The Candy Crowley Tipping Point

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

I thought Candy Crowley did a fine job. I don't know where all of these accusations of bias are coming from.

So interfering, fact checking and taking sides when your moderating is not an indication of bias? Got it.

The only bias she presented was for the truth. You guys were wetting yourselves over her being the moderator as soon as it was announced. You saw what you wanted to see and believed you would.

 

[clevergirl]

The Candy Crowley tipping point, best estimate -is 400 pounds.

I'd say you were trying to lighten things up...but~

 

[Sarah G]

The Candy Crowley tipping point, best estimate -is 400 pounds.

Too easy Warb.

 

[GoneBezerk]

We understand you're a dumbass piece of shit.

I thought Candy Crowley did a fine job. I don't know where all of these accusations of bias are coming from.

So interfering, fact checking and taking sides when your moderating is not an indication of bias? Got it.

The only bias she presented was for the truth. You guys were wetting yourselves over her being the moderator as soon as it was announced. You saw what you wanted to see and believed you would.

 

[clevergirl]

I thought Candy Crowley did a fine job. I don't know where all of these accusations of bias are coming from.

So interfering, fact checking and taking sides when your moderating is not an indication of bias? Got it.

The only bias she presented was for the truth. You guys were wetting yourselves over her being the moderator as soon as it was announced. You saw what you wanted to see and believed you would.

That's why she admitted her "truth" was wrong immediately after the debate... You're obviously OK with a biased and corrupt media...

 

[Cowman]

Only the losers whine about the umpires.

Romney hardly lost... Especially when you look at the first debate.

He did lose. Just admit it. Obama made him look like a fucking idiot.

Please continue.

 

[Bigfoot]

Crowley spent a lot of time feeding her own ego.

 

[clevergirl]

Only the losers whine about the umpires.

Romney hardly lost... Especially when you look at the first debate.

He did lose. Just admit it. Obama made him look like a fucking idiot.

Please continue.

Insisting Obama won ignores the facts... Obama did manage to beat his first performance true.

The point of the thread is dealing with Americans who lost due to a biased and unethical moderator...

The first debate was scored by CNN Romney 67% Obama 25% That is a 42 point spread.

The second debate was score by CNN Obama 46% Romney 39% That is a 7 point spread.

Get a clue.

Polling Center: CNN Poll: Who won the second presidential debate? - Elections & Politics from CNN.com

 

[asterism]

the candy crowley tipping point, best estimate -is 400 pounds.

rofl

 

[Sarah G]

So interfering, fact checking and taking sides when your moderating is not an indication of bias? Got it.

The only bias she presented was for the truth. You guys were wetting yourselves over her being the moderator as soon as it was announced. You saw what you wanted to see and believed you would.

That's why she admitted her "truth" was wrong immediately after the debate... You're obviously OK with a biased and corrupt media...

Good grief, he did say it that day and the day after. Romney lied again, go figure.

 

[clevergirl]

The only bias she presented was for the truth. You guys were wetting yourselves over her being the moderator as soon as it was announced. You saw what you wanted to see and believed you would.

That's why she admitted her "truth" was wrong immediately after the debate... You're obviously OK with a biased and corrupt media...

Good grief, he did say it that day and the day after. Romney lied again, go figure.

That you support and continue the spin is admirable...but it does not make it any less spin.

The Obama administration spent two weeks claiming Benghazi was the fall out from an obscure movie trailer on video. The use of the term acts of terror precipitated his reference to 9/11- not Benghazi. It is easy enough to go through and re post threads from that time period where posters from the left were likewise claiming this was not a terrorist attack but a protest gone wild due to the video.

But, again, I digress...This thread deals specifically to the FACT that a moderator stepped way over the ethical line and later ADMITTED her fact check was technically incorrect and that Romney was technically accurate...

 

[kaz]

Only the losers whine about the umpires.

Romney hardly lost... Especially when you look at the first debate.

He did lose. Just admit it. Obama made him look like a fucking idiot.

Please continue.

Yes, Romney totally said less of what liberals want to hear then Obama did, total victory.

Ironically as the cow man, maybe you could give some advice on how to do some Crawly tipping. Have you been tipped before?

 

[clevergirl]

Romney hardly lost... Especially when you look at the first debate.

He did lose. Just admit it. Obama made him look like a fucking idiot.

Please continue.

Yes, Romney totally said less of what liberals want to hear then Obama did, total victory.

Ironically as the cow man, maybe you could give some advice on how to do some Crawly tipping. Have you been tipped before?

Noteworthy is that cowman ignored my CNN scorecard post...

 

[GoneBezerk]

.....but not as long as she spends at the ALL YOU CAN EAT BUFFET.

Crowley spent a lot of time feeding her own ego.

 

[kaz]

He did lose. Just admit it. Obama made him look like a fucking idiot.

Please continue.

Yes, Romney totally said less of what liberals want to hear then Obama did, total victory.

Ironically as the cow man, maybe you could give some advice on how to do some Crawly tipping. Have you been tipped before?

Noteworthy is that cowman ignored my CNN scorecard post...

That one didn't give him the answer he wanted...

 

[Sarah G]

That's why she admitted her "truth" was wrong immediately after the debate... You're obviously OK with a biased and corrupt media...

Good grief, he did say it that day and the day after. Romney lied again, go figure.

That you support and continue the spin is admirable...but it does not make it any less spin.

The Obama administration spent two weeks claiming Benghazi was the fall out from an obscure movie trailer on video. The use of the term acts of terror precipitated his reference to 9/11- not Benghazi. It is easy enough to go through and re post threads from that time period where posters from the left were likewise claiming this was not a terrorist attack but a protest gone wild due to the video.

But, again, I digress...This thread deals specifically to the FACT that a moderator stepped way over the ethical line and later ADMITTED her fact check was technically incorrect and that Romney was technically accurate...

Jon Stewart on How Obama Allowed Romney to Proceed into a Wall

Democalypse 2012 - The Second Debate*: Now Including the President - Benghazi - The Daily Show with Jon Stewart - 10/17/12 - Video Clip | Comedy Central

 

[clevergirl]

Good grief, he did say it that day and the day after. Romney lied again, go figure.

That you support and continue the spin is admirable...but it does not make it any less spin.

The Obama administration spent two weeks claiming Benghazi was the fall out from an obscure movie trailer on video. The use of the term acts of terror precipitated his reference to 9/11- not Benghazi. It is easy enough to go through and re post threads from that time period where posters from the left were likewise claiming this was not a terrorist attack but a protest gone wild due to the video.

But, again, I digress...This thread deals specifically to the FACT that a moderator stepped way over the ethical line and later ADMITTED her fact check was technically incorrect and that Romney was technically accurate...

Jon Stewart on How Obama Allowed Romney to Proceed into a Wall

Democalypse 2012 - The Second Debate*: Now Including the President - Benghazi - The Daily Show with Jon Stewart - 10/17/12 - Video Clip | Comedy Central

Spin cycle continues~

 

[kaz]

That you support and continue the spin is admirable...but it does not make it any less spin.

The Obama administration spent two weeks claiming Benghazi was the fall out from an obscure movie trailer on video. The use of the term acts of terror precipitated his reference to 9/11- not Benghazi. It is easy enough to go through and re post threads from that time period where posters from the left were likewise claiming this was not a terrorist attack but a protest gone wild due to the video.

But, again, I digress...This thread deals specifically to the FACT that a moderator stepped way over the ethical line and later ADMITTED her fact check was technically incorrect and that Romney was technically accurate...

Jon Stewart on How Obama Allowed Romney to Proceed into a Wall

Democalypse 2012 - The Second Debate*: Now Including the President - Benghazi - The Daily Show with Jon Stewart - 10/17/12 - Video Clip | Comedy Central

Spin cycle continues~

Let them have their delusions for a couple more weeks. Their bubble is about to pop, and in a bid way...

 

[Amelia]

The only bias she presented was for the truth. You guys were wetting yourselves over her being the moderator as soon as it was announced. You saw what you wanted to see and believed you would.

That's why she admitted her "truth" was wrong immediately after the debate... You're obviously OK with a biased and corrupt media...

Good grief, he did say it that day and the day after. Romney lied again, go figure.

Saying "no acts of terror" after mentioning 9/11/2001 is not the same as calling Benghazi an act of terror. When Obama spoke of Benghazi at the beginning of the speech he alluded to the film saying, "We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others."

Listeners to the speech interpreted his words the way he meant them that day -- as saying the attack was prompted by the speech.

It is Orwellian and disingenuous to pretend that his ambiguous statement at the end of the speech said what Obama now represents it as saying. Disingenuous on its face and disingenuous in the context of the administration's next two weeks of deflection from the actual facts about what happened.

Democrats are fine with this deflection now. They won't be fine with similar deflections if Romney wins and takes over the duties of national security.

 

[francoHFW]

That's why she admitted her "truth" was wrong immediately after the debate... You're obviously OK with a biased and corrupt media...

Good grief, he did say it that day and the day after. Romney lied again, go figure.

That you support and continue the spin is admirable...but it does not make it any less spin.

The Obama administration spent two weeks claiming Benghazi was the fall out from an obscure movie trailer on video. The use of the term acts of terror precipitated his reference to 9/11- not Benghazi. It is easy enough to go through and re post threads from that time period where posters from the left were likewise claiming this was not a terrorist attack but a protest gone wild due to the video.

But, again, I digress...This thread deals specifically to the FACT that a moderator stepped way over the ethical line and later ADMITTED her fact check was technically incorrect and that Romney was technically accurate...

An obscure video that the most powerful RW fundie islamist talk show host in Cairo went ballistic over, causing 20+ arab countries to go nuts protesting over 9/11/12. How could anyone, ie the CIA be confused? IDIOT dupe.

Technically, maybe, if you're a brainwashed MORON like you- change the channel, dupe.