Tresha91203
Platinum Member
The goal was not that. He specified that he was sure SOME of those in the back would outrun some of those in front if all else were equal. Is he right...or wrong?
He also repeatedly empasized that those in front were not at fault in any way for having an advantage. Is he right or wrong?
That's an important thing to note. Resolving racial inequity is not about blaming the beneficiaries of our legacy of advantage. It's about eliminating, as much as is humanly possible, those advantages. There's a huge difference between acknowledging that something wrong exists and should be corrected and blaming someone because they are the beneficiary of that wrong.
Why eliminate the advantages? Why not eliminate the disadvantages? We need to build up on what works, not tear it down.