The Kavanaugh conundrum: Trump's FBI grandstanding highlights flaw in the bureau's background check

Discussion in 'Politics' started by NewsVine_Mariyam, Sep 23, 2018.

  1. NewsVine_Mariyam
    Offline

    NewsVine_Mariyam Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2018
    Messages:
    2,014
    Thanks Received:
    482
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    The Beautiful Pacific Northwest
    Ratings:
    +2,043
    The thing about background checks, even FBI background checks is that they don't detect hidden or in some cases not so hidden character flaws. There are a lot of people with no criminal history to speak of who are basically sociopaths, the two serial rapists and in one case murderers captured via DNA in California recently come to mind

    Opinion | Frank Figliuzzi: Kavanaugh chaos highlights major flaw in FBI background check process

    This White House has repeatedly undermined the institutions charged with upholding the law.

    Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation has been stalled by a credible allegation dating back three decades to his high school days at Georgetown Prep. What appeared to be a confirmation certainty is now in question as the reporting victim, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford, requests an FBI investigation to substantiate her claims.

    And yet, the only entity who can grant Ford’s request seems wholly uninterested in making that happen. President Donald Trump can, with one phone call, request the FBI re-open its background inquiry into Kavanaugh. Thus far he has both refused to issue such a request and uttered false statements about the FBI’s willingness and authority to investigate if he were to do so. Similarly, Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, the committee chair, wrongly asserted that this is not a job for the FBI. I disagree. Congress and the White House must take steps to modify the existing memorandum of understanding between the White House and the FBI as well as current protocols so that the bureau can unilaterally and independently pursue logical follow-ups to background inquiries.

    Meanwhile, the GOP-controlled Senate Judiciary Committee seems to have learned little from the travesty of the Anita Hill hearings, nor from our evolving cultural understanding of how to handle credible allegations. The White House and the Republicans on the Judiciary Committee are so myopically focused on getting Kavanuagh confirmed that they can’t see the logical solution staring them in the face.

    [snipped]
    Any rookie FBI agent can recite the acronym used to shape the interview questions posed to colleagues, neighbors, scorned significant others and family members of a nominee — CARLA. CARLA stands for character, aptitude, reputation, loyalty (to our nation) and associations. There are sub-headings under each of those categories — such as finances and temperament — but you get the idea. Here’s the thing though; these SPINs are unlike almost any other investigation the FBI conducts. They are neither criminal nor national security investigations but rather more akin to hiring a private eye to check on your cheating spouse. By that I mean that unlike the FBI’s other work, the FBI’s client in these investigations isn’t the American public, it’s the nominating agency; in this case the White House.​
     
    • Funny Funny x 7
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. Indeependent
    Offline

    Indeependent Platinum Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Nov 19, 2013
    Messages:
    31,554
    Thanks Received:
    2,752
    Trophy Points:
    1,115
    Ratings:
    +16,525
    The Vulcan Mindmeld.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. Toddsterpatriot
    Offline

    Toddsterpatriot Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    44,195
    Thanks Received:
    5,624
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +23,202
    The thing about background checks, even FBI background checks is that they don't detect hidden or in some cases not so hidden character flaws.

    Or imaginary flaws either.
     
    • Agree Agree x 7
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. NewsVine_Mariyam
    Offline

    NewsVine_Mariyam Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2018
    Messages:
    2,014
    Thanks Received:
    482
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    The Beautiful Pacific Northwest
    Ratings:
    +2,043
    What do you consider an imaginary flaw?
     
  5. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    14,916
    Thanks Received:
    3,127
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +14,327
    the Kavanugh one comes to mind...
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. NewsVine_Mariyam
    Offline

    NewsVine_Mariyam Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2018
    Messages:
    2,014
    Thanks Received:
    482
    Trophy Points:
    140
    Location:
    The Beautiful Pacific Northwest
    Ratings:
    +2,043
    What part is the flaw? What is he alleged to have done, the fact that so many in society don't believe it should be a disqualifier if true, or the fact that he lied about it or failed to disclose it when asked?
     
  7. Oldstyle
    Offline

    Oldstyle Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    26,906
    Thanks Received:
    4,195
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Florida
    Ratings:
    +13,598
    Really? You're blaming the FBI because they failed to uncover a 36 year old "alleged" improper touching incident that may or may not have ever happened?
     
    • Funny and Agree!! Funny and Agree!! x 5
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. Toddsterpatriot
    Offline

    Toddsterpatriot Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2011
    Messages:
    44,195
    Thanks Received:
    5,624
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +23,202
    The unprovable, solo claim dreamt up by a partisan Dem.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  9. Billy_Bob
    Offline

    Billy_Bob Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2014
    Messages:
    14,916
    Thanks Received:
    3,127
    Trophy Points:
    1,010
    Location:
    Top Of The Great Divide
    Ratings:
    +14,327
    Kavanugh had 6 FBI background investigations. They talked with friends, family, school mates, teachers, school staff and administrators and looked into social media, news, and all school records. They talked with friend and foe alike from those periods.

    What was it they missed? From the evidence shown so far they did not miss anything. Ford has yet to produce any credible witness or evidence to support the accusations. While Kavanugh has produced hundreds of witnesses that have never seen any predatory behaviors of any kind and many of them go back to when he was 16 years of age...

    Now what is it you think they missed?
     
    • Winner Winner x 4
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. Oldstyle
    Offline

    Oldstyle Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2011
    Messages:
    26,906
    Thanks Received:
    4,195
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Florida
    Ratings:
    +13,598
    There is nothing wrong with the investigations that are done by the rank and file FBI...it's what's been done by a select few in high level positions in Washington that have made the FBI a joke. Comey, McCabe, Page, Strzok...those are the people who have brought disrepute to the FBI...not Donald Trump!
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page