Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
And you lie at each and every turn to support your commitment to hurt this country. I hope you pay dearly one day.View attachment 199224People are most conservative when they know nothing, expect everything and want it tax free.
Goebbels was correct, and that is exactly what the current Trump&Co does everyday.
My comment was a parody of Ann Coulter, to wit:
"People are most conservative on issues that they know most about"
Really? What do I do to "hurt this country"? In fact it is my country, and the country of my sons and their children. It is assholes like you who are divisive and can't see how toxic the current conservative movement has become.
I don't care what you hope for, you're one of the deplorable, ignorant and likely somewhat mentally retarded losers.
Classic traitor reply. Claim ignorance and attack the messenger. Goebbels would be proud of you.
And you lie at each and every turn to support your commitment to hurt this country. I hope you pay dearly one day.
Goebbels was correct, and that is exactly what the current Trump&Co does everyday.
My comment was a parody of Ann Coulter, to wit:
"People are most conservative on issues that they know most about"
Really? What do I do to "hurt this country"? In fact it is my country, and the country of my sons and their children. It is assholes like you who are divisive and can't see how toxic the current conservative movement has become.
I don't care what you hope for, you're one of the deplorable, ignorant and likely somewhat mentally retarded losers.
Classic traitor reply. Claim ignorance and attack the messenger. Goebbels would be proud of you.
I posted an opinion which is supported by your work here. You attacked me, and as usual you posted something with no evidence or support or substance.
Q. Did you enlist in our nation's armed forces? ( I did in 1967); have you ever taken the oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States? (I have on three occasions); have you ever testified in court under oath? (I have over 100 times).
"The IG report bait n’ switch was just another example of our elite shrugging in the face of indisputable evidence of its own wrongdoing.
The bombshells in the IG report could justly be classified as “thermonuclear,” but remember the Comey conference back in July 2016? Its bombshells were thermonuclear too. Integrity Boy laid out an utterly devastating case against Felonia Milhous Von Pansuit, highlighting in damning detail her litany of crimes that would have consigned you, me, or anyone else not in the elite to a long tour in the stony lonesome.
And then that Looming Doofus concluded his lengthy summation with, “But never mind.”
The same with the IG report.
Yeah, the report demonstrated intense and pervasive political bias. Yeah, at every turn the FBI/DOJ hacks gave unprecedented deference and breaks to Hillary. Yeah, from the get-go they talked about how no one was ever going to be prosecuted. Nah, nothing to see."
The IG Report Was a Whitewash and Devastating All At Once
And you lie at each and every turn to support your commitment to hurt this country. I hope you pay dearly one day.Goebbels was correct, and that is exactly what the current Trump&Co does everyday.
My comment was a parody of Ann Coulter, to wit:
"People are most conservative on issues that they know most about"
Really? What do I do to "hurt this country"? In fact it is my country, and the country of my sons and their children. It is assholes like you who are divisive and can't see how toxic the current conservative movement has become.
I don't care what you hope for, you're one of the deplorable, ignorant and likely somewhat mentally retarded losers.
Classic traitor reply. Claim ignorance and attack the messenger. Goebbels would be proud of you.
I posted an opinion which is supported by your work here. You attacked me, and as usual you posted something with no evidence or support or substance.
Q. Did you enlist in our nation's armed forces? ( I did in 1967); have you ever taken the oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States? (I have on three occasions); have you ever testified in court under oath? (I have over 100 times).
"Did you enlist in our nation's armed forces?"
Do you still exchange Christmas cards with Chelsea (Bradley) Manning????
And....neither of you are supporters of the Constitution.
And you lie at each and every turn to support your commitment to hurt this country. I hope you pay dearly one day.
Really? What do I do to "hurt this country"? In fact it is my country, and the country of my sons and their children. It is assholes like you who are divisive and can't see how toxic the current conservative movement has become.
I don't care what you hope for, you're one of the deplorable, ignorant and likely somewhat mentally retarded losers.
Classic traitor reply. Claim ignorance and attack the messenger. Goebbels would be proud of you.
I posted an opinion which is supported by your work here. You attacked me, and as usual you posted something with no evidence or support or substance.
Q. Did you enlist in our nation's armed forces? ( I did in 1967); have you ever taken the oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States? (I have on three occasions); have you ever testified in court under oath? (I have over 100 times).
"Did you enlist in our nation's armed forces?"
Do you still exchange Christmas cards with Chelsea (Bradley) Manning????
And....neither of you are supporters of the Constitution.
Which part of COTUS do I not support? Clearly, your genre and constant drumbeat is a contradiction of the spirit / vision statement left to us by the signers of COTUS, to wit:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
"The IG report bait n’ switch was just another example of our elite shrugging in the face of indisputable evidence of its own wrongdoing.
The bombshells in the IG report could justly be classified as “thermonuclear,” but remember the Comey conference back in July 2016? Its bombshells were thermonuclear too. Integrity Boy laid out an utterly devastating case against Felonia Milhous Von Pansuit, highlighting in damning detail her litany of crimes that would have consigned you, me, or anyone else not in the elite to a long tour in the stony lonesome.
And then that Looming Doofus concluded his lengthy summation with, “But never mind.”
The same with the IG report.
Yeah, the report demonstrated intense and pervasive political bias. Yeah, at every turn the FBI/DOJ hacks gave unprecedented deference and breaks to Hillary. Yeah, from the get-go they talked about how no one was ever going to be prosecuted. Nah, nothing to see."
The IG Report Was a Whitewash and Devastating All At Once
You point fingers at others, and yet you constantly demonstrate intense and pervasive political bias and hate.
Really? What do I do to "hurt this country"? In fact it is my country, and the country of my sons and their children. It is assholes like you who are divisive and can't see how toxic the current conservative movement has become.
I don't care what you hope for, you're one of the deplorable, ignorant and likely somewhat mentally retarded losers.
Classic traitor reply. Claim ignorance and attack the messenger. Goebbels would be proud of you.
I posted an opinion which is supported by your work here. You attacked me, and as usual you posted something with no evidence or support or substance.
Q. Did you enlist in our nation's armed forces? ( I did in 1967); have you ever taken the oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States? (I have on three occasions); have you ever testified in court under oath? (I have over 100 times).
"Did you enlist in our nation's armed forces?"
Do you still exchange Christmas cards with Chelsea (Bradley) Manning????
And....neither of you are supporters of the Constitution.
Which part of COTUS do I not support? Clearly, your genre and constant drumbeat is a contradiction of the spirit / vision statement left to us by the signers of COTUS, to wit:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
You're quite the slow learner, aren't you.
But, I'll explain it again.
The memorializing documents of this nation advance these principles:
Individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
These are endorsed by classical liberals, called conservatives today, and the Founders.
On the opposite end of the political spectrum we find Socialists, Liberals, Nazis, Communists, Fascists and Progressives, who support the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.
Recognize your anti-Constitution stance?
This would be a fine occasion to remind all that the above charge: "They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited"... President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013
....exactly the hallmark of every totalitarian political view:
Communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, Progressivism, and fascism.....you.
Classic traitor reply. Claim ignorance and attack the messenger. Goebbels would be proud of you.
I posted an opinion which is supported by your work here. You attacked me, and as usual you posted something with no evidence or support or substance.
Q. Did you enlist in our nation's armed forces? ( I did in 1967); have you ever taken the oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States? (I have on three occasions); have you ever testified in court under oath? (I have over 100 times).
"Did you enlist in our nation's armed forces?"
Do you still exchange Christmas cards with Chelsea (Bradley) Manning????
And....neither of you are supporters of the Constitution.
Which part of COTUS do I not support? Clearly, your genre and constant drumbeat is a contradiction of the spirit / vision statement left to us by the signers of COTUS, to wit:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
You're quite the slow learner, aren't you.
But, I'll explain it again.
The memorializing documents of this nation advance these principles:
Individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
These are endorsed by classical liberals, called conservatives today, and the Founders.
On the opposite end of the political spectrum we find Socialists, Liberals, Nazis, Communists, Fascists and Progressives, who support the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.
Recognize your anti-Constitution stance?
This would be a fine occasion to remind all that the above charge: "They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited"... President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013
....exactly the hallmark of every totalitarian political view:
Communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, Progressivism, and fascism.....you.
I learn very quickly, it took your first post/thread for me to understand with great clarity that you are a hack and incapable of defending the point of view you hold, by reading only that which supports your hackery and "alternative" world history.
]
Did you read the Preamble and did you comprehend its message? Of course not.
I posted an opinion which is supported by your work here. You attacked me, and as usual you posted something with no evidence or support or substance.
Q. Did you enlist in our nation's armed forces? ( I did in 1967); have you ever taken the oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States? (I have on three occasions); have you ever testified in court under oath? (I have over 100 times).
"Did you enlist in our nation's armed forces?"
Do you still exchange Christmas cards with Chelsea (Bradley) Manning????
And....neither of you are supporters of the Constitution.
Which part of COTUS do I not support? Clearly, your genre and constant drumbeat is a contradiction of the spirit / vision statement left to us by the signers of COTUS, to wit:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
You're quite the slow learner, aren't you.
But, I'll explain it again.
The memorializing documents of this nation advance these principles:
Individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
These are endorsed by classical liberals, called conservatives today, and the Founders.
On the opposite end of the political spectrum we find Socialists, Liberals, Nazis, Communists, Fascists and Progressives, who support the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.
Recognize your anti-Constitution stance?
This would be a fine occasion to remind all that the above charge: "They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited"... President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013
....exactly the hallmark of every totalitarian political view:
Communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, Progressivism, and fascism.....you.
I learn very quickly, it took your first post/thread for me to understand with great clarity that you are a hack and incapable of defending the point of view you hold, by reading only that which supports your hackery and "alternative" world history.
]
Did you read the Preamble and did you comprehend its message? Of course not.
OK, OK....stop begging....
Here it is for the third time:
You're quite the slow learner, aren't you.
But, I'll explain it again.
The memorializing documents of this nation advance these principles:
Individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
These are endorsed by classical liberals, called conservatives today, and the Founders.
On the opposite end of the political spectrum we find Socialists, Liberals, Nazis, Communists, Fascists and Progressives, who support the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.
Recognize your anti-Constitution stance?
This would be a fine occasion to remind all that the above charge: "They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited"... President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013
....exactly the hallmark of every totalitarian political view:
Communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, Progressivism, and fascism.....you.
"Did you enlist in our nation's armed forces?"
Do you still exchange Christmas cards with Chelsea (Bradley) Manning????
And....neither of you are supporters of the Constitution.
Which part of COTUS do I not support? Clearly, your genre and constant drumbeat is a contradiction of the spirit / vision statement left to us by the signers of COTUS, to wit:
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
You're quite the slow learner, aren't you.
But, I'll explain it again.
The memorializing documents of this nation advance these principles:
Individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
These are endorsed by classical liberals, called conservatives today, and the Founders.
On the opposite end of the political spectrum we find Socialists, Liberals, Nazis, Communists, Fascists and Progressives, who support the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.
Recognize your anti-Constitution stance?
This would be a fine occasion to remind all that the above charge: "They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited"... President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013
....exactly the hallmark of every totalitarian political view:
Communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, Progressivism, and fascism.....you.
I learn very quickly, it took your first post/thread for me to understand with great clarity that you are a hack and incapable of defending the point of view you hold, by reading only that which supports your hackery and "alternative" world history.
]
Did you read the Preamble and did you comprehend its message? Of course not.
OK, OK....stop begging....
Here it is for the third time:
You're quite the slow learner, aren't you.
But, I'll explain it again.
The memorializing documents of this nation advance these principles:
Individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
These are endorsed by classical liberals, called conservatives today, and the Founders.
On the opposite end of the political spectrum we find Socialists, Liberals, Nazis, Communists, Fascists and Progressives, who support the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.
Recognize your anti-Constitution stance?
This would be a fine occasion to remind all that the above charge: "They had nothing in common other than the government’s view that federal power is virtually unlimited"... President Obama's Top 10 Constitutional Violations Of 2013
....exactly the hallmark of every totalitarian political view:
Communism, Nazism, Liberalism, socialism, Progressivism, and fascism.....you.
Once again, you have never taken a U. course in writing, nor understand what is an expository essay. Your writing skills suggest a very weak education, or that English is not your native language. Your understanding (lol) of political philosophy is rudimentary and your takeaway that of a dilettante.
You and Trump both have a primary vocabulary of someone who may have graduated from a high school, but surely not a college preparatory one.
Your genre is built on a foundation of hate, and framed by fear with no substance beyond the assassination of the character of those who do not hold to your immature and borrowed ideology.
Now, once again you are free to call me a fool and worse. On some level you know that your use of personal attacks, sans evidence, is worthless, for it lacks substance and thought and any effort to produce a rebuttal to the posts of others who understand the realpolitik.
Evidence which is sufficiently useful to prove something important in a trial is missing in the OP by Ms. PoliticalChic.
Hence, one must conclude the allegations of corruption and wrongdoing are simply an echo of another of Trump's BIG LIES, which dominate the thinki ... um ... ah .. beliefs of Conservative Trump Supporters.
funny, he was spot on with the "no,no he won't we'll stop it" comment.7. Living up to the Beria doctrine....“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”....we have the Mueller-Comey-McCabe (Hillary should be in there) Axis of corruption.
Asked numerous times of the Democrats/Liberals/anti-Trump Republicans.....
Should an individual under investigation expect, and be entitled to, impartiality by the investigating agencies?
im·par·ti·al·i·ty
imˌpärSHēˈalədē/
noun
1. equal treatment of all rivals or disputants; fairness.
....the only semblance of a response has been the miasma of dust as the cowards sprint off.
8. Jake TapperVerified account @jaketapper
These are stunning texts for FBI officials to have written.
Lisa Page: “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”
Peter Strzok: “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it.”
9:54 AM - 14 Jun 2018
Who is "we"?????
You know who.
Evidence which is sufficiently useful to prove something important in a trial is missing in the OP by Ms. PoliticalChic.
Hence, one must conclude the allegations of corruption and wrongdoing are simply an echo of another of Trump's BIG LIES, which dominate the thinki ... um ... ah .. beliefs of Conservative Trump Supporters.
/thread
funny, he was spot on with the "no,no he won't we'll stop it" comment.7. Living up to the Beria doctrine....“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”....we have the Mueller-Comey-McCabe (Hillary should be in there) Axis of corruption.
Asked numerous times of the Democrats/Liberals/anti-Trump Republicans.....
Should an individual under investigation expect, and be entitled to, impartiality by the investigating agencies?
im·par·ti·al·i·ty
imˌpärSHēˈalədē/
noun
1. equal treatment of all rivals or disputants; fairness.
....the only semblance of a response has been the miasma of dust as the cowards sprint off.
8. Jake TapperVerified account @jaketapper
These are stunning texts for FBI officials to have written.
Lisa Page: “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”
Peter Strzok: “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it.”
9:54 AM - 14 Jun 2018
Who is "we"?????
You know who.
What is the russia russia all about if not to stop it. he spoke directly into the beginning of the investigation.
Evidence which is sufficiently useful to prove something important in a trial is missing in the OP by Ms. PoliticalChic.
Hence, one must conclude the allegations of corruption and wrongdoing are simply an echo of another of Trump's BIG LIES, which dominate the thinki ... um ... ah .. beliefs of Conservative Trump Supporters.
/thread
As you seem to have swallowed the "Trump'sw Big Lies" propaganda.....I wonder if you could provide any list comparable to this:
1. This is the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow
2. If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor
3. ObamaCare will save the average family $2500
4. They did a good job in Libya
5. A video caused Benghazi?
6. Islam has been woven into the fabric of our history
7. Jobs are gone and they’re never coming back
8. Michael brown hands up don’t shoot
9. IRS not a smidgen of corruption
10. Shovel ready jobs.
11. There’s a Muslim travel ban?
12. Very little difference between capitalism and communism
13. Remember that ‘Red Line’ in Syria that we were gonna enforce?
14. “We have removed all of Syria’s poison gas reserves”
15. Will be the most transparent in history (worst at FOIA requests)
16. October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table,"
17. I do not talk to the Attorney General about pending investigations. I do not talk to FBI directors about pending investigations. We have a strict line, and always have maintained it, previous president. Uh Oh: New Texts Suggest Obama WH, CIA, FBI, And Harry Reid Colluded At Outset Of Russia Probe
18. WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration secretly sought to give Iran access — albeit briefly — to the U.S. financial system by sidestepping sanctions kept in place after the 2015 nuclear deal, despite repeatedly telling Congress and the public it had no plans to do so. … under President Barack Obama, the Treasury Department issued a license in February 2016, never previously disclosed, that would have allowed Iran to convert $5.7 billion it held at a bank in Oman from Omani rials into euros by exchanging them first into U.S. dollars.
Secret Obama-era permit let Iran convert funds to dollars
If not...you're self-identified as a dunce.
Evidence which is sufficiently useful to prove something important in a trial is missing in the OP by Ms. PoliticalChic.
Hence, one must conclude the allegations of corruption and wrongdoing are simply an echo of another of Trump's BIG LIES, which dominate the thinki ... um ... ah .. beliefs of Conservative Trump Supporters.
/thread
As you seem to have swallowed the "Trump'sw Big Lies" propaganda.....I wonder if you could provide any list comparable to this:
1. This is the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow
2. If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor
3. ObamaCare will save the average family $2500
4. They did a good job in Libya
5. A video caused Benghazi?
6. Islam has been woven into the fabric of our history
7. Jobs are gone and they’re never coming back
8. Michael brown hands up don’t shoot
9. IRS not a smidgen of corruption
10. Shovel ready jobs.
11. There’s a Muslim travel ban?
12. Very little difference between capitalism and communism
13. Remember that ‘Red Line’ in Syria that we were gonna enforce?
14. “We have removed all of Syria’s poison gas reserves”
15. Will be the most transparent in history (worst at FOIA requests)
16. October 7 2008, in the second presidential debate: "We cannot allow Iran to get a nuclear weapon. It would be a game-changer in the region. Not only would it threaten Israel, our strongest ally in the region and one of our strongest allies in the world, but it would also create a possibility of nuclear weapons falling into the hands of terrorists. And so it's unacceptable. And I will do everything that's required to prevent it. And we will never take military options off the table,"
17. I do not talk to the Attorney General about pending investigations. I do not talk to FBI directors about pending investigations. We have a strict line, and always have maintained it, previous president. Uh Oh: New Texts Suggest Obama WH, CIA, FBI, And Harry Reid Colluded At Outset Of Russia Probe
18. WASHINGTON (AP) — The Obama administration secretly sought to give Iran access — albeit briefly — to the U.S. financial system by sidestepping sanctions kept in place after the 2015 nuclear deal, despite repeatedly telling Congress and the public it had no plans to do so. … under President Barack Obama, the Treasury Department issued a license in February 2016, never previously disclosed, that would have allowed Iran to convert $5.7 billion it held at a bank in Oman from Omani rials into euros by exchanging them first into U.S. dollars.
Secret Obama-era permit let Iran convert funds to dollars
If not...you're self-identified as a dunce.
Examples ^^^ of an obsessive and compulsive member of the Ministry of Truth, with lies of omission, using half-truths, rumors, innuendos, rumors, and echoes of propaganda.
"The IG report bait n’ switch was just another example of our elite shrugging in the face of indisputable evidence of its own wrongdoing.
The bombshells in the IG report could justly be classified as “thermonuclear,” but remember the Comey conference back in July 2016? Its bombshells were thermonuclear too. Integrity Boy laid out an utterly devastating case against Felonia Milhous Von Pansuit, highlighting in damning detail her litany of crimes that would have consigned you, me, or anyone else not in the elite to a long tour in the stony lonesome.
And then that Looming Doofus concluded his lengthy summation with, “But never mind.”
The same with the IG report.
Yeah, the report demonstrated intense and pervasive political bias. Yeah, at every turn the FBI/DOJ hacks gave unprecedented deference and breaks to Hillary. Yeah, from the get-go they talked about how no one was ever going to be prosecuted. Nah, nothing to see."
The IG Report Was a Whitewash and Devastating All At Once
7. Living up to the Beria doctrine....“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime”....we have the Mueller-Comey-McCabe (Hillary should be in there) Axis of corruption.
Asked numerous times of the Democrats/Liberals/anti-Trump Republicans.....
Should an individual under investigation expect, and be entitled to, impartiality by the investigating agencies?
im·par·ti·al·i·ty
imˌpärSHēˈalədē/
noun
1. equal treatment of all rivals or disputants; fairness.
....the only semblance of a response has been the miasma of dust as the cowards sprint off.
8. Jake TapperVerified account @jaketapper
These are stunning texts for FBI officials to have written.
Lisa Page: “[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!”
Peter Strzok: “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it.”
9:54 AM - 14 Jun 2018
Who is "we"?????
You know who.
