The GOP's big beef against Ketanji Brown Jackson is that she's NOT an activist judge

Stormy Daniels

Gold Member
Mar 19, 2018
7,107
2,395
265
The woman follows the sentencing rules that Congress makes, even for crimes as terrible as child pornography. But that's bad according to the Republicans in the Senate Judiciary committee.

Is Jackson so damn perfect that this is the best the opposition could come up with?
 
The woman follows the sentencing rules that Congress makes, even for crimes as terrible as child pornography. But that's bad according to the Republicans in the Senate Judiciary committee.

Is Jackson so damn perfect that this is the best the opposition could come up with?
No, that is not the claim.

The claim is that she does NOT follow those sentencing guidelines. The gripe was that the sentence of 3 months for the case when was questioned on most was WAY below the guidelines.

The thread title is false.
 
I don't know all the facts of the case in question that FA_Q2 is talking about. The kid was 18, is that right?
 
The woman follows the sentencing rules that Congress makes, even for crimes as terrible as child pornography. But that's bad according to the Republicans in the Senate Judiciary committee.

Is Jackson so damn perfect that this is the best the opposition could come up with?
A partisan sees it exactly the same way you do, Stormy. true story
 
I don't know all the facts of the case in question that FA_Q2 is talking about. The kid was 18, is that right?
None of us know all the facts. That is the largest problem I have with the complaint. We need the case itself and I am not aware if it is public information and, if it is, I have not see it directly sourced.

The guilty party was 18 though, that much both sides have stated. One of the videos, however, has been claimed as having an 8 year old in it. I also do not doubt that claim, there is no reason it would be false and no indication that it is.

There is, however, a LOT more nuance in a charge like this.
 
Yeah until I know the facts, I really dunno what to say. She said she gave the kid 3 months in federal prison. He was 18. That's really all I know, other than what Josh Hawley said -- which was the ages of the victims.
 
The woman follows the sentencing rules that Congress makes, even for crimes as terrible as child pornography. But that's bad according to the Republicans in the Senate Judiciary committee.

Is Jackson so damn perfect that this is the best the opposition could come up with?
I'm not saying people that support her are pedos, but they are very sympathetic to them

Libturds have this sickness with children. They use them for anything politically.

She's a GD activist bitch
 
The woman follows the sentencing rules that Congress makes, even for crimes as terrible as child pornography. But that's bad according to the Republicans in the Senate Judiciary committee.

Is Jackson so damn perfect that this is the best the opposition could come up with?
She’s an activist against being educated lol because she stoopid lol
 
I'm not saying people that support her are pedos, but they are very sympathetic to them

Libturds have this sickness with children. They use them for anything politically.

She's a GD activist bitch
No one is "very sympathetic to pedos".
 
No, that is not the claim.

The claim is that she does NOT follow those sentencing guidelines. The gripe was that the sentence of 3 months for the case when was questioned on most was WAY below the guidelines.

The thread title is false.
"A couple of observations: One is that your chart does not include all of the factors that Congress has told judges to consider, including the probation office’s recommendation in these cases," Jackson responded, prompting Cruz to say the committee did not have those recommendations available for review.

 

Forum List

Back
Top