The Fruits Of Democrat Success -

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Billy_Kinetta, Oct 6, 2017.

  1. Billy_Kinetta
    Offline

    Billy_Kinetta Paladin of the Lost Hour Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2013
    Messages:
    23,127
    Thanks Received:
    4,462
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +26,672
  2. dturner1157
    Offline

    dturner1157 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jun 22, 2016
    Messages:
    406
    Thanks Received:
    77
    Trophy Points:
    80
    Ratings:
    +463
    Oh! Ok. I was thinking when I saw this thread that any fruit mentioned in relation to Democrats must be rotten. And then I saw the link confirming it LOL
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Theowl32
    Offline

    Theowl32 Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2013
    Messages:
    11,244
    Thanks Received:
    5,424
    Trophy Points:
    1,055
    Ratings:
    +15,612
    As Saul Alinsky and soros and every hippy marxist professor along with every commie American hating hollywood director/producer would have it.
     
  4. andaronjim
    Offline

    andaronjim Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2015
    Messages:
    8,042
    Thanks Received:
    1,129
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +6,562
    Don't worry, when those cities go broke, you can bet the lame stream media will be blaming President Trump for it, like Obama blamed Bush for Obama's failed economic policies....


     
  5. JoeB131
    Offline

    JoeB131 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2011
    Messages:
    91,888
    Thanks Received:
    7,817
    Trophy Points:
    1,815
    Location:
    Chicago, Chicago, that Toddling Town
    Ratings:
    +19,474
    Uh, the economy was in full roaring recession when Obama got there.

    But you keep on with your alternative history.

    Except what is overloading the system now? Look, back in 1966, if you were poor, you could get a job that put food on the table, even if you had a barely HS Education.

    Now we have College grads who can't find jobs, even in a period of supposed "Full Employment".

    Jobs don't offer pensions anymore, and 401K's are a joke. We are increasingly going to the "Gig Economy" of Uber and Dog Walkers and Thumbtack.com.

    So, yeah, those fucking working people, they just refuse to fucking starve because the Rich want more Dressage Horsies.

    You see, I get where you come from. Been there, done that, wore the t-shirt.

    You miss the old America of your fathers where you could get a good union job and make a good living and only the most useless people got welfare.

    But now 40% of households on food stamps have jobs.

    A "universal income" is probably going to be inevitable. Maybe that's not a good thing, but it's not like your side is coming up with a better alternative. Trump finding people for white trash to hate on is not an answer.
     
  6. andaronjim
    Offline

    andaronjim Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2015
    Messages:
    8,042
    Thanks Received:
    1,129
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +6,562
    Until the liberals made it so hard that you have to have 2 people working just to make a living, because the liberals destroyed the nuclear family.
    Who was the president for the past 8 years and how great was his economic plan?
    GM and Chrylser had a pension plan and ended up going bankrupt and only the TAX payers bailed them out because Obama made it so.
    So the liberals want everyone on foodstamps, so those people will owe the government for being fed.
    47% don't pay taxes....
     
  7. andaronjim
    Offline

    andaronjim Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2015
    Messages:
    8,042
    Thanks Received:
    1,129
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +6,562
    Does that mean that WELFARE will no longer be necessary as everyone is paid the same?
     
  8. forkup
    Online

    forkup Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2016
    Messages:
    2,126
    Thanks Received:
    269
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Ratings:
    +931
    It is in a way. As long as you convince people like the writer of this OP. That it is the other sides fault, most people are perfectly happy to overlook that the top incomes take a ridiculous amount of the total income. What's more they will fight any legislation designed to come to a fair income distribution. The problem lies not in a bloated military establishment, nor does it lie with the rich. No the problem is Joe getting a pension. It would be funny if it wouldn't be so damn tragic.U.S. inequality keeps getting uglier
     
  9. andaronjim
    Offline

    andaronjim Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2015
    Messages:
    8,042
    Thanks Received:
    1,129
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +6,562
    Please explain how they "TAKE"?
     
  10. dannyboys
    Offline

    dannyboys Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2013
    Messages:
    11,215
    Thanks Received:
    1,606
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +7,275

Share This Page