The One Question No One So Far Can Answer

Trump claimed somebody at the IRS illegally released his 1995 federal tax records. Again, an accusation of a crime that didn't happen, with perfectly legal explanations of how both the recorded conversations and released tax records occurred.

How could his tax returns have been released legally if he never gave anyone permission to release them?


Can you imagine who else would have a copy of Donalds joint return.

Trumpā€™s 2005 tax return leak leaves more questions than answers

In September 2016, a joint-tax return for Trump and his ex-wife, Marla Maples, was mailed to the Daily News and the New York Times in a manila envelope. The envelopeā€™s return address listed the Trump Organization.

If Trump didn't give permission to release it, then it was released illegally.
 
The government agreed that she had broken no law, but she still went to jail, because the government proved to a jury that she thought she was breaking the law.

She didn't go to jail because she thought she was breaking the law.

Actually she did. She thought she was breaking the law, which caused her to lie about what she did. It was her lies about her contacts, which she thought were illegal, was her downfall.
 
I'd still like to know how Russia made me vote for Trump?
You did it all by yourself so you have no one to blame but yourself.

Didn't you lefties claimed that election was hacked? Suddenly, nobody is talking about it anymore.

So, either you were lying back then, or you'r lying now. Perhaps both?
No one is talking about the hacking in the election because the FBI has determined that the Russians are involve. The scope of investigation has increased to include the Trump campaign and other ways the Russians or other foreign powers interfered with the process.
 
Not if it was from Marla Maples, DOLT !!!

But you said return address was the Trump Organization. Make up your mind.

You can put any return address you want onto an envelope. Marla isn't stupid enough to put her own address on it.

You're saying it like she did it? And just your suspicion is enough to declare - it's her. It must be her. Who else could be? She must testify. Under oath. Jail her.
 
I'd still like to know how Russia made me vote for Trump?


The worst damage done was when Wikileaks leaked Debbie Wasserman's emails- (DNC chair) who was showing her anxiety over Bernie Sanders campaigning on a rigged election, and his refusal to drop out of the race--which infuriated Sanders supporters. Trump swept in to sweep up the collateral damage and was campaigning for Sanders Supporters, and they were all over this board stating that if Sanders didn't win they were going to vote for Trump.

Regardless if it changed a single vote--collusion with a Foreign adversary to interfere into an American election is TREASON.

As of 5/17/2017 This has now turned into a criminal investigation.
Lindsey Graham: Russia probe 'now a criminal investigation'

Regardless if it changed a single vote--collusion with a Foreign adversary to interfere into an American election is TREASON.

Where do you get this ridiculous definition of treason?


We consider cyber attacks to be the 21st Century Act of war.
Russian hack almost brought the U.S. military to its knees
From Russia With Malware

"Donald Trump's call on Russia to hack Hillary Clinton's emails has shocked, flabbergasted and appalled lawmakers and national security experts across the political spectrum, with one saying it was "tantamount to treason."
'Treason'? Critics savage Trump over Russia hack comments

1. a secret agreement, especially for ... treacherous purposes; conspiracy

2. Law. a secret understanding between two or more persons to gain something illegally ... or to appear as adversaries though in agreement

Treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, ... adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason ... and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

In this 8 minute video--you will see that Trump surrogates were not only on the phone with the Russian Ambassador--but Russian intelligence agents, including the very day that the DNC was getting hacked into.



Collusion with a Foreign adversary to interfere in an American Democratic election process by committing a FELONY by hacking into DNC databases is TREASON.


secret agreement, especially for ... treacherous purposes; conspiracy

A conspiracy with no crime is not a crime.

Law. a secret understanding between two or more persons to gain something illegally

What was illegal?

Treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, ... adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason

levies war against them


Why the omission? And who is the enemy?
Who gave that enemy aid and comfort?

Collusion with a Foreign adversary to interfere in an American Democratic election process by committing a FELONY by hacking into DNC databases is TREASON

You'll have to show me the election laws you feel were broken.
Or that any Trump surrogate was involved in any hacking.



As they say trying to reason with a Trump supporter is like trying to teach Algebra to a Chimpanzee.

IOW doesn't matter how many verifiable--trusted links-&-video's I give you, you wouldn't believe it--if it grew teeth and bit off your leg.

So you lil Einsteins keep watching Trump's fairy godfather show--Sean Hannity--stay tuned into all your right wing talk shows--you're in for a hell of a ride.

th


It would surprise me right now--with all this information--that the Ass Clown makes it into his second year. This is TREASON.



Lindsey Graham: Russia probe 'now a criminal investigation'


This is TREASON.

Bullshit.
 
You're saying it like she did it? And just your suspicion is enough to declare - it's her. It must be her. Who else could be? She must testify. Under oath. Jail her.

We know Marla Maples had a copy of Trumps 1995 tax return, because it was a joint return. And as a joint return, both parties legally own it. And the only pages released, were the one's they both signed.
 
The government agreed that she had broken no law, but she still went to jail, because the government proved to a jury that she thought she was breaking the law.

She didn't go to jail because she thought she was breaking the law.

Actually she did. She thought she was breaking the law, which caused her to lie about what she did. It was her lies about her contacts, which she thought were illegal, was her downfall.

You're a fucking moron. She wasn't arrested because she thought she was breaking the law. She was arrested because she lied to the FBI.

You claimed the government agreed that she had broken no law.

Wrong, idiot.
 
I'd still like to know how Russia made me vote for Trump?
You did it all by yourself so you have no one to blame but yourself.

Didn't you lefties claimed that election was hacked? Suddenly, nobody is talking about it anymore.

So, either you were lying back then, or you'r lying now. Perhaps both?
No one is talking about the hacking in the election because the FBI has determined that the Russians are involve. The scope of investigation has increased to include the Trump campaign and other ways the Russians or other foreign powers interfered with the process.

You lefties claimed it was Russians that hacked elections.

Now you're saying, they did not. Which one is it?
 
The government agreed that she had broken no law, but she still went to jail, because the government proved to a jury that she thought she was breaking the law.

She didn't go to jail because she thought she was breaking the law.

Actually she did. She thought she was breaking the law, which caused her to lie about what she did. It was her lies about her contacts, which she thought were illegal, was her downfall.

Actually she did.

Actually she didn't.

She thought she was breaking the law, which caused her to lie about what she did.

She didn't go to jail for her thoughts. She went to jail for lying to the FBI.
 
You're saying it like she did it? And just your suspicion is enough to declare - it's her. It must be her. Who else could be? She must testify. Under oath. Jail her.

We know Marla Maples had a copy of Trumps 1995 tax return, because it was a joint return. And as a joint return, both parties legally own it. And the only pages released, were the one's they both signed.

Your claim is that, since her signature is on the return, she must be one that send it to media.

And who's we?
 

Forum List

Back
Top