have never said we should forgive pedos or defended and made excuses for pedos. And its not me who came into a thread about the rape and murder an 11 year old child and said it wasn't "naughty and sinful".

The 'naughty and sinful' thing was in reference to sex as denounced by moralistc theists. Not underaged sex, child murder, or anything else of the sort. Looking at back posts it seemed tog et inserted erroneously over time but shouldn't have.

Av' referenced the term refutting my assertion in part, then you Luddly jumped in and seem to have replied adding the other stuff to his rebuttal of my post.

Happens when replying to a reply to another reply.

Look at the subject of the thread.

Make any excuses you want but it doesn't change the fact that Avatar accused me of being a pedophile. Nor does it change the FACT that its not me who has consistently made excuses child predators, said they should be "forgiven" and blamed the victims.

Reading the relevant post I'd have to say it was somewhat ambiguous and oculd only be taken like that if wanting to make the claim and make the statement into such an accusation.

Believe me Luddly, I KNOW what being accused of that looks like and that wasn't it.

 

[Avatar4321]

The murder of an 11 year old child is not any kind of "war on women".

Except if you're Mike Huckster, Duggars, Ted Nugent, Warren Jeffs, Duck Dynasty ...

Yeah, you just lost the little credibility you had over on the duggar thread.

I have to disagree with you. Luddly stood up four square for the victims on the Duggar thread.

Thank you Jeremiah

Same with this child. She was a victim and I can't believe how people have twisted my opinion that children should be protected.

There is nothing any of the apologists can say that will make me change my mind that children should be protected against child predators.

The murder of an 11 year old child is not any kind of "war on women".

Except if you're Mike Huckster, Duggars, Ted Nugent, Warren Jeffs, Duck Dynasty ...

Yeah, you just lost the little credibility you had over on the duggar thread.

I have to disagree with you. Luddly stood up four square for the victims on the Duggar thread.

He's piece of shit...You shouldn't be swayed by his bull. if those people were leftist, he'd give a shit. Like he could give a shit about this sweet girl who was slaughtered

Jroc

Protecting children is NOT a partisan issue. I don't care what their politics are - child predators are slime who should be shot on the spot.

Not to mention that YOU don't know what the politics are of the people involved in this CHILD's death. If you say you DO know their politics, you are LYING. AGAIN.

OTOH, we DO know the Duggars are far RW and I stood up for those victims while you RWs made excuses for the pedophile. So, you saying I only care about liberal victims is a pile of bull shit.

Read my posts in any of the Duggar, Duck Dynasty, Ted Nugent threads or any other thread about child welfare. Read the posts from YOU asshole RWs. You'll see that its always the RWs who side with the chile predators and against the victims.

You aren't protecting her. You freaking attacking us for protecting her. So stop pretending to do something you aren't doing.

 

[Avatar4321]

11 yo is a child.
A woman is an adult.
That's why children are called "children" and adults are called ADULTS.

We have laws to protect children from evil twisted vile adults who want children treated as adults. Like it not, that's as it should be.

Fed up with you assholes wanting the age of consent to be lowered to grade school age. And really fed up with people saying that protecting children from evil, twisted, vile adults is "trivial".

US law defines a child as everyone under the magic age of 18 since something magical and not well understood happens to people on the morning of their 18th birthday.

Let "children" be Hollywood actors cause what could possibly go wrong with that? Let them walk themselves to school before they hit their teens cause that's never been a problem. Let them drive at 16 because the current fad of texting and looking at a smartphone display isn't worrisome. Let children play football because all the protective gear is just for show, not like crashing heads into heads is dangerous or anything.

Our selective concern for children is fucking annoying. If children are "children" and somehow incompetant solely because of their age, then why can children have sex with other children? If they're too young to know whether they should be having sex or not, why are they usually allowed to make that bad decision with another child? Two mentally incompetant people having sex is somehow safe?

USA is among the most infantilizing countries on this planet. If not the most. If having sex at 13 is a 'bad decision' but only by virtue of being 13, and that same decision is an 'acceptable risk' at 16, 17, or 18, when it's also then legal, then it's also an acceptable risk at 13. I'm sure there are pleanty of 13 yos FAR more mature than some 16-18 yos. Is the 16yo who drives and kills someone because they just HAD to respond to a text MORE mature than a 13yo who seeks sex by virtue of being 16?

People desperately need to get over their 'ooh sex is naughty and sinful' infantilism quickly because it's not helping protect anyone.

Sex isn't naughty and sinful. It's quite the opposite. It's sacred.

It's the profaning of the sacred that is naughty and sinful.

Avatar4321

Oh brother. WHAT are you thinking?

Sex with an 11 yo is far worse than "naughty and sinful".

WTF is WRONG with you phoney christians? You Avatar4321 have consistently come down on the side of child molesters and now, in THIS thread about the rape and murder of an 11yo CHILD, you're saying its "sacred"?

This is why I despise these phoney christians.

Odd how I talk about sex and your mind jumps to sex with an 11 year old. Doesn't sound like it's me with the problem.

How dare you accuse me of being a pedophile.

I have never said we should forgive pedos or defended and made excuses for pedos. And its not me who came into a thread about the rape and murder an 11 year old child and said it wasn't "naughty and sinful".

Who'd-a thunk a cockroach could wear magic underwear?

How dare I say you have a problem for immediately thinking about sex with an 11 year old? Deny it all you want. You have a problem. Most people don't assume when you talk about sex you are talking about sex with an 11 year old.I never claimed you were a pedo, in fact that's the false accusation you've been making.

You don't want to be called out then stop being such a flaming hypocrite and stop using victims for partisan attacks.