Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
HL is a poor deflection. It will be revisited and narrowed. You love to drama, don't you? You are wrong, get over it.Just like hobby lobby? Damn Jake you have a dildo up your ass about this? Again what case drama queen?Hit a never.So mother fucker Jake the ass hole fake...Riddle me this? Which cases are now in the lower courts against citizens United?Indeed. The far right is trying to give money free speech while talking away votes from eligible citizens.Good. It's a constitutional abomination.You have no idea, do you? You will by spring next year.
NoneBtw Looney tunes, did you guys bother to ask yourselves if they revisit this. case ...
And ruled against company's And unions..
How many jobs will be lost?
Again which case?
Or are you guys just having mental masturbation moments and more Jake the flack stuff?
It's more than just the Supreme Court for the next twenty years, but the lower courts that will turn liberal
HL is a poor deflection. It will be revisited and narrowed. You love to drama, don't you? You are wrong, get over it.Just like hobby lobby? Damn Jake you have a dildo up your ass about this? Again what case drama queen?Hit a never.So mother fucker Jake the ass hole fake...Riddle me this? Which cases are now in the lower courts against citizens United?Indeed. The far right is trying to give money free speech while talking away votes from eligible citizens.Good. It's a constitutional abomination.
You know why we won?NoneBtw Looney tunes, did you guys bother to ask yourselves if they revisit this. case ...
And ruled against company's And unions..
How many jobs will be lost?
Again which case?
Or are you guys just having mental masturbation moments and more Jake the flack stuff?
I don't see what the big deal to you guys is to get a left leaning supreme court anyways.Jesus you won on gay marriage and twice on Obozo care plus a few others to say the right leaning supreme court wasn't fair ...is just showing the left as fools.
You don't have to overturn......just clarify and redefineHL is a poor deflection. It will be revisited and narrowed. You love to drama, don't you? You are wrong, get over it.Just like hobby lobby? Damn Jake you have a dildo up your ass about this? Again what case drama queen?Hit a never.So mother fucker Jake the ass hole fake...Riddle me this? Which cases are now in the lower courts against citizens United?Indeed. The far right is trying to give money free speech while talking away votes from eligible citizens.
Again fag name me a supreme court case that was revisited and overturned?
NoneBtw Looney tunes, did you guys bother to ask yourselves if they revisit this. case ...
And ruled against company's And unions..
How many jobs will be lost?
Again which case?
Or are you guys just having mental masturbation moments and more Jake the flack stuff?
I don't see what the big deal to you guys is to get a left leaning supreme court anyways.Jesus you won on gay marriage and twice on Obozo care plus a few others to say the right leaning supreme court wasn't fair ...is just showing the left as fools.
You know why we won?NoneBtw Looney tunes, did you guys bother to ask yourselves if they revisit this. case ...
And ruled against company's And unions..
How many jobs will be lost?
Again which case?
Or are you guys just having mental masturbation moments and more Jake the flack stuff?
I don't see what the big deal to you guys is to get a left leaning supreme court anyways.Jesus you won on gay marriage and twice on Obozo care plus a few others to say the right leaning supreme court wasn't fair ...is just showing the left as fools.
Because conservative attempts to restrict gay rights were so unconstitutional that even conservative judges couldn't agree
Your boyfriend must have bored your ass bad, bear. You have been corrected. You have sounded stupid. You don't understand any of this. Citizen's will be revisited by SCOTUS as surely as the sun comes up if HRC is elected.Again fag name me a supreme court case that was revisited and overturned?HL is a poor deflection. It will be revisited and narrowed. You love to drama, don't you? You are wrong, get over it.Just like hobby lobby? Damn Jake you have a dildo up your ass about this? Again what case drama queen?Hit a never.So mother fucker Jake the ass hole fake...Riddle me this? Which cases are now in the lower courts against citizens United?Indeed. The far right is trying to give money free speech while talking away votes from eligible citizens.
The court held back on gay marriage till it was already a done deal. State after state allowed it before the court finally made it nationwideYou know why we won?NoneBtw Looney tunes, did you guys bother to ask yourselves if they revisit this. case ...
And ruled against company's And unions..
How many jobs will be lost?
Again which case?
Or are you guys just having mental masturbation moments and more Jake the flack stuff?
I don't see what the big deal to you guys is to get a left leaning supreme court anyways.Jesus you won on gay marriage and twice on Obozo care plus a few others to say the right leaning supreme court wasn't fair ...is just showing the left as fools.
Because conservative attempts to restrict gay rights were so unconstitutional that even conservative judges couldn't agree
No...gay friendly California voted against it. Then the ass hole 5th district court took up the case.
You fuckers went against the will of the people on gay marriage, every one was fine with civil unions.
Your boyfriend must have bored your ass bad, bear. You have been corrected. You have sounded stupid. You don't understand any of this. Citizen's will be revisited by SCOTUS as surely as the sun comes up if HRC is elected.Again fag name me a supreme court case that was revisited and overturned?HL is a poor deflection. It will be revisited and narrowed. You love to drama, don't you? You are wrong, get over it.Just like hobby lobby? Damn Jake you have a dildo up your ass about this? Again what case drama queen?Hit a never.So mother fucker Jake the ass hole fake...Riddle me this? Which cases are now in the lower courts against citizens United?
The court held back on gay marriage till it was already a done deal. State after state allowed it before the court finally made it nationwideYou know why we won?NoneBtw Looney tunes, did you guys bother to ask yourselves if they revisit this. case ...
And ruled against company's And unions..
How many jobs will be lost?
Again which case?
Or are you guys just having mental masturbation moments and more Jake the flack stuff?
I don't see what the big deal to you guys is to get a left leaning supreme court anyways.Jesus you won on gay marriage and twice on Obozo care plus a few others to say the right leaning supreme court wasn't fair ...is just showing the left as fools.
Because conservative attempts to restrict gay rights were so unconstitutional that even conservative judges couldn't agree
No...gay friendly California voted against it. Then the ass hole 5th district court took up the case.
You fuckers went against the will of the people on gay marriage, every one was fine with civil unions.
How the first liberal Supreme Court in a generation could reshape America
Dylan Matthews on August 22, 2016, wrote, in “How the first liberal Supreme Court in a generation could reshape America”, that “Odds are that very soon, the Supreme Court will become something it hasn’t been in nearly 50 years: made up of a majority of Democratic-appointed justices.
Ever since Abe Fortas’s resignation in 1969, the Court has either been split down the middle or, more often, made up primarily of Republican appointees. Some of those Republican appointees nonetheless turned out to be liberals, but even taking that into account, the Court hasn’t been majority liberal since 1971, when William Rehnquist and Lewis Powell joined. That hasn’t stopped the Court from evolving in a progressive direction at times. In 1973, GOP appointee Harry Blackmun authored Roe v. Wade, drawing only two dissents; from 1996’s Romer v. Evans to 2015’s Obergefell v. Hodges, Anthony Kennedy and the Court’s liberals steadily expanded the rights of LGBTQ Americans.
But for the most part, over the past half-century liberals have been playing defense as an organized and well-planned movement of conservatives has limited the scope of rights trumpeted by liberals, expanded the power of the state in criminal justice, and issued more business-friendly rulings on campaign finance and regulatory issues. The Court ruled that states didn't have to give poor black and Latino school districts the same funding as rich white districts. It ruled that school resegregation achieved through white flight to wealthy suburbs was just fine. It ruled that despite declaring abortion a fundamental right, that didn’t mean Medicaid had to extend that right to poor women, and then it reversed course on treating abortion as a fundamental right at all. It struck down the death penalty but then brought it back four years later.”
A new court appointed by Clinton might improve prison conditions, possibly stop executions permanently, enact finance campaign laws that would gut Citizens United. Abortion rights would be defended. It might defend voting rights and damage gerrymandering. The LGBT question would be put to rest for two generations.
It tells me that your views are way, way to the right, out in right field near the eye-strain bleachers. Even the conservative court rules too liberally for you.NoneBtw Looney tunes, did you guys bother to ask yourselves if they revisit this. case ...
And ruled against company's And unions..
How many jobs will be lost?
Again which case?
Or are you guys just having mental masturbation moments and more Jake the flack stuff?
I don't see what the big deal to you guys is to get a left leaning supreme court anyways.Jesus you won on gay marriage and twice on Obozo care plus a few others to say the right leaning supreme court wasn't fair ...is just showing the left as fools.
How the first liberal Supreme Court in a generation could reshape America
Dylan Matthews on August 22, 2016, wrote, in “How the first liberal Supreme Court in a generation could reshape America”, that “Odds are that very soon, the Supreme Court will become something it hasn’t been in nearly 50 years: made up of a majority of Democratic-appointed justices.
Ever since Abe Fortas’s resignation in 1969, the Court has either been split down the middle or, more often, made up primarily of Republican appointees. Some of those Republican appointees nonetheless turned out to be liberals, but even taking that into account, the Court hasn’t been majority liberal since 1971, when William Rehnquist and Lewis Powell joined. That hasn’t stopped the Court from evolving in a progressive direction at times. In 1973, GOP appointee Harry Blackmun authored Roe v. Wade, drawing only two dissents; from 1996’s Romer v. Evans to 2015’s Obergefell v. Hodges, Anthony Kennedy and the Court’s liberals steadily expanded the rights of LGBTQ Americans.
But for the most part, over the past half-century liberals have been playing defense as an organized and well-planned movement of conservatives has limited the scope of rights trumpeted by liberals, expanded the power of the state in criminal justice, and issued more business-friendly rulings on campaign finance and regulatory issues. The Court ruled that states didn't have to give poor black and Latino school districts the same funding as rich white districts. It ruled that school resegregation achieved through white flight to wealthy suburbs was just fine. It ruled that despite declaring abortion a fundamental right, that didn’t mean Medicaid had to extend that right to poor women, and then it reversed course on treating abortion as a fundamental right at all. It struck down the death penalty but then brought it back four years later.”
A new court appointed by Clinton might improve prison conditions, possibly stop executions permanently, enact finance campaign laws that would gut Citizens United. Abortion rights would be defended. It might defend voting rights and damage gerrymandering. The LGBT question would be put to rest for two generations.
Gay marriage was already legal in CaliforniaThe court held back on gay marriage till it was already a done deal. State after state allowed it before the court finally made it nationwideYou know why we won?None
I don't see what the big deal to you guys is to get a left leaning supreme court anyways.Jesus you won on gay marriage and twice on Obozo care plus a few others to say the right leaning supreme court wasn't fair ...is just showing the left as fools.
Because conservative attempts to restrict gay rights were so unconstitutional that even conservative judges couldn't agree
No...gay friendly California voted against it. Then the ass hole 5th district court took up the case.
You fuckers went against the will of the people on gay marriage, every one was fine with civil unions.
California didn't allow it that's why it went to the supreme court.
If McConnell can hold onto the Senate, then he can thwart anything Hillary does.How the first liberal Supreme Court in a generation could reshape America
Dylan Matthews on August 22, 2016, wrote, in “How the first liberal Supreme Court in a generation could reshape America”, that “Odds are that very soon, the Supreme Court will become something it hasn’t been in nearly 50 years: made up of a majority of Democratic-appointed justices.
Ever since Abe Fortas’s resignation in 1969, the Court has either been split down the middle or, more often, made up primarily of Republican appointees. Some of those Republican appointees nonetheless turned out to be liberals, but even taking that into account, the Court hasn’t been majority liberal since 1971, when William Rehnquist and Lewis Powell joined. That hasn’t stopped the Court from evolving in a progressive direction at times. In 1973, GOP appointee Harry Blackmun authored Roe v. Wade, drawing only two dissents; from 1996’s Romer v. Evans to 2015’s Obergefell v. Hodges, Anthony Kennedy and the Court’s liberals steadily expanded the rights of LGBTQ Americans.
But for the most part, over the past half-century liberals have been playing defense as an organized and well-planned movement of conservatives has limited the scope of rights trumpeted by liberals, expanded the power of the state in criminal justice, and issued more business-friendly rulings on campaign finance and regulatory issues. The Court ruled that states didn't have to give poor black and Latino school districts the same funding as rich white districts. It ruled that school resegregation achieved through white flight to wealthy suburbs was just fine. It ruled that despite declaring abortion a fundamental right, that didn’t mean Medicaid had to extend that right to poor women, and then it reversed course on treating abortion as a fundamental right at all. It struck down the death penalty but then brought it back four years later.”
A new court appointed by Clinton might improve prison conditions, possibly stop executions permanently, enact finance campaign laws that would gut Citizens United. Abortion rights would be defended. It might defend voting rights and damage gerrymandering. The LGBT question would be put to rest for two generations.
McConnell will be a one term majority leaderIf McConnell can hold onto the Senate, then he can thwart anything Hillary does.How the first liberal Supreme Court in a generation could reshape America
Dylan Matthews on August 22, 2016, wrote, in “How the first liberal Supreme Court in a generation could reshape America”, that “Odds are that very soon, the Supreme Court will become something it hasn’t been in nearly 50 years: made up of a majority of Democratic-appointed justices.
Ever since Abe Fortas’s resignation in 1969, the Court has either been split down the middle or, more often, made up primarily of Republican appointees. Some of those Republican appointees nonetheless turned out to be liberals, but even taking that into account, the Court hasn’t been majority liberal since 1971, when William Rehnquist and Lewis Powell joined. That hasn’t stopped the Court from evolving in a progressive direction at times. In 1973, GOP appointee Harry Blackmun authored Roe v. Wade, drawing only two dissents; from 1996’s Romer v. Evans to 2015’s Obergefell v. Hodges, Anthony Kennedy and the Court’s liberals steadily expanded the rights of LGBTQ Americans.
But for the most part, over the past half-century liberals have been playing defense as an organized and well-planned movement of conservatives has limited the scope of rights trumpeted by liberals, expanded the power of the state in criminal justice, and issued more business-friendly rulings on campaign finance and regulatory issues. The Court ruled that states didn't have to give poor black and Latino school districts the same funding as rich white districts. It ruled that school resegregation achieved through white flight to wealthy suburbs was just fine. It ruled that despite declaring abortion a fundamental right, that didn’t mean Medicaid had to extend that right to poor women, and then it reversed course on treating abortion as a fundamental right at all. It struck down the death penalty but then brought it back four years later.”
A new court appointed by Clinton might improve prison conditions, possibly stop executions permanently, enact finance campaign laws that would gut Citizens United. Abortion rights would be defended. It might defend voting rights and damage gerrymandering. The LGBT question would be put to rest for two generations.
It will be more important news on election night to see how the Senate goes than anything else.
Hillary has essentially already won the presidency. No use crying over that anymore.
