The House Impeachment Report

[Uncensored2008]

Katz vs US where the court ruled 7-1 Katz had an expectation of privacy on a public pay phone? You meant some other Katz v. US, right?

Yes, that's the one. It's the ruling precedent which allows pen registers to be obtained from phone companies without a warrant. It's been done for decades.

But the Court ruled in favor of Katz 7-1! It's the OPPOSITE of what you say

Katz established the modern test for what constitutes an illegal search and seizure. Basically, when you dial a phone, you transmit the number to the telephone company. You cannot reasonably claim an expectation of privacy for information you have submitted to the telephone company. Therefore a pen register is not covered under the 4th amendment. It's "outside the envelope" type of information.

So Trump can get Schiff and Ciaramellas phone records just by asking? Does he have to say, "please"?

The phone company has to agree to the request. The DoJ issues subpoenas for them all the time.

The DOJ requires a WARRANT, per our Constitution. Is Adam Schitt SUPERIOR TO THE CONSTITUTION?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Phone records of government agencies are public records unless they are classified. Private phone records are not public records and require search warrants.

Then how did that FUCKING CROOK Adam the lying Schitt get the phone records of the President's PRIVATE ATTORNEY and a Journalist?

I know you have terminal TDS, but you're okay with outright shitting all over fundamental civil rights? Is there ANY LAW in this nation, or is the gun the only law now?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

He needs a warrant, which only a judge can issue.

Says who?
Certainly not the SCOTUS (who I am told are judges). They wrote this in Smith v Maryland:

Telephone users, in sum, typically know that they must convey numerical information to the phone company; that the phone company has facilities for recording this information; and that the phone company does in fact record this information for a variety of legitimate business purposes. Although subjective expectations cannot be scientifically gauged, it is too much to believe that telephone subscribers, under these circumstances, harbor any general expectation that the numbers they dial will remain secret.

Phone records are not protected by the 4th amendment.

So Trump, Jr. can get all of Schiff and Biden's phone records...awesome!

Probably not but he can ask. I’m sure the lawyers at ATT will have a blast turning down Jr’s request.

They said yes to Schiff, on what basis can they deny Donald Jr?

Schiff a member of Congress and chairman of the intelligence committee engaging in a government investigation and submitted a subpoena

I don’t think ATT is going to take Junior’s request very seriously.

Who the fuck cares about Schiff's day job? He's not a fucking dictator.

 

[Camp]

Yes, that's the one. It's the ruling precedent which allows pen registers to be obtained from phone companies without a warrant. It's been done for decades.

But the Court ruled in favor of Katz 7-1! It's the OPPOSITE of what you say

Katz established the modern test for what constitutes an illegal search and seizure. Basically, when you dial a phone, you transmit the number to the telephone company. You cannot reasonably claim an expectation of privacy for information you have submitted to the telephone company. Therefore a pen register is not covered under the 4th amendment. It's "outside the envelope" type of information.

So Trump can get Schiff and Ciaramellas phone records just by asking? Does he have to say, "please"?

The phone company has to agree to the request. The DoJ issues subpoenas for them all the time.

The DOJ requires a WARRANT, per our Constitution. Is Adam Schitt SUPERIOR TO THE CONSTITUTION?

Any citizen can request phone records of a government agency (FOIA) without a search warrant.

 

[Uncensored2008]

It's called a subpoena. Schiff issued a subpoena to ATT.

Nothing illegal about it. Read a book.

Comrade, have you even HEARD of the Bill of Rights? Lying Schitt has no power to search the person and papers of US citizens. I get that you're a fucking hack and hate Trump, but do you have such contempt for basic civil rights? Are you fucking kidding?

So listen up shit fer brains, it takes a WARRANT based on PROBABLE CAUSE issued by a JUDGE to access phone records. Can Trump start examining the phone records of Rachel Madcow and Don Lemon? You KNOW they are engaged in illegal acts, so can Trump start digging until he finds a crime? Is that the world you fuckwad Communists REALLY want?

 

[Uncensored2008]

"Talk to Rudy"
Impeachment report: Giuliani spoke to White House, Nunes and OMB at key points in Ukraine campaign

How the FUCK did Lying Schitt get the PHONE RECORDS of the President's personal lawyer and a US Congressman?

Why the FUCK is this crook bastard Schitt not in CUSTODY? This is the MOST OUTRAGEOUS abuse of power and infringement of 4th Amendment rights I've ever seen. PLUS the CROOKED LITTLE FUCK has the phone records of journalist John Solomon? What happened to the 1st Amendment, you fucking traitor bastards?

THIS is the kind of shit you take up arms over. WE HAVE NO FUCKING LAW, Adam Schitt is a scumbag dictator constrained by no law or Constitution.

William Barr, ENFORCE THE FUCKING LAW, or by god we the people will. Arrest this SCHITT now.

It's called a subpoena. Schiff issued a subpoena to ATT.

Nothing illegal about it. Read a book.

Actually you should learn a thing or two. Schitt has NO right to those records as Giuliani and Nunes are NOT being investigated. Thus he has ZERO legal reason to have them. And messing with Solomon will get Schitt in a hell of a lot more trouble than he can handle. Solomon will wipe the deck with him should this get to court. Schitt CAN and SHOULD be arrested for this. But continue to kiss his ass as you clowns get destroyed in 2020.

Giuliani is definitely part of this investigation. Nunes is just an idiot who got caught up in the mess but is going to be subject to an ethics investigation shortly. Solomon is in deep shit. He's been found to be pumping basically propaganda bought and paid for by corrupt Ukrainians. He's been canned from The Hill and is trying to salvage what scraps of credibility he has left.

Schiff isn't in any trouble. He's a Stanford graduate, Harvard law graduate, former federal prosecutor. Nunes is a hayseed. Solomon is a hack. Giuliani has dementia. He'll be fine, mostly because he knows the law and hasn't violated anything. A pen register is not protected by the 4th amendment.

Lying Schitt violated the constitution, both 1st and 4th Amendments. Funny how you fuckwads HOWL about freedom of the press, until one of your thugs shits all over it. Schitt is directly infringing freedom of the press by harassing journalists who report negatively on his criminal acts. Schitt engaged in illegal search and seizure - oh and BTW, the little fucker is NOT a law enforcement officer, he has ZERO authority to investigate private citizens. Schitt crossed the line from merely sleazy to criminal this time.

AG Barr, do your FUCKING JOB and arrest this pile of shit. What charge? Abuse of power, malicious prosecution, espionage, violation of civil rights.

 

[Uncensored2008]

But the Court ruled in favor of Katz 7-1! It's the OPPOSITE of what you say

Katz established the modern test for what constitutes an illegal search and seizure. Basically, when you dial a phone, you transmit the number to the telephone company. You cannot reasonably claim an expectation of privacy for information you have submitted to the telephone company. Therefore a pen register is not covered under the 4th amendment. It's "outside the envelope" type of information.

So Trump can get Schiff and Ciaramellas phone records just by asking? Does he have to say, "please"?

The phone company has to agree to the request. The DoJ issues subpoenas for them all the time.

The DOJ requires a WARRANT, per our Constitution. Is Adam Schitt SUPERIOR TO THE CONSTITUTION?

Any citizen can request phone records of a government agency (FOIA) without a search warrant.

Journalist John Solomon is NOT a government agency. Private Attorney Rudy Guilliani is NOT a government agency.

What ever happened to the leftist of yesteryear that defended civil rights? You TRULY support and promote a police state.

 

[Uncensored2008]

I hope you get the chance to confront Schiff in a courtroom some day. Be sure to let me know.

Before that happens, perhaps you could start learning about basics of US law. You’ve got some catching up to do.

Schitt is a lawless little fuck. He is a crook, a criminal, and a traitor. Courts are worthless when there is no law. He needs to be confronted on the field of battle which is where things are hashed out once law is jettisoned, as it has now been.

 

[MisterBeale]

Washington saw Trump

Report | Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence

"In his farewell address, President George Washington warned of a moment when 'cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.'

"The Framers of the Constitution well understood that an individual could one day occupy the Office of the President who would place his personal or political interests above those of the nation.

"Having just won hard-fought independence from a King with unbridled authority, they were attuned to the dangers of an executive who lacked fealty to the law and the Constitution."

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Washington saw Trump

Report | Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence

"In his farewell address, President George Washington warned of a moment when 'cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.'

"The Framers of the Constitution well understood that an individual could one day occupy the Office of the President who would place his personal or political interests above those of the nation.

"Having just won hard-fought independence from a King with unbridled authority, they were attuned to the dangers of an executive who lacked fealty to the law and the Constitution."

Yes Washington was warning America about leftist democrats
He would have shot and killed every traitorous bastard

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Report | Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence

"The impeachment inquiry into Donald J. Trump, the 45th President of the United States, uncovered a months-long effort by President Trump to use the powers of his office to solicit foreign interference on his behalf in the 2020 election.

"As described in this executive summary and the report that follows, President Trump’s scheme subverted U.S. foreign policy toward Ukraine and undermined our national security in favor of two politically motivated investigations that would help his presidential reelection campaign.

"The President demanded that the newly-elected Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky, publicly announce investigations into a political rival that he apparently feared the most, former Vice President Joe Biden, and into a discredited theory that it was Ukraine, not Russia, that interfered in the 2016 presidential election.

"To compel the Ukrainian President to do his political bidding, President Trump conditioned two official acts on the public announcement of the investigations: a coveted White House visit and critical U.S. military assistance Ukraine needed to fight its Russian adversary.

"During a July 25, 2019, call between President Trump and President Zelensky, President Zelensky expressed gratitude for U.S. military assistance.

"President Trump immediately responded by asking President Zelensky to 'do us a favor though' and openly pressed for Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Biden and the 2016 conspiracy theory.

"In turn, President Zelensky assured President Trump that he would pursue the investigation and reiterated his interest in the White House meeting.

"Although President Trump’s scheme intentionally bypassed many career personnel, it was undertaken with the knowledge and approval of senior Administration officials, including the President’s Acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and Secretary of Energy Rick Perry.

"In fact, at a press conference weeks after public revelations about the scheme, Mr. Mulvaney publicly acknowledged that the President directly tied the hold on military aid to his desire to get Ukraine to conduct a political investigation, telling Americans to 'get over it.'

"President Trump and his senior officials may see nothing wrong with using the power of the Office of the President to pressure a foreign country to help the President’s reelection campaign. Indeed, President Trump continues to encourage Ukraine and other foreign countries to engage in the same kind of election interference today.

"However, the Founding Fathers prescribed a remedy for a chief executive who places his personal interests above those of the country: impeachment.

"Accordingly, as part of the House of Representatives’ impeachment inquiry, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, in coordination with the Committees on Oversight and Reform and Foreign Affairs, were compelled to undertake a serious, sober, and expeditious investigation into whether the President’s misconduct warrants that remedy.

"In response, President Trump engaged in an unprecedented campaign of obstruction of this impeachment inquiry.

"Nevertheless, due in large measure to patriotic and courageous public servants who provided the Committees with direct evidence of the President’s actions, the Committees uncovered significant misconduct on the part of the President of the United States.

"As required under House Resolution 660, the Intelligence Committee, in consultation with the Committees on Oversight and Reform and Foreign Affairs, has prepared this report to detail the evidence uncovered to date, which will now be transmitted to the Judiciary Committee for its consideration.

"Preface

• Executive Summary

• Key Findings of Fact

• Report

"RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

"The President’s Request for a Political Favor | The President Removed Anti-Corruption Champion Ambassador Yovanovitch | The President’s Hand-picked Agents Begin the Scheme | President Trump Froze Vital Military Assistance | The President Conditioned a White House Meeting on Investigations | The President’s Agents Pursued a “Drug Deal” | President Trump Pressed President Zelensky to Do a Political Favor | The President’s Representatives Ratcheted up Pressure on the Ukrainian President | Ukrainians Inquired about the President’s Hold on Security Assistance | The President’s Security Assistance Hold Became Public | The President’s Scheme Unraveled | The President’s Chief of Staff Confirmed Aid was Conditioned on Investigations"

From your link:

President Trump’s scheme subverted U.S. foreign policy toward Ukraine

Hey Dumbass, the President sets foreign policy, so explain how he can "subvert foreign policy".

I'll wait for your answer........

Hey Dumbass, the President sets foreign policy, so explain how he can "subvert foreign policy".

I'll wait for your answer........

By withholding foreign aid in exchange for political dirt on a possible political rival, or do you imagine presidents are above the law?

Joe Biden's asshole just tightened up because he did that very thing and bragged about it.
According to witnesses Trump never wanted nor did he ask for or get a quid pro quo

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Report | Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence

"The impeachment inquiry into Donald J. Trump, the 45th President of the United States, uncovered a months-long effort by President Trump to use the powers of his office to solicit foreign interference on his behalf in the 2020 election.

"As described in this executive summary and the report that follows, President Trump’s scheme subverted U.S. foreign policy toward Ukraine and undermined our national security in favor of two politically motivated investigations that would help his presidential reelection campaign.

"The President demanded that the newly-elected Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky, publicly announce investigations into a political rival that he apparently feared the most, former Vice President Joe Biden, and into a discredited theory that it was Ukraine, not Russia, that interfered in the 2016 presidential election.

"To compel the Ukrainian President to do his political bidding, President Trump conditioned two official acts on the public announcement of the investigations: a coveted White House visit and critical U.S. military assistance Ukraine needed to fight its Russian adversary.

"During a July 25, 2019, call between President Trump and President Zelensky, President Zelensky expressed gratitude for U.S. military assistance.

"President Trump immediately responded by asking President Zelensky to 'do us a favor though' and openly pressed for Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Biden and the 2016 conspiracy theory.

"In turn, President Zelensky assured President Trump that he would pursue the investigation and reiterated his interest in the White House meeting.

"Although President Trump’s scheme intentionally bypassed many career personnel, it was undertaken with the knowledge and approval of senior Administration officials, including the President’s Acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and Secretary of Energy Rick Perry.

"In fact, at a press conference weeks after public revelations about the scheme, Mr. Mulvaney publicly acknowledged that the President directly tied the hold on military aid to his desire to get Ukraine to conduct a political investigation, telling Americans to 'get over it.'

"President Trump and his senior officials may see nothing wrong with using the power of the Office of the President to pressure a foreign country to help the President’s reelection campaign. Indeed, President Trump continues to encourage Ukraine and other foreign countries to engage in the same kind of election interference today.

"However, the Founding Fathers prescribed a remedy for a chief executive who places his personal interests above those of the country: impeachment.

"Accordingly, as part of the House of Representatives’ impeachment inquiry, the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, in coordination with the Committees on Oversight and Reform and Foreign Affairs, were compelled to undertake a serious, sober, and expeditious investigation into whether the President’s misconduct warrants that remedy.

"In response, President Trump engaged in an unprecedented campaign of obstruction of this impeachment inquiry.

"Nevertheless, due in large measure to patriotic and courageous public servants who provided the Committees with direct evidence of the President’s actions, the Committees uncovered significant misconduct on the part of the President of the United States.

"As required under House Resolution 660, the Intelligence Committee, in consultation with the Committees on Oversight and Reform and Foreign Affairs, has prepared this report to detail the evidence uncovered to date, which will now be transmitted to the Judiciary Committee for its consideration.

"Preface

• Executive Summary

• Key Findings of Fact

• Report

"RETURN TO TABLE OF CONTENTS

"The President’s Request for a Political Favor | The President Removed Anti-Corruption Champion Ambassador Yovanovitch | The President’s Hand-picked Agents Begin the Scheme | President Trump Froze Vital Military Assistance | The President Conditioned a White House Meeting on Investigations | The President’s Agents Pursued a “Drug Deal” | President Trump Pressed President Zelensky to Do a Political Favor | The President’s Representatives Ratcheted up Pressure on the Ukrainian President | Ukrainians Inquired about the President’s Hold on Security Assistance | The President’s Security Assistance Hold Became Public | The President’s Scheme Unraveled | The President’s Chief of Staff Confirmed Aid was Conditioned on Investigations"

From your link:

President Trump’s scheme subverted U.S. foreign policy toward Ukraine

Hey Dumbass, the President sets foreign policy, so explain how he can "subvert foreign policy".

I'll wait for your answer........

I have your answer.

He took US foreign policy, which is intended to be for the benefit of the country and instead used it for his own personal benefit.

Subversion.

What was that personal benefit?

Oh, the same personal benefit found in all of the evidence that the House Intel Committee apparently forgot is inadmissible or doesn't exist?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I don't see anything suspicious about phone calls between people who all work together. Furthermore, Schiff violated the 4th Amendment. How did he get these phone records? Its illegal for him to have them without a warrant.

Not illegal at all. There is no expectation of privacy when it comes to phone call records. This was decided decades ago in the SCOTUS decision Katz v United States.

Your interpretation of the decision is dead wrong.


Held:

1. The Government's eavesdropping activities violated the privacy upon which petitioner justifiably relied while using the telephone booth, and thus constituted a "search and seizure" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. Pp. 389 U. S. 350-353.

(a) The Fourth Amendment governs not only the seizure of tangible items, but extends as well to the recording of oral statements. Silverman v. United States, 365 U. S. 505, 365 U. S. 511. P. 389 U. S. 353.

(b) Because the Fourth Amendment protects people, rather than places, its reach cannot turn on the presence or absence of a physical intrusion into any given enclosure. The "trespass" doctrine of Olmstead v. United States, 277 U. S. 438, and Goldman v. United States, 316 U. S. 129, is no longer controlling. Pp. 389 U. S. 351, 389 U. S. 353.

2. Although the surveillance in this case may have been so narrowly circumscribed that it could constitutionally have been authorized in advance, it was not in fact conducted pursuant to the warrant procedure which is a constitutional precondition of such electronic surveillance. Pp. 389 U. S. 354-359.

369 F.2d 130, reversed.

Page 389 U. S. 348

Katz v. United States, 389 U.S. 347 (1967)

I guess you have not been reading long. Stay in elementary school and they will help you learn.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I don't see anything suspicious about phone calls between people who all work together. Furthermore, Schiff violated the 4th Amendment. How did he get these phone records? Its illegal for him to have them without a warrant.

Not illegal at all. There is no expectation of privacy when it comes to phone call records. This was decided decades ago in the SCOTUS decision Katz v United States.

So Trump can pull all of Bidens, Obama, Comey, Brennan and Clapper's phone logs. Sweet! Emails and text too, right?

All he has to do is instruct his DOJ to get his phone records. Emails and texts no, that content would actually require a warrant.

I double dog dare Trump to do it. Cmon. Do it.

Your own cited court case says otherwise, dumbass!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I don't see anything suspicious about phone calls between people who all work together. Furthermore, Schiff violated the 4th Amendment. How did he get these phone records? Its illegal for him to have them without a warrant.

Not illegal at all. There is no expectation of privacy when it comes to phone call records. This was decided decades ago in the SCOTUS decision Katz v United States.

Katz vs US where the court ruled 7-1 Katz had an expectation of privacy on a public pay phone? You meant some other Katz v. US, right?

Yes, that's the one. It's the ruling precedent which allows pen registers to be obtained from phone companies without a warrant. It's been done for decades.

But the Court ruled in favor of Katz 7-1! It's the OPPOSITE of what you say

Katz established the modern test for what constitutes an illegal search and seizure. Basically, when you dial a phone, you transmit the number to the telephone company. You cannot reasonably claim an expectation of privacy for information you have submitted to the telephone company. Therefore a pen register is not covered under the 4th amendment. It's "outside the envelope" type of information.

Read my post containing the summary of the what SCOTUS held. You are 100% backwards, dumbass!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I don't see anything suspicious about phone calls between people who all work together. Furthermore, Schiff violated the 4th Amendment. How did he get these phone records? Its illegal for him to have them without a warrant.

Not illegal at all. There is no expectation of privacy when it comes to phone call records. This was decided decades ago in the SCOTUS decision Katz v United States.

I think there is. The police can't get them without a warrant. The court ruled in Katz's favor, which is exactly the opposite of what you assumed.

Katz v. United States - Wikipedia​

In December 1967, the Supreme Court issued a 7–1 decision in Katz's favor and overturned his conviction. Its decision significantly redefined the law governing the Fourth Amendment's protections, which was previously limited to the searches and seizures of individuals' "persons, houses, papers, and effects" spoken of in the Amendment, and was traditionally understood to require an actual "trespass" or other physical intrusion by law enforcement officers. The Court expanded the Amendment's protections beyond these traditional areas, stating that "what [a person] seeks to preserve as private, even in an area accessible to the public, may be constitutionally protected." In an influential concurring opinion included in the decision, Justice John Marshall Harlan II interpreted the Court's opinion to require claims of Fourth Amendment protection to pass a two-part test: "first that a person have exhibited an actual (subjective) expectation of privacy and, second, that the expectation be one that society is prepared to recognize as 'reasonable.'"​

You don't have an expectation of privacy when it comes to identifying who you dialed and when.

Edit to add; The actual precedent is Smith v Maryland. My bad.

The Katz ruling says otherwise, dumbass!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

How the FUCK did Lying Schitt get the PHONE RECORDS of the President's personal lawyer and a US Congressman?

Why the FUCK is this crook bastard Schitt not in CUSTODY? This is the MOST OUTRAGEOUS abuse of power and infringement of 4th Amendment rights I've ever seen. PLUS the CROOKED LITTLE FUCK has the phone records of journalist John Solomon? What happened to the 1st Amendment, you fucking traitor bastards?

THIS is the kind of shit you take up arms over. WE HAVE NO FUCKING LAW, Adam Schitt is a scumbag dictator constrained by no law or Constitution.

William Barr, ENFORCE THE FUCKING LAW, or by god we the people will. Arrest this SCHITT now.

It's called a subpoena. Schiff issued a subpoena to ATT.

Nothing illegal about it. Read a book.

He needs a warrant, which only a judge can issue.

Says who?
Certainly not the SCOTUS (who I am told are judges). They wrote this in Smith v Maryland:

Telephone users, in sum, typically know that they must convey numerical information to the phone company; that the phone company has facilities for recording this information; and that the phone company does in fact record this information for a variety of legitimate business purposes. Although subjective expectations cannot be scientifically gauged, it is too much to believe that telephone subscribers, under these circumstances, harbor any general expectation that the numbers they dial will remain secret.

Phone records are not protected by the 4th amendment.

They sure as hell are, moron.

Says who?

The court decision that you apparently never read says so!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

How the FUCK did Lying Schitt get the PHONE RECORDS of the President's personal lawyer and a US Congressman?

Why the FUCK is this crook bastard Schitt not in CUSTODY? This is the MOST OUTRAGEOUS abuse of power and infringement of 4th Amendment rights I've ever seen. PLUS the CROOKED LITTLE FUCK has the phone records of journalist John Solomon? What happened to the 1st Amendment, you fucking traitor bastards?

THIS is the kind of shit you take up arms over. WE HAVE NO FUCKING LAW, Adam Schitt is a scumbag dictator constrained by no law or Constitution.

William Barr, ENFORCE THE FUCKING LAW, or by god we the people will. Arrest this SCHITT now.

It's called a subpoena. Schiff issued a subpoena to ATT.

Nothing illegal about it. Read a book.

Actually you should learn a thing or two. Schitt has NO right to those records as Giuliani and Nunes are NOT being investigated. Thus he has ZERO legal reason to have them. And messing with Solomon will get Schitt in a hell of a lot more trouble than he can handle. Solomon will wipe the deck with him should this get to court. Schitt CAN and SHOULD be arrested for this. But continue to kiss his ass as you clowns get destroyed in 2020.

Giuliani is definitely part of this investigation. Nunes is just an idiot who got caught up in the mess but is going to be subject to an ethics investigation shortly. Solomon is in deep shit. He's been found to be pumping basically propaganda bought and paid for by corrupt Ukrainians. He's been canned from The Hill and is trying to salvage what scraps of credibility he has left.

Schiff isn't in any trouble. He's a Stanford graduate, Harvard law graduate, former federal prosecutor. Nunes is a hayseed. Solomon is a hack. Giuliani has dementia. He'll be fine, mostly because he knows the law and hasn't violated anything. A pen register is not protected by the 4th amendment.

You're a delusional idiot. You will say anything to defend Schiff and his kangaroo court. If anyone is in trouble, it's Schiff. He has already committed perjury dozens of times. That will come to light when he is sitting in the hot seat during the Senate trial.

I can’t tell if this is satire or if you actually are this dumb.

Schiff can’t commit perjury if he isn’t under oath. He hasn’t been under oath. He’s not going to be called as a witness in the Senate Trial. This isn’t a kangaroo court, it’s an investigation and quite successful despite Trump’s clear obstruction of Constitutional Congressional powers.

He most certainly will be called in a Senate trial. You can take that to the bank. Hos conflicting statements regarding the whistle blower's contacts with him or his staff are evidence of his collusion with him or her to prompt the inquiry.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Actually you should learn a thing or two. Schitt has NO right to those records as Giuliani and Nunes are NOT being investigated. Thus he has ZERO legal reason to have them. And messing with Solomon will get Schitt in a hell of a lot more trouble than he can handle. Solomon will wipe the deck with him should this get to court. Schitt CAN and SHOULD be arrested for this. But continue to kiss his ass as you clowns get destroyed in 2020.

Giuliani is definitely part of this investigation. Nunes is just an idiot who got caught up in the mess but is going to be subject to an ethics investigation shortly. Solomon is in deep shit. He's been found to be pumping basically propaganda bought and paid for by corrupt Ukrainians. He's been canned from The Hill and is trying to salvage what scraps of credibility he has left.

Schiff isn't in any trouble. He's a Stanford graduate, Harvard law graduate, former federal prosecutor. Nunes is a hayseed. Solomon is a hack. Giuliani has dementia. He'll be fine, mostly because he knows the law and hasn't violated anything. A pen register is not protected by the 4th amendment.

You're a delusional idiot. You will say anything to defend Schiff and his kangaroo court. If anyone is in trouble, it's Schiff. He has already committed perjury dozens of times. That will come to light when he is sitting in the hot seat during the Senate trial.

I can’t tell if this is satire or if you actually are this dumb.

Schiff can’t commit perjury if he isn’t under oath. He hasn’t been under oath. He’s not going to be called as a witness in the Senate Trial. This isn’t a kangaroo court, it’s an investigation and quite successful despite Trump’s clear obstruction of Constitutional Congressional powers.

He most certainly is going to be called as a witness in the Senate trial. What makes you believe the Republicans won't do it? The so-called "whistleblower" will also be called. The Senate is where we will learn how this whole sordid plot to overthrow a lawfully elected president was conjured up and hatched.

For starters, I find it hard to believe a member of Congress is going to be called to testify in a congressional proceeding. Second, Schiff is not a fact witness to anything relevant to an impeachment. He had nothing to do with whether or not Trump abused his office. Schiff’s testimony has no relevance.

And most importantly, Republicans won’t call Schiff because that would make Nunes fair game. As we can see now, Nunes is a part of the conspiracy.

So the Democrats will not call Nunes? Bullshit! Please lay off whatever substance you are abusing. No one can be this stupid without outside help.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

But the Court ruled in favor of Katz 7-1! It's the OPPOSITE of what you say

Katz established the modern test for what constitutes an illegal search and seizure. Basically, when you dial a phone, you transmit the number to the telephone company. You cannot reasonably claim an expectation of privacy for information you have submitted to the telephone company. Therefore a pen register is not covered under the 4th amendment. It's "outside the envelope" type of information.

So Trump can get Schiff and Ciaramellas phone records just by asking? Does he have to say, "please"?

The phone company has to agree to the request. The DoJ issues subpoenas for them all the time.

The DOJ requires a WARRANT, per our Constitution. Is Adam Schitt SUPERIOR TO THE CONSTITUTION?

Any citizen can request phone records of a government agency (FOIA) without a search warrant.

The democrat Party went down sucking Stalins nuts