Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Her bias was so obvious and pervasive during the debate making it a sham- that she very well may have helped Romney more then her unethical interference helped Obama.
She got it wrong.
She interfered.
She took a side.
Candy Crowley may finally have done something else as well: so visibly tipping the scales of media bias that the end result makes Mitt Romney the next president.
The American Spectator : The Candy Crowley Tipping Point
That's why she admitted her "truth" was wrong immediately after the debate... You're obviously OK with a biased and corrupt media...
Good grief, he did say it that day and the day after. Romney lied again, go figure.
Saying "no acts of terror" after mentioning 9/11/2001 is not the same as calling Benghazi an act of terror. When Obama spoke of Benghazi at the beginning of the speech he alluded to the film saying, "We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others."
Listeners to the speech interpreted his words the way he meant them that day -- as saying the attack was prompted by the speech.
It is Orwellian and disingenuous to pretend that his ambiguous statement at the end of the speech said what Obama now represents it as saying. Disingenuous on its face and disingenuous in the context of the administration's next two weeks of deflection from the actual facts about what happened.
Democrats are fine with this deflection now. They won't be fine with similar deflections if Romney wins and takes over the duties of national security.
Good grief, he did say it that day and the day after. Romney lied again, go figure.
Saying "no acts of terror" after mentioning 9/11/2001 is not the same as calling Benghazi an act of terror. When Obama spoke of Benghazi at the beginning of the speech he alluded to the film saying, "We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others."
Listeners to the speech interpreted his words the way he meant them that day -- as saying the attack was prompted by the speech.
It is Orwellian and disingenuous to pretend that his ambiguous statement at the end of the speech said what Obama now represents it as saying. Disingenuous on its face and disingenuous in the context of the administration's next two weeks of deflection from the actual facts about what happened.
Democrats are fine with this deflection now. They won't be fine with similar deflections if Romney wins and takes over the duties of national security.
He did say it more than once and sorry to break the news but Romney isn't headed for the WH. You keep those old fingers and toes crossed tho.
Insisting Obama won ignores the facts... Obama did manage to beat his first performance true.
The point of the thread is dealing with Americans who lost due to a biased and unethical moderator...
The first debate was scored by CNN Romney 67% Obama 25% That is a 42 point spread.
The second debate was scored by CNN Obama 46% Romney 39% That is a 7 point spread.
Get a clue.
Polling Center: CNN Poll: Who won the second presidential debate? - Elections & Politics from CNN.com
He said an act of terror on 9/12. It Wasn't until 9/19 that the CIA said TERRORIST attack, ya fegging MORON dupes.
Saying "no acts of terror" after mentioning 9/11/2001 is not the same as calling Benghazi an act of terror. When Obama spoke of Benghazi at the beginning of the speech he alluded to the film saying, "We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others."
Listeners to the speech interpreted his words the way he meant them that day -- as saying the attack was prompted by the speech.
It is Orwellian and disingenuous to pretend that his ambiguous statement at the end of the speech said what Obama now represents it as saying. Disingenuous on its face and disingenuous in the context of the administration's next two weeks of deflection from the actual facts about what happened.
Democrats are fine with this deflection now. They won't be fine with similar deflections if Romney wins and takes over the duties of national security.
He did say it more than once and sorry to break the news but Romney isn't headed for the WH. You keep those old fingers and toes crossed tho.
He didn't say it in the Rose Garden, and he spent two weeks throwing a filmmaker under a bus instead of being honest about what happened.
Funny how the Dems blame Republicans for putting politics before country when they care so little about the lies coming from the White House.
Her bias was so obvious and pervasive during the debate making it a sham- that she very well may have helped Romney more then her unethical interference helped Obama.
She got it wrong.
She interfered.
She took a side.
Candy Crowley may finally have done something else as well: so visibly tipping the scales of media bias that the end result makes Mitt Romney the next president.
The American Spectator : The Candy Crowley Tipping Point
It was a clear win for Obama. Mitt lost it, he broke the first rule of debating, keep a cool head. He was attempting to run over the president and when that failed, he started in on the moderator. He's a bully but it didn't work this time.
Mittens lost, it hurts, huh?
Insisting Obama won ignores the facts... Obama did manage to beat his first performance true.
The point of the thread is dealing with Americans who lost due to a biased and unethical moderator...
The first debate was scored by CNN Romney 67% Obama 25% That is a 42 point spread.
The second debate was scored by CNN Obama 46% Romney 39% That is a 7 point spread.
Get a clue.
Polling Center: CNN Poll: Who won the second presidential debate? - Elections & Politics from CNN.com
Her bias was so obvious and pervasive during the debate making it a sham- that she very well may have helped Romney more then her unethical interference helped Obama.
Insisting Obama won ignores the facts... Obama did manage to beat his first performance true.
The point of the thread is dealing with Americans who lost due to a biased and unethical moderator...
The first debate was scored by CNN Romney 67% Obama 25% That is a 42 point spread.
The second debate was scored by CNN Obama 46% Romney 39% That is a 7 point spread.
Get a clue.
Polling Center: CNN Poll: Who won the second presidential debate? - Elections & Politics from CNN.com
What ever happened to Republicans being the party of Responsibility?
Dems had no problem saying Obama sucked in the first debate
Why the petty excuses from Republicans?
Insisting Obama won ignores the facts... Obama did manage to beat his first performance true.
The point of the thread is dealing with Americans who lost due to a biased and unethical moderator...
The first debate was scored by CNN Romney 67% Obama 25% That is a 42 point spread.
The second debate was scored by CNN Obama 46% Romney 39% That is a 7 point spread.
Get a clue.
Polling Center: CNN Poll: Who won the second presidential debate? - Elections & Politics from CNN.com
What ever happened to Republicans being the party of Responsibility?
Dems had no problem saying Obama sucked in the first debate
Why the petty excuses from Republicans?
Insisting Obama won ignores the facts... Obama did manage to beat his first performance true.
The point of the thread is dealing with Americans who lost due to a biased and unethical moderator...
The first debate was scored by CNN Romney 67% Obama 25% That is a 42 point spread.
The second debate was scored by CNN Obama 46% Romney 39% That is a 7 point spread.
Get a clue.
Polling Center: CNN Poll: Who won the second presidential debate? - Elections & Politics from CNN.com
What ever happened to Republicans being the party of Responsibility?
Dems had no problem saying Obama sucked in the first debate
Why the petty excuses from Republicans?
LOL -- coz Obama did suck in the first debate so bad that you couldn't deny it, and Romney didn't suck in either.
And Crowley played semantic games to cover for Obama.
Now if Crowley really wanted to do the job, maybe she could have pointed out when the men didn't answer the question. Sure would have been nice to hear Obama's answer to the actual question about Libya. If Crowley was going to accept accolades for being an activist moderator, it would have been nice if she had used the activism to get more information, not to obscure matters.
