The Enemy of My Enemies

[PoliticalChic]

View attachment 159682

Au contraire, BlindOne

Bush allowed plenty of time for Hussein to have an agreement....he had up to 2012.
Three years for the windbag.

Instead....as he admitted, he would not leave a force to guard against the birth of ISIS



1. Bush made sure that the community organizer had until 2012 to work out an agreement:
"In one of his final acts in office, President Bush in December of 2008 had signed a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) with the Iraqi government thatset the clock ticking on ending the war he’d launched in March of 2003. The SOFA provided a legal basis for the presence of U.S. forces in Iraq after the United Nations Security Council mandate for the occupation mission expired at the end of 2008. But it required that all U.S. forces be gone from Iraq by January 1, 2012, unless the Iraqi government was willing to negotiate a new agreement that would extend their mandate. "
Iraq 8217 s Government Not Obama Called Time on the U.S. Troop Presence TIME.com



2." BLITZER: -- Agreement that would have left a residual force, 5,000 or 10,000 U.S. troops, but you couldn't get immunity from Nuri al Maliki's government. Take us behind the scenes, clarify, who's right, John McCain or Jay Carney, in this debate.

BARBERO: Well, in the summer of 2010, prepared a briefing, I was responsible for Iraqi security forces, andtook it to all the Iraqi leaders, Maliki, the other Shia leaders, the Sunnis, the Kurds, and said here is going to be the status of your security forces, what they cannot do, what they will be able to do, when we're schedule to leave. And to a man they said, well, general, you must stay.And my response was, you must make it easy for us. So I think Maliki did not make it easy for us and we did not try hard enough. So it's a -- both views. I think it could have been done though."
CNN.com - Transcripts



3. "Obama's 2012 Debate Boast: I Didn't Want to Leave Any Troops in Iraq
Obama then denied that he ever supported a status of forces agreement that would have left troops in Iraq:

MR. ROMNEY: [W]ith regards to Iraq, you and I agreed, I believe, that there should have been a status of forces agreement. Did you —

PRESIDENT OBAMA: That's not true.

MR. ROMNEY: Oh, you didn't — you didn't want a status of forces agreement?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: No, but what I — what I would not have done is left 10,000 troops in Iraq that would tie us down. That certainly would not help us in the Middle East.

"Here's one thing I've learned as commander in chief," Obama said at the end of the exchange. "You've got to be clear, both to our allies and our enemies, about where you stand and what you mean."
Obama s 2012 Debate Boast I Didn t Want to Leave Any Troops in Iraq The Weekly Standard



4. And this:
"This month, Colin Kahl, the senior Pentagon official in charge of Iraq policy at the time, explained why the White House insisted on Iraq’s parliament approving the changes to the SOFA.

He wrote in Politico Magazine that in 2011 Iraq’s prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, “told U.S. negotiators that he was willing to sign an executive memorandum of understanding that included these legal protections.

Yet this time around, Obama is willing to accept an agreement from Iraq’s foreign ministry on U.S. forces in Iraq without a vote of Iraq’s parliament. “We believe we need a separate set of assurances from the Iraqis,” one senior U.S. defense official told The Daily Beast on Sunday. This official said this would likely be an agreement or exchange of diplomatic notes from the Iraq’s foreign ministry. “We basically need a piece of paper from them,” another U.S. official involved in the negotiations told The Daily Beast. The official didn’t explain why the parliamentary vote, so crucial three years ago, was no longer needed.”
Obama Does a U-Turn on Immunity for U.S. Troops in Iraq - The Daily Beast

Obama rejected it.




Now....don't ever let me catch you lying about Obama's culpability again!


1. Bush left Iraq with an agreement that allowed US troops to remain until 2012.

2. The windbag, Obama took charge in 2009

3. Obama declined to negotiate a Status of Forces agreement that would have left troops, and he actually removed same before he had to.

4. Political landscapes, like nature, abhor a vacuum.

5. Therefore, through Obama's efforts, ISIS had free reign.

QED Isis: In Iraq Because Of Obama

From your very first link oh-so funny cut-n-paste one.

"But ending the U.S. troop presence in Iraq was an overwhelmingly popular demand among Iraqis, and Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki appears to have been unwilling to take the political risk of extending it. While he was inclined to see a small number of American soldiers stay behind to continue mentoring Iraqi forces, the likes of Shi’ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, on whose support Maliki’s ruling coalition depends, were having none of it. Even the Obama Administration’s plan to keep some 3,000 trainers behind failed because the Iraqis were unwilling to grant them the legal immunity from local prosecution that is common to SOF agreements in most countries where U.S. forces are based.

........

But as of December 31, no more American soldiers will be doing tours of duty in Iraq. The war that ousted Saddam Hussein, unleashing an insurgency that left 4,500 Americans and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis dead, and which will cost the U.S. upwards of $1 trillion, is finally over. Historians will note that the U.S. invasion of Iraq precipitated dramatic changes across the Middle East political landscape in the ensuing decade. But many of those changes were hardly the ones the war’s authors had in mind."

Iraq’s Government, Not Obama, Called Time on the U.S. Troop Presence | TIME.com

ISIS resulted out of President Bushes disastrous invasion and occupation of Iraq.

I could say something about you not lying again, but everyone here knows that ain't happening.......

1. "...cut-n-paste one."
Cut and paste means providing actual links, quotes and sources.
It's what educated folks do.




2. "From your very first link oh-so funny cut-n-paste one.

"But ending the U.S. troop presence in Iraq was an overwhelmingly popular demand among Iraqis, and Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki appears to have been unwilling to take the political risk of extending it."

Proving exactly what we on the Right have always said about the windbag, Hussein Obama: he had not the skills to be the American leader.

As events proved, finding a way to get an agreement was the right thing to do.
He didn't, couldn't and as I showed.....had no intention or placing roadblocks in the way of ISIS.


3. While ISIS celebrated....Obama sat back and gave them an 'atta-boy'..

Not a missile, not a bullet, not a mean word from Obama.


4. When his ineptitude become public....Obama reversed course:
"Yet this time around, Obama is willing to accept an agreement from Iraq’s foreign ministry on U.S. forces in Iraq without a vote of Iraq’s parliament."



5. Now....don't ever let me catch you lying about Obama's culpability again!


1. Bush left Iraq with an agreement that allowed US troops to remain until 2012.

2. The windbag, Obama took charge in 2009

3. Obama declined to negotiate a Status of Forces agreement that would have left troops, and he actually removed same before he had to.

4. Political landscapes, like nature, abhor a vacuum.

5. Therefore, through Obama's efforts, ISIS had free reign.

QED Isis: In Iraq Because Of Obama

Why didn't the architect of the invasion and occupation secure a long term arraignment for troop presence in the country he invaded? Was there some sticking point holding that up? I mean he had a full year to negotiate it? Could it be the same reason President Obama couldn't in his year long attempt to negotiate one? Of course it was, no president would allow our troop to be deployed in a country and at the mercy of foreign courts, especially a newly founded Islamic one.

Why did the brain-dead trained seals who vote Democrat saddle the world with
.....Barack Hussein Obama, the dirt-eating low-life, crypto-Islamist, back-stabbing, infanticide-supporting incompetent snake with an unbroken record of failure, both as a President and as a human being?


Why?

You could save a lot of space if you just admit you’re a racist.

What's a 'racist'???

The most insightful definition is 'a conservative winning an argument with a Liberal.'



And, yes.....I do enjoy mocking you.

 

[Reasonable]

 

[Reasonable]

View attachment 159682

From your very first link oh-so funny cut-n-paste one.

"But ending the U.S. troop presence in Iraq was an overwhelmingly popular demand among Iraqis, and Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki appears to have been unwilling to take the political risk of extending it. While he was inclined to see a small number of American soldiers stay behind to continue mentoring Iraqi forces, the likes of Shi’ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, on whose support Maliki’s ruling coalition depends, were having none of it. Even the Obama Administration’s plan to keep some 3,000 trainers behind failed because the Iraqis were unwilling to grant them the legal immunity from local prosecution that is common to SOF agreements in most countries where U.S. forces are based.

........

But as of December 31, no more American soldiers will be doing tours of duty in Iraq. The war that ousted Saddam Hussein, unleashing an insurgency that left 4,500 Americans and hundreds of thousands of Iraqis dead, and which will cost the U.S. upwards of $1 trillion, is finally over. Historians will note that the U.S. invasion of Iraq precipitated dramatic changes across the Middle East political landscape in the ensuing decade. But many of those changes were hardly the ones the war’s authors had in mind."

Iraq’s Government, Not Obama, Called Time on the U.S. Troop Presence | TIME.com

ISIS resulted out of President Bushes disastrous invasion and occupation of Iraq.

I could say something about you not lying again, but everyone here knows that ain't happening.......

1. "...cut-n-paste one."
Cut and paste means providing actual links, quotes and sources.
It's what educated folks do.




2. "From your very first link oh-so funny cut-n-paste one.

"But ending the U.S. troop presence in Iraq was an overwhelmingly popular demand among Iraqis, and Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki appears to have been unwilling to take the political risk of extending it."

Proving exactly what we on the Right have always said about the windbag, Hussein Obama: he had not the skills to be the American leader.

As events proved, finding a way to get an agreement was the right thing to do.
He didn't, couldn't and as I showed.....had no intention or placing roadblocks in the way of ISIS.


3. While ISIS celebrated....Obama sat back and gave them an 'atta-boy'..

Not a missile, not a bullet, not a mean word from Obama.


4. When his ineptitude become public....Obama reversed course:
"Yet this time around, Obama is willing to accept an agreement from Iraq’s foreign ministry on U.S. forces in Iraq without a vote of Iraq’s parliament."



5. Now....don't ever let me catch you lying about Obama's culpability again!


1. Bush left Iraq with an agreement that allowed US troops to remain until 2012.

2. The windbag, Obama took charge in 2009

3. Obama declined to negotiate a Status of Forces agreement that would have left troops, and he actually removed same before he had to.

4. Political landscapes, like nature, abhor a vacuum.

5. Therefore, through Obama's efforts, ISIS had free reign.

QED Isis: In Iraq Because Of Obama

Why didn't the architect of the invasion and occupation secure a long term arraignment for troop presence in the country he invaded? Was there some sticking point holding that up? I mean he had a full year to negotiate it? Could it be the same reason President Obama couldn't in his year long attempt to negotiate one? Of course it was, no president would allow our troop to be deployed in a country and at the mercy of foreign courts, especially a newly founded Islamic one.

Why did the brain-dead trained seals who vote Democrat saddle the world with
.....Barack Hussein Obama, the dirt-eating low-life, crypto-Islamist, back-stabbing, infanticide-supporting incompetent snake with an unbroken record of failure, both as a President and as a human being?


Why?

You could save a lot of space if you just admit you’re a racist.

What's a 'racist'???

The most insightful definition is 'a conservative winning an argument with a Liberal.'



And, yes.....I do enjoy mocking you.

This proclaimed genius doesn’t know what a racist is. Hilarious.
Look two places. In the mirror and at the picture of Trump you have in your bedroom.

 

[PoliticalChic]

My, my.....but you are a slow learner, aren't you.

Iraq’s Government, Not Obama, Called Time on the U.S. Troop Presence

Is the title of the first link you quote.

Repeat........

Repeat?

Sure:

1. Bush made sure that the community organizer had until 2012 to work out an agreement:
"In one of his final acts in office, President Bush in December of 2008 had signed a Status of Forces Agreement (SOFA) with the Iraqi government thatset the clock ticking on ending the war he’d launched in March of 2003. The SOFA provided a legal basis for the presence of U.S. forces in Iraq after the United Nations Security Council mandate for the occupation mission expired at the end of 2008. But it required that all U.S. forces be gone from Iraq by January 1, 2012, unless the Iraqi government was willing to negotiate a new agreement that would extend their mandate. "
Iraq 8217 s Government Not Obama Called Time on the U.S. Troop Presence TIME.com



2." BLITZER: -- Agreement that would have left a residual force, 5,000 or 10,000 U.S. troops, but you couldn't get immunity from Nuri al Maliki's government. Take us behind the scenes, clarify, who's right, John McCain or Jay Carney, in this debate.

BARBERO: Well, in the summer of 2010, prepared a briefing, I was responsible for Iraqi security forces, andtook it to all the Iraqi leaders, Maliki, the other Shia leaders, the Sunnis, the Kurds, and said here is going to be the status of your security forces, what they cannot do, what they will be able to do, when we're schedule to leave. And to a man they said, well, general, you must stay.And my response was, you must make it easy for us. So I think Maliki did not make it easy for us and we did not try hard enough. So it's a -- both views. I think it could have been done though."
CNN.com - Transcripts



3. "Obama's 2012 Debate Boast: I Didn't Want to Leave Any Troops in Iraq
Obama then denied that he ever supported a status of forces agreement that would have left troops in Iraq:

MR. ROMNEY: [W]ith regards to Iraq, you and I agreed, I believe, that there should have been a status of forces agreement. Did you —

PRESIDENT OBAMA: That's not true.

MR. ROMNEY: Oh, you didn't — you didn't want a status of forces agreement?

PRESIDENT OBAMA: No, but what I — what I would not have done is left 10,000 troops in Iraq that would tie us down. That certainly would not help us in the Middle East.

"Here's one thing I've learned as commander in chief," Obama said at the end of the exchange. "You've got to be clear, both to our allies and our enemies, about where you stand and what you mean."
Obama s 2012 Debate Boast I Didn t Want to Leave Any Troops in Iraq The Weekly Standard

 

[PoliticalChic]

View attachment 159683

Why is it that you Leftists hate free speech?

'Cause you always lose the debate???

 

[PoliticalChic]

View attachment 159682

1. "...cut-n-paste one."
Cut and paste means providing actual links, quotes and sources.
It's what educated folks do.




2. "From your very first link oh-so funny cut-n-paste one.

"But ending the U.S. troop presence in Iraq was an overwhelmingly popular demand among Iraqis, and Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki appears to have been unwilling to take the political risk of extending it."

Proving exactly what we on the Right have always said about the windbag, Hussein Obama: he had not the skills to be the American leader.

As events proved, finding a way to get an agreement was the right thing to do.
He didn't, couldn't and as I showed.....had no intention or placing roadblocks in the way of ISIS.


3. While ISIS celebrated....Obama sat back and gave them an 'atta-boy'..

Not a missile, not a bullet, not a mean word from Obama.


4. When his ineptitude become public....Obama reversed course:
"Yet this time around, Obama is willing to accept an agreement from Iraq’s foreign ministry on U.S. forces in Iraq without a vote of Iraq’s parliament."



5. Now....don't ever let me catch you lying about Obama's culpability again!


1. Bush left Iraq with an agreement that allowed US troops to remain until 2012.

2. The windbag, Obama took charge in 2009

3. Obama declined to negotiate a Status of Forces agreement that would have left troops, and he actually removed same before he had to.

4. Political landscapes, like nature, abhor a vacuum.

5. Therefore, through Obama's efforts, ISIS had free reign.

QED Isis: In Iraq Because Of Obama

Why didn't the architect of the invasion and occupation secure a long term arraignment for troop presence in the country he invaded? Was there some sticking point holding that up? I mean he had a full year to negotiate it? Could it be the same reason President Obama couldn't in his year long attempt to negotiate one? Of course it was, no president would allow our troop to be deployed in a country and at the mercy of foreign courts, especially a newly founded Islamic one.

Why did the brain-dead trained seals who vote Democrat saddle the world with
.....Barack Hussein Obama, the dirt-eating low-life, crypto-Islamist, back-stabbing, infanticide-supporting incompetent snake with an unbroken record of failure, both as a President and as a human being?


Why?

You could save a lot of space if you just admit you’re a racist.

What's a 'racist'???

The most insightful definition is 'a conservative winning an argument with a Liberal.'



And, yes.....I do enjoy mocking you.

This proclaimed genius doesn’t know what a racist is. Hilarious.
Look two places. In the mirror and at the picture of Trump you have in your bedroom.

What's a 'racist'???

The most insightful definition is 'a conservative winning an argument with a Liberal.'



And, yes.....I do enjoy mocking you.

 

[Reasonable]

 

[PoliticalChic]

View attachment 159682

1. "...cut-n-paste one."
Cut and paste means providing actual links, quotes and sources.
It's what educated folks do.




2. "From your very first link oh-so funny cut-n-paste one.

"But ending the U.S. troop presence in Iraq was an overwhelmingly popular demand among Iraqis, and Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki appears to have been unwilling to take the political risk of extending it."

Proving exactly what we on the Right have always said about the windbag, Hussein Obama: he had not the skills to be the American leader.

As events proved, finding a way to get an agreement was the right thing to do.
He didn't, couldn't and as I showed.....had no intention or placing roadblocks in the way of ISIS.


3. While ISIS celebrated....Obama sat back and gave them an 'atta-boy'..

Not a missile, not a bullet, not a mean word from Obama.


4. When his ineptitude become public....Obama reversed course:
"Yet this time around, Obama is willing to accept an agreement from Iraq’s foreign ministry on U.S. forces in Iraq without a vote of Iraq’s parliament."



5. Now....don't ever let me catch you lying about Obama's culpability again!


1. Bush left Iraq with an agreement that allowed US troops to remain until 2012.

2. The windbag, Obama took charge in 2009

3. Obama declined to negotiate a Status of Forces agreement that would have left troops, and he actually removed same before he had to.

4. Political landscapes, like nature, abhor a vacuum.

5. Therefore, through Obama's efforts, ISIS had free reign.

QED Isis: In Iraq Because Of Obama

Why didn't the architect of the invasion and occupation secure a long term arraignment for troop presence in the country he invaded? Was there some sticking point holding that up? I mean he had a full year to negotiate it? Could it be the same reason President Obama couldn't in his year long attempt to negotiate one? Of course it was, no president would allow our troop to be deployed in a country and at the mercy of foreign courts, especially a newly founded Islamic one.

Why did the brain-dead trained seals who vote Democrat saddle the world with
.....Barack Hussein Obama, the dirt-eating low-life, crypto-Islamist, back-stabbing, infanticide-supporting incompetent snake with an unbroken record of failure, both as a President and as a human being?


Why?

You could save a lot of space if you just admit you’re a racist.

What's a 'racist'???

The most insightful definition is 'a conservative winning an argument with a Liberal.'



And, yes.....I do enjoy mocking you.

This proclaimed genius doesn’t know what a racist is. Hilarious.
Look two places. In the mirror and at the picture of Trump you have in your bedroom.

"This proclaimed genius ...."

I didn't 'proclaim' myself a genius....

....but I accept your nomination.

 

[PoliticalChic]

View attachment 159684

1. Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425

2. "The night riders move through the darkness, white against the black road....they go about their business, their horsed draped, guns and bullwhips banging dully against saddles.

....this is the South Carolina of the 1870s, not of the turn of a new millennium, and the night riders are the terror of these times. They roam upcountry, visiting their version of justice on poor blacks and the Republicans that support them, refusing to bow to the requirements of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments."

From the novel "The White Road," by John Connolly

 

[Reasonable]

Being mocked by a racist knownothing like yourself is a badge of honor. Having the top leaders in the world mock this dunce of a president is heartwarming.

 

[PoliticalChic]

7. Hussein Obama ran his administration in full favor of Islamoterrorists....

a. ...sending terror leaders captured on the battlefield, back to the war...


b. ...clearing the field for the creation of ISIS by refusing to leave any troops as a counterweight in Iraq


c.....lying to the public about Islam

"Obama: 'Islam Has Been Woven Into the Fabric of Our Country Since Its Founding'" Obama: 'Islam Has Been Woven Into the Fabric of Our Country Since Its Founding'


"Obama says the Islamic State ‘is not Islamic.’" Obama says the Islamic State ‘is not Islamic.’ Americans disagree.




d. Awarding nuclear weapons to Iran, the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism.


e. Under Obama: "Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million" Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart



How blind must one be to miss these 'clues'????

From far right sites?
Your sources are shit and you lie. If you didn’t have those, you’d have nothing to talk about.

There is no 'Far Right' in this country.

The fact that you believe that there is proves how ignorant you are.

Let's prove that.

The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.

To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)


I can name lots of radical positions by the Left, hence....Far Left....you.....

.... see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



And....if you can't, well.....we've proven that you are an idiot.

Soooo......you can't come up with any radical positions by the Rightwing, the Conservatives????

And we can agree that you're an idiot?

Excellent.

 

[PoliticalChic]

View attachment 159685

Being mocked by a racist knownothing like yourself is a badge of honor. Having the top leaders in the world mock this dunce of a president is heartwarming.

So....Putin wasn't behind the Trump campaign???

Hillary was his choice?

Excellent.

 

[Reasonable]

View attachment 159684

View attachment 159686

1. Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425

2. "The night riders move through the darkness, white against the black road....they go about their business, their horsed draped, guns and bullwhips banging dully against saddles.

....this is the South Carolina of the 1870s, not of the turn of a new millennium, and the night riders are the terror of these times. They roam upcountry, visiting their version of justice on poor blacks and the Republicans that support them, refusing to bow to the requirements of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments."

From the novel "The White Road," by John Connolly

History illiterate.

"Democrats founded the KKK!" is the equivalence of "Did you know your beloved LA Dodgers are actually the BROOKLYN Dodgers?!?!"

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

I don't have any enemies. Not a single one.

 

[Reasonable]

View attachment 159685

Being mocked by a racist knownothing like yourself is a badge of honor. Having the top leaders in the world mock this dunce of a president is heartwarming.

So....Putin wasn't behind the Trump campaign???

Hillary was his choice?

Excellent.

Still spouting lies. It’s your MO. Everyone of our intelligence agencies have agreed Putin helped Trump win. Every one..

 

[Reasonable]

7. Hussein Obama ran his administration in full favor of Islamoterrorists....

a. ...sending terror leaders captured on the battlefield, back to the war...


b. ...clearing the field for the creation of ISIS by refusing to leave any troops as a counterweight in Iraq


c.....lying to the public about Islam

"Obama: 'Islam Has Been Woven Into the Fabric of Our Country Since Its Founding'" Obama: 'Islam Has Been Woven Into the Fabric of Our Country Since Its Founding'


"Obama says the Islamic State ‘is not Islamic.’" Obama says the Islamic State ‘is not Islamic.’ Americans disagree.




d. Awarding nuclear weapons to Iran, the world's worst state sponsor of terrorism.


e. Under Obama: "Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million" Immigration to Swell U.S. Muslim Population to 6.2 Million - Breitbart



How blind must one be to miss these 'clues'????

From far right sites?
Your sources are shit and you lie. If you didn’t have those, you’d have nothing to talk about.

There is no 'Far Right' in this country.

The fact that you believe that there is proves how ignorant you are.

Let's prove that.

The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.

To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)


I can name lots of radical positions by the Left, hence....Far Left....you.....

.... see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



And....if you can't, well.....we've proven that you are an idiot.

Soooo......you can't come up with any radical positions by the Rightwing, the Conservatives????

And we can agree that you're an idiot?

Excellent.

No radical positions by conservatives?
Ha ha ha ha
The KKK were conservatives.... liberals fought against them.
And then there’s this.

 

[BlindBoo]

Repeat?

Iraq’s Government, Not Obama, Called Time on the U.S. Troop Presence

Iraq’s Government, Not Obama, Called Time on the U.S. Troop Presence | TIME.com

 

[Reasonable]

View attachment 159685

Being mocked by a racist knownothing like yourself is a badge of honor. Having the top leaders in the world mock this dunce of a president is heartwarming.

So....Putin wasn't behind the Trump campaign???

Hillary was his choice?

Excellent.

You lie like you breathe. But it’s what we expect from a woman who supports a misogynistic pig and sex offender as president.

 

[PoliticalChic]

View attachment 159685

Being mocked by a racist knownothing like yourself is a badge of honor. Having the top leaders in the world mock this dunce of a president is heartwarming.

So....Putin wasn't behind the Trump campaign???

Hillary was his choice?

Excellent.

Still spouting lies. It’s your MO. Everyone of our intelligence agencies have agreed Putin helped Trump win. Every one..

False.

Now...watch me prove you to be a trained seal


We were initially told that seventeen U.S. intelligence agencies had independently confirmed that Russia hacked the Democratic National Committee and our 2016 presidential election.

But wait! We now learn that only three agencies have confirmed this intelligence finding (CIA, NSA, FBI).

Further, only one agency actually conducted the majority of the research that netted that conclusion: The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).

The main intelligence gathering was conducted by the CIA. In other words, the FBI and the NSA simply said "we agree" that the CIA's work is credible. The three agencies did not independently make this same conclusion. The CIA coerced the FBI and NSA into compliance.

....Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Sec. Jeh Johnson attempted to coerce several Secretaries of State about designating our voting systems as 'critical infrastructure' which would've subjugated those state's roles in the election to the federal government. To DHS's shock, the states outright rejected that request.


.... Democrats had plenty of cover to conflate these findings into an assertion of a Trump-collusion. This explains why none of the Obama-holdovers (including former FBI Director James Comey) were willing to formally admit they had no evidence (against Trump) and continued to act in a way that ultimately discredited President Trump.

Obama's Political Weapon Against Trump




. Oh....and BTW....subsequently, we have also learned that the DNC is in charge of both the DoJ and the FBI: they refused...refused... requests that the DNC's servers be investigated. Imagine, if you refused the FBI.

3. Which brings us to Dmitri Alperovitch, and Crowdstrike.

a. “FBI SAYS THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY WOULDN’T LET AGENTS SEE THE HACKED EMAIL SERVERS ....neither the FBI nor any other intelligence agency ever did an independent assessment of the organization’s breached servers. Instead, they alleged, the FBI relied exclusively on information from private digital forensics company Crowdstrike. “
The FBI says the Democratic Party wouldn't let agents see the hacked email servers

b. “In lieu of substantive evidence provided to the public that the alleged hacks which led to Wikileaks releases of DNC and Clinton Campaign Manager John Podesta’s emails were orchestrated by the Russian Government, CrowdStrike’s bias has been cited as undependable in its own assessment, in addition to its skeptical methods and conclusions. The firm’s CTO and co-founder, Dmitri Alperovitch, is a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, a think tank with openly anti-Russian sentiments that is funded by Ukrainian billionaire Victor Pinchuk, who also happened to donate at least $10 million to the Clinton Foundation.” What Is CrowdStrike? Firm Hired By DNC Has Ties To Hillary Clinton, A Ukrainian Billionaire, And Google | Zero Hedge


4. This summary from the Leftwing Slate:
”.... if the evidence that they’ve used to level major accusations at a foreign government comes not from agencies of the U.S. government or direct law enforcement investigations, but rather from private sector firms like CrowdStrike, then the “high confidence” of the government counts for very little. “
The FBI Relied on a Private Firm’s Investigation of the DNC Hack—Which Makes the Agency Harder to Trust



Isn't this fun???

 

[Peach]

99% of your posts are total drivel. But this one....

...This one is just hilarious. Well done!

I really got a chuckle out of the thought of 'left wing groups sitting at a conference table with ISIS and Al Qaeda'.
Who do you think was responsible for ordering lunch for the meeting?

Translation: "I couldn't find a single thing to dispute in the well documented posts."



Hence.....you personify:

If you claim to be an American, and subscribe to the beliefs and values memorialized in our founding documents.....

...well....Bolsheviks, Nazis, and Islamofascists should be your enemies.

and....

"the enemy of my enemy is my friend"......that would describe Donald J. Trump's administration.

Where do you think this big meeting took place between the dems and ISIS? Motel 6 conference room at the airport?

Altair VI?