The One Question No One So Far Can Answer

[oreo]

Yes, of course, he meant that he would have to do something unpopular after he wins and election, absolutely he politicize the situation. To that there is no doubt, but what exactly was he promising? To do Russia's will or ours? If ours why would he need to wait?

You tell me... it's all in the past, he said it, he won the election, he served out his term. Please tell us what he did with this post election flexibility that defied the will of the voters for the will of Russia

I guess since he didn't do anything then he didn't need make the treasonous statement.

Haha, so you call Obamas "flexibility" statement treasonous yet you don't see treason in Trumps actions?! Talk about blind ignorance.

What did Trump do that you consider treason? Name it, show it. Not just some speculation from the Washington establishment trying their hardest to get rid of Trump.

OBAMA SAID IT that can not be denied. Trump? What are you accusing him of? Having the Russians release information they would have released anyways and that information was actually truthful?c , You're going to need good reading comprehension skills and an attention span that last longer than a gnat to get through this.

As they say--trying to reason with a Trump supporter is like trying to teach Algebra to a Chimpanzee. This is just a smidgen of what is out there right now. You will hear many more names as this investigation moves along. Jerad Kushner (Trump's son in law,) Carter Page & Paul Manafort--they know where in constant communications with the Russians during the campaign season--along with Michael Flynn.

Analysis | 5 times Donald Trump’s team denied contact with Russia

The biggest denier of all is:

More Trump advisers disclose meeting with Russia's ambassador - CNNPolitics.com
Comey says FBI began investigation into Russia meddling in July

Then this Fox News video--where we learn that Trump surrogates were not only on the phone with the Russian Ambassador but with Russian intelligence agencies the very day that the DNC databases were getting hacked into.


CNN confirms this video
Trump aides were in constant touch with senior Russian officials during campaign - CNNPolitics.com

McCain wants to know why that clause (we will not arm the Ukranians against pro-Russian separatists was put into the Republican platform at the Convention in Cleveland)--link above in More Trump advisers admit meeting with Russian ambassador.


Adam Schiff cochair house intelligence committee says much more here than just circumstantial evidence.


Jeff Sessions--also accused of lying under oath stating he had no contact with any Russians--but he had met with the Russian ambassador twice during the campaign. Now while everyone believes he was confused by the question, he had also filled out a questionaire prior to the confirmation hearing and checked a box that he had no contact--and then refused to go back into congress to testify again. Sessions was forced to recuse himself from the Russian investigation.
Jeff Sessions spoke twice with Russian envoy during presidential campaign: Department of Justice
Sessions recuses himself from Russia investigations - CNNPolitics.com

Michael Flynn--lied to the FBI (which is a Felony) about his discussion with the Russian ambassor--stating he did not talk about Sanctions. They clearly had his conversation wiretapped. Then we find out he was a paid lobbyist for Turkey, and had received money from Russia--and he never declared that on his renewal of top secret clearance. Grand Jury Subpeonas were sent out last week on Flynn. Flynn's lawyers asked for immunity from prosecution--citing "he has a story to tell" and the Senate denied him immunity from prosecution.
Flynn reportedly lied to FBI about sanctions talk with Russian envoy
Michael Flynn targeted by grand jury subpoenas, sources confirm
http://thehill.com/homenews/news/32...key-while-attending-intel-briefings-reportfly
Trump adviser Flynn paid by multiple Russia-related entities, new records show

Roger Stone a Trump advisor and long time friend of Trump tweets out that he had a back door into Wikileaks and was in contact with the Russian hacker.
Trump adviser Roger Stone repeatedly claimed to know of forthcoming WikiLeaks dumps - CNNPolitics.com
Top Trump confidante admits to speaking privately with Guccifer 2.0, an alleged Russian cyberspy

Trump fires Comey:
Trump fires FBI director James Comey - CNNPolitics.com

Then admits Obstruction of Justice in this video.


Trump meets with the Russians and will not allow American media in, but allows Russian media--then gets pissed off when the Russians tweeted out this picture, and then in a period of ultra ego--he braggs about highly classified information that our allies didn't even know about.
Analysis | Trump sharing highly classified information with Russia shows his extreme hubris

White House furious after being trolled with Russia Oval Office photos - CNNPolitics.com

05/17/2017 Lindsey Graham announces that this is now a CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/m/3459ddc7-c010-335d-9619-24f7dfe893b8/ss_lindsey-graham:-russia-probe.html

 

[Flopper]

I've posed this hypothetical question to a couple of members and so far no one seems up to the task of providing an answer. So now I'm posing it the whole board.

Ok, here's a hypothetical scenario. Let's say a Trump associate spoke to a Russian representative. The Russian told him we have some really bad shit on the hildabitch and the representative said wow, it would sure help us if you released it on Tuesday and they did exactly that.

Tell me, what specific law would have been broken? Don't give me an opinion, quote the law.

Any takers?

.

In your scenario, probably no law is being broken. If they were complicit in spreading false Informstion to influence an election then they are probably flirting with treason. If they told the Russians not to react to sanctions because the new administration will be more forgiving then I'm guessing that's a violation... not sure which exact law it's breaking though. Perhaps treason as well. Undermining our government

Since the Trump associate was working with the Russian by requesting the release of the information on the Tuesday of the election, he was operating as an agent for a foreign power and would be required to register as such an agent and make periodic full disclosure. The punish is a fine of up to $10,000 and/or 5 years in prison.
Foreign Agents Registration Unit (FARA)

Excuse me, the term "Tuesday" is the generic term, election day was NOT part of it. That's one of the flaws of you regressives, you like to read things into everything that really isn't there.

.

From a legal standpoint, what Tuesday it might be is irrelevant. What is relevant would be the Trump associate telling the Russian when to release the damaging information to defeat Hillary.

 

[Ame®icano]

I'd still like to know how Russia made me vote for Trump?

 

[Dalia]

I've posed this hypothetical question to a couple of members and so far no one seems up to the task of providing an answer. So now I'm posing it the whole board.

Ok, here's a hypothetical scenario. Let's say a Trump associate spoke to a Russian representative. The Russian told him we have some really bad shit on the hildabitch and the representative said wow, it would sure help us if you released it on Tuesday and they did exactly that.

Tell me, what specific law would have been broken? Don't give me an opinion, quote the law.

Any takers?

.

In your scenario, probably no law is being broken. If they were complicit in spreading false Informstion to influence an election then they are probably flirting with treason. If they told the Russians not to react to sanctions because the new administration will be more forgiving then I'm guessing that's a violation... not sure which exact law it's breaking though. Perhaps treason as well. Undermining our government

the media that influenced for a Hillary's victory are guilty as well?

 

[Flopper]

I think he meant, very simply, that everything is politicized during a campaign, so it isn't the most appropriate time to be engaging with an actor as controversial as Russia. You really don't understand that? Common sense man.

Yes, of course, he meant that he would have to do something unpopular after he wins and election, absolutely he politicize the situation. To that there is no doubt, but what exactly was he promising? To do Russia's will or ours? If ours why would he need to wait?

You tell me... it's all in the past, he said it, he won the election, he served out his term. Please tell us what he did with this post election flexibility that defied the will of the voters for the will of Russia

And the Chickens have come home to roost.

"Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham on Thursday said it’s clear that after Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein briefed the Senate on the investigation into Russian involvement in the presidential election that it has become a criminal probe.

“The shock to the body is that this is now a criminal investigation,” Graham (R-SC) told reporters moments after he exited the Senate chamber.

He said now that it has become a criminal investigation instead of an counterintelligence probe Congress may be impeded in carrying out its own examinations.

“You’ve got a special counsel who has prosecutorial powers now, and I think we in Congress have to be very careful not to interfere,” Graham said. “Public access to this is probably going to be very limited now. It’s going to really limit what the public will know about this.”
http://nypost.com/2017/05/18/lindsey-graham-russia-probe-now-a-criminal-investigation/

Let's see if you have the attention span to listen to this entire 8 minute video:



Collusion with a Foreign Adversary to interfere into an American election is TREASON. This country is not going to tolerate a Traitor sitting in the oval office.

Just as expected, the establishment moves to try and get rid of Trump. It was expected.

You know when this all comes collapsing down around your ears--you need to blame the RIGHT people, and it's not going to be "establishment Republicans." YOU DID THIS--not them. You had 16 other GOP candidates, a couple of them much more qualified and competent that would not be ingulfed in these serious scandals today. You were warned a 1000 times about Donald Trump, and you ignored all those warnings. A very good article--funny--but it hits it right on the nail.
All Along I Thought Trump Wasn’t a Conservative/Republican, But Now I Realize I’m Not

Other than yourselves never thinking beyond the tips of your noses, you were guided to Trump by right wing talk show hosts. It all started 7 years ago with Rush Limbaugh--who set his sites on what you refer to as Establishment Republicans aka Rino's--you're two favorite words. Limbaugh and others continually violating Reagan's 11th commandment "thou shall not speak ill of a fellow Republican" basically eating their own. He continually did this without giving you even one brief lession in basic civics. Like:
1. You cannot defund Obamacare leaving millions that were forced onto it without medical insurance overnight. Yes--Republicans could have done that, but the odds of them winning a dog catchers position afterwards would have been zero to none.
(all for ratings and those obscene profit breaks.)

The next one you can BLAME is FOX NEWS: Who gave Trump an unprecedented 2 billion in free news coverage during the primaries while ignoring all other GOP Candidates. (all for ratings and those obscene profit breaks.)
But WHY is CNN crushing Fox News in the ratings?

I don't need to tell you who the other right wing talk show hosts that promoted this ass clown you already know who they are. But they ALL did it for nothing more than those (ratings and & obscene profit breaks.)

Donald Trump broke the conservative media
Caller to Limbaugh Show Exposes That Rush Knows He Blew It with Donald Trump

Right now everyone in the above right wing talk show host group--is in a full panic spin mode. They know they are 100% responsible for Trump. They own this disaster. Just YOU remember who they are--(that ratings and profits were more important to them)--than anything else.

Trump made it clear in his campaign he had no use for establishment politicians. So he went out his way find Republicans who were on the fringe of the establishment. The result was a lot of people that were ill equipped to handle the kind of problems Trump is creating for himself.

 

[Slade3200]

I'd still like to know how Russia made me vote for Trump?

Nobody is claiming that... welcome to the conversation!

 

[Flopper]

I'd still like to know how Russia made me vote for Trump?

You did it all by yourself so you have no one to blame but yourself.

 

[Slade3200]

I've posed this hypothetical question to a couple of members and so far no one seems up to the task of providing an answer. So now I'm posing it the whole board.

Ok, here's a hypothetical scenario. Let's say a Trump associate spoke to a Russian representative. The Russian told him we have some really bad shit on the hildabitch and the representative said wow, it would sure help us if you released it on Tuesday and they did exactly that.

Tell me, what specific law would have been broken? Don't give me an opinion, quote the law.

Any takers?

.

In your scenario, probably no law is being broken. If they were complicit in spreading false Informstion to influence an election then they are probably flirting with treason. If they told the Russians not to react to sanctions because the new administration will be more forgiving then I'm guessing that's a violation... not sure which exact law it's breaking though. Perhaps treason as well. Undermining our government

the media that influenced for a Hillary's victory are guilty as well?

Any that stole information or knowingly printed false information are guilty of crimes, sure. But that is a different discussion

 

[oreo]

I'd still like to know how Russia made me vote for Trump?

The worst damage done was when Wikileaks leaked Debbie Wasserman's emails- (DNC chair) who was showing her anxiety over Bernie Sanders campaigning on a rigged election, and his refusal to drop out of the race--which infuriated Sanders supporters. Trump swept in to sweep up the collateral damage and was campaigning for Sanders Supporters, and they were all over this board stating that if Sanders didn't win they were going to vote for Trump.

Regardless if it changed a single vote--collusion with a Foreign adversary to interfere into an American election is TREASON.

As of 5/17/2017 This has now turned into a criminal investigation.
Lindsey Graham: Russia probe 'now a criminal investigation'

 

[Ame®icano]

I'd still like to know how Russia made me vote for Trump?

You did it all by yourself so you have no one to blame but yourself.

Didn't you lefties claimed that election was hacked? Suddenly, nobody is talking about it anymore.

So, either you were lying back then, or you'r lying now. Perhaps both?

 

[Dalia]

Russian hackers hacking Democratic Party information on Trump.

Le siège du Parti démocrate à Washington.
PHOTO REUTERS/Gary Cameron

The computer network of the National Democratic Committee was reportedly infiltrated by hackers from the Russian government. These included research on Republican candidate Donald Trump.

"Russian government hackers have infiltrated the National Democratic Committee's computer network and have had access to the entire database containing research on Donald Trump, the Republican presidential candidate," wrote June 15, Washington Post. The newspaper relies on statements by officials of the Committee, the governing body of the Democratic Party, and experts who intervened to end the intrusion.

This one was so important that the hackers were also able to read all the emails and cats exchanged on this network, specify these sources. According to the Washington Post, other US political organizations have recently been hacked by Russian spies. In particular, teams of presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump were targeted.
Strengths and weaknesses
Two groups of hackers were said to have targeted the National Democratic Committee, the newspaper said, both on behalf of the Russian government. One of them would have had access to the computer network for almost a year.
These intrusions are an example of Russia's interest in the American political system and its desire to understand the program, strengths and weaknesses of the future potential president. "
The Democratic Party's computers contained information about Trump dating back many years. In the US political system, each party conducts extensive research on opposing candidates in order to discover weaknesses and possible angles of attack in the campaign.

Etats-Unis. Des hackers russes piratent les informations du Parti démocrate sur Trump

 

[Ame®icano]

I'd still like to know how Russia made me vote for Trump?

The worst damage done was when Wikileaks leaked Debbie Wasserman's emails- (DNC chair) who was showing her anxiety over Bernie Sanders campaigning on a rigged election, and his refusal to drop out of the race--which infuriated Sanders supporters. Trump swept in to sweep up the collateral damage and was campaigning for Sanders Supporters, and they were all over this board stating that if Sanders didn't win they were going to vote for Trump.

Regardless if it changed a single vote--collusion with a Foreign adversary to interfere into an American election is TREASON.

As of 5/17/2017 This has now turned into a criminal investigation.
Lindsey Graham: Russia probe 'now a criminal investigation'

How hacking the DNC (rather leaking from DNC) equate with election hacking?

 

[easyt65]

'The One Question No One So Far Can Answer...'


Why haven't Hillary Clinton, Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, and the Obama loyalists who perpetrated the Felony Espionage by illegally releasing info been 'Perp-Walked' and jailed yet....

 

[easyt65]

Russian hackers hacking Democratic Party information on Trump.

Le siège du Parti démocrate à Washington.
PHOTO REUTERS/Gary Cameron

The computer network of the National Democratic Committee was reportedly infiltrated by hackers from the Russian government. These included research on Republican candidate Donald Trump.

"Russian government hackers have infiltrated the National Democratic Committee's computer network and have had access to the entire database containing research on Donald Trump, the Republican presidential candidate," wrote June 15, Washington Post. The newspaper relies on statements by officials of the Committee, the governing body of the Democratic Party, and experts who intervened to end the intrusion.

This one was so important that the hackers were also able to read all the emails and cats exchanged on this network, specify these sources. According to the Washington Post, other US political organizations have recently been hacked by Russian spies. In particular, teams of presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump were targeted.
Strengths and weaknesses
Two groups of hackers were said to have targeted the National Democratic Committee, the newspaper said, both on behalf of the Russian government. One of them would have had access to the computer network for almost a year.
These intrusions are an example of Russia's interest in the American political system and its desire to understand the program, strengths and weaknesses of the future potential president. "
The Democratic Party's computers contained information about Trump dating back many years. In the US political system, each party conducts extensive research on opposing candidates in order to discover weaknesses and possible angles of attack in the campaign.

Etats-Unis. Des hackers russes piratent les informations du Parti démocrate sur Trump

A couple of problems with this lie:

1. It has never been proven the Russians did it - the DNC would not let the FBI analyze the servers.

2. Debbie W-S hired 3 Pakistani spies and gave them access to DNC e-mails, usernames, and passwords...these same 3 spies are now suspected of blackmailing Democrats / politicians with information they got their hands on after DWS gave them illegal access to House files

3. Seth Rich was the Inside Leaker...who the DNc / Hillary had 'popped'



Fce it, embrace it, everyone now knows it, whether they are willing to say it or not - there was no Russian hacking

 

[Dalia]

I've posed this hypothetical question to a couple of members and so far no one seems up to the task of providing an answer. So now I'm posing it the whole board.

Ok, here's a hypothetical scenario. Let's say a Trump associate spoke to a Russian representative. The Russian told him we have some really bad shit on the hildabitch and the representative said wow, it would sure help us if you released it on Tuesday and they did exactly that.

Tell me, what specific law would have been broken? Don't give me an opinion, quote the law.

Any takers?

.

In your scenario, probably no law is being broken. If they were complicit in spreading false Informstion to influence an election then they are probably flirting with treason. If they told the Russians not to react to sanctions because the new administration will be more forgiving then I'm guessing that's a violation... not sure which exact law it's breaking though. Perhaps treason as well. Undermining our government

the media that influenced for a Hillary's victory are guilty as well?

Any that stole information or knowingly printed false information are guilty of crimes, sure. But that is a different discussion

I was talking about the fact that CNN has done a lot of harm to Trump during his campaign and the media should be neutral because they influence the results of an election is the same as saying that the Russians have done everything for Trump to win the elections

 

[Dalia]

Russian hackers hacking Democratic Party information on Trump.

Le siège du Parti démocrate à Washington.
PHOTO REUTERS/Gary Cameron

The computer network of the National Democratic Committee was reportedly infiltrated by hackers from the Russian government. These included research on Republican candidate Donald Trump.

"Russian government hackers have infiltrated the National Democratic Committee's computer network and have had access to the entire database containing research on Donald Trump, the Republican presidential candidate," wrote June 15, Washington Post. The newspaper relies on statements by officials of the Committee, the governing body of the Democratic Party, and experts who intervened to end the intrusion.

This one was so important that the hackers were also able to read all the emails and cats exchanged on this network, specify these sources. According to the Washington Post, other US political organizations have recently been hacked by Russian spies. In particular, teams of presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump were targeted.
Strengths and weaknesses
Two groups of hackers were said to have targeted the National Democratic Committee, the newspaper said, both on behalf of the Russian government. One of them would have had access to the computer network for almost a year.
These intrusions are an example of Russia's interest in the American political system and its desire to understand the program, strengths and weaknesses of the future potential president. "
The Democratic Party's computers contained information about Trump dating back many years. In the US political system, each party conducts extensive research on opposing candidates in order to discover weaknesses and possible angles of attack in the campaign.

Etats-Unis. Des hackers russes piratent les informations du Parti démocrate sur Trump

A couple of problems with this lie:

1. It has never been proven the Russians did it - the DNC would not let the FBI analyze the servers.

2. Debbie W-S hired 3 Pakistani spies and gave them access to DNC e-mails, usernames, and passwords...these same 3 spies are now suspected of blackmailing Democrats / politicians with information they got their hands on after DWS gave them illegal access to House files

3. Seth Rich was the Inside Leaker...who the DNc / Hillary had 'popped'



Fce it, embrace it, everyone now knows it, whether they are willing to say it or not - there was no Russian hacking

I believe you I am in France and it is the rumor that says the Russians have done some hacking to make Trump win as they would have also pirated Macron to make him lose the French election

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I've posed this hypothetical question to a couple of members and so far no one seems up to the task of providing an answer. So now I'm posing it the whole board.

Ok, here's a hypothetical scenario. Let's say a Trump associate spoke to a Russian representative. The Russian told him we have some really bad shit on the hildabitch and the representative said wow, it would sure help us if you released it on Tuesday and they did exactly that.

Tell me, what specific law would have been broken? Don't give me an opinion, quote the law.

Any takers?

.

In your scenario, probably no law is being broken. If they were complicit in spreading false Informstion to influence an election then they are probably flirting with treason. If they told the Russians not to react to sanctions because the new administration will be more forgiving then I'm guessing that's a violation... not sure which exact law it's breaking though. Perhaps treason as well. Undermining our government

Since the Trump associate was working with the Russian by requesting the release of the information on the Tuesday of the election, he was operating as an agent for a foreign power and would be required to register as such an agent and make periodic full disclosure. The punish is a fine of up to $10,000 and/or 5 years in prison.
Foreign Agents Registration Unit (FARA)

Excuse me, the term "Tuesday" is the generic term, election day was NOT part of it. That's one of the flaws of you regressives, you like to read things into everything that really isn't there.

.

From a legal standpoint, what Tuesday it might be is irrelevant. What is relevant would be the Trump associate telling the Russian when to release the damaging information to defeat Hillary.

What is relevant would be the Trump associate telling the Russian when to release the damaging information to defeat Hillary.

And that would be breaking what law? Specifically?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I'd still like to know how Russia made me vote for Trump?

The worst damage done was when Wikileaks leaked Debbie Wasserman's emails- (DNC chair) who was showing her anxiety over Bernie Sanders campaigning on a rigged election, and his refusal to drop out of the race--which infuriated Sanders supporters. Trump swept in to sweep up the collateral damage and was campaigning for Sanders Supporters, and they were all over this board stating that if Sanders didn't win they were going to vote for Trump.

Regardless if it changed a single vote--collusion with a Foreign adversary to interfere into an American election is TREASON.

As of 5/17/2017 This has now turned into a criminal investigation.
Lindsey Graham: Russia probe 'now a criminal investigation'

Regardless if it changed a single vote--collusion with a Foreign adversary to interfere into an American election is TREASON.

Where do you get this ridiculous definition of treason?

 

[Slade3200]

I've posed this hypothetical question to a couple of members and so far no one seems up to the task of providing an answer. So now I'm posing it the whole board.

Ok, here's a hypothetical scenario. Let's say a Trump associate spoke to a Russian representative. The Russian told him we have some really bad shit on the hildabitch and the representative said wow, it would sure help us if you released it on Tuesday and they did exactly that.

Tell me, what specific law would have been broken? Don't give me an opinion, quote the law.

Any takers?

.

In your scenario, probably no law is being broken. If they were complicit in spreading false Informstion to influence an election then they are probably flirting with treason. If they told the Russians not to react to sanctions because the new administration will be more forgiving then I'm guessing that's a violation... not sure which exact law it's breaking though. Perhaps treason as well. Undermining our government

the media that influenced for a Hillary's victory are guilty as well?

Any that stole information or knowingly printed false information are guilty of crimes, sure. But that is a different discussion

I was talking about the fact that CNN has done a lot of harm to Trump during his campaign and the media should be neutral because they influence the results of an election is the same as saying that the Russians have done everything for Trump to win the elections

You're right the media does have a tremendous amount of influence and misinformation being pushed around. Reform is tricky as we have a constitutional right for freedom of speech and the press.

As for Trump, he brings a lot of the negative press upon himself by the way he acts and all the shIT he talks. He is provacative. Our free market system allows for networks like Fox to counter the MSNBCs and other networks and we have the choice to choose what we watch.

I would however love for there to be an unbiased source for news in our country. The spin gets dizzying

 

[Dalia]

I've posed this hypothetical question to a couple of members and so far no one seems up to the task of providing an answer. So now I'm posing it the whole board.

Ok, here's a hypothetical scenario. Let's say a Trump associate spoke to a Russian representative. The Russian told him we have some really bad shit on the hildabitch and the representative said wow, it would sure help us if you released it on Tuesday and they did exactly that.

Tell me, what specific law would have been broken? Don't give me an opinion, quote the law.

Any takers?

.

In your scenario, probably no law is being broken. If they were complicit in spreading false Informstion to influence an election then they are probably flirting with treason. If they told the Russians not to react to sanctions because the new administration will be more forgiving then I'm guessing that's a violation... not sure which exact law it's breaking though. Perhaps treason as well. Undermining our government

the media that influenced for a Hillary's victory are guilty as well?

Any that stole information or knowingly printed false information are guilty of crimes, sure. But that is a different discussion

I was talking about the fact that CNN has done a lot of harm to Trump during his campaign and the media should be neutral because they influence the results of an election is the same as saying that the Russians have done everything for Trump to win the elections

You're right the media does have a tremendous amount of influence and misinformation being pushed around. Reform is tricky as we have a constitutional right for freedom of speech and the press.

As for Trump, he brings a lot of the negative press upon himself by the way he acts and all the shIT he talks. He is provacative. Our free market system allows for networks like Fox to counter the MSNBCs and other networks and we have the choice to choose what we watch.

I would however love for there to be an unbiased source for news in our country. The spin gets dizzying

When CNN made breaking news about the history of the grabbing pussy this recording was made against his request. they did everything so that he did not win and still it goes on ... the leftists are bad loser we in France we lost Marine did not win and we will bite our fingers ...