International Parasite Agreement

[Flanders]

Climate change scams always originate at the United Nations. Environmental ripoffs offer the United Nations its best hope of gaining the authority to tax the American people. This latest one is more of the same:

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration is working to forge a sweeping international climate change agreement to compel nations to cut their planet-warming fossil fuel emissions, but without ratification from Congress.

In preparation for this agreement, to be signed at a United Nations summit meeting in 2015 in Paris, the negotiators are meeting with diplomats from other countries to broker a deal to commit some of the world’s largest economies to enact laws to reduce their carbon pollution.

Wannabe domestic parasites demanding seats at the public trough better tread carefully before they get behind an agreement designed to benefit foreign parasites. Americans will be less inclined to accept more domestic environmental parasites diving into the public feed tub after Taqiyya the Liar punishes Americans internationally the way he did domestically:

In June, he bypassed Congress and used his executive authority to order a far-reaching regulation forcing American coal-fired power plants to curb their carbon emissions.

NOTE: The EPA is a de facto United Nations agency.

There is no reason to cover the UN’s designer-science in detail. Ditto Third World parasites dictating policy. This excerpt will suffice. It is a masterpiece that combines phoney science with a demand for American tax dollars:

Poor countries look to rich countries to help build dams and levees to guard against coastal flooding from rising seas levels, or to provide food aid during pervasive droughts.

I do want to touch on a critical aspect of the UN’s relentless drive to become a global government.

Notice how the word “legal” is used correctly in the beginning. Blue is correct usage —— red is misdirection:

But under the Constitution, a president may enter into a legally binding treaty only if it is approved by a two-thirds majority of the Senate.

XXXXX​

“If you want a deal that includes all the major emitters, including the U.S., you cannot realistically pursue a legally binding treaty at this time,”. . .

The New York Times admits that treaties must be ratified by the Senate to be legally binding. Now read how “legal” becomes misdirection:

American negotiators are instead homing in on a hybrid agreement — a proposal to blend legally binding conditions from an existing 1992 treaty with new voluntary pledges. The mix would create a deal that would update the treaty, and thus, negotiators say, not require a new vote of ratification.

Countries would be legally required to enact domestic climate change policies — but would voluntarily pledge to specific levels of emissions cuts and to channel money to poor countries to help them adapt to climate change. Countries might then be legally obligated to report their progress toward meeting those pledges at meetings held to identify those nations that did not meet their cuts.

“There’s some legal and political magic to this,” . . .

Suddenly, “legal” jumps back to proper usage:

That regulation, which would not be not final until next year, already faces legal challenges, including a lawsuit filed on behalf of a dozen states.

And then a quick jump back to improper usage:

Observers of United Nations climate negotiations, which have gone on for more than two decades without achieving a global deal to legally bind the world’s biggest polluters to carbon cuts,. . .

XXXXX​

At a 2009 climate meeting in Copenhagen, world leaders tried but failed to forge a new legally binding treaty to supplant the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. Instead, they agreed only to a series of voluntary pledges to cut carbon emissions through 2020.

The Obama administration’s climate change negotiators are desperate to avoid repeating the failure of Kyoto, the United Nations’ first effort at a legally binding global climate change treaty.

Obama Pursuing Climate Accord in Lieu of Treaty
By CORAL DAVENPORTAUG. 26, 2014

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/27/u...ng-climate-accord-in-lieu-of-treaty.html?_r=0

The final excerpt best clarifies my point: “. . . the United Nations’ first effort at a legally binding global climate change treaty.” My point:

NOTHING THE UNITED NATIONS DOES IS LEGALLY BINDING.​

 

[The Irish Ram]

It's the Global Initiative vs the Constitution. And we keep electing Globals. When someone says they plan on fundamental change that means changing our foundation. It means replacing our freedoms with Global restraints. The Billarys are the next ones up.
We are watching this country die.

 

[Rotagilla]

As long as it undermines or cripples traditional american values and "redistributes" taxpayers money (that would predominantly be white people) it's ok.
That's obama's goal.
It has been from the beginning. He even told the people he was going to "fundamentally change" america.
..and they all clapped and cheered.
They just HAD to have their "black" president to show how "progessive" they were.

enjoy.

 

[Flanders]

We are watching this country die.

To The Irish Ram: People dying at the hands of environmentalists is my concern. This is where my concern originates.

Philosophers, theologians, and psycho-babblers in general should look into the possibility that institutional killing for the love of killing could be an ancient reaction to reincarnation —— if we can’t kill insects we will kill humans. If I’m onto something here it is time to start asking exactly what is environmentalism reacting to? More to my point, exactly how much influence did the environmental priesthood exercise in Nazi Germany:

“Romantic love is often blind. This is nowhere made more evident than in the environmental infatuation, if not worship, of a natural world which the modern greens will never be able to save no matter how totalitarian the movement becomes.” – R. Mark Musser, author

The green infatuation and Gaia worship were prominent in Hitler’s time. Musser talks about “the green Nazi motive of the Holocaust” in his book, Nazi Oaks. “Unbeknownst to many, the highway to modern environmentalism passed through Nazi Germany. By 1935, the Third Reich was the greenest regime on the planet.”

Lies and Dang Lies Environmentalists Tell
By Dr. Ileana Johnson Paugh August 27, 2014

Lies and Dang Lies Environmentalists Tell

Let’s not kid one another on this one. Priesthoods pushing totalitarian ideologies like Islam and Communism wrap their bloodlust in doctrines of one kind or another because they cannot very well admit that killing for the love of killing is the only thing that will satisfy them. (I’ve often said that the environmental movement is a sect of the Communist religion.)

NOTE: Communists used to say that only clerics and fascists wear black. I’ve yet to hear American Communists mention that Muslim butchers wear black, too. Question: What color uniforms will environmental butchers wear if they ever get totalitarian control over the world? Green is the obvious choice!

As long as it undermines or cripples traditional american values and "redistributes" taxpayers money (that would predominantly be white people) it's ok.
That's obama's goal.
It has been from the beginning. He even told the people he was going to "fundamentally change" america.
..and they all clapped and cheered.
They just HAD to have their "black" president to show how "progessive" they were.

enjoy.

To Rotagilla: Good point. His sweeping climate change agreement definitely adds more than a touch of racism to environmental scams that existed before he came along. I would even add that he is trying to pay Africans restitution for slavery. The only thing I cannot figure out is how sending billions of “environmental tax dollars” to Africa is restitution since today’s black Africans were never slaves in Colonial America.

 

[Rotagilla]

To Rotagilla: Good point. His sweeping climate change agreement definitely adds more than a touch of racism to environmental scams that existed before he came along. I would even add that he is trying to pay Africans restitution for slavery. The only thing I cannot figure out is how sending billions of “environmental tax dollars” to Africa is restitution since today’s black Africans were never slaves in Colonial America.

It's more about revenge/retribution against whites than helping africans.
No continent in history has had more money poured into it to help than africa.

..yet they still burn witches...they still practice slavery.
but of course, race has nothing to do with it.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Here is a glimpse at what he wrote in the article called Problems Facing Our Socialism. (In Kenya)
”Theoretically, there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed.”

Sadly, the people getting the benefits don't live here. America is the 1% whose wealth is being distributed. It has always been the dream of Obamas, Sr. and Jr.

 

[Flanders]

Here is a glimpse at what he wrote in the article called Problems Facing Our Socialism. (In Kenya)
”Theoretically, there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed.”

To The Irish Ram: Thanks. I never saw that one before. It fits right in with his theory of Positive Rights —— that is Positive Rights as defined in the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948) must be paid for with tax dollars as opposed to the Negative Rights in our original Bill of Rights that do not require tax dollars:



The worst of it is that Barack Taqiyya is completely committed to giving the United Nations control over the American people any way he can accomplish it. He obviously hit upon climate change fraud as a way to give United Nations agreements the same weight in our courts that a ratified treaty accrues. If he makes it stick America’s sovereignty will vanish faster than it is disappearing because of open-borders.

This update is a half-ass denial of intent if ever I saw one:

The Obama administration denied Wednesday that it is trying to bypass Congress in forming a global agreement to mitigate climate change.

State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said “it is entirely premature to say whether it will or won’t require Senate approval” since the officials haven’t even begun to write a United Nations climate change agreement to reduce international greenhouse gas emissions.

State denies Obama to bypass Senate with UN climate deal
By Timothy Cama - 08/27/14 11:48 AM EDT

State denies Obama to bypass Senate with UN climate deal TheHill

 

[Flanders]

I do not know how much coverage talking heads gave to the International Parasite Agreement. Networks do not like stories that show any president as a United Nations employee. Happily, Bret Baier and Greta Van Susteren did cover it.

In the first video Charles Krauthammer made me a little nervous with his take on International treaties, while Steve Hayes picked me up a few notches with his comments on Crazy Uncles like me:

Video Special Report Bret Baier Fox News Channel

In the second video Greta gives the topic some coverage in her interview with Rand Paul:

On the Record with Greta Van Susteren Fox News

All in all I was happy to see the topic covered in prime time. I would be in happy heaven had I heard a few words denouncing the whole damn global warming scare tactic as a complete fraud.

 

[Old Rocks]

So, another asshole claiming that the whole of the scientific establishment, worldwide, is in on some sinister conspiracy. Do realize how damned silly you fools sound?

 

[jc456]

So, another asshole claiming that the whole of the scientific establishment, worldwide, is in on some sinister conspiracy. Do realize how damned silly you fools sound?

And you have no idea if it is or isn't right?

 

[Rotagilla]

Here is a glimpse at what he wrote in the article called Problems Facing Our Socialism. (In Kenya)
”Theoretically, there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed.”

Sadly, the people getting the benefits don't live here. America is the 1% whose wealth is being distributed. It has always been the dream of Obamas, Sr. and Jr.

..and who are the majority of taxpayers in america?
White people.

 

[The Irish Ram]

So, another asshole claiming that the whole of the scientific establishment, worldwide, is in on some sinister conspiracy. Do realize how damned silly you fools sound?

Rocks, what do you think Soros and Kissinger meant when they said they were priming Obama to lead the New World Order?
How many times has Soros visited the Obama White House? Who is Soros, and who knows more about collapsing a country's economy than Soros?

A conspiracy ceases to be a conspiracy when the conspirators start screaming about the progress of their agenda:

Conflicts across the globe and an international respect for Barack Obama have created the perfect setting for establishment of “a New World Order,” according to Henry Kissinger

The president-elect is coming into office at a moment when there is upheaval in many parts of the world simultaneously,” Kissinger responded. “You have India, Pakistan; you have the jihadist movement. So he can’t really say there is one problem, that it’s the most important one. But he can give new impetus to American foreign policy partly because the reception of him is so extraordinary around the world. His task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a new world order can be created. It’s a great opportunity, it isn’t just a crisis.

“A new partnership of nations has begun, and we stand today at a unique and extraordinary moment,” said Bush before a joint session of Congress. “Out of these troubled times, our fifth objective – a new world order – can emerge: A new era … in which the nations of the world, east and west, north and south, can prosper and live in harmony.”

“There is a need for a new world order,” Kissinger told PBS interviewer Charlie Rose last year, “I think that at the end of this administration, with all its turmoil, and at the beginning of the next, we might actually witness the creation of a new order.....

Soros announced in September 2006 that he would donate $50 million to the United Nations Millennium Project, a massive redistributive scheme calling for the governments of wealthy countries to commit 0.7% of their GNP to promoting “the economic development and welfare of developing countries.”16 Heading this Project (from 2002-2006) was Jeffrey Sachs, the economist who had worked with Soros in Russia during the Bill Clinton administration.

Soros's desire for a worldwide welfare structure is consistent with his general preference for some form of global government. In 1998 he wrote that “insofar as there are collective interests that transcend state boundaries, the sovereignty of states must be subordinated to international law and international institutions.” “The greatest opposition to this idea,” he added somberly, “is coming from the United States.”
Soros has continued to espouse this perspective ever since. At a 2003 event, a questioner asked Soros whether he and his foundations could “help to bring more foreign influence into the United States instead of relying on what is essentially a balance between Democrats and conservative Republicans, which hasn't worked and is not about to start working.” Soros replied:

“I think you put your finger on a very important flaw in the current world order. And that is that only Americans have a vote in Congress. And yet it is the United States that basically determines policy for the world. That is a flaw in the current setup. I don't think you can correct it by giving the Chinese government a vote in Congress. But it is a flaw, and I think this is where American leadership is needed, to take into account and respect the interests of others as well, in order to retain the dominant position we currently enjoy.”

Everything that Obama has done to us benefits the NWO. From our debt to redistributing what little wealth we have left, from taking control over our health, to dividing Congress to climate control to controlling what we eat.
The next administration, especially if Soros bankrolls Billary like He did Obama, will bankrupt this country permanently. Unless you believe that these people are just kidding..........

 

[Flanders]

So, another asshole claiming that the whole of the scientific establishment, worldwide, is in on some sinister conspiracy. Do realize how damned silly you fools sound?

To Old Rocks: Change your theme. You cannot defend phoney designer-science so you focus on personal attacks. See my responses to you in this thread:

Idiots Crooks Bedbugs US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Here’s something else you can explain away with your usual idiotic replies:

Christiana Figueres, the top UN climate official, said upcoming negotiations on an international global warming accord should be viewed as a health issue.

“The logic behind the comment from Christiana Figueres, the U.N. climate chief, is that older, dirtier forms of energy are likely the first to be eliminated under a deal to curb greenhouse gas emissions. Doing so would improve public health by reducing air pollutants such as nitrogen oxide and sulfur dioxide, which contribute to heart and respiratory ailments, in addition to slashing heat-trapping carbon emissions, which most scientists say cause global warming.

“Seen in this light, the climate agreement is actually a public health agreement,” Figueres said of next year’s U.N.-hosted talks in Paris, according to Responding to Climate Change. The meeting is viewed as a last-ditch effort to secure enough carbon-cutting commitments by 2020 to avoid a 2 degrees Celsius global temperature rise by 2100.”

XXXXX​

Before filing the hoax of global warming/climate change under ‘h’ for health, Figueres revealed her determination to put gender equality at the heart of efforts to tackle climate change.

And if you think that sounds off-the-wall plain crazy, according to her own website, Figueres has been trained by Al Gore.

The world of citizen taxpayers paying through the nose for global warming/climate change categorized as a health issue is being masterminded by a motley crew that now includes Barack Obama as its dear leader.

The deadly combination of Obama and the UN will indenture civil society
By Judi McLeod August 29, 2014

The deadly combination of Obama and the UN will indenture civil society

Rocks, what do you think Soros and Kissinger meant when they said they were priming Obama to lead the New World Order?
How many times has Soros visited the Obama White House? Who is Soros, and who knows more about collapsing a country's economy than Soros?

A conspiracy ceases to be a conspiracy when the conspirators start screaming about the progress of their agenda:

To the Irish Ram: Good one. Alas, it will go over The Old Rock’s head. His responses to my threads have been so idiotic I originally thought he was playing the Devil’s advocate. Now I know better. He is just another wannabe parasite lacking the wit to make any kind of case for the global warming scam.

 

[Rotagilla]

Everything that Obama has done to us benefits the NWO. From our debt to redistributing what little wealth we have left, from taking control over our health, to dividing Congress to climate control to controlling what we eat.
The next administration, especially if Soros bankrolls Billary like He did Obama, will bankrupt this country permanently. Unless you believe that these people are just kidding..........

obama is a believer in and actively practices the cloward-pivens strategy to purposely overwhelm a system and collapse it from within...the border crisis for instance....

 

[Old Rocks]

Really? So what you are saying that every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University is in on a conspiracy. And this conspiracy extends into every nation and culture on this planet. Do you not realize how insane you sound?

You people flap-yap, and never cite anyone other than right wing crazies. Here is a site from the largest Scientific Society in the world, the American Institute of Physics;

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

 

[Old Rocks]

What amazes me about peope like Flanders, is how they can repeat all this meaningless drivel, yet cannot get out to see what is happening just on this continent. There will be no glaciers in Glacier National Park in my lifetime. 99% of the glaciers in Alaska are rapidly receding, the melting permafrost there is created major problems with the infrastructure there. The predicted drought for the southwest, from Hansen's 1981 paper, is now a fact, as is the opening of the Northwest Passage in some years.

Every thing is politics and conspiracy to such ignorant fools. Completely amazing that such people can even navigate their way out of bed in the morning.

 

[jc456]

Really? So what you are saying that every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University is in on a conspiracy. And this conspiracy extends into every nation and culture on this planet. Do you not realize how insane you sound?

You people flap-yap, and never cite anyone other than right wing crazies. Here is a site from the largest Scientific Society in the world, the American Institute of Physics;

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

Dude stop scrambling it's looking like your desperate. If the left doesn't agree with us, why would we be quoting from there? What the hell is wrong with you? Where else would our information come from? The liars on the left are just that liars. There is zero evidence to support climate anything. You know that and why you continue to use insults and stupid posts in an attempt to defend what is not defendable. Just a hoot though how desperate you are. hahahahhahaahhaha....

 

[Old Rocks]

The subject concerns science. Scientists by an overwhelming majority have stated that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger. So, in order to counter that, you cite people that have zero scientific background, and are just a willfully ignorant as you are.

It is interesting that you automatically assume that everyone that has bothered to get or is getting a higher education is on the left. And that everyone that is a scientist is a leftist. Ever consider actually taking some classes such as geology, meteology, or oceanography? Might open yours eyes to reality rather than the alternative universe you 'Conservatives' live in.

 

[Rotagilla]

"scientists" used to think the earth was flat...and people believed them.
"scientists" used to think the sun revolved around the earth...and people believed them.
"scientists" used to think man couldn't fly...and people believed them.

 

[Flanders]

Really? So what you are saying that every Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University is in on a conspiracy. And this conspiracy extends into every nation and culture on this planet. Do you not realize how insane you sound?

To Old Rocks: You responded to the thread, so I will give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you forgot this:

Phlogiston Theory

Centuries ago, Al Gore’s scientific consensus gave the world the phlogiston theory. The following excerpt from a piece by Robert Tracinski’s gives a brief history:

In the late 17th and early 18th centuries, in the early years of the science of chemistry, many serious scientists accepted phlogiston theory. This was an attempt to explain the chemical processes of combustion, oxidation, and metabolism by inferring the existence of a substance call "phlogiston." This theory was wrong, but it was not a totally crazy invention; it simply came too early, before scientists had sufficient evidence to prove a theory of combustion. Phlogiston was only superseded when the great chemist Lavoisier identified oxygen as the substance that is actually responsible for combustion, a discovery that helped pave the way for the development of modern chemistry.

This next excerpt is beautiful in its simplicity in relation to today’s global warming scam:

But imagine: what would have happened if the government had come along and pumped the equivalent of billions of dollars into phlogiston research? What if phlogiston had become a social cause, promoted by political leaders, touted by famous actors, defended by the culture's best writers? What if those who raised objections to the theory were vilified as "phlogiston deniers" and had to worry about losing funding for their research?

Yet that is precisely how today's scientific, political, and cultural establishment is approaching the nascent science of climatology.

The questions posed by Mr. Tracinski are not that difficult to answer. As a matter of self-preservation a phlogiston bureaucracy feeding on tax dollars would have quickly acquired enough authority to get away with manufacturing scientific “facts” as well as accumulating the muscle to silence critics. Does that sound familiar?

Assuming that phlogiston theory would have eventually been disproved by Lavoisier, the phlogiston parasites would have been so entrenched in France’s public trough they would be there in perpetuity. It is easier for literal scientists to cure all of the diseases known to man than it is for scientific truth to drive one parasite away from the public trough.

NOTE: In today’s America plagued by bureaucratic tyranny, how much simpler it is for those with a vested interest in big government to write and enforce regulations than it is to get an oppressive law enacted. I do not know about you but I have never voted for a bureaucrat, nor have I ever heard a proposed regulation debated by an informed public before it was implemented by bureaucrats.

The members of Congress plaster sorrowful expressions on their faces every time they admit to failing in their oversight responsibilities —— which happens every other week. So with all of Congress’ oversight failures, and with bureaucrats and judges making the laws these days just how do our elected sad sacks spend their time? Between unelected bureaucrats and bossy judges it is getting mighty hard to locate individual liberties.

The final excerpt reminds us that the founder of modern chemistry lost his head:

During the Reign of Terror, the French government sent Lavoisier to the guillotine because of his connections to the old aristocratic regime. That is one of history's great crimes against science -- but it probably did less damage than our government has caused by killing climatology with the false kindness of politically motivated research funding.

April 12, 2007
Is Climatology a Science?
By Robert Tracinski

RealClearPolitics - Articles - Is Climatology a Science

I suspect that Lavoisier incurred the wrath of phlogiston’s true believers, just as today’s environmental priesthood would behead all who speak out against the global warming fraud.

How to Lose One s Head US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

You people flap-yap, and never cite anyone other than right wing crazies. Here is a site from the largest Scientific Society in the world, the American Institute of Physics;

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

To Old Rocks: I do not assume any such thing. Not everybody who gets a degree is a Leftist. On the hand, too many Lefties with a degree are parasites who aimed for unnecessary government jobs from the start. The very nature of the global warming scam will create a frightening number of educated parasites feeding at the public trough. In short: If the International Parasite Agreement is implemented the climate change “workforce” will be top-heavy with educated parasites living on tax dollars forever.

Put educated parasites in perspective this way. The Affordable Care Act will create millions of government jobs for uneducated parasites and unionized professions like nurses, lab technicians, and so on. Pelosi puts it at 4 million.