The Irish... And Who Didn't 'Help' Them Succeed

[PoliticalChic]

The Irish pulled up their boots and went to work. Unlike a certain other faction that demand reparations, have been given every opportunity to better themselves through affirmative action and other programs and STILL can't make anything of themselves.

the irish weren't defined by the color of their skin or enslaved or forced to come here or segregated by law.

you're welcome

and the blacks today are here by choice. There are flights leaving all day every day.
so why after all this time are they still unable to make anything of themselves.

you really should stop lumping all people together based upon your bigotry. the reality is that segregation existed less than 50 years ago. and institutional racism still exists.

but you're a bigot, you'd rather talk about all black people when i'm guessing not a single person of color is your friend.

"...you really should stop lumping all people together based upon your bigotry. the reality is that segregation existed less than 50 years ago."

And let's remember that the bigotry, segregation, and second-class citizenship was entirely fostered by the Democrat Party.
100%

1. 1966- Republican Spiro Agnew ran against Democrat segregationists George Mahoney for governor of Maryland. Agnew enacted some of the first laws in the nation against race discrimination in public housing. “Agnew signed the state's first open-housing laws and succeeded in getting the repeal of an anti-miscegenationlaw.” Spiro Agnew - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2. 1957- Democrat Sam Ervin, another liberal luminary, instrumental in the destruction of anti-communist Republicans Joe McCarthy and Richard Nixon, told his fellow segregationists, and who led the Watergate investigation, said of the 1957 civil rights bill: “We’ve got to give the goddamned ******* something. We’re not gonna be able to get out of here until we’ve got some kind of ****** bill.’ Robert Caro, “Master of the Senate: The Years of Lyndon Johnson,” xv.
3. Here are the lies we’re up against: the Washington Post lies outright, describing Senator William Fulbright as “a progressive on racial issues.” Fulbright was a full-bore segregationist, voting against the 1957, 1960, 1964, and 1965 civil rights bills.
4. And another lie from the Leftist press: "In a category by itself is the Nineteenth Amendment backing women’s suffrage, voted by Congress in 1919, a move Wilson and others promoted." What can Obama expect from his last Congress?

It was the Republicans who wrestled women's suffrage from the Democrats....over their filibuster.

nice cut and paste

What's wrong with cut and paste?

Every fact provided via that method is accurate and true.

Aren't they.


Anytime you get up the courage to take on any of my posts.....be sure to let me know.

 

[rightwinger]

And the Irish-Americans were pro-union, pro worker's rights, and ran the Democratic party.

And haven't you extolled the virtues of Anglo-Saxon Christianity (meaning Protestant) which is decidedly NOT the Irish?

And the Know-Nothing Party was the Progressive Party of the era.....virulently anti-Catholic.....exactly what FDR's very first pick for the Supreme Court was....a KKKer who hated Catholics and corrupted the Constitution.

Touché

Hardly

Know Nothings were as conservative as you could get
Anti-Catholic, anti Immigration

You post...and I prove you wrong....that's pretty much the Liberal- conservative pattern.

"...the party also distinguished itself by its opposition to slavery, support for an expansion of the rights of women, regulation of industry, and support of measures designed to improve the status of working people."
Stephen Taylor, "Progressive Nativism: The Know-Nothing Party in Massachusetts" Historical Journal of Massachusetts (2000) 28#2 pp 167-84


You must be sooooo embarrassed, huh?

The Know Nothings were 99% anti-immigrant and anti-Catholic. Nobody joined the Know Nothings because they wanted to see women vote

What we would call a Trump voter today

Stephen Taylor, "Progressive Nativism: The Know-Nothing Party in Massachusetts"Historical Journal of Massachusetts (2000) 28#2 pp 167-84



You can run, but you can't hide.


Progressives....the originators of the "Master Race" concept, the ones who advanced Eugenics, and who taught the Nazis.

Yup....you Progressives.

You consider THAT proof?

Never realized academic standards at Columbia are so low


.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The Irish voted Dem well into the 1970s from the very first days they could vote in America.

They were heavy in the labor movement.

They were anti-war in WWI because our ally was Great Britain.

They opposed busing in Boston during the 1970s.

you have to admit that bussing was a very bad and unfair practice.

Even if so, it was greatly outweighed by the racial hatred displayed by the protesters. As a result, many of the Irish began voting GOP in Massachusetts.

I think the opposition to what bussing was doing would have been well called for. Don't you?

Of course it was not. The point was integration.

 

[PoliticalChic]

And the Know-Nothing Party was the Progressive Party of the era.....virulently anti-Catholic.....exactly what FDR's very first pick for the Supreme Court was....a KKKer who hated Catholics and corrupted the Constitution.

Touché

Hardly

Know Nothings were as conservative as you could get
Anti-Catholic, anti Immigration

You post...and I prove you wrong....that's pretty much the Liberal- conservative pattern.

"...the party also distinguished itself by its opposition to slavery, support for an expansion of the rights of women, regulation of industry, and support of measures designed to improve the status of working people."
Stephen Taylor, "Progressive Nativism: The Know-Nothing Party in Massachusetts" Historical Journal of Massachusetts (2000) 28#2 pp 167-84


You must be sooooo embarrassed, huh?

The Know Nothings were 99% anti-immigrant and anti-Catholic. Nobody joined the Know Nothings because they wanted to see women vote

What we would call a Trump voter today

Stephen Taylor, "Progressive Nativism: The Know-Nothing Party in Massachusetts"Historical Journal of Massachusetts (2000) 28#2 pp 167-84



You can run, but you can't hide.


Progressives....the originators of the "Master Race" concept, the ones who advanced Eugenics, and who taught the Nazis.

Yup....you Progressives.

You consider THAT proof?

Never realized academic standards at Columbia are so low

Pretty diaphanous dodge.

 

[Unkotare]

Alliteration is awfully amusing.

 

[rightwinger]

Hardly

Know Nothings were as conservative as you could get
Anti-Catholic, anti Immigration

You post...and I prove you wrong....that's pretty much the Liberal- conservative pattern.

"...the party also distinguished itself by its opposition to slavery, support for an expansion of the rights of women, regulation of industry, and support of measures designed to improve the status of working people."
Stephen Taylor, "Progressive Nativism: The Know-Nothing Party in Massachusetts" Historical Journal of Massachusetts (2000) 28#2 pp 167-84


You must be sooooo embarrassed, huh?

The Know Nothings were 99% anti-immigrant and anti-Catholic. Nobody joined the Know Nothings because they wanted to see women vote

What we would call a Trump voter today

Stephen Taylor, "Progressive Nativism: The Know-Nothing Party in Massachusetts"Historical Journal of Massachusetts (2000) 28#2 pp 167-84



You can run, but you can't hide.


Progressives....the originators of the "Master Race" concept, the ones who advanced Eugenics, and who taught the Nazis.

Yup....you Progressives.

You consider THAT proof?

Never realized academic standards at Columbia are so low

Pretty diaphanous dodge.

Pretty lame reference

 

[Maryland Patriot]

And the Know-Nothing Party was the Progressive Party of the era.....virulently anti-Catholic.....exactly what FDR's very first pick for the Supreme Court was....a KKKer who hated Catholics and corrupted the Constitution.

Touché

Hardly

Know Nothings were as conservative as you could get
Anti-Catholic, anti Immigration

You post...and I prove you wrong....that's pretty much the Liberal- conservative pattern.

"...the party also distinguished itself by its opposition to slavery, support for an expansion of the rights of women, regulation of industry, and support of measures designed to improve the status of working people."
Stephen Taylor, "Progressive Nativism: The Know-Nothing Party in Massachusetts" Historical Journal of Massachusetts (2000) 28#2 pp 167-84


You must be sooooo embarrassed, huh?

The Know Nothings were 99% anti-immigrant and anti-Catholic. Nobody joined the Know Nothings because they wanted to see women vote

What we would call a Trump voter today

Stephen Taylor, "Progressive Nativism: The Know-Nothing Party in Massachusetts"Historical Journal of Massachusetts (2000) 28#2 pp 167-84



You can run, but you can't hide.


Progressives....the originators of the "Master Race" concept, the ones who advanced Eugenics, and who taught the Nazis.

Yup....you Progressives.

You consider THAT proof?

Never realized academic standards at Columbia are so low


.

and yet, you still didn't qualify to get in.
That's really got to eat at you after a while.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

the irish weren't defined by the color of their skin or enslaved or forced to come here or segregated by law.

you're welcome

and the blacks today are here by choice. There are flights leaving all day every day.
so why after all this time are they still unable to make anything of themselves.

you really should stop lumping all people together based upon your bigotry. the reality is that segregation existed less than 50 years ago. and institutional racism still exists.

but you're a bigot, you'd rather talk about all black people when i'm guessing not a single person of color is your friend.

"...you really should stop lumping all people together based upon your bigotry. the reality is that segregation existed less than 50 years ago."

And let's remember that the bigotry, segregation, and second-class citizenship was entirely fostered by the Democrat Party.
100%

1. 1966- Republican Spiro Agnew ran against Democrat segregationists George Mahoney for governor of Maryland. Agnew enacted some of the first laws in the nation against race discrimination in public housing. “Agnew signed the state's first open-housing laws and succeeded in getting the repeal of an anti-miscegenationlaw.” Spiro Agnew - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2. 1957- Democrat Sam Ervin, another liberal luminary, instrumental in the destruction of anti-communist Republicans Joe McCarthy and Richard Nixon, told his fellow segregationists, and who led the Watergate investigation, said of the 1957 civil rights bill: “We’ve got to give the goddamned ******* something. We’re not gonna be able to get out of here until we’ve got some kind of ****** bill.’ Robert Caro, “Master of the Senate: The Years of Lyndon Johnson,” xv.
3. Here are the lies we’re up against: the Washington Post lies outright, describing Senator William Fulbright as “a progressive on racial issues.” Fulbright was a full-bore segregationist, voting against the 1957, 1960, 1964, and 1965 civil rights bills.
4. And another lie from the Leftist press: "In a category by itself is the Nineteenth Amendment backing women’s suffrage, voted by Congress in 1919, a move Wilson and others promoted." What can Obama expect from his last Congress?

It was the Republicans who wrestled women's suffrage from the Democrats....over their filibuster.

nice cut and paste

What's wrong with cut and paste?

Every fact provided via that method is accurate and true.

Aren't they.


Anytime you get up the courage to take on any of my posts.....be sure to let me know.

Why do you bother, they wont take it as a fact unless obama or Hillary blows it out their ass in the form of smoke signals

 

[Manchester]

Oh no, those poor disadvantaged white kids.

no, how about, those parents that

Oh no, those poor disadvantaged white kids.

how about the parents that sacrificed to put their kids into the best schools only to see those schools destroyed by those that had no interest in learning.

The schools are provided by the state, they are owned by all tax payers. If the elected government wishes to tear down the walls of apartheid that have been built up it can because they are THEIR schools and they have a democratic mandate from the people. Of course some people like apartheid and will bitch about it, years later. Maybe even with technical arguments that don't on the surface appear racist.

 

[rightwinger]

Hardly

Know Nothings were as conservative as you could get
Anti-Catholic, anti Immigration

You post...and I prove you wrong....that's pretty much the Liberal- conservative pattern.

"...the party also distinguished itself by its opposition to slavery, support for an expansion of the rights of women, regulation of industry, and support of measures designed to improve the status of working people."
Stephen Taylor, "Progressive Nativism: The Know-Nothing Party in Massachusetts" Historical Journal of Massachusetts (2000) 28#2 pp 167-84


You must be sooooo embarrassed, huh?

The Know Nothings were 99% anti-immigrant and anti-Catholic. Nobody joined the Know Nothings because they wanted to see women vote

What we would call a Trump voter today

Stephen Taylor, "Progressive Nativism: The Know-Nothing Party in Massachusetts"Historical Journal of Massachusetts (2000) 28#2 pp 167-84



You can run, but you can't hide.


Progressives....the originators of the "Master Race" concept, the ones who advanced Eugenics, and who taught the Nazis.

Yup....you Progressives.

You consider THAT proof?

Never realized academic standards at Columbia are so low


.

and yet, you still didn't qualify to get in.
That's really got to eat at you after a while.

I never could quite master that cut and paste stuff

 

[rightwinger]

the irish weren't defined by the color of their skin or enslaved or forced to come here or segregated by law.

you're welcome

and the blacks today are here by choice. There are flights leaving all day every day.
so why after all this time are they still unable to make anything of themselves.

you really should stop lumping all people together based upon your bigotry. the reality is that segregation existed less than 50 years ago. and institutional racism still exists.

but you're a bigot, you'd rather talk about all black people when i'm guessing not a single person of color is your friend.

"...you really should stop lumping all people together based upon your bigotry. the reality is that segregation existed less than 50 years ago."

And let's remember that the bigotry, segregation, and second-class citizenship was entirely fostered by the Democrat Party.
100%

1. 1966- Republican Spiro Agnew ran against Democrat segregationists George Mahoney for governor of Maryland. Agnew enacted some of the first laws in the nation against race discrimination in public housing. “Agnew signed the state's first open-housing laws and succeeded in getting the repeal of an anti-miscegenationlaw.” Spiro Agnew - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2. 1957- Democrat Sam Ervin, another liberal luminary, instrumental in the destruction of anti-communist Republicans Joe McCarthy and Richard Nixon, told his fellow segregationists, and who led the Watergate investigation, said of the 1957 civil rights bill: “We’ve got to give the goddamned ******* something. We’re not gonna be able to get out of here until we’ve got some kind of ****** bill.’ Robert Caro, “Master of the Senate: The Years of Lyndon Johnson,” xv.
3. Here are the lies we’re up against: the Washington Post lies outright, describing Senator William Fulbright as “a progressive on racial issues.” Fulbright was a full-bore segregationist, voting against the 1957, 1960, 1964, and 1965 civil rights bills.
4. And another lie from the Leftist press: "In a category by itself is the Nineteenth Amendment backing women’s suffrage, voted by Congress in 1919, a move Wilson and others promoted." What can Obama expect from his last Congress?

It was the Republicans who wrestled women's suffrage from the Democrats....over their filibuster.

nice cut and paste

What's wrong with cut and paste?

Every fact provided via that method is accurate and true.

Aren't they.


Anytime you get up the courage to take on any of my posts.....be sure to let me know.

Cut and paste is supposed to support your opinion, not substitute for one

 

[rightwinger]

Oh no, those poor disadvantaged white kids.

no, how about, those parents that

Oh no, those poor disadvantaged white kids.

how about the parents that sacrificed to put their kids into the best schools only to see those schools destroyed by those that had no interest in learning.

The schools are provided by the state, they are owned by all tax payers. If the elected government wishes to tear down the walls of apartheid that have been built up it can because they are THEIR schools and they have a democratic mandate from the people. Of course some people like apartheid and will bitch about it, years later. Maybe even with technical arguments that don't on the surface appear racist.

Those "good" schools were localized apartheid. School districts were drawn to keep out the colored. The courts didn't stand for it

 

[PoliticalChic]

and the blacks today are here by choice. There are flights leaving all day every day.
so why after all this time are they still unable to make anything of themselves.

you really should stop lumping all people together based upon your bigotry. the reality is that segregation existed less than 50 years ago. and institutional racism still exists.

but you're a bigot, you'd rather talk about all black people when i'm guessing not a single person of color is your friend.

"...you really should stop lumping all people together based upon your bigotry. the reality is that segregation existed less than 50 years ago."

And let's remember that the bigotry, segregation, and second-class citizenship was entirely fostered by the Democrat Party.
100%

1. 1966- Republican Spiro Agnew ran against Democrat segregationists George Mahoney for governor of Maryland. Agnew enacted some of the first laws in the nation against race discrimination in public housing. “Agnew signed the state's first open-housing laws and succeeded in getting the repeal of an anti-miscegenationlaw.” Spiro Agnew - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2. 1957- Democrat Sam Ervin, another liberal luminary, instrumental in the destruction of anti-communist Republicans Joe McCarthy and Richard Nixon, told his fellow segregationists, and who led the Watergate investigation, said of the 1957 civil rights bill: “We’ve got to give the goddamned ******* something. We’re not gonna be able to get out of here until we’ve got some kind of ****** bill.’ Robert Caro, “Master of the Senate: The Years of Lyndon Johnson,” xv.
3. Here are the lies we’re up against: the Washington Post lies outright, describing Senator William Fulbright as “a progressive on racial issues.” Fulbright was a full-bore segregationist, voting against the 1957, 1960, 1964, and 1965 civil rights bills.
4. And another lie from the Leftist press: "In a category by itself is the Nineteenth Amendment backing women’s suffrage, voted by Congress in 1919, a move Wilson and others promoted." What can Obama expect from his last Congress?

It was the Republicans who wrestled women's suffrage from the Democrats....over their filibuster.

nice cut and paste

What's wrong with cut and paste?

Every fact provided via that method is accurate and true.

Aren't they.


Anytime you get up the courage to take on any of my posts.....be sure to let me know.

Why do you bother, they wont take it as a fact unless obama or Hillary blows it out their ass in the form of smoke signals

It's my mission!

Certainly true that the drones will never change their affiliations...even if they admit every truth.....but there are others that see how corrupt folks like Leftwinger are.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You post...and I prove you wrong....that's pretty much the Liberal- conservative pattern.

"...the party also distinguished itself by its opposition to slavery, support for an expansion of the rights of women, regulation of industry, and support of measures designed to improve the status of working people."
Stephen Taylor, "Progressive Nativism: The Know-Nothing Party in Massachusetts" Historical Journal of Massachusetts (2000) 28#2 pp 167-84


You must be sooooo embarrassed, huh?

The Know Nothings were 99% anti-immigrant and anti-Catholic. Nobody joined the Know Nothings because they wanted to see women vote

What we would call a Trump voter today

Stephen Taylor, "Progressive Nativism: The Know-Nothing Party in Massachusetts"Historical Journal of Massachusetts (2000) 28#2 pp 167-84



You can run, but you can't hide.


Progressives....the originators of the "Master Race" concept, the ones who advanced Eugenics, and who taught the Nazis.

Yup....you Progressives.

You consider THAT proof?

Never realized academic standards at Columbia are so low


.

and yet, you still didn't qualify to get in.
That's really got to eat at you after a while.

I never could quite master that cut and paste stuff

No wonder....it requires a vast reservoir of knowledge, and being well read and well educated.
More importantly, you could never master that veracity stuff.

 

[PoliticalChic]

and the blacks today are here by choice. There are flights leaving all day every day.
so why after all this time are they still unable to make anything of themselves.

you really should stop lumping all people together based upon your bigotry. the reality is that segregation existed less than 50 years ago. and institutional racism still exists.

but you're a bigot, you'd rather talk about all black people when i'm guessing not a single person of color is your friend.

"...you really should stop lumping all people together based upon your bigotry. the reality is that segregation existed less than 50 years ago."

And let's remember that the bigotry, segregation, and second-class citizenship was entirely fostered by the Democrat Party.
100%

1. 1966- Republican Spiro Agnew ran against Democrat segregationists George Mahoney for governor of Maryland. Agnew enacted some of the first laws in the nation against race discrimination in public housing. “Agnew signed the state's first open-housing laws and succeeded in getting the repeal of an anti-miscegenationlaw.” Spiro Agnew - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2. 1957- Democrat Sam Ervin, another liberal luminary, instrumental in the destruction of anti-communist Republicans Joe McCarthy and Richard Nixon, told his fellow segregationists, and who led the Watergate investigation, said of the 1957 civil rights bill: “We’ve got to give the goddamned ******* something. We’re not gonna be able to get out of here until we’ve got some kind of ****** bill.’ Robert Caro, “Master of the Senate: The Years of Lyndon Johnson,” xv.
3. Here are the lies we’re up against: the Washington Post lies outright, describing Senator William Fulbright as “a progressive on racial issues.” Fulbright was a full-bore segregationist, voting against the 1957, 1960, 1964, and 1965 civil rights bills.
4. And another lie from the Leftist press: "In a category by itself is the Nineteenth Amendment backing women’s suffrage, voted by Congress in 1919, a move Wilson and others promoted." What can Obama expect from his last Congress?

It was the Republicans who wrestled women's suffrage from the Democrats....over their filibuster.

nice cut and paste

What's wrong with cut and paste?

Every fact provided via that method is accurate and true.

Aren't they.


Anytime you get up the courage to take on any of my posts.....be sure to let me know.

Cut and paste is supposed to support your opinion, not substitute for one

Another empty dodge....

You must be trying to portray the method as being a random selection of quotes, sources and linked material.....
...because you are a congenital liar.

But you know it is the result of a carefully constructed thesis leading to an undeniable conclusion.

As you have found.

 

[rightwinger]

you really should stop lumping all people together based upon your bigotry. the reality is that segregation existed less than 50 years ago. and institutional racism still exists.

but you're a bigot, you'd rather talk about all black people when i'm guessing not a single person of color is your friend.

"...you really should stop lumping all people together based upon your bigotry. the reality is that segregation existed less than 50 years ago."

And let's remember that the bigotry, segregation, and second-class citizenship was entirely fostered by the Democrat Party.
100%

1. 1966- Republican Spiro Agnew ran against Democrat segregationists George Mahoney for governor of Maryland. Agnew enacted some of the first laws in the nation against race discrimination in public housing. “Agnew signed the state's first open-housing laws and succeeded in getting the repeal of an anti-miscegenationlaw.” Spiro Agnew - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2. 1957- Democrat Sam Ervin, another liberal luminary, instrumental in the destruction of anti-communist Republicans Joe McCarthy and Richard Nixon, told his fellow segregationists, and who led the Watergate investigation, said of the 1957 civil rights bill: “We’ve got to give the goddamned ******* something. We’re not gonna be able to get out of here until we’ve got some kind of ****** bill.’ Robert Caro, “Master of the Senate: The Years of Lyndon Johnson,” xv.
3. Here are the lies we’re up against: the Washington Post lies outright, describing Senator William Fulbright as “a progressive on racial issues.” Fulbright was a full-bore segregationist, voting against the 1957, 1960, 1964, and 1965 civil rights bills.
4. And another lie from the Leftist press: "In a category by itself is the Nineteenth Amendment backing women’s suffrage, voted by Congress in 1919, a move Wilson and others promoted." What can Obama expect from his last Congress?

It was the Republicans who wrestled women's suffrage from the Democrats....over their filibuster.

nice cut and paste

What's wrong with cut and paste?

Every fact provided via that method is accurate and true.

Aren't they.


Anytime you get up the courage to take on any of my posts.....be sure to let me know.

Cut and paste is supposed to support your opinion, not substitute for one

Another empty dodge....

You must be trying to portray the method as being a random selection of quotes, sources and linked material.....
...because you are a congenital liar.

But you know it is the result of a carefully constructed thesis leading to an undeniable conclusion.

As you have found.

Your posts are at best, tedious

Random deceptive quotes that do nothing to support your point of view.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"...you really should stop lumping all people together based upon your bigotry. the reality is that segregation existed less than 50 years ago."

And let's remember that the bigotry, segregation, and second-class citizenship was entirely fostered by the Democrat Party.
100%

1. 1966- Republican Spiro Agnew ran against Democrat segregationists George Mahoney for governor of Maryland. Agnew enacted some of the first laws in the nation against race discrimination in public housing. “Agnew signed the state's first open-housing laws and succeeded in getting the repeal of an anti-miscegenationlaw.” Spiro Agnew - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2. 1957- Democrat Sam Ervin, another liberal luminary, instrumental in the destruction of anti-communist Republicans Joe McCarthy and Richard Nixon, told his fellow segregationists, and who led the Watergate investigation, said of the 1957 civil rights bill: “We’ve got to give the goddamned ******* something. We’re not gonna be able to get out of here until we’ve got some kind of ****** bill.’ Robert Caro, “Master of the Senate: The Years of Lyndon Johnson,” xv.
3. Here are the lies we’re up against: the Washington Post lies outright, describing Senator William Fulbright as “a progressive on racial issues.” Fulbright was a full-bore segregationist, voting against the 1957, 1960, 1964, and 1965 civil rights bills.
4. And another lie from the Leftist press: "In a category by itself is the Nineteenth Amendment backing women’s suffrage, voted by Congress in 1919, a move Wilson and others promoted." What can Obama expect from his last Congress?

It was the Republicans who wrestled women's suffrage from the Democrats....over their filibuster.

nice cut and paste

What's wrong with cut and paste?

Every fact provided via that method is accurate and true.

Aren't they.


Anytime you get up the courage to take on any of my posts.....be sure to let me know.

Cut and paste is supposed to support your opinion, not substitute for one

Another empty dodge....

You must be trying to portray the method as being a random selection of quotes, sources and linked material.....
...because you are a congenital liar.

But you know it is the result of a carefully constructed thesis leading to an undeniable conclusion.

As you have found.

Your posts are at best, tedious

Random deceptive quotes that do nothing to support your point of view.

I already said you are a congenital liar.....

...what made you imagine you had to prove it?

 

[rightwinger]

nice cut and paste

What's wrong with cut and paste?

Every fact provided via that method is accurate and true.

Aren't they.


Anytime you get up the courage to take on any of my posts.....be sure to let me know.

Cut and paste is supposed to support your opinion, not substitute for one

Another empty dodge....

You must be trying to portray the method as being a random selection of quotes, sources and linked material.....
...because you are a congenital liar.

But you know it is the result of a carefully constructed thesis leading to an undeniable conclusion.

As you have found.

Your posts are at best, tedious

Random deceptive quotes that do nothing to support your point of view.

I already said you are a congenital liar.....

...what made you imagine you had to prove it?

Everything you know about the Irish came off a Lucky Charms box

Why don't you cut and paste that?

 

[Unkotare]

What's wrong with cut and paste?

Every fact provided via that method is accurate and true.

Aren't they.


Anytime you get up the courage to take on any of my posts.....be sure to let me know.

Cut and paste is supposed to support your opinion, not substitute for one

Another empty dodge....

You must be trying to portray the method as being a random selection of quotes, sources and linked material.....
...because you are a congenital liar.

But you know it is the result of a carefully constructed thesis leading to an undeniable conclusion.

As you have found.

Your posts are at best, tedious

Random deceptive quotes that do nothing to support your point of view.

I already said you are a congenital liar.....

...what made you imagine you had to prove it?

Everything you know about the Irish came off a Lucky Charms box

?

Why would you say that?

 

[rightwinger]

Cut and paste is supposed to support your opinion, not substitute for one

Another empty dodge....

You must be trying to portray the method as being a random selection of quotes, sources and linked material.....
...because you are a congenital liar.

But you know it is the result of a carefully constructed thesis leading to an undeniable conclusion.

As you have found.

Your posts are at best, tedious

Random deceptive quotes that do nothing to support your point of view.

I already said you are a congenital liar.....

...what made you imagine you had to prove it?

Everything you know about the Irish came off a Lucky Charms box

?

Why would you say that?

Because if she can't cut and paste, she really can't form any opinion