Clementine
Platinum Member
- Dec 18, 2011
- 12,919
- 4,826
- 350
Her bias was so obvious and pervasive during the debate making it a sham- that she very well may have helped Romney more then her unethical interference helped Obama.
She got it wrong.
She interfered.
She took a side.
Candy Crowley may finally have done something else as well: so visibly tipping the scales of media bias that the end result makes Mitt Romney the next president.
The American Spectator : The Candy Crowley Tipping Point
I thought it was read odd that Obama counted on her to back him up on saying it was a terrorist attack and she happened to have the transcript of his speech right there. Hmmm, how did he know that? And knew she'd lie about it? Of course, she corrected her lie later, but stuck her neck out for Obama.
Lies are not helpful in the long run. Maybe she helped Obama through that tough spot during the debate, but the end result is Romney pulling ahead in the polls.