Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Speaking of fraud, this is at least the second time you've mentioned this story with no link provided.
A probabilistic quantification of the anthropogenic component of twentieth century global warming - Springer
http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/...GH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.167.2337&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Anthropogenic and natural warming inferred from changes in Earth x27 s energy balance Nature Geoscience Nature Publishing Group
http://thingsbreak.files.wordpress....ing-160-years-of-temperature-observations.pdf
Global temperature evolution 1979 2010 - Abstract - Environmental Research Letters - IOPscience
Speaking of fraud, this is at least the second time you've mentioned this story with no link provided.
Just checking to see if you had any interest in seeing mikiey's fraud for yourself.....didn't think you did...Or are you just to dumb to do a search.
A probabilistic quantification of the anthropogenic component of twentieth century global warming - Springer
http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/...GH&whole_paper=YES&type=PRINTER&filetype=.pdf
http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.167.2337&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Anthropogenic and natural warming inferred from changes in Earth x27 s energy balance Nature Geoscience Nature Publishing Group
http://thingsbreak.files.wordpress....ing-160-years-of-temperature-observations.pdf
Global temperature evolution 1979 2010 - Abstract - Environmental Research Letters - IOPscience
And in typical warmer fashion, he fails to mention that most of the 20th century warming occurred prior to 1950 when CO2 levels were supposedly safe.
....and what little there actually is...after accounting for the incredible amount of tampering with the temperature record can not possibly be attributed to man.
...more mathematical sleight of hand and nothing else.
No anthropogenic fingerprint can be rationally distinguished from the natural noise.
Just one more fraudulent pseudo study on the mountain of pseudo studies on the pseudoscience of climate change.
More total bullshit and denier cult crackpot conspiracy theories.Australia seems to be well on its way to investigating its BoM. The fallout from their homogenisation could easily spread to the global datasets. One thing that would make me less concerned is if there was a study done where high quality stations were taken out, one by one, and the algorithms reproduced them without adding a warming trend.
I am also interested in seeing the ongoing results from the NOAA experiment where they set up a station with multiple types of thermometers, at multiple distances from a building, and continuous readings that could be used to quantify both TOB and UHI. The preliminary results from 2 years ago larger UHI effects than expected but no data was given on TOB.