Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Never said that you fool.
I said that both were presided over by a Republican who leaned towards unfettered markets and did not police the industries who were heading us into trouble.
Both this Great recession and the GD were ushered in by completely Republican governments who were led by presidents who did not believe in regulation of the markets.
In other words they sat on their hands and "let the market take care of its self".
Look, Idiot, I've put up with your blathering stupidity long enough to recognise that you are an imbecile, but I will attempt ONE LAST TIME:
Economic Conditions are not JUST a function of whoever leads govenments.
Never said that you fool.
I said that both were presided over by a Republican who leaned towards unfettered markets and did not police the industries who were heading us into trouble.
Both this Great recession and the GD were ushered in by completely Republican governments who were led by presidents who did not believe in regulation of the markets.
In other words they sat on their hands and "let the market take care of its self".
And "history" shows that Hoover didn't believe in regulation of the markets, does it? That's a fallacy.
Hoovers investments were too little too late.
Look at the charts of what happened after FDR entered office and implimented his plan. There was a precipitus decline in the economic indicators right after that.
To pretend the history says anything but it does is dishonest.
Never said that you fool.
I said that both were presided over by a Republican who leaned towards unfettered markets and did not police the industries who were heading us into trouble.
Both this Great recession and the GD were ushered in by completely Republican governments who were led by presidents who did not believe in regulation of the markets.
In other words they sat on their hands and "let the market take care of its self".
And "history" shows that Hoover didn't believe in regulation of the markets, does it? That's a fallacy.
The 1920 recession was a typical post war recession.
And "history" shows that Hoover didn't believe in regulation of the markets, does it? That's a fallacy.
Hoovers investments were too little too late.
Look at the charts of what happened after FDR entered office and implimented his plan. There was a precipitus decline in the economic indicators right after that.
To pretend the history says anything but it does is dishonest.
Hoover's interventions predated his days as President and the Great Depression and go back to when he was Secretary of Commerce under Harding and Coolidge. Luckily, Harding ignored Hoover's advice to intervene in the economy during the recession of 1920-21.
yeah, that dot com bubble was so smoothNever said that you fool.
I said that both were presided over by a Republican who leaned towards unfettered markets and did not police the industries who were heading us into trouble.
Both this Great recession and the GD were ushered in by completely Republican governments who were led by presidents who did not believe in regulation of the markets.
In other words they sat on their hands and "let the market take care of its self".
Look, Idiot, I've put up with your blathering stupidity long enough to recognise that you are an imbecile, but I will attempt ONE LAST TIME:
Economic Conditions are not JUST a function of whoever leads govenments.
Look taintwallow I never said they were.
If yoou want a better chance at good regulations that prevent the boom bust cycle then you need Democrats and history soundly shows that.
mmmkay asswink.
Hoovers investments were too little too late.
Look at the charts of what happened after FDR entered office and implimented his plan. There was a precipitus decline in the economic indicators right after that.
To pretend the history says anything but it does is dishonest.
Hoover's interventions predated his days as President and the Great Depression and go back to when he was Secretary of Commerce under Harding and Coolidge. Luckily, Harding ignored Hoover's advice to intervene in the economy during the recession of 1920-21.
I have never ( as well as other regulation people) suggested that EVERY recession has to be helped by intervention.
The 1920 recession was the result of the end of a war. The government stopped its war spending causing the economy to shrink. I dont think anything bad would have happened if they had helped it a little with infrastructure spending. The people may have not gone as hungry for a time.
To continue to pretend that government intervention would have deepened the 1920 recession is utter bullshit just like any other intervention.
You just cant proove anything misers claims to be true because it has never been showm by history.
I just showed you that history conclusively shows intervention and regulation works.
WOW Kevin you got nothing huh?
keep believing that, i'm sure it will help you sleep at nightDive you dont even know what we are talking about huh?
others have already hit on the points i would haveCant comment on the history that is the thrust of this thread can you?
And the bumps I talked about were there because the people in our government fucked up and then smart people had to step in and repair the damage.
The idea of unregulated markets is a failed idea.
Everytime we deregulate we get fucked until we reregulate.
You may be too dense to realize it and face facts but most people are capable of this.
and jake is projecting againDive is lost again: we can't hear you!
Is economic history now liberally biased?
