SSDD
Gold Member
- Nov 6, 2012
- 16,672
- 1,966
- 280
Think back to the year 2011. The warming had stopped and climate science considered it a travesty that they couldn't explain it. At that time, we were told that the so called "pause" must continue on unabated for 17 years before it would become clear that human caused CO2 warming hypotheses could be legitimately questioned.
From the Journal of Geophysical Research..
Separating signal and noise in atmospheric temperature changes The importance of timescale - Santer - 2011 - Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres 1984 ndash 2012 - Wiley Online Library
Guess what...the so called "pause" has now been going on for 17 years and more. Who, other than skeptics has been legitimately questioning the human caused CO2 warming hypothesis? Will anything falsify the human caused CO2 warming hypothesis?....and if it does, will it matter in the least?
From the Journal of Geophysical Research..
Separating signal and noise in atmospheric temperature changes The importance of timescale - Santer - 2011 - Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres 1984 ndash 2012 - Wiley Online Library
A single decade of observational TLT data is therefore inadequate for identifying a slowly evolving anthropogenic warming signal. Our results show that temperature records of at least 17 years in length are required for identifying human effects on global-mean tropospheric temperature.
Guess what...the so called "pause" has now been going on for 17 years and more. Who, other than skeptics has been legitimately questioning the human caused CO2 warming hypothesis? Will anything falsify the human caused CO2 warming hypothesis?....and if it does, will it matter in the least?