Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Not if Smith files a motion in limine, then a petition for writ of mandamus.
This chess game is not over, make no mistake about it.
John Fitzpatrick says so out loud in the video I posted at the 5:44 mark.Wrong.
The only thing judge Cannon has done wrong is not disbar Jack Smith.
The laws are clear, presidents have absolute arbitrary authority over all classified docs.
They can give permanent copies to anyone they want, including themselves.
The are NOT at all covered by the Presidential Records Act, which only covers unique and singular items, like signed treaties. It does NOT cover copies of docs used for weekly cabinet briefings, like Trump legally had.
Regardless of the merits of each case, clearly 91 charges without any victims, is intentionally "piling on" to deliberately abuse the upcoming elections. That truly is insurrection, and Jack Smith is guilty of treason.
a mandamus writ should be easy, but watch. should be good to put this one (the most important for national security) in to 2025 or infinity.
of course cannon should be removed, impeached., disbarred for cheating the american people in a case like this.
the joke may be on her in the end. trump47 won't need her anymore and has a record of renenge on promises.
Yep, what I said.Wrong.
There is not a single legal basis for any charge by Jack Smith.
Totally bogus, contrary to law and all legal precedents.
Presidents always have total arbitrary authority over classified docs, and always must retain total access to them even after no longer president, as in their libraries of classified docs.
No one has ever been demanded to return a classified doc they legally were given.
Apologies.... She's bitten off far more than she can chew.
...
go to 5:44 of the video.
Watch Sunday Morning: Top secret: Keeping documents classified - Full show on CBS
Government documents that are classified as confidential, secret or top secret constitute information that would cause damage to the country's security if it were revealed. CBS News national security correspondent David Martin looks at the inner workings of America's classification apparatus –...www.cbs.com
John Fitzpatrick says so out loud in the video I posted at the 5:44 mark.
makes the entire documents issue a scam, a demofk election interference opt.Correct.
Presidential authority over classified docs is absolute and supreme.
All presidents can give anyone, including themselves, all the permanent copies of classified docs they want.
what it says is there is no process. None...Z....E....R....O. Nothing illegal by any president. The only one illegally holding any classified documents is and was creepy joe biden. Zero authority to have them. Z...E...R...OThat isn't a claim by the dense team in court that they were declassified, it's a news report.
Funny thing is, if someone actually watches the video it undermines FPOTUS#45's. It talks about how there has to be a process and how the President can declassify materials, but has to tell someone. Which means evidence, testimony, and documents that will backup the declassifications claim.
The question isn't whether FPOTUS#45 could declassify documents in office. There is no disagreement with that. The question is DID he declassify the documents prior to leaving office?
So again, here are the documents in the case. In which one does he make a claim before the court that he declassified them?
WW
That isn't a claim by the dense team in court that they were declassified.
Funny thing is, if someone actually watch the video it undermines FPOTUS#45's.
The question isn't whether FPOTUS#45 could declassify documents in office. There is no disagreement with that. The question is DID he declassify the documents prior to leaving office?
So again, here are the documents in the case. In which one does he make a claim before the court that he declassified them?
WW
which paragraph of the espionage act exceps the president or anyone else?Wrong.
There is not a single legal basis for any charge by Jack Smith.
Totally bogus, contrary to law and all legal precedents.
Presidents always have total arbitrary authority over classified docs, and always must retain total access to them even after no longer president, as in their libraries of classified docs.
No one has ever been demanded to return a classified doc they legally were given.
what it says is there is no process. None...Z....E....R....O. Nothing illegal by any president. The only one illegally holding any classified documents is and was creepy joe biden. Zero authority to have them. Z...E...R...O
no, when he left with the documents as VP, he didn't have the authority to have them because he never became president. So every document he had, was illegal. There is no absolute rule for VPs. That's why they get sworn in as president if they are needed.Biden was only guilty of having classified docs illegally when in congress.
When VP, then he had equal arbitrary authority as a president.
which paragraph of the espionage act exceps the president or anyone else?
what trump has accomplished in these cases is dismantle faith in the justice system by exposing the economic influence of oligarchs over the courts, and the unchecked, unbalanced power of the executive branch.
no, when he left with the documents as VP, he didn't have the authority to have them because he never became president. So every document he had, was illegal. There is no absolute rule for VPs. That's why they get sworn in as president if they are needed.
Not if she gets kicked off the case...
This is a pretty open shut case at this stage...
A new judge will set a trail date and bang it is done...
Trump Defence team wouldn't get any more delays.
A smarter judge could have slow walked (if they wished) this far better... Cannon is really inexperienced.
If Cannon was smart, she would get a top class legal expert (which she could get easily), she would have found some point of law and run it up the ladder..
Personally, I think Smith knew this was screwed timewise as soon as she was appointed... She has slow walked this now for 9 months.. 7 months more to go...
in that case my question becpmesAll of them.
Clearly classified doc laws are totally unlike any others.
All other laws are based on the defense of inherent rights of individuals.
Classified doc laws are not.
Instead they are based on the choice to arbitrarily make president ultimate authorities over all classified doc matters.
No one else has or can have any authority over classified docs at all, except as delegated by a president.
Classified doc authority is imbued ONLY in the president, not congress or the courts.
That's how trump thinks and works....
This crap he's throwing at democrats 24/7 is just him accusing others of doing what he has done, his whole, silver spoon, rotten life.
Interesting.Wrong.
Read EO 13526.
It says:
{...
Sec. 1.3. Classification Authority.
(a) The authority to classify information
originally may be exercised only by:
(1) the President and the Vice President;
...}
So for some reason, VPs have equal classified authority to presidents.
TDS runs deep in this one!in that case my question becpmes
"is a man wise enough to use that authority (and responsibility) wisely?"
do you think trump treated our secrets responsibly?
