In the nowhere infamous story in Matthew 25:14-30, possibly someone Greek had created the tale of the householder. One Servant got 5 Talents. One Servant Got 2 Talents. So they each doubled that through fixed percentage returns from the money-changers. The curiously a third servant got one Talent. Putting that to the fixed percentage returns would in no way keep up with the outcomes for the two other servants. The risk-reward scenario would be said different. So for safe-keeping, the one Talent was simply buried.
Anyone could show that the Pythgorean Theorem applied, The Three slaves--customary of Imperial Regimes--did not actually get paid, but were provided between zero and five talents The two doubled their talents. The one talent was a zero-rewards winner. The square root of five squared, plus the square root of five squared, would compute a seven talent hypoteneuse outcome. The Decimal Point would not be invented for 100 more years. Possibly the same Greek teller of tales had created the original, community-based household. People hired at different times of the day were actually paid a living wage--in equal amounts--regardless if they had worked all the day or not. Each wage-earner could then take the afternoon-time, with the equal amount paid, and spend in the market-place for the living necessities. The story is in Matthew 20:1-16. The other story is an upside-down triangle. That could be fit into a rectangle. The rectangle would be the scale of hours worked, worked for the living daily pay--a left-side--and the equal amount paid at each point. Little lines can be drawn into both stories.
Modern economies have created the concept of worthless money(?): Originating of a Credit Market, based in valued assets. At the Civil War start, the Imperially subjugated black slaves were valued at upwards of $2200.00 per slave. Land might be as much as $1.50 per acre, and a good mule maybe $25.00. Bankers could make loans. In the Industrial world, plants and land had different values. Bankers could make loans.
So back to the little rectangle, with the left-right diagonal from the bottom to the top. The bankers had in common a way to create a credit market. Money units happened, their distribution would be legally regulated. The arithmetic was no different from the original stories, and before that even known to the ancient world through the "money-changers."
Famously, the Southern Asset values mostly ceased to exist after the U. S. Constitution was amended. What had been lawful, created no further value. The market place of the money, had collapsed. What was left were incomes, with basis in anything left. Bankers were in the usury business throughout. When their businesses failed, of course, so did the value of their credit-based notes. After 1913, then even as Karl Marx had advocated, the credit market was centralized. After 1919, the Germans were sending valueable notes to pay reparations. The people were left with worthless paper. In the United States, By 1932, the credit market was three times larger than the amount of Personal Income around to pay it. Other than a stock market bubble, there had not been much inflation. The Democrats would go back to the New Testament basics, but instead through the advocacy and practice of Keynesian economics.
History, even now, fails to note the basic problem of usury economics. So Interest rates now "regulate" a money supply. The money gets distributed to incomes using the fixed percentage usury basis of even the Old Testament. The outcome is reported in Matthew 25:14-30, or more recently in the worthless mortgage paper crisis--and in the same manner of the banks of 150 years ago. The owner gets foreclosed out of the house. No one really knows what became of the paper.
So famously, Ronald Reagan would take what federal deficit there was, and send it off to the already prosperous, defense contractors. Barack Obama would take what federal deficit there was, and send it off to the already prosperous, bureaucrats and public school teachers. In the years before that, Bush-Cheney would take what federal deficit there was, and spend it with not particular outcome at all, apparently even intended at the start(?)!
The U. S. hyper-inflation post-1965 could be read an outcome of the over-extension of credit. Prices had to rise to pay off increasing loan requirements, those required to keep the market-place functioning, in the manner of paid incomes heading off to the market-place, to create a daily living. See Matthew 20:1-16. A Concept of "Good" is attributed to life. Since the lower incomes had no such living wages, then they could not keep up, number one. They might as well have buried what they had for safekeeping. Prices had to rise so at least the middle and rich would be purchasing, to repay the credit market what it was owed.
There would arise, "Quantitative Easing," when it could not be repaid--and more or less, with the flip of a switch.
Fortunately, in all this--Nixon had in common with Reagan, in common with Clinton, in common with Bush-Cheney, in common with Obama-Biden: A solid basis in law, backed by nuclear weapons. The Soviet Bloc had no such lawful basis. It went out of business. (Hopefully, they are not Iran(?)!) Famous Dickens character, Micawber had a phrase for it, too! Keynes was apparently gay, himself: Who had bade the people bend over, and await the Public Works(?)!
President Ford had created, instead equal-amount rebates. The Democrats under Reagan had raised and indexed the equal amount standard deduction and personal exemptions. The Clintons provided an equal child tax credit amount. Obama-Biden put the equal amount Make Work Pay Refundable Tax Credit into their stimulus. The Republicans took that away, first order of business, 2011. There would be lower income plans such as "Cash for Clunkers," and directly to stimulate industry sector spending.
Keynes had promised Public Works spending in the event of failure, not noting the New Testament Stories, or paying attention to the Old Testament stories. A Theory of "Business Cycles" had arisen, instead. In the nuclear weapons based lawful economics of the United States--people not involved with the defense industry, or employed in the public sector--The federal government managed to actually ignore completely. It would be so easy to bring that about. . . .really.
Some put the Sanders Administration price tag at about $18.0 tril. Personal income is less than $20.0 tril., and that so far. The Total Credit Market is at or more than $60 tril.
The Doom Coffin emerge(s), even now!
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Young Warrior raised in great shadow of War Pony: Understand when Mr. Ed, of television fame, is doing counting(?)! "Hey, how are ya, are ya, are ya?!? Hey, how are ya, are ya, are ya?!")
Anyone could show that the Pythgorean Theorem applied, The Three slaves--customary of Imperial Regimes--did not actually get paid, but were provided between zero and five talents The two doubled their talents. The one talent was a zero-rewards winner. The square root of five squared, plus the square root of five squared, would compute a seven talent hypoteneuse outcome. The Decimal Point would not be invented for 100 more years. Possibly the same Greek teller of tales had created the original, community-based household. People hired at different times of the day were actually paid a living wage--in equal amounts--regardless if they had worked all the day or not. Each wage-earner could then take the afternoon-time, with the equal amount paid, and spend in the market-place for the living necessities. The story is in Matthew 20:1-16. The other story is an upside-down triangle. That could be fit into a rectangle. The rectangle would be the scale of hours worked, worked for the living daily pay--a left-side--and the equal amount paid at each point. Little lines can be drawn into both stories.
Modern economies have created the concept of worthless money(?): Originating of a Credit Market, based in valued assets. At the Civil War start, the Imperially subjugated black slaves were valued at upwards of $2200.00 per slave. Land might be as much as $1.50 per acre, and a good mule maybe $25.00. Bankers could make loans. In the Industrial world, plants and land had different values. Bankers could make loans.
So back to the little rectangle, with the left-right diagonal from the bottom to the top. The bankers had in common a way to create a credit market. Money units happened, their distribution would be legally regulated. The arithmetic was no different from the original stories, and before that even known to the ancient world through the "money-changers."
Famously, the Southern Asset values mostly ceased to exist after the U. S. Constitution was amended. What had been lawful, created no further value. The market place of the money, had collapsed. What was left were incomes, with basis in anything left. Bankers were in the usury business throughout. When their businesses failed, of course, so did the value of their credit-based notes. After 1913, then even as Karl Marx had advocated, the credit market was centralized. After 1919, the Germans were sending valueable notes to pay reparations. The people were left with worthless paper. In the United States, By 1932, the credit market was three times larger than the amount of Personal Income around to pay it. Other than a stock market bubble, there had not been much inflation. The Democrats would go back to the New Testament basics, but instead through the advocacy and practice of Keynesian economics.
History, even now, fails to note the basic problem of usury economics. So Interest rates now "regulate" a money supply. The money gets distributed to incomes using the fixed percentage usury basis of even the Old Testament. The outcome is reported in Matthew 25:14-30, or more recently in the worthless mortgage paper crisis--and in the same manner of the banks of 150 years ago. The owner gets foreclosed out of the house. No one really knows what became of the paper.
So famously, Ronald Reagan would take what federal deficit there was, and send it off to the already prosperous, defense contractors. Barack Obama would take what federal deficit there was, and send it off to the already prosperous, bureaucrats and public school teachers. In the years before that, Bush-Cheney would take what federal deficit there was, and spend it with not particular outcome at all, apparently even intended at the start(?)!
The U. S. hyper-inflation post-1965 could be read an outcome of the over-extension of credit. Prices had to rise to pay off increasing loan requirements, those required to keep the market-place functioning, in the manner of paid incomes heading off to the market-place, to create a daily living. See Matthew 20:1-16. A Concept of "Good" is attributed to life. Since the lower incomes had no such living wages, then they could not keep up, number one. They might as well have buried what they had for safekeeping. Prices had to rise so at least the middle and rich would be purchasing, to repay the credit market what it was owed.
There would arise, "Quantitative Easing," when it could not be repaid--and more or less, with the flip of a switch.
Fortunately, in all this--Nixon had in common with Reagan, in common with Clinton, in common with Bush-Cheney, in common with Obama-Biden: A solid basis in law, backed by nuclear weapons. The Soviet Bloc had no such lawful basis. It went out of business. (Hopefully, they are not Iran(?)!) Famous Dickens character, Micawber had a phrase for it, too! Keynes was apparently gay, himself: Who had bade the people bend over, and await the Public Works(?)!
President Ford had created, instead equal-amount rebates. The Democrats under Reagan had raised and indexed the equal amount standard deduction and personal exemptions. The Clintons provided an equal child tax credit amount. Obama-Biden put the equal amount Make Work Pay Refundable Tax Credit into their stimulus. The Republicans took that away, first order of business, 2011. There would be lower income plans such as "Cash for Clunkers," and directly to stimulate industry sector spending.
Keynes had promised Public Works spending in the event of failure, not noting the New Testament Stories, or paying attention to the Old Testament stories. A Theory of "Business Cycles" had arisen, instead. In the nuclear weapons based lawful economics of the United States--people not involved with the defense industry, or employed in the public sector--The federal government managed to actually ignore completely. It would be so easy to bring that about. . . .really.
Some put the Sanders Administration price tag at about $18.0 tril. Personal income is less than $20.0 tril., and that so far. The Total Credit Market is at or more than $60 tril.
The Doom Coffin emerge(s), even now!
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Young Warrior raised in great shadow of War Pony: Understand when Mr. Ed, of television fame, is doing counting(?)! "Hey, how are ya, are ya, are ya?!? Hey, how are ya, are ya, are ya?!")
