The Hare-Brained Three-Hop Plot Against Trump

[Terri4Trump]

But I'm always right.

Me too. Let's start a club.

 

[IM2]

…or, the Deep State attack on Trump.
In 9 posts in this thread, the full story of the last three year.



Let’s put it this way: Difference between Watergate and the Obama Spying?
Watergate was a failed attempt by a political party to spy on their political enemies.



1.The Deep State cannot allow an outsider to insinuate his way into their fiefdom, and block their system of spinning straw into gold….the worthless becoming millionaires. And Trump is the quintessential outsider….even, disrupter.
The exposure of the Biden Crime Family and their selling out our government for beaucoup bucks has revealed how so many politicians go to Washington to do good, and wind up doing well.

Can you say ‘Clintons…’


2.Not only was the Deep State, and everyone associated with it, in a huddle even before Trump was elected…but they were so confident of Hillary’s election, that they didn’t feel the need to hide it.

October 25, 2016...”NYTimes gave Hillary 93% chance of winning the election.”
2016 Election Forecast: Who Will Be President?


Schumer Warns Trump: Intel Community Has Many Ways to 'Get Back at You'





“Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails “A text message sent by former FBI agent Peter Strzok to Lisa Page, a former FBI lawyer with whom Strzok was having an affair, in August 2016 that mentioned an "insurance policy" has long been a subject of concern among Republican investigators who believe there could have been a plot to undermine then-candidate Donald Trump.”
Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails




3. Hop #1
This was the plan….and mighty successful it was.

First, pick a target. Trump had several unknowns who gravitated to his campaign and the one they picked was Carter Page. Page had some legit business with Russians, and the Deep State think tank needed to use that Russian connection, no matter how peripheral, to hand around Trump’s neck.

Two considerations: 1) Page was squeaky clean, and had even worked for one of the agencies providing info on Russia to our government, and 2) the need for the cover of a warrant.


Next… how easily both considerations were covered.

Translation. Another pack of lies.

There is no deep state. You couldn't sell that in a James Bond picture. Yet Trump supporters have no problems with it as it allows you people to ignore reality. That all of Trump's problems are self-inflicted.

There is no Biden crime family. Trump has used his Presidency to line his pockets. His Presidency and his businesses are fused together into a money making enterprise.

There was no insurance policy. Strzok was clearly joking. You ignore the fact that Strzok also supported re-opening the investigation into Clinton's e-mails the few weeks before the election. He was hardly a partisan.

There is a huge problem with Page. He was not connected with the Trump campaign when they sought the warrant to monitor Page. Page had extensive ties to Russia.

"There is no deep state."

I never lie....and I'll make you a tool, to prove it.


"Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump

A large cast of characters ranging from presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, CIA Director John Brennan, current deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, senior Justice Department Official Bruce Ohr and his wife and sometime CIA asset, Nellie Ohr, FBI Director James Comey, FBI attorney Lisa Page, FBI official Peter Strzok, and, of course, Andrew McCabe, took part.

Deep State's Anti-Trump Collusion
They all worked together to undermine Trump...

And they lied about it. Or kept quiet about it. Or misrepresented what they did, even to the Foreign Intelligence Security Court. That is real obstruction of justice. And a real conspiracy."
Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump | Investor's Business Daily



That's your strike one.

The village idiot posts a thread then makes clains based upon informatoon she gets from right wing websites that have zero credibility. Take the quoted post for example, she takes a link from IBT and runs off at the mouth about how that proves there is a deep state. Except IBT is a bullshit right wing fake propaganda website that has consistently failed fact check after fact check.

Overall, we would rate Investors Business Daily Right Biased based on right leaning economic and market positions. We would also give them a High factual rating on strictly investing and market news. However, editorially IBT is clearly a Questionable source with promotion of right wing conspiracy theories and numerous failed fact checks.

Analysis / Bias

In review, Investors Business Daily primarily reports on economics, markets and investing. They also report on politics, especially through their editorial section with a very strong right wing bias. There is moderate use of loaded language in their articles that significantly favors the right, such as this: Democratic Socialism: Who Knew That ‘Free’ Could Cost So Much? For the most part IBD sources their market information to credible mainstream and government websites, however they occasionally utilize factually mixed sources such as the Daily Signal.

Investors Business Daily strays from the consensus of science in regards to climate change and they have made outrageous and false claims, such as Stephen Hawking would be dead if he lived under England’s Government health care system. This is a false propaganda statement as Stephen Hawking is a citizen of the UK and lives there. Hawking claims the British Healthcare system saved his life and kept him alive to old age.

A factual search reveals numerous failed fact checks by IFCN fact checkers. Here are a few of the many we found:

• IBD editorial board claims that cap-and-trade is unpopular in America – FALSE
• Private health insurance not banned on page 16 of the House bill – PANTS ON FIRE
• Investor’s Business Daily editorial misrepresents study to claim plants will prevent dangerous climate change – FALSE
• Was it recently revealed that the U.S. found uranium in Iraq after the invasion in 2003 – FALSE

Every thread she starts, it the same thing. A bunch of ludicrous, unfounded, debunked bullshit. When called on it she goes to the loony chamber and digs up some far right retardation, then claims she is never wrong.

 

[Oldstyle]

…or, the Deep State attack on Trump.
In 9 posts in this thread, the full story of the last three year.



Let’s put it this way: Difference between Watergate and the Obama Spying?
Watergate was a failed attempt by a political party to spy on their political enemies.



1.The Deep State cannot allow an outsider to insinuate his way into their fiefdom, and block their system of spinning straw into gold….the worthless becoming millionaires. And Trump is the quintessential outsider….even, disrupter.
The exposure of the Biden Crime Family and their selling out our government for beaucoup bucks has revealed how so many politicians go to Washington to do good, and wind up doing well.

Can you say ‘Clintons…’


2.Not only was the Deep State, and everyone associated with it, in a huddle even before Trump was elected…but they were so confident of Hillary’s election, that they didn’t feel the need to hide it.

October 25, 2016...”NYTimes gave Hillary 93% chance of winning the election.”
2016 Election Forecast: Who Will Be President?


Schumer Warns Trump: Intel Community Has Many Ways to 'Get Back at You'





“Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails “A text message sent by former FBI agent Peter Strzok to Lisa Page, a former FBI lawyer with whom Strzok was having an affair, in August 2016 that mentioned an "insurance policy" has long been a subject of concern among Republican investigators who believe there could have been a plot to undermine then-candidate Donald Trump.”
Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails




3. Hop #1
This was the plan….and mighty successful it was.

First, pick a target. Trump had several unknowns who gravitated to his campaign and the one they picked was Carter Page. Page had some legit business with Russians, and the Deep State think tank needed to use that Russian connection, no matter how peripheral, to hand around Trump’s neck.

Two considerations: 1) Page was squeaky clean, and had even worked for one of the agencies providing info on Russia to our government, and 2) the need for the cover of a warrant.


Next… how easily both considerations were covered.

Translation. Another pack of lies.

There is no deep state. You couldn't sell that in a James Bond picture. Yet Trump supporters have no problems with it as it allows you people to ignore reality. That all of Trump's problems are self-inflicted.

There is no Biden crime family. Trump has used his Presidency to line his pockets. His Presidency and his businesses are fused together into a money making enterprise.

There was no insurance policy. Strzok was clearly joking. You ignore the fact that Strzok also supported re-opening the investigation into Clinton's e-mails the few weeks before the election. He was hardly a partisan.

There is a huge problem with Page. He was not connected with the Trump campaign when they sought the warrant to monitor Page. Page had extensive ties to Russia.

Strzok was clearly "joking"? Seriously? Did you catch his testimony? I can't think of a more humorless guy than Peter Strzok! He wasn't joking. He was dead serious when he told his lover that Trump couldn't be elected because they HAD an insurance policy to prevent that! His actions show that. Stop trying to excuse the inexcusable. The Democrats used the FBI, the CIA and the FISA Court to spy on their political opposition! They falsified documents to obtain the FISA warrants using Carter Page as the "conduit" to spy on the Trump campaign itself! It's a crime far worse than anything Tricky Dick Nixon EVER did!

 

[PoliticalChic]

…or, the Deep State attack on Trump.
In 9 posts in this thread, the full story of the last three year.



Let’s put it this way: Difference between Watergate and the Obama Spying?
Watergate was a failed attempt by a political party to spy on their political enemies.



1.The Deep State cannot allow an outsider to insinuate his way into their fiefdom, and block their system of spinning straw into gold….the worthless becoming millionaires. And Trump is the quintessential outsider….even, disrupter.
The exposure of the Biden Crime Family and their selling out our government for beaucoup bucks has revealed how so many politicians go to Washington to do good, and wind up doing well.

Can you say ‘Clintons…’


2.Not only was the Deep State, and everyone associated with it, in a huddle even before Trump was elected…but they were so confident of Hillary’s election, that they didn’t feel the need to hide it.

October 25, 2016...”NYTimes gave Hillary 93% chance of winning the election.”
2016 Election Forecast: Who Will Be President?


Schumer Warns Trump: Intel Community Has Many Ways to 'Get Back at You'





“Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails “A text message sent by former FBI agent Peter Strzok to Lisa Page, a former FBI lawyer with whom Strzok was having an affair, in August 2016 that mentioned an "insurance policy" has long been a subject of concern among Republican investigators who believe there could have been a plot to undermine then-candidate Donald Trump.”
Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails




3. Hop #1
This was the plan….and mighty successful it was.

First, pick a target. Trump had several unknowns who gravitated to his campaign and the one they picked was Carter Page. Page had some legit business with Russians, and the Deep State think tank needed to use that Russian connection, no matter how peripheral, to hand around Trump’s neck.

Two considerations: 1) Page was squeaky clean, and had even worked for one of the agencies providing info on Russia to our government, and 2) the need for the cover of a warrant.


Next… how easily both considerations were covered.

Translation. Another pack of lies.

There is no deep state. You couldn't sell that in a James Bond picture. Yet Trump supporters have no problems with it as it allows you people to ignore reality. That all of Trump's problems are self-inflicted.

There is no Biden crime family. Trump has used his Presidency to line his pockets. His Presidency and his businesses are fused together into a money making enterprise.

There was no insurance policy. Strzok was clearly joking. You ignore the fact that Strzok also supported re-opening the investigation into Clinton's e-mails the few weeks before the election. He was hardly a partisan.

There is a huge problem with Page. He was not connected with the Trump campaign when they sought the warrant to monitor Page. Page had extensive ties to Russia.

"There is no deep state."

I never lie....and I'll make you a tool, to prove it.


"Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump

A large cast of characters ranging from presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, CIA Director John Brennan, current deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, senior Justice Department Official Bruce Ohr and his wife and sometime CIA asset, Nellie Ohr, FBI Director James Comey, FBI attorney Lisa Page, FBI official Peter Strzok, and, of course, Andrew McCabe, took part.

Deep State's Anti-Trump Collusion
They all worked together to undermine Trump...

And they lied about it. Or kept quiet about it. Or misrepresented what they did, even to the Foreign Intelligence Security Court. That is real obstruction of justice. And a real conspiracy."
Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump | Investor's Business Daily



That's your strike one.

The village idiot posts a thread then makes clains based upon informatoon she gets from right wing websites that have zero credibility. Take the quoted post for example, she takes a link from IBT and runs off at the mouth about how that proves there is a deep state. Except IBT is a bullshit right wing fake propaganda website that has consistently failed fact check after fact check.

Overall, we would rate Investors Business Daily Right Biased based on right leaning economic and market positions. We would also give them a High factual rating on strictly investing and market news. However, editorially IBT is clearly a Questionable source with promotion of right wing conspiracy theories and numerous failed fact checks.

Analysis / Bias

In review, Investors Business Daily primarily reports on economics, markets and investing. They also report on politics, especially through their editorial section with a very strong right wing bias. There is moderate use of loaded language in their articles that significantly favors the right, such as this: Democratic Socialism: Who Knew That ‘Free’ Could Cost So Much? For the most part IBD sources their market information to credible mainstream and government websites, however they occasionally utilize factually mixed sources such as the Daily Signal.

Investors Business Daily strays from the consensus of science in regards to climate change and they have made outrageous and false claims, such as Stephen Hawking would be dead if he lived under England’s Government health care system. This is a false propaganda statement as Stephen Hawking is a citizen of the UK and lives there. Hawking claims the British Healthcare system saved his life and kept him alive to old age.

A factual search reveals numerous failed fact checks by IFCN fact checkers. Here are a few of the many we found:

• IBD editorial board claims that cap-and-trade is unpopular in America – FALSE
• Private health insurance not banned on page 16 of the House bill – PANTS ON FIRE
• Investor’s Business Daily editorial misrepresents study to claim plants will prevent dangerous climate change – FALSE
• Was it recently revealed that the U.S. found uranium in Iraq after the invasion in 2003 – FALSE

Every thread she starts, it the same thing. A bunch of ludicrous, unfounded, debunked bullshit. When called on it she goes to the loony chamber and digs up some far right retardation, then claims she is never wrong.

From your quote:
"... Investors Business Daily Right Biased based on right leaning economic and market positions."


What you fail to understand is that there is no demarcation between these and politics.....

Antonio Gramsci, Italian Marxist theoretician and founding member and one-time leader of the Communist Party of Italy. Gramsci’s motto is that of liberals today: “that all life is "political."

....hence they are equally correct in their Rightwing views.



It takes a certain bottom-of-the-barrel fool to deny that there is a Deep State, as the nation has learned via these last three years.
Raise your paw.



Here, from the former CIA Moscow Station head...


1. ".... the denizens of the Deep State that everyone in Washington likes to tell us doesn’t exist....made up of thousands of similarly credentialed, remarkably “un-diverse” civil servants and political appointees who saw themselves promoted rapidly during the eight years of the Obama administration. The appointees have left, but make no mistake — the progressive civil servants remain.


2. The present culture of the intelligence community and the shameless political shenanigans of the Obama administration combined to create this disaster. ....CIA leadership famously stood up to the Nixon administration when asked to domestically spy on Justice during Watergate, for example.

3. It seems that today we lack the character and the competence to ensure that the intelligence community honors the trust of the American people."
How the intel community was turned into a political weapon against President Trump

 

[CrusaderFrank]

…or, the Deep State attack on Trump.
In 9 posts in this thread, the full story of the last three year.



Let’s put it this way: Difference between Watergate and the Obama Spying?
Watergate was a failed attempt by a political party to spy on their political enemies.



1.The Deep State cannot allow an outsider to insinuate his way into their fiefdom, and block their system of spinning straw into gold….the worthless becoming millionaires. And Trump is the quintessential outsider….even, disrupter.
The exposure of the Biden Crime Family and their selling out our government for beaucoup bucks has revealed how so many politicians go to Washington to do good, and wind up doing well.

Can you say ‘Clintons…’


2.Not only was the Deep State, and everyone associated with it, in a huddle even before Trump was elected…but they were so confident of Hillary’s election, that they didn’t feel the need to hide it.

October 25, 2016...”NYTimes gave Hillary 93% chance of winning the election.”
2016 Election Forecast: Who Will Be President?


Schumer Warns Trump: Intel Community Has Many Ways to 'Get Back at You'





“Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails “A text message sent by former FBI agent Peter Strzok to Lisa Page, a former FBI lawyer with whom Strzok was having an affair, in August 2016 that mentioned an "insurance policy" has long been a subject of concern among Republican investigators who believe there could have been a plot to undermine then-candidate Donald Trump.”
Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails




3. Hop #1
This was the plan….and mighty successful it was.

First, pick a target. Trump had several unknowns who gravitated to his campaign and the one they picked was Carter Page. Page had some legit business with Russians, and the Deep State think tank needed to use that Russian connection, no matter how peripheral, to hand around Trump’s neck.

Two considerations: 1) Page was squeaky clean, and had even worked for one of the agencies providing info on Russia to our government, and 2) the need for the cover of a warrant.


Next… how easily both considerations were covered.

Translation. Another pack of lies.

There is no deep state. You couldn't sell that in a James Bond picture. Yet Trump supporters have no problems with it as it allows you people to ignore reality. That all of Trump's problems are self-inflicted.

There is no Biden crime family. Trump has used his Presidency to line his pockets. His Presidency and his businesses are fused together into a money making enterprise.

There was no insurance policy. Strzok was clearly joking. You ignore the fact that Strzok also supported re-opening the investigation into Clinton's e-mails the few weeks before the election. He was hardly a partisan.

There is a huge problem with Page. He was not connected with the Trump campaign when they sought the warrant to monitor Page. Page had extensive ties to Russia.

Translation: He didn't read it

 

[alang1216]

"Fusion GPS’s Glenn Simpson Has No Remorse For Carter Page

Fusion GPS founder Glenn Simpson showed no remorse for Carter Page at a recent book promotion event, saying that the former Trump campaign adviser is “not a civil liberties victim” and likely should have been prosecuted during the special counsel’s investigation.

“He’s not a poster child for the evils of government surveillance,” Simpson said at the Jan. 16 event, held at the Washington, D.C. book store Politics and Prose to promote his book, “Crime In Progress.”

Simpson’s remarks suggest he disagrees with the findings of a Justice Department inspector general’s report released on Dec. 9 that largely focused on the FBI’s surveillance efforts against Page.

The Justice Department’s inspector general (IG) found that the FBI submitted false and misleading information to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) in order to obtain wiretap warrants against Page. The Justice Department subsequently deemed two of the four warrants against Page to be invalid. "
Fusion GPS’s Glenn Simpson Has No Remorse For Carter Page




The Deep State plan was to pick a target....Carter Page.....lie about him vis-a-vis Russia, get a warrant to surveil Page....hop #1.....and use that to surveil everyone Page communicated with....hop #2 and so on....up to Trump.

The Horowitz report paints a somewhat different picture. Some Wikipedia quotes:

• On December 9, 2019, US Inspector General Michael Horowitz testified to Congress that the FBI showed no political bias at the initiation of the investigation into Trump and possible connections with Russia.
• Horowitz attributed the warrant problems to "gross incompetence and negligence" rather than intentional malfeasance or political bias.

Hmm... The Gov't school grad provides sources and links. The Ivy school grad provides a cartoon. Telling...

 

[Oldstyle]

…or, the Deep State attack on Trump.
In 9 posts in this thread, the full story of the last three year.



Let’s put it this way: Difference between Watergate and the Obama Spying?
Watergate was a failed attempt by a political party to spy on their political enemies.



1.The Deep State cannot allow an outsider to insinuate his way into their fiefdom, and block their system of spinning straw into gold….the worthless becoming millionaires. And Trump is the quintessential outsider….even, disrupter.
The exposure of the Biden Crime Family and their selling out our government for beaucoup bucks has revealed how so many politicians go to Washington to do good, and wind up doing well.

Can you say ‘Clintons…’


2.Not only was the Deep State, and everyone associated with it, in a huddle even before Trump was elected…but they were so confident of Hillary’s election, that they didn’t feel the need to hide it.

October 25, 2016...”NYTimes gave Hillary 93% chance of winning the election.”
2016 Election Forecast: Who Will Be President?


Schumer Warns Trump: Intel Community Has Many Ways to 'Get Back at You'





“Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails “A text message sent by former FBI agent Peter Strzok to Lisa Page, a former FBI lawyer with whom Strzok was having an affair, in August 2016 that mentioned an "insurance policy" has long been a subject of concern among Republican investigators who believe there could have been a plot to undermine then-candidate Donald Trump.”
Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails




3. Hop #1
This was the plan….and mighty successful it was.

First, pick a target. Trump had several unknowns who gravitated to his campaign and the one they picked was Carter Page. Page had some legit business with Russians, and the Deep State think tank needed to use that Russian connection, no matter how peripheral, to hand around Trump’s neck.

Two considerations: 1) Page was squeaky clean, and had even worked for one of the agencies providing info on Russia to our government, and 2) the need for the cover of a warrant.


Next… how easily both considerations were covered.

Translation. Another pack of lies.

There is no deep state. You couldn't sell that in a James Bond picture. Yet Trump supporters have no problems with it as it allows you people to ignore reality. That all of Trump's problems are self-inflicted.

There is no Biden crime family. Trump has used his Presidency to line his pockets. His Presidency and his businesses are fused together into a money making enterprise.

There was no insurance policy. Strzok was clearly joking. You ignore the fact that Strzok also supported re-opening the investigation into Clinton's e-mails the few weeks before the election. He was hardly a partisan.

There is a huge problem with Page. He was not connected with the Trump campaign when they sought the warrant to monitor Page. Page had extensive ties to Russia.

"There is no deep state."

I never lie....and I'll make you a tool, to prove it.


"Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump

A large cast of characters ranging from presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, CIA Director John Brennan, current deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, senior Justice Department Official Bruce Ohr and his wife and sometime CIA asset, Nellie Ohr, FBI Director James Comey, FBI attorney Lisa Page, FBI official Peter Strzok, and, of course, Andrew McCabe, took part.

Deep State's Anti-Trump Collusion
They all worked together to undermine Trump...

And they lied about it. Or kept quiet about it. Or misrepresented what they did, even to the Foreign Intelligence Security Court. That is real obstruction of justice. And a real conspiracy."
Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump | Investor's Business Daily



That's your strike one.

The village idiot posts a thread then makes clains based upon informatoon she gets from right wing websites that have zero credibility. Take the quoted post for example, she takes a link from IBT and runs off at the mouth about how that proves there is a deep state. Except IBT is a bullshit right wing fake propaganda website that has consistently failed fact check after fact check.

Overall, we would rate Investors Business Daily Right Biased based on right leaning economic and market positions. We would also give them a High factual rating on strictly investing and market news. However, editorially IBT is clearly a Questionable source with promotion of right wing conspiracy theories and numerous failed fact checks.

Analysis / Bias

In review, Investors Business Daily primarily reports on economics, markets and investing. They also report on politics, especially through their editorial section with a very strong right wing bias. There is moderate use of loaded language in their articles that significantly favors the right, such as this: Democratic Socialism: Who Knew That ‘Free’ Could Cost So Much? For the most part IBD sources their market information to credible mainstream and government websites, however they occasionally utilize factually mixed sources such as the Daily Signal.

Investors Business Daily strays from the consensus of science in regards to climate change and they have made outrageous and false claims, such as Stephen Hawking would be dead if he lived under England’s Government health care system. This is a false propaganda statement as Stephen Hawking is a citizen of the UK and lives there. Hawking claims the British Healthcare system saved his life and kept him alive to old age.

A factual search reveals numerous failed fact checks by IFCN fact checkers. Here are a few of the many we found:

• IBD editorial board claims that cap-and-trade is unpopular in America – FALSE
• Private health insurance not banned on page 16 of the House bill – PANTS ON FIRE
• Investor’s Business Daily editorial misrepresents study to claim plants will prevent dangerous climate change – FALSE
• Was it recently revealed that the U.S. found uranium in Iraq after the invasion in 2003 – FALSE

Every thread she starts, it the same thing. A bunch of ludicrous, unfounded, debunked bullshit. When called on it she goes to the loony chamber and digs up some far right retardation, then claims she is never wrong.

Did you not get the memo that Hawking died? Guess that British healthcare system wasn't as good as you thought it was! Just saying...

 

[The Original Tree]

Trump exposed The Left’s Evil, Hatred, Intolerance and Corruption.

 

[candycorn]

…or, the Deep State attack on Trump.
In 9 posts in this thread, the full story of the last three year.



Let’s put it this way: Difference between Watergate and the Obama Spying?
Watergate was a failed attempt by a political party to spy on their political enemies.



1.The Deep State cannot allow an outsider to insinuate his way into their fiefdom, and block their system of spinning straw into gold….the worthless becoming millionaires. And Trump is the quintessential outsider….even, disrupter.
The exposure of the Biden Crime Family and their selling out our government for beaucoup bucks has revealed how so many politicians go to Washington to do good, and wind up doing well.

Can you say ‘Clintons…’


2.Not only was the Deep State, and everyone associated with it, in a huddle even before Trump was elected…but they were so confident of Hillary’s election, that they didn’t feel the need to hide it.

October 25, 2016...”NYTimes gave Hillary 93% chance of winning the election.”
2016 Election Forecast: Who Will Be President?


Schumer Warns Trump: Intel Community Has Many Ways to 'Get Back at You'





“Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails “A text message sent by former FBI agent Peter Strzok to Lisa Page, a former FBI lawyer with whom Strzok was having an affair, in August 2016 that mentioned an "insurance policy" has long been a subject of concern among Republican investigators who believe there could have been a plot to undermine then-candidate Donald Trump.”
Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails




3. Hop #1
This was the plan….and mighty successful it was.

First, pick a target. Trump had several unknowns who gravitated to his campaign and the one they picked was Carter Page. Page had some legit business with Russians, and the Deep State think tank needed to use that Russian connection, no matter how peripheral, to hand around Trump’s neck.

Two considerations: 1) Page was squeaky clean, and had even worked for one of the agencies providing info on Russia to our government, and 2) the need for the cover of a warrant.


Next… how easily both considerations were covered.

Translation. Another pack of lies.

There is no deep state. You couldn't sell that in a James Bond picture. Yet Trump supporters have no problems with it as it allows you people to ignore reality. That all of Trump's problems are self-inflicted.

There is no Biden crime family. Trump has used his Presidency to line his pockets. His Presidency and his businesses are fused together into a money making enterprise.

There was no insurance policy. Strzok was clearly joking. You ignore the fact that Strzok also supported re-opening the investigation into Clinton's e-mails the few weeks before the election. He was hardly a partisan.

There is a huge problem with Page. He was not connected with the Trump campaign when they sought the warrant to monitor Page. Page had extensive ties to Russia.

"There is no deep state."

I never lie....and I'll make you a tool, to prove it.


"Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump

A large cast of characters ranging from presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, CIA Director John Brennan, current deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, senior Justice Department Official Bruce Ohr and his wife and sometime CIA asset, Nellie Ohr, FBI Director James Comey, FBI attorney Lisa Page, FBI official Peter Strzok, and, of course, Andrew McCabe, took part.

Deep State's Anti-Trump Collusion
They all worked together to undermine Trump...

And they lied about it. Or kept quiet about it. Or misrepresented what they did, even to the Foreign Intelligence Security Court. That is real obstruction of justice. And a real conspiracy."
Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump | Investor's Business Daily



That's your strike one.

There is no deep state and no conspiracy. Strike 4 or five on you.

Jumbo is a conspiracy nutjob

 

[PoliticalChic]

…or, the Deep State attack on Trump.
In 9 posts in this thread, the full story of the last three year.



Let’s put it this way: Difference between Watergate and the Obama Spying?
Watergate was a failed attempt by a political party to spy on their political enemies.



1.The Deep State cannot allow an outsider to insinuate his way into their fiefdom, and block their system of spinning straw into gold….the worthless becoming millionaires. And Trump is the quintessential outsider….even, disrupter.
The exposure of the Biden Crime Family and their selling out our government for beaucoup bucks has revealed how so many politicians go to Washington to do good, and wind up doing well.

Can you say ‘Clintons…’


2.Not only was the Deep State, and everyone associated with it, in a huddle even before Trump was elected…but they were so confident of Hillary’s election, that they didn’t feel the need to hide it.

October 25, 2016...”NYTimes gave Hillary 93% chance of winning the election.”
2016 Election Forecast: Who Will Be President?


Schumer Warns Trump: Intel Community Has Many Ways to 'Get Back at You'





“Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails “A text message sent by former FBI agent Peter Strzok to Lisa Page, a former FBI lawyer with whom Strzok was having an affair, in August 2016 that mentioned an "insurance policy" has long been a subject of concern among Republican investigators who believe there could have been a plot to undermine then-candidate Donald Trump.”
Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails




3. Hop #1
This was the plan….and mighty successful it was.

First, pick a target. Trump had several unknowns who gravitated to his campaign and the one they picked was Carter Page. Page had some legit business with Russians, and the Deep State think tank needed to use that Russian connection, no matter how peripheral, to hand around Trump’s neck.

Two considerations: 1) Page was squeaky clean, and had even worked for one of the agencies providing info on Russia to our government, and 2) the need for the cover of a warrant.


Next… how easily both considerations were covered.

Translation. Another pack of lies.

There is no deep state. You couldn't sell that in a James Bond picture. Yet Trump supporters have no problems with it as it allows you people to ignore reality. That all of Trump's problems are self-inflicted.

There is no Biden crime family. Trump has used his Presidency to line his pockets. His Presidency and his businesses are fused together into a money making enterprise.

There was no insurance policy. Strzok was clearly joking. You ignore the fact that Strzok also supported re-opening the investigation into Clinton's e-mails the few weeks before the election. He was hardly a partisan.

There is a huge problem with Page. He was not connected with the Trump campaign when they sought the warrant to monitor Page. Page had extensive ties to Russia.

"There is no deep state."

I never lie....and I'll make you a tool, to prove it.


"Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump

A large cast of characters ranging from presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, CIA Director John Brennan, current deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, senior Justice Department Official Bruce Ohr and his wife and sometime CIA asset, Nellie Ohr, FBI Director James Comey, FBI attorney Lisa Page, FBI official Peter Strzok, and, of course, Andrew McCabe, took part.

Deep State's Anti-Trump Collusion
They all worked together to undermine Trump...

And they lied about it. Or kept quiet about it. Or misrepresented what they did, even to the Foreign Intelligence Security Court. That is real obstruction of justice. And a real conspiracy."
Andrew McCabe Confirms: Deep State Plotted To Take Down Trump | Investor's Business Daily
That's your strike one.

Jumbo is a conspiracy nutjob

You are tough!!!

I remember how you battled the wind in the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade….


Are you gonna go back to your original avi, 'TheBalloon'?????







So...there is nothing in the entire thread that you can deny?

Excellent.

 

[candycorn]

 

[PoliticalChic]

View attachment 304119

Don't you worry, Ugly.....I'm here to defend you....

...but please....wait until after dark to go outside......the children, you know....

 

[PoliticalChic]

4. Now…how to cover up that Carter Page was actually an American asset?
The Deep Stated needed someone as the 'first hop'.....but.....Page actually worked with one of the intel agencies?


Guess what they did?
Simple: The Deep State lied, changed the report from ‘he was a source’ to ‘not a source.’



“Supervisory Special Agent 2," who swore to an affidavit for all three FISA renewals against Page in 2017, told Horowitz's investigators that on the third renewal he wanted "a definitive answer to whether Page had ever been a source for another U.S. government agency before he signed the final renewal application."

While in contact with what was reportedly the CIA's liaison, Clinesmith was reminded that back in August 2016, predating the first Page warrant application in October 2016, the other agency

An email from the other government agency's liaison was sent to Clinesmith, who then "altered the liaison's email by inserting the words 'not a source' into it, thus making it appear that the liaison had said that Page was 'not a source' for the other agency" and sent it to "Supervisory Special Agent 2," Horowitz found.”
FBI lawyer under criminal investigation altered document to say Carter Page 'was not a source' for another agency


"altered the liaison's email by inserting the words 'not a source' into it




The one given the ‘short straw,’ currently the sacrificial lamb as the plot has become public knowledge, is Kevin Clinesmith.

Kevin E. Clinesmith is a lawyer and FBI agent who worked on the Hillary Clinton email scandal investigation, the Trump-Russia collusion hoax, and the Mueller team.
Kevin Clinesmith - Conservapedia

Clinesmith tossed under the bus to cover the complicity of the rest of the intel community, i.e., the Deep State.

"HUGE: New Information Shows Carter Page Was a Whistleblower in October 2016 But Deep State FBI Spied on Him Anyway"
HUGE: New Information Shows Carter Page Was a Whistleblower in October 2016 But Deep State FBI Spied on Him Anyway




The Deep Stated needed someone as the 'first hop'.....but.....Page actually worked with one of the intel agencies?


Guess what they did?
Simple: The Deep State lied, changed the report from ‘he was a source’ to ‘not a source.’



“Supervisory Special Agent 2," who swore to an affidavit for all three FISA renewals against Page in 2017, told Horowitz's investigators that on the third renewal he wanted "a definitive answer to whether Page had ever been a source for another U.S. government agency before he signed the final renewal application."

While in contact with what was reportedly the CIA's liaison, Clinesmith was reminded that back in August 2016, predating the first Page warrant application in October 2016, the other agency

An email from the other government agency's liaison was sent to Clinesmith, who then "altered the liaison's email by inserting the words 'not a source' into it, thus making it appear that the liaison had said that Page was 'not a source' for the other agency" and sent it to "Supervisory Special Agent 2," Horowitz found.”
FBI lawyer under criminal investigation altered document to say Carter Page 'was not a source' for another agency


"altered the liaison's email by inserting the words 'not a source' into it




The one given the ‘short straw,’ currently the sacrificial lamb as the plot has become public knowledge, is Kevin Clinesmith.

Kevin E. Clinesmith is a lawyer and FBI agent who worked on the Hillary Clinton email scandal investigation, the Trump-Russia collusion hoax, and the Mueller team.
Kevin Clinesmith - Conservapedia

Clinesmith tossed under the bus to cover the complicity of the rest of the intel community, i.e., the Deep State.

 

[PoliticalChic]

4. Now…how to cover up that Carter Page was actually an American asset?
The Deep Stated needed someone as the 'first hop'.....but.....Page actually worked with one of the intel agencies?


Guess what they did?
Simple: The Deep State lied, changed the report from ‘he was a source’ to ‘not a source.’



“Supervisory Special Agent 2," who swore to an affidavit for all three FISA renewals against Page in 2017, told Horowitz's investigators that on the third renewal he wanted "a definitive answer to whether Page had ever been a source for another U.S. government agency before he signed the final renewal application."

While in contact with what was reportedly the CIA's liaison, Clinesmith was reminded that back in August 2016, predating the first Page warrant application in October 2016, the other agency

An email from the other government agency's liaison was sent to Clinesmith, who then "altered the liaison's email by inserting the words 'not a source' into it, thus making it appear that the liaison had said that Page was 'not a source' for the other agency" and sent it to "Supervisory Special Agent 2," Horowitz found.”
FBI lawyer under criminal investigation altered document to say Carter Page 'was not a source' for another agency


"altered the liaison's email by inserting the words 'not a source' into it




The one given the ‘short straw,’ currently the sacrificial lamb as the plot has become public knowledge, is Kevin Clinesmith.

Kevin E. Clinesmith is a lawyer and FBI agent who worked on the Hillary Clinton email scandal investigation, the Trump-Russia collusion hoax, and the Mueller team.
Kevin Clinesmith - Conservapedia

Clinesmith tossed under the bus to cover the complicity of the rest of the intel community, i.e., the Deep State.

 

[PoliticalChic]

…or, the Deep State attack on Trump.
In 9 posts in this thread, the full story of the last three year.



Let’s put it this way: Difference between Watergate and the Obama Spying?
Watergate was a failed attempt by a political party to spy on their political enemies.



1.The Deep State cannot allow an outsider to insinuate his way into their fiefdom, and block their system of spinning straw into gold….the worthless becoming millionaires. And Trump is the quintessential outsider….even, disrupter.
The exposure of the Biden Crime Family and their selling out our government for beaucoup bucks has revealed how so many politicians go to Washington to do good, and wind up doing well.

Can you say ‘Clintons…’


2.Not only was the Deep State, and everyone associated with it, in a huddle even before Trump was elected…but they were so confident of Hillary’s election, that they didn’t feel the need to hide it.

October 25, 2016...”NYTimes gave Hillary 93% chance of winning the election.”
2016 Election Forecast: Who Will Be President?


Schumer Warns Trump: Intel Community Has Many Ways to 'Get Back at You'





“Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails “A text message sent by former FBI agent Peter Strzok to Lisa Page, a former FBI lawyer with whom Strzok was having an affair, in August 2016 that mentioned an "insurance policy" has long been a subject of concern among Republican investigators who believe there could have been a plot to undermine then-candidate Donald Trump.”
Devin Nunes: Peter Strzok's 'insurance policy' was about getting into Trump campaign emails




3. Hop #1
This was the plan….and mighty successful it was.

First, pick a target. Trump had several unknowns who gravitated to his campaign and the one they picked was Carter Page. Page had some legit business with Russians, and the Deep State think tank needed to use that Russian connection, no matter how peripheral, to hand around Trump’s neck.

Two considerations: 1) Page was squeaky clean, and had even worked for one of the agencies providing info on Russia to our government, and 2) the need for the cover of a warrant.


Next… how easily both considerations were covered.

"Barr: Obama probe of Trump launched 'without any basis'
'What happened to him was one of the greatest travesties in American history'


The Obama administration's counter-intelligence investigation of the 2016 Trump campaign was launched "without any basis," charged Attorney General William Barr in an interview to air Thursday night.

"Without any basis, they started this investigation of his campaign," he said.

But "even more concerning," the attorney general said, "is what happened after the campaign "to sabotage the presidency."

The IG also confirmed that the unverified dossier compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele was used as primary evidence to obtain the warrants."

Barr: Obama probe of Trump launched 'without any basis' | WND | by WND Staff

The Obama administration's investigation of the 2016 Trump campaign was launched "without any basis," charged Attorney General William Barr

www.wnd.com