The King James Bible Defended!

[daws101]

You know, you should really watch History Channel's "Banned from the Bible" pts 1 and 2.

It will show you how incorrect your statement is.

watch non evangelical TV !....that's a sin!

That's not mentioned in the Bible, so it can't be true.

so from that pov nothing else in this world exists..?

 

[Lokiate]

no

 

[Avatar4321]

So, you weren't aware the King James Bible was revised in the 19th century. No worries, now, you know

No. Im very much aware of it. But it's still completely irrelevant.

Irrelevant only to those without a functional brain. You opt out.

How is it at all relevant to the relationship of rdeans claim that King James was gay and the translation of the King James Version?

Hint: It's not.

 

[Avatar4321]

watch non evangelical TV !....that's a sin!

That's not mentioned in the Bible, so it can't be true.

so from that pov nothing else in this world exists..?

That's precisely why that viewpoint is absurd