The enemies of America want the United States to fail.

[Sallow]

This is true. I've never heard an opposition party openly hoping a President to fail or the leaders of that party setting the agenda that the President will be a one term President.

You must not have watched any TV, listened to a Radio, or read a News Paper for your whole life then, or you may just have selective memory loss.

Easy enough.

Post a link.

 

[Unkotare]

If the president fails, the country fails. In my entire life, only the enemies of this country want America to fail.

What a stupid-extreme partisan douchebag you are.

 

[Sallow]

Yes, that says 51 percent of Democrats and 34 percent of Independents didn't want President Bush to succeed...even though our nation was at war in Iraq and Afghanistan.



Read more: Most Democrats Wanted Bush to Fail in 2006 Poll, Will Media Care? | NewsBusters.org

yes the democrats wanted Bush to fail. i hate it when people have these type of anti progress ideas. We should not want our presidents to fail. When we want our president to fail we are undermining the cause of the US of A

I must admit that I have difficulty reading your posts with that juvenile avi...but you require a correction here...or at least a variation of your post.

There are two ' US of A's' in this discussion.

There is the one created by the Founders, and memorialized in the D of I and the Constitution, and there is the one has been pressed upon this nation over the last century...the one that tosses aside the Constitution, shreds federalism, and values the collective over the individual.

It is no misdemeanor to wish the latter, Progressive America to fail in favor of the restoration of the original.

You sort of got that backwards. The "restoration" types wanted the "States Rights" thing twice in the history of the country. One..where they openly rebelled against one of the Founders, George Washington, during the Whiskey Rebellion. The next time during the Civil War. Both times it was the conservatives that rebelled.

 

[Full-Auto]

yes the democrats wanted Bush to fail. i hate it when people have these type of anti progress ideas. We should not want our presidents to fail. When we want our president to fail we are undermining the cause of the US of A

I must admit that I have difficulty reading your posts with that juvenile avi...but you require a correction here...or at least a variation of your post.

There are two ' US of A's' in this discussion.

There is the one created by the Founders, and memorialized in the D of I and the Constitution, and there is the one has been pressed upon this nation over the last century...the one that tosses aside the Constitution, shreds federalism, and values the collective over the individual.

It is no misdemeanor to wish the latter, Progressive America to fail in favor of the restoration of the original.

You sort of got that backwards. The "restoration" types wanted the "States Rights" thing twice in the history of the country. One..where they openly rebelled against one of the Founders, George Washington, during the Whiskey Rebellion. The next time during the Civil War. Both times it was the conservatives that rebelled.

One of the concerns acknowledged by Hamilton was that States may be too powerful in usurping the federal powers. We now know that had little merit.

 

[PoliticalChic]

yes the democrats wanted Bush to fail. i hate it when people have these type of anti progress ideas. We should not want our presidents to fail. When we want our president to fail we are undermining the cause of the US of A

I must admit that I have difficulty reading your posts with that juvenile avi...but you require a correction here...or at least a variation of your post.

There are two ' US of A's' in this discussion.

There is the one created by the Founders, and memorialized in the D of I and the Constitution, and there is the one has been pressed upon this nation over the last century...the one that tosses aside the Constitution, shreds federalism, and values the collective over the individual.

It is no misdemeanor to wish the latter, Progressive America to fail in favor of the restoration of the original.

You sort of got that backwards. The "restoration" types wanted the "States Rights" thing twice in the history of the country. One..where they openly rebelled against one of the Founders, George Washington, during the Whiskey Rebellion. The next time during the Civil War. Both times it was the conservatives that rebelled.

I can see why you would pretend not to have read the post....let me reprise the operative portion:

"...the one that tosses aside the Constitution, shreds federalism, and values the collective over the individual."

You down wit' dat, right puppy?

Progressive Puppy....kinda catchy...

 

[Sallow]

I must admit that I have difficulty reading your posts with that juvenile avi...but you require a correction here...or at least a variation of your post.

There are two ' US of A's' in this discussion.

There is the one created by the Founders, and memorialized in the D of I and the Constitution, and there is the one has been pressed upon this nation over the last century...the one that tosses aside the Constitution, shreds federalism, and values the collective over the individual.

It is no misdemeanor to wish the latter, Progressive America to fail in favor of the restoration of the original.

You sort of got that backwards. The "restoration" types wanted the "States Rights" thing twice in the history of the country. One..where they openly rebelled against one of the Founders, George Washington, during the Whiskey Rebellion. The next time during the Civil War. Both times it was the conservatives that rebelled.

One of the concerns acknowledged by Hamilton was that States may be too powerful in usurping the federal powers. We now know that had little merit.

Yep. He spoke up against having a standing army under federal control but acknowledged that may not be possible because of American expansionism and the "wild" frontier.

 

[Full-Auto]

You sort of got that backwards. The "restoration" types wanted the "States Rights" thing twice in the history of the country. One..where they openly rebelled against one of the Founders, George Washington, during the Whiskey Rebellion. The next time during the Civil War. Both times it was the conservatives that rebelled.

One of the concerns acknowledged by Hamilton was that States may be too powerful in usurping the federal powers. We now know that had little merit.

Yep. He spoke up against having a standing army under federal control but acknowledged that may not be possible because of American expansionism and the "wild" frontier.

Another excellent point.

It has been quite enjoyable reading the arguments for the constitution, the concerns for and against, then comparing them with today. I am just a chapter or two away from getting into taxation. Should be fun...............

 

[Truthmatters]

This is true. I've never heard an opposition party openly hoping a President to fail or the leaders of that party setting the agenda that the President will be a one term President.

You're gettin' the spanking you so richy deserve, puppy:

If it's unpatriotic and supposedly treasonous for conservative talk radio host Rush Limbaugh to want Barack Obama's policies to fail in the middle of a serious recession, is it similarly so for Democrats who wished President Bush wouldn't succeed while the nation was at war?

In August 2006, a Fox News/Opinion Dynamics poll asked the following of 900 registered voters:


Regardless of how you voted in the presidential election, would you say you want President Bush to succeed or not?

Here are the stunning results (h/t Patterico via NB reader Thomas Stewart):

[Democrats: 51% fail]

Yes, that says 51 percent of Democrats and 34 percent of Independents didn't want President Bush to succeed...even though our nation was at war in Iraq and Afghanistan.

When these Democrats say they want Bush to fail, might this mean that they simply reject what they see as his far-right religious and corporate agenda? If so, it’s hard to see why independents—hardly right-wing zealots—hope he succeeds by 63 percent to 34 percent. Sadly, much of the Democratic Party wants to see this president crash and burn. [...]

Read more: Most Democrats Wanted Bush to Fail in 2006 Poll, Will Media Care? | NewsBusters.org

The man had just lied us into a war for gods sake.

He was lying constantly about nearly everything he said.

Today its YOU people lying about what Obama is doing.

Taxes are the lowest they have been in 50 years and you pretend they have been raised by Obama.

Your team constantly calls him things he is not and votes against laws they have written themselves to try and hurt him.

There is a differance between party members hoping the guy lying people into their graves doesnt suceede and Elected officials voting against what they stood for last week to harm a presidents chances of re election.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

This is true. I've never heard an opposition party openly hoping a President to fail or the leaders of that party setting the agenda that the President will be a one term President.

You must have an extremely short memory.

The Democrats said the exact same things about President Bush

Where & WHEN??!!!

You're on-the-clock.....

<tick><tick><tick><tick><tick><tick><tick><tick>

(Failure to provide proof makes you a LIAR!)

​

 

[uscitizen]

The enemies of America want the United States to fail.

Yaah, they elected Bush a couple of times.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

Obama is an enemy of America. So wanting him to fail is actually patriotic.

Yeah.....

....we know.


​

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Dude, take a Xanbar...... or two or three.....

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

BTW... Steelers SUCK.

 

[kwc57]

If the president fails, the country fails. In my entire life, only the enemies of this country want America to fail.

Good God, you're finally getting it. Obama is purposely trying to destroy our economy so he can fundamenatally transform it into a socualist society dependent on the central gubmint. Thank you for finally waking up and joining those of us who see Obama for the enemy that he is.

 

[Sallow]

I must admit that I have difficulty reading your posts with that juvenile avi...but you require a correction here...or at least a variation of your post.

There are two ' US of A's' in this discussion.

There is the one created by the Founders, and memorialized in the D of I and the Constitution, and there is the one has been pressed upon this nation over the last century...the one that tosses aside the Constitution, shreds federalism, and values the collective over the individual.

It is no misdemeanor to wish the latter, Progressive America to fail in favor of the restoration of the original.

You sort of got that backwards. The "restoration" types wanted the "States Rights" thing twice in the history of the country. One..where they openly rebelled against one of the Founders, George Washington, during the Whiskey Rebellion. The next time during the Civil War. Both times it was the conservatives that rebelled.

I can see why you would pretend not to have read the post....let me reprise the operative portion:

"...the one that tosses aside the Constitution, shreds federalism, and values the collective over the individual."

You down wit' dat, right puppy?

Progressive Puppy....kinda catchy...

The two real life instances I presented to you are conservatives doing just that.

Cutie.

 

[Intense]

This is true. I've never heard an opposition party openly hoping a President to fail or the leaders of that party setting the agenda that the President will be a one term President.

You must not have watched any TV, listened to a Radio, or read a News Paper for your whole life then, or you may just have selective memory loss.

Easy enough.

Post a link.

Most Democrats Wanted Bush to Fail in 2006 Poll, Will Media Care?

Read more: Most Democrats Wanted Bush to Fail in 2006 Poll, Will Media Care? | NewsBusters.org
-------------------------------------------------------

Flashback: Carville Wanted Bush to Fail

Flashback: Carville Wanted Bush To Fail | Fox News
-------------------------------------------------------


Larry Elder

But what of Democrats who rooted against the success of George W. Bush?

"Would you say you want President Bush to succeed or not?" asked an August 2006 Fox News/Opinion Dynamics poll. The result? Ninety percent of Republicans wanted Bush to succeed, versus 7 percent who did not. Among independents, 63 percent wanted the President to succeed, compared with 34 percent who did not. What about Democrats? Forty percent wanted him to succeed, but 51 percent did not .

Did Democrats want Bush to fail? - Democratic Underground
------------------------------------------------------

New York Post logo

September 24, 2006
The Hate Trap

by Craig Charney



September 24, 2006 — The leftist and liberal throng who cheered Venezuelan strongman Hugo Chavez at a Harlem church Thursday, a day after he called President Bush “the devil,” are just the latest sign of a real problem for the Democratic Party and the nation: Bush-hate is now the opiate of the party’s base.

A recent Fox News poll gets at the disturbing truth: A majority of Democrats say they want to see the president fail. Such deep hatred is bad news for the country at a time when America needs to bridge the partisan divide. It’s also bad news for the Democrats, who risk repeating the Republicans’ mistakes of a decade ago, driving away the centrists they need to regain power or going too far if they do manage to win.

Fox’s question was revealing: “Regardless of how you voted in the presidential election, would you say you want President Bush to succeed or not?” Democrats said “not,” 51 percent to 40 percent—where the public at large wanted success by almost two to one.

In other words, the rage extends way beyond the lip-pierced Deaniacs, aging hippies and other fringes of the Democratic Party. Lots of otherwise sensible people—suburban moms, hospital orderlies, schoolteachers, big-hatted church ladies—detest George W. Bush.

When these Democrats say they want Bush to fail, might this mean that they simply reject what they see as his far-right religious and corporate agenda? If so, it’s hard to see why independents—hardly right-wing zealots—hope he succeeds by 63 percent to 34 percent. Sadly, much of the Democratic Party wants to see this president crash and burn.

In fact, the fury against Bush has reached unprecedented levels, even compared to the animosity among Republicans to his predecessor. Not long ago, a Washington Post-ABC News poll found that “strong disapproval” of Bush was 10 points higher than that recorded for Bill Clinton at any point during his presidency, including his impeachment. (That wasn’t during a war, either.)

The Hate Trap

 

[Unkotare]

The man had just lied us into a war for gods sake.

He was lying constantly about nearly everything he said.

No he did not, and no he did not. YOU, however, are lying right now.

 

[HUGGY]

If the president fails, the country fails. In my entire life, only the enemies of this country want America to fail.

Ya' ever think the President and the 'enemies' might be one and the same!!??

Lots of circumstancial evidence....

You are the enemy.

 

[Mr. Shaman]

This is true. I've never heard an opposition party openly hoping a President to fail or the leaders of that party setting the agenda that the President will be a one term President.

You must not have watched any TV, listened to a Radio, or read a News Paper for your whole life then, or you may just have selective memory loss.

.....OR, a committed Snooki Palin fan.


[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKKKgua7wQk]SARAH PALIN BOOK SIGNING - Interviews with Supporters - YouTube[/ame]

_

_

_

_

 

[Truthmatters]

Bush had lied us INTO a WAR!!!@!!!!!!


Americans were dying for his lies.

Killall Burn and Loot were electrocuting soilders in their showers.

Pallets and Plallets of hundered dollare bills by the plane load were disapearing into thin air in Iraq.

All this debt you are so concerned about now was being dumped onto the American people.

PEOPLE were DYING for the BUSH LIES!