- May 20, 2009
- 144,297
- 66,653
- 2,330
Sure, if you take 390 as an acceptable current number, 100 would be just over 25% or about 11% extra "carbon forcing" over current levels. What's your point? Heat would lead to more moisture in the atmosphere and, therefore, more snow, when it meets a cold air mass. Longer, warmer summers would lead to fatter animals of all sorts. Sure sounds like possible consequences of AGW.
Sounds like you're making it all up.
So if a .01% change in the total atmospheric content has such a profound effect, why is it impossible for you to show us one repeatable experiment that gives ANY much less ALL of the results you allege?
0.01%! Try 30-40%. That's the % increase over historical averages and the REAL number that should be considered. If the low number really proved anything, why is the earth many degrees warmer than if that 0.01% wasn't there at all?
Are you fucking retarded? A 100ppm change is a .01% change in total atmospheric content